Post: #76

Gold points being made above.

Alcohol, porn, drugs, we are being attacked on all sides here. Problem is these habits are normal and ingrained into us like second nature. Try spending your whole week like this. Masturbating once in the morning and in the afternoon, every porn video is titled 'mother fucks step son' or 'white teen gets fucked by black monster'. Go to the pub and drink until you feel numb and watch some pointless football match. The cocaine and drugs issue is big but not big enough as porn, which screws up your fertility and virility.

On the other hand, at least the likes of Erdogan, are promoting his Turkish men to move into nice neighbourhoods, buy nice cars, to bang foreign women but at the same time start strong Turkish families. Although primitive in his approach, us Western men could seriously do with a strong dosage of that type of thinking. It would help deter them away from this path of self destruction which a whole generation has been set on.

I suspect that the intellectual feminists, (Not the buzz feed types) are well aware of what is happening. However they embrace it as part of their gravitation towards nihilistic utopia. If the world is all fucked up, then we will get some sort of revengeful pleasure.

Pornography I suspect strongly is a form of Psy-Op. The Israelis used it on the Palestinians around the second intifada I believe. By broadcasting pornography on the television sets, they weakened a lot of Palestinian men. Hitler allegedly dropped of tons of pornographic images across France, as a way to subvert the resistance. So we can guess how much damage pornography is doing right now.

I believe now as individuals, we need to develop some next level form of strength and self mastery to live in this current day of age. That requires a higher goal, as if it is to just be in a better position to get pussy and money, then we could fall back down in this cycle of chasing immediate gratification. Its a hard one, this is when strong communities, balanced sexual market places, solid jobs and trades, families of course; play a big role.

Post: #77

(04-30-2017 05:18 AM)Mercenary Wrote:  I read an article on satanism. All this fag, incest, tranny, BDSM shit is promoted in it. But proper religions are ofcourse disgusted by it. Christians are portrayed as "intolerant bigots". OR Christianity is being "rewritten" by fags and the like.

I don't know how far incest can/will be promoted. But probably, along with paedophilia in some way or other. My guess its to create a sicko idea that ALL love is to be associated with sexuality. Whereas any normal people knows that the two are different eg no normal parent would do sicko shit with their kids, no matter how much they "loved them". Perhaps the idea is that groups are easier to control when they are in families? I don't know, the mind boggles at such weirdness!

You might want to read about O.T.O, a religious organization founded by none other than Crowley. Their sex rituals involve some really fucked up stuff and Crowley has known ties to pedophilia.
Of course many celebrities were also involved.





Edit: Hah, Even Kinsey was involved. What a fucking big surprise

Post: #78

(11-12-2012 04:02 PM)Giovonny Wrote:  There is nothing new under the sun. This stuff has been happening for thousands of years. There have been cultures that openly practiced all of this stuff.

In the past this was mostly due to how isolate humans were from one another, you had a couple of 15, 20, 40 people living isolate from the rest of the world, they had not option but to fuck each others.

Is now we can communicate and travel anywhere and meet people not related to you, pick your phone and contact some girl in another state and make plans for next weekends, or meet some girl across the planet in Ukraine and travel there to meet her in a few hours flight.

In Iceland which has a low population of less than 400K there is an app that let people know if they are related in order to prevent incest.



And Islamic richs countries like Qatar they make people do DNA test before having kids to prevent genetics problems.

Post: #79

Re incest.
I only found this out a year ago.
58% of British Pakistanis apparently marry a first cousin.
The number rises to a staggering 75% in Pakistan and the city of Bradford!

The English (and many European) upper classes also have a very small gene pool.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...risks.html

Massive increase in birth defects.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...-risk.html

As an aside, I wonder how much the artificial insemination of "homosexual couples" also increases birth defects..

