Post: #101

(03-07-2012 01:08 PM)thegmanifesto Wrote:  

(03-07-2012 01:02 PM)Aliblahba Wrote:  

(03-07-2012 01:22 AM)Athlone McGinnis Wrote:  Two more of the leaked Munn pics I neglected to post earlier:

I'm gonna name my first child after you Athlone.

She is just a 5.

I was 1 step away from masturbating to those pics. I give her an 8, but I KNEW she was a dirty bitch. I KNEW IT!!!!!! Fuck man, she talked about yellow vagina juice on her show.

Now here's the litmus test. Pay attention....this shit is serious.

Emech, would you pay her mind in the Tampa area?

Post: #102

(03-07-2012 01:08 PM)thegmanifesto Wrote:  She is just a 5.

Post: #103

Dear Rooshvforum,

Serious question for all of you:

Is a 1 the new 10?™

or

Is a 5 the new 10?™

I am really confused.

And where is my list of nightclubs?!

And while we are on the subject:

Is Beta the new Alpha?™

Post: #104

Here's some twos dancing..Gross!!!
[attachment=5201]

Post: #105

(03-07-2012 12:52 PM)Athlone McGinnis Wrote:  Guys are letting their perception of American female personal flaws/habits impact their view of their physical beauty.


Just a theory, but I think it has legs.

Sounds about right. While American girls are annoying as hell and getting fatter at an alarming rate, a lot of guys seem to focus on all the bad and ignore the good. I mean there are cute girls out there that have no qualms giving it up within hours. If you're into immediate satisfaction that's a great thing. What it means for the future stability of society is something I've wondered about, but were here on a game forum.

I can not imagine anyone giving them a low rating. I mean I guess I must be dumpster diving then. The redhead is 36? Shit! She goes up to a 9, I love the redhead Irish look. I'm just curious how many 36 year old women do you guys know that look as good as her? The majority of women above the age of 35 look abysmal.

I go to happy hours, I do online dating, I day game and it's rare as hell for me to find girls like these two.

Post: #106

(03-07-2012 01:08 PM)basilransom Wrote:  

(03-07-2012 12:52 PM)Athlone McGinnis Wrote:  Guys are letting their perception of American female personal flaws/habits impact their view of their physical beauty.
I've seen this happen on my campus, so I know thatthe phenomenon can exist among men. When a certain population of females behaves consistently in a way that many men dislike (bad attitude, bitchy, rude, thug worship, etc, etc), many guys will begin to subconsciously underrate them physically. She'll become a 6 or 7, even if objectively she could reasonably pull an 8.

Similarly, you can see women from other parts of the world (ex: The Philippines, E. Europe, etc) get overrated because they are perceived to have superior intangible qualities which, in turn, leads men to believe that they make better, more attainable mates.

Just a theory, but I think it has legs.

I think it's just that one or two guys calls a pretty girl a 5, and then other guys think "well, if I go and call her a 9, that's going to make me look pretty lame." Or just that "eh, whatever, a 5 is ridiculous, to the point where I wouldn't belabor the point with someone who'd say that."

I'd give H & M an 8.5 and a 9. Kind of want to give Hendricks a 9, but she's a little older, and may be masking some defects. Then again, I effing love redheads and milky skin, and she's a unique one. I'd definitely take Hendricks over Munn - I like girls who look distinctive, and in turn they tend to be more interesting and open-minded. Munn sort of has that generic hot girl face.

All that said, seeing girls in photos and in person is different. You see tons of hot girls in photos which can skew your perception. And, IMO, for 7s and above, they will almost always *feel* more attractive in person than in a photo. The real life sensations of proximity to a cute girl boosts your perception of her.

That's the great thing about some of Hendricks' pics. She's stripped bare - no make-up, her hair isn't done. It's like she's right out of the shower and getting ready to go to bed. Even seeing her like that, I'd hit. In fact, I like seeing women this way - I'm not a big fan of lots of make-up. The most I want her to wear is a little something on the lips, and maybe a bit of eye liner to enhance. If I think she's attractive like that, I know she is when she does herself all the way up. I just like to know what I'm really working with under the mask.

Post: #107

Question:

What would this girl be rated?

A 3?

Pushing a 4?

Maybe 3.75?

A "maybe you would 'hit it' if she begged on her hands and knees and offered you 40k in a briefcase"? Unmarked bills?

Post: #108

(03-07-2012 01:51 PM)thegmanifesto Wrote:  Dear Rooshvforum,

Serious question for all of you:

Is a 1 the new 10?™

or

Is a 5 the new 10?™

I am really confused.

And where is my list of nightclubs?!

And while we are on the subject:

Is Beta the new Alpha?™

G i know everyone's been promising you nightclubs, but they haven't delivered. Don't fret I've found the perfect place. I know I should be posting this in the "super secret, non-searchable, hall of fame members only forum" but I'll let everyone in on this data. Its called club bounce http://clubbounce.net/ Its great every single girl in there is a 10, the ratio is like 69:1 plus I know how much you like California so its in the perfect place, Long Beach. I really hope you enjoy it, maybe in the daytime you can swoop girls on the beach with a game of pickup football or the worlds best opener/pickup line.

Post: #109

If Olivia Munn stands alone alone in the middle of a forest, and there's no one around to see her.... is she still a five?

Post: #110

(03-07-2012 11:42 PM)T and A Man Wrote:  If Olivia Munn stands alone alone in the middle of a forest, and there's no one around to see her.... is she still a five?

If she is on a deserted island with you is she still a 5?

Or a 1?

Is a 1 the new 10?™

Quote:G i know everyone's been promising you nightclubs, but they haven't delivered.

I know.

What is my goddamn list of nightclubs!

Post: #111

(03-08-2012 06:51 PM)thegmanifesto Wrote:  

(03-07-2012 11:42 PM)T and A Man Wrote:  If Olivia Munn stands alone alone in the middle of a forest, and there's no one around to see her.... is she still a five?

If she is on a deserted island with you is she still a 5?

Or a 1?

Is a 1 the new 10?™

Post: #112

Olivia Munn is fuking hot!

Now, as much of a fan of Mad Men as I am, Christina Hendricks is too thick for my taste. Some of you guys love this, and that's fine. In defense of Gmac, I wouldn't rate her too high without the make up. Is she bangable? Yes, in the right outfit and lighting.

Just have a look at her here, without the male up and clothes, and you tell me how you'd rate this girl if she passed you in the grocery store. I wouldn't turn my head to get a second look. She would barely register on my radar. Blip, gone.

http://ohsara.tumblr.com/post/1170948162...-no-makeup

Post: #113

Looks like Russell Brand in 15 years...

Post: #114

(03-08-2012 09:15 PM)Hotwheels Wrote:  Looks like Russell Brand in 15 years...

Lol. That is one of the best photos the Internet has ever produced.

Post: #115

(03-08-2012 08:55 PM)durangotang Wrote:  I wouldn't rate her too high without the make up. Is she bangable? Yes, in the right outfit and lighting.

Just have a look at her here, without the male up and clothes, and you tell me how you'd rate this girl if she passed you in the grocery store. I wouldn't turn my head to get a second look. She would barely register on my radar. Blip, gone.

http://ohsara.tumblr.com/post/1170948162...-no-makeup

Yeah, but if you're going to do that comparison, then you're going to have to apply it to all girls. Like, yes Hendricks might look plain if she goes out with no make up to the grocery store and doesn't dress nice or get the lighting. fair enough, It's even fair that she might not register.

BUT; you could say that about supermodels, hot actresses, swimsuit models etc.

Lets say Heidi Klum is a 9; Supermodel, underwear model, clearly awesome genetic material, smart, successful, blah blah. Lets give her a 9.

She isn't going to be rated a 9 if she doesn't do her makeup, wears baggy clothes, lives in a country wear thick coats are necessary, and is under those junkie-proof lighting things. Lets give her the flu too. She might go down to a 6. But, you can't compare her to say, a girl who is a 6 in a nightclub, because she is dolled up and clean, dressed to impress and still a 6.

Are they the same or not?

Post: #116

(03-09-2012 07:19 PM)Kitsune Wrote:  

(03-08-2012 08:55 PM)durangotang Wrote:  I wouldn't rate her too high without the make up. Is she bangable? Yes, in the right outfit and lighting.