Post: #80

(04-30-2017 12:44 PM)loremipsum Wrote:  

(04-30-2017 05:18 AM)Mercenary Wrote:  I read an article on satanism. All this fag, incest, tranny, BDSM shit is promoted in it. But proper religions are ofcourse disgusted by it. Christians are portrayed as "intolerant bigots". OR Christianity is being "rewritten" by fags and the like.

I don't know how far incest can/will be promoted. But probably, along with paedophilia in some way or other. My guess its to create a sicko idea that ALL love is to be associated with sexuality. Whereas any normal people knows that the two are different eg no normal parent would do sicko shit with their kids, no matter how much they "loved them". Perhaps the idea is that groups are easier to control when they are in families? I don't know, the mind boggles at such weirdness!

You might want to read about O.T.O, a religious organization founded by none other than Crowley. Their sex rituals involve some really fucked up stuff and Crowley has known ties to pedophilia.
Of course many celebrities were also involved.





Edit: Hah, Even Kinsey was involved. What a fucking big surprise

I said that. The quote thing went wonky.
I watched the Arthur C Clarke TV programme "Childhood's End". Now Clarke was strongly rumoured to be a paedo (he was apparently up to shit where he lived in Sri Lanka). Anyway, Clarke touches on the topic of Satanism and "the Devil appearing as a meek and mild man". Childhood's End was an absolutely CHILLING story. Its as if he could see stuff decades before. I won't spoil the story for you...but if you ever watch the tv film or read the book, it might make you wonder.

I think our sexual energy is fundamental to our existence. But if its meddled with or corrupted, it becomes a fundamental tool to control and manipulate. Crowley knew that these rituals could blackmail, to hypnotise and do all sorts of things. Although we tend to laugh at "magic", we do see cases of people being "spellbound" in one way or another. The PUA term "oneitis" is probably the simplest example of being "spellbound". Crowley was also adept at increasing people's energy levels and focus thro his weird rituals. In the same way, inappropriate use of "Kundalini Tantra" sexual energy has seen cases of insanity result.

I reckon homosexuals often show signs of something that looks much like schizophrenia illness. I'm thinking the "aggressively camp" ones. All limp wrists and creepy voices but look at the psychotic bitchiness, tantrums and glare in their eyes.

Post: #81

(11-12-2012 02:38 PM)jariel Wrote:  Very common in Latin America.

"Los primos se exprimen."

Entre primo mas me arrimo!

Post: #82

(04-30-2017 03:06 PM)BelyyTigr Wrote:  Re incest.
I only found this out a year ago.
58% of British Pakistanis apparently marry a first cousin.
The number rises to a staggering 75% in Pakistan and the city of Bradford!

The English (and many European) upper classes also have a very small gene pool.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...risks.html

Massive increase in birth defects.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...-risk.html

As an aside, I wonder how much the artificial insemination of "homosexual couples" also increases birth defects..

Incest in all Muslim countries is between 35% to over 60%. Even Dubai has 45%.

In addition you have usually the rebellious, highly-intelligent ones getting killed for being blasphemers or trying to change the religious crap.

It lowers IQ tremendously, creates massive birth defects, creates warped personalities - all Muslim countries usually devolve into shitholes that never advance beyond a certain level - only through taking slaves. But if they for example ever conquered the entire world, then mankind would quickly devolve to the Middle Ages or even lower.

As for the European aristocracy - their inbreeding made it easier for the money elite to wrestle the ruling control out of their hands. They stopped doing that though this century.

There are rumors of ritualized incest in Satanic circles, though the children are never allowed to be born and registered out of those unions. They talk about killing them on an altar, but who knows whether that is true.

Post: #83

(04-30-2017 12:46 PM)Latinopan Wrote:  

(11-12-2012 04:02 PM)Giovonny Wrote:  There is nothing new under the sun. This stuff has been happening for thousands of years. There have been cultures that openly practiced all of this stuff.

In the past this was mostly due to how isolate humans were from one another, you had a couple of 15, 20, 40 people living isolate from the rest of the world, they had not option but to fuck each others.