Just have a look at her here, without the male up and clothes, and you tell me how you'd rate this girl if she passed you in the grocery store. I wouldn't turn my head to get a second look. She would barely register on my radar. Blip, gone.

http://ohsara.tumblr.com/post/1170948162...-no-makeup

Yeah, but if you're going to do that comparison, then you're going to have to apply it to all girls.

Exactly.

Your not going to the grocery store with the broad.

You going to be rolling out at night with her when she looks like this:



In swooping her in the bedroom when she looks like this:



I dare anyone on here to post girls they have dated and girls that were their girlfriends when they were looking their worst.

And we can all rate them.

Post: #117

(03-05-2012 04:53 AM)Cr33pin Wrote:  Thats how i bang chicks... some love it an tell me they love the way i dominate them and are always trying to bang me afterwards.... some complain im to rough, not gentle, it hurts an blah blah blah.... haha i really dont give a fuck

i have noticed i have toned it down with new chicks since my break up with the ex... fuck that im going back doing what i wanna do....

Dude wtf same here. Why did I become a nice guy after "I broke up" with my ex????

She was always telling me i was an asshole. I think part of it is guilt. Whats your reason?

Post: #118

(03-09-2012 07:50 PM)thegmanifesto Wrote:  

(03-09-2012 07:19 PM)Kitsune Wrote:  

(03-08-2012 08:55 PM)durangotang Wrote:  I wouldn't rate her too high without the make up. Is she bangable? Yes, in the right outfit and lighting.

Just have a look at her here, without the male up and clothes, and you tell me how you'd rate this girl if she passed you in the grocery store. I wouldn't turn my head to get a second look. She would barely register on my radar. Blip, gone.

http://ohsara.tumblr.com/post/1170948162...-no-makeup

Yeah, but if you're going to do that comparison, then you're going to have to apply it to all girls.

Exactly.

Your not going to the grocery store with the broad.

You going to be rolling out at night with her when she looks like this:



In swooping her in the bedroom when she looks like this:



I dare anyone on here to post girls they have dated and girls that were their girlfriends when they were looking their worst.

And we can all rate them.

Dude, I stared for like 5 minutes at that girls picture trying to figure out what was wrong with her tits. Then I realized, there's nothing wrong with them. Their fucking HUGE. That's why I stared at them for so long.

Post: #119

(03-09-2012 07:50 PM)thegmanifesto Wrote:  I dare anyone on here to post girls they have dated and girls that were their girlfriends when they were looking their worst.

And we can all rate them.

Christina Hendricks has an overweight body, slumped shoulders, a flat butt, and her breasts are too large. Not my style. A lot of guys love her. Go swoop her G. The pic I posted of her is what I think she looks like on an average day - not looking her worst.

If people start posting pics of there ex's, then give us three pics 1) Worst 2) Average 3) Best. I bet we could get some scarily accurate ratings that way.

Post: #120

(03-09-2012 07:19 PM)Kitsune Wrote:  Yeah, but if you're going to do that comparison, then you're going to have to apply it to all girls. Like, yes Hendricks might look plain if she goes out with no make up to the grocery store and doesn't dress nice or get the lighting. fair enough, It's even fair that she might not register.

BUT; you could say that about supermodels, hot actresses, swimsuit models etc.

Lets say Heidi Klum is a 9; Supermodel, underwear model, clearly awesome genetic material, smart, successful, blah blah. Lets give her a 9.

She isn't going to be rated a 9 if she doesn't do her makeup, wears baggy clothes, lives in a country wear thick coats are necessary, and is under those junkie-proof lighting things. Lets give her the flu too. She might go down to a 6. But, you can't compare her to say, a girl who is a 6 in a nightclub, because she is dolled up and clean, dressed to impress and still a 6.

Are they the same or not?

Comparing a normal 'dolled-up' nightclub girl who's a 6 to a 'dolled-up' professional model/celebrity who appears to be a 9 isn't exactly fair either.

Give any non-fat woman the same elite stylists and make-up artists these celebrities have access to, plus ten grand or so for a totally new designer wardrobe and that 6 will now easily be an 8 at least...