Is now we can communicate and travel anywhere and meet people not related to you, pick your phone and contact some girl in another state and make plans for next weekends, or meet some girl across the planet in Ukraine and travel there to meet her in a few hours flight.


And Islamic richs countries like Qatar they make people do DNA test before having kids to prevent genetics problems.

Instead of relying on ridiculous DNA tests they should rather rely on common sense

https://en.europenews.dk/-Muslim-Inbreed...78170.html

54% of Quataris have some sort of incestuous relationships. The most detrimental effects are not even seen with the bare eye. Those unions lower IQ, decrease mental prowess, create weaker bodies, less energy, weaker immune system etc.

Quote:A rough estimate shows that close to half of all Muslims in the world are inbred: In Pakistan, 70 percent of all marriages are between first cousins (so-called "consanguinity") and in Turkey the amount is between 25-30 percent (Jyllands-Posten, 27/2 2009 More stillbirths among immigrants"

Statistical research on Arabic countries shows that up to 34 percent of all marriages in Algiers are consanguine (blood related), 46 percent in Bahrain, 33 percent in Egypt, 80 percent in Nubia (southern area in Egypt), 60 percent in Iraq, 64 percent in Jordan, 64 percent in Kuwait, 42 percent in Lebanon, 48 percent in Libya, 47 percent in Mauritania, 54 percent in Qatar, 67 percent in Saudi Arabia, 63 percent in Sudan, 40 percent in Syria, 39 percent in Tunisia, 54 percent in the United Arabic Emirates and 45 percent in Yemen (Reproductive Health Journal, 2009 Consanguinity and reproductive health among Arabs.).

They used to practice that too along the Hajnal line in Poland, Russia and Ukraine. It essentially lowered their IQs by 10 points. IQs around 1890-1900 were roughly 90 there. It improved by 10 points by the 1960s (at least in Eastern Europe - later in Russia as well). There are good IQ tests done on immigrants in the US in the early 20th century. Currently the young Polish population pegs even at 106 in some tests.

By the way - the smartest Europeans according to a test by Richard Lynn (only young generation tested):


1. Germans / Dutch - 107 - they are above Chinese
2. Polish - 106
3. Swedes - 104
4. Swiss - 101

To be honest it seems to me that the German IQ of Natives must be around 110 by now. The same goes for the native Swedes and Swiss. It is hard to come by of IQ tests separated by ethnicity. IQs have been improving each decade by 2 points since the 1930s in the West and some countries. While the development stopped in the 1990s partly due to a massive rise in autism rates, it seems that nutrition and especially more knowledge about pregnancy, breastfeeding has raised IQs of Whites in the West closer to 110.

I think that the globalists prefer this to remain a secret, because it would look even worse when 85-IQ Muslim immigrants are moved in millions to the West and wild claims are made that they will honestly replace the Europeans (as well as Americans) in any way or form. And then the same Whites are accused of structural racism when 85-IQ ethnicities cannot compete with 110-IQ ones - or that they are not equally represented.

Post: #84

Is incest good or bad?

I'm not sure...it's all relative.

Post: #85

(04-30-2017 04:41 PM)MajorStyles Wrote:  Is incest good or bad?
I'm not sure...it's all relative.

A relativist mindset is a SJW mindset. It is a lazy tool used to derail logical arguments and discussion. I'm not accusing you, but it is helpful to make opinions about ideas.

We are biologically designed to not breed with our family members. Many animals are designed to have anti-incest tendencies. Avoiding incest is a tool to avoid genetic bottlenecking. If incest is prevalent in a species then that species is susceptible to diseases and other maladies that benefit from the limited gene pool. If someone is attracted to their family member it is better for us to prevent them breeding in the interest of the human gene pool.

(04-29-2017 10:27 PM)RatInTheWoods Wrote:  A great way to challenge "pro gay marriage" advocates is ask them if they have a problem with Poly marriage.