Post: #121

(03-09-2012 10:28 PM)Vice Wrote:  Comparing a normal 'dolled-up' nightclub girl who's a 6 to a 'dolled-up' professional model/celebrity who appears to be a 9 isn't exactly fair either.

Give any non-fat woman the same elite stylists and make-up artists these celebrities have access to, plus ten grand or so for a totally new designer wardrobe and that 6 will now easily be an 8 at least...

Really?

So why the fuck do Victoria's Secret girls get paid in the hundreds of thousands, if not millions, for their looks?

By this logic, I could create a competing modelling firm by picking unknowns off the street, dolling them up at my own expense and then raking in the money from the ads.

I guess you guys have a point, but the difference between this and the 'What would you rate a 5' thread is stark. People are up in her saying Christina Hendricks is a 5 or 6, then in the 'Rate a 5' thread its a completely different ball game.

I mean, even without make up, its ridiculous to suggest that half our target market' of girls on a normal highstreet or club is like that. If so, I'll echo GManifestos sentiments; where the fuck do you guys go grocery shopping/clubbing where at least half of all the girls there are hotter than Hendricks/Munn?

It's not my concern what people use for their rating systems, but gee. Let me couchsurf at whoevers place has average girls like that and I'll be a happy man.

Post: #122

   

Watching Christina on Mad Men always reminded me of my ex, with those boobs bigger than her head. Say what you want about her, but I need no more convincing about this body type in bed. Spend some time fucking a girl with DD/DDD breasts and a reasonably small waist and it will be hard to fuck a skinny girl ever again. Gravity aside, they look amazing with a girl on her back bouncing, and rubbing against your thighs while she blows you, and good luck not popping off with em pressed against your chest. With that said, these girls have a shorter shelf-life in terms of body quality. They are smoking hot from 17 till about 25 and then metabolism and gravity takes over. The real story here is that every guy on this forum should take some notes from her husband. Dude seems to not give a fuck and apparently she chased him. Work on your game, swagger, style, energy, whatever and stop worrying about numbers. If the quality of your lays are not improving each year, you have to admit that your getting lazy. And don't blame it on diminishing returns.

Post: #123

(03-10-2012 02:06 PM)Kitsune Wrote:  

(03-09-2012 10:28 PM)Vice Wrote:  Comparing a normal 'dolled-up' nightclub girl who's a 6 to a 'dolled-up' professional model/celebrity who appears to be a 9 isn't exactly fair either.

Give any non-fat woman the same elite stylists and make-up artists these celebrities have access to, plus ten grand or so for a totally new designer wardrobe and that 6 will now easily be an 8 at least...

Really?

So why the fuck do Victoria's Secret girls get paid in the hundreds of thousands, if not millions, for their looks?

By this logic, I could create a competing modelling firm by picking unknowns off the street, dolling them up at my own expense and then raking in the money from the ads.

I guess you guys have a point, but the difference between this and the 'What would you rate a 5' thread is stark. People are up in her saying Christina Hendricks is a 5 or 6, then in the 'Rate a 5' thread its a completely different ball game.

I mean, even without make up, its ridiculous to suggest that half our target market' of girls on a normal highstreet or club is like that. If so, I'll echo GManifestos sentiments; where the fuck do you guys go grocery shopping/clubbing where at least half of all the girls there are hotter than Hendricks/Munn?

It's not my concern what people use for their rating systems, but gee. Let me couchsurf at whoevers place has average girls like that and I'll be a happy man.

Yeah, that is what I have been saying the whole time.

I am just looking for a list of nightclubs.

Where is this going down?

I know Gmac is in DC, so which grocery stores and nightclubs in DC have at least half of all the girls there are hotter than Hendricks/Munn?

I still haven't seen one nightclub listed.

Or one Grocery Store.

Post: #124

(03-10-2012 03:02 PM)IVth_Element Wrote:  With that said, these girls have a shorter shelf-life in terms of body quality. They are smoking hot from 17 till about 25 and then metabolism and gravity takes over.

It is worth noting here that Christina Hendricks is 36.

Post: #125

(03-10-2012 03:20 PM)Athlone McGinnis Wrote:  It is worth noting here that Christina Hendricks is 36.

Exactly. It would take me a long time to find a 36 year old who is that good looking.