They usually always do, but when they try and explain why its a bad moral idea, you hit them with all the insults, accusations of narrow minded thinking etc they they use to justify gay marriage.

Its love, what multiple people do in private is their business etc etc

Great fun, try this out yourself.

I would disagree with this. My friends wife preached to us at a party recently that poly marriage should be allowed between consenting adults. She of course she did not want her husband to add any extra wives. I told her to buy a burkha and hand in her license if she wants to live like its the third world. Her theory was men were afraid they wouldn't have wives and that why polygamy was outlawed.

My theory is her husband didn't tell what to think about that issue and women tend to default their positions to that of buzzfeed.

Post: #86

Fags won their big fight - gay marriage. But that wasn't going to stop them, now it's a "movement" that needs its next target of protest. Incest, pedos, bestiality - they're all brought in to form an ever-growing coalition of freaks. No freakish group will be denied entry (at least covertly), as long as it's firmly against traditional family and values.

Post: #87

Incest isn't only wrong by convention; its wrong in essence. It must be, else why so many idiots and monsters among the children of incest. - HBO's Rome

Post: #88

(04-30-2017 05:36 PM)Number one bummer Wrote:  

(04-30-2017 04:41 PM)MajorStyles Wrote:  Is incest good or bad?
I'm not sure...it's all relative.

A relativist mindset is a SJW mindset. It is a lazy tool used to derail logical arguments and discussion. I'm not accusing you, but it is helpful to make opinions about ideas.

Post: #89

(04-29-2017 10:49 PM)Paracelsus Wrote:  I would be kinda careful of accepting Dworkin's theory, mainly because

(a) she reckons she was sexually abused as a child, which generates a fucked-up worldview of itself
(b) the Westermarck Effect essentially disproves what she says. It appears a hardwired epigenetic rule, that is, literally human nature, that people don't fuck the close relatives they grew up with. You have to be really fucked up to still be channelling Freud in this day and age.

Oh, I wasn't saying I accepted her doctrine, just that it's interesting how with feminists, everything regarding male-female relationships always comes back to patriarchy, i.e., rule by the father.

Even if one isn't going to be banging one's immediate family members, those relationships can still serve as a template for future relationships. Girls will compare their husbands to how good of a provider, protector, and leader their father was, for instance. If they have daddy issues, then that's going to affect future relationships, even if the father-daughter relationship wasn't sexual.

It's been documented that a lot of feminists had major daddy issues stemming from the lack of a father figure, or a dysfunctional relationship with their father. It could be that he was a bad father, or maybe she was just such a bitch from the very beginning that he didn't really have a chance to have a good relationship with her. And then she continued being a bitch till eventually, she escalated her bitchiness even further by becoming a feminist.

Post: #90

(04-30-2017 06:03 PM)Captainstabbin Wrote:  Fags won their big fight - gay marriage. But that wasn't going to stop them, now it's a "movement" that needs its next target of protest. Incest, pedos, bestiality - they're all brought in to form an ever-growing coalition of freaks. No freakish group will be denied entry (at least covertly), as long as it's firmly against traditional family and values.

And the flip side of that is that feminists will shame anything that does tend to promote traditional family and values as perverted and/or predatory. So, for example, traditional Mormon polygamy is shamed, while polyamorous relationships, in which women aren't expected to be faithful to any particular man, are considered okay. Likewise, it's considered disgusting for an older man to want to be with a younger woman, but it's considered totally cool for Emmanuel Macron to be married to an old hag.

Post: #91

(04-30-2017 05:36 PM)Number one bummer Wrote:  

(04-30-2017 04:41 PM)MajorStyles Wrote:  Is incest good or bad?
I'm not sure...it's all relative.

A relativist mindset is a SJW mindset. It is a lazy tool used to derail logical arguments and discussion. I'm not accusing you, but it is helpful to make opinions about ideas.

My attempt at comedy, brother. Don't worry though, I won't quit my day job.