Post: #76

(10-26-2013 03:46 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

Laura Bush has that wholesome, good girl look I would definitely smash. Michelle Obama looks like she'd try to bang me with a strap on.

What is it about her that you find particularly aggressive in that picture? It's not she has an Angela Davis afro and is throwing up a black power fist.

What does a black person have to do to look wholesome? Tap dance?

Post: #77

(10-27-2013 09:46 PM)j r Wrote:  

(10-26-2013 03:46 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

Laura Bush has that wholesome, good girl look I would definitely smash. Michelle Obama looks like she'd try to bang me with a strap on.

What is it about her that you find particularly aggressive in that picture? It's not she has an Angela Davis afro and is throwing up a black power fist.

What does a black person have to do to look wholesome? Tap dance?

Dude, just look at the honey to the left of Obama. She looks like a wholesome sweetheart. I'd bang her all night long.

Michelle Obama is as tall as her husband and has deltoids that rise up to her earrings. Borderline tranny.

Post: #78

(10-27-2013 09:46 PM)j r Wrote:  

(10-26-2013 03:46 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

Laura Bush has that wholesome, good girl look I would definitely smash. Michelle Obama looks like she'd try to bang me with a strap on.

What is it about her that you find particularly aggressive in that picture? It's not she has an Angela Davis afro and is throwing up a black power fist.

What does a black person have to do to look wholesome? Tap dance?

She looks pretty good here, much thinner than she is now. I don't usually like dark skinned black women.

Post: #79

Obama's gone, January, 2017. Who cares about his wife?

Presidents are time servers. Who do they serve? For example, what does Obama want to say or do, that he dare not say or do? We'll probably never know.

And who is overruling him, Bush, Clinton, and other past U.S. Presidents?

Personally, I don't believe for one second that a half black man in the oval office is really as powerful as we're supposed to believe.

Post: #80

(10-27-2013 11:20 PM)Therapsid Wrote:  Personally, I don't believe for one second that a half black man in the oval office is really as powerful as we're supposed to believe.

Powerful enough to order that Angela Merkel's telephone be tapped.

Post: #81

(10-25-2013 01:12 PM)Easy E Wrote:  Lots of Obama lovers on here.

I will just leave you with this quote:

"He’s your president, not your boyfriend."

-- Bill Maher

In response to the overly emotional haters of Obama.

He didn't fuck your girlfriend and mom on the same night. Relax.

Post: #82

(10-28-2013 07:52 AM)Clyde Wrote:  

(10-25-2013 01:12 PM)Easy E Wrote:  Lots of Obama lovers on here.

I will just leave you with this quote:

"He’s your president, not your boyfriend."

-- Bill Maher

In response to the overly emotional haters of Obama.

He didn't fuck your girlfriend and mom on the same night. Relax.

I don't care if he is gay or not.

What I do care about is him wasting money like there are no consequences for it, and making jokes about it.

Wasting money at the rate he has done will cause far more damage to our lives than if he did fuck our girlfriends. The economic crisis headed our way after 16 years of out of control spending will be devastating.

Post: #83

(10-28-2013 07:56 AM)It_is_my_time Wrote:  

(10-28-2013 07:52 AM)Clyde Wrote:  

(10-25-2013 01:12 PM)Easy E Wrote:  Lots of Obama lovers on here.

I will just leave you with this quote:

"He’s your president, not your boyfriend."

-- Bill Maher

In response to the overly emotional haters of Obama.

He didn't fuck your girlfriend and mom on the same night. Relax.

I don't care if he is gay or not.

What I do care about is him wasting money like there are no consequences for it, and making jokes about it.

Wasting money at the rate he has done will cause far more damage to our lives than if he did fuck our girlfriends. The economic crisis headed our way after 16 years of out of control spending will be devastating.

They said the same thing about Clinton, Bush, etc. Congress loves to spend money.

If Christie wins the next election. The only thing that you can guarantee is that he will spend more money than Obama. If Romney won. He would have spent more money than Obama. No President is going to give the Tax payer a break. It costs too much to become President and those donations aren't given because they believe in his message.

Post: #84

(10-28-2013 08:08 AM)Clyde Wrote:  

(10-28-2013 07:56 AM)It_is_my_time Wrote:  

(10-28-2013 07:52 AM)Clyde Wrote:  

(10-25-2013 01:12 PM)Easy E Wrote:  Lots of Obama lovers on here.

I will just leave you with this quote:

"He’s your president, not your boyfriend."

-- Bill Maher

In response to the overly emotional haters of Obama.

He didn't fuck your girlfriend and mom on the same night. Relax.

I don't care if he is gay or not.

What I do care about is him wasting money like there are no consequences for it, and making jokes about it.

Wasting money at the rate he has done will cause far more damage to our lives than if he did fuck our girlfriends. The economic crisis headed our way after 16 years of out of control spending will be devastating.

They said the same thing about Clinton, Bush, etc. Congress loves to spend money.

If Christie wins the next election. The only thing that you can guarantee is that he will spend more money than Obama. If Romney won. He would have spent more money than Obama. No President is going to give the Tax payer a break. It costs too much to become President and those donations aren't given because they believe in his message.

Clinton and Bush did spend too much. Clinton wasn't as bad as Bush, mostly because he screwed his own party over and they got run out of town and he was a borderline lame duck president for 6 years.

Bush wasted money with little regard. Obama has taken the spending Bush had and put it on steroids and then threw on a turbo booster.

I don't know what Romney would or would not have spent. He at least campaigned to cut spending, unlike Obama, so I would have to at least take him for his word until he proved me wrong. Christie looks like another disaster to me.

Regardless, Obama's spending and complete lack of understanding of simple economics is beyond shocking. He will go down as one of the worst, if not by far the worst president of all time. Especially as we are watching his only "accomplishment" self destruct before it even goes live.

Post: #85

I don't have Obama pom poms. But It does surprise me that people truly are drinking the Kool-aid. That if X person was running the country. Things would be different. This truly gives credence to the Simpsons. I voted for Kodos T-Shirt.

McCain/Palin was a horrible ticket. Romney/Ryan was a horrible ticket. They ran a poor campaign and Obama ran a better one. That is just the way I see it. Clinton was probably the greatest Politician I have witnessed.

The worst President in history is going to be a next one up label. The way things are right now. Nothing will ever get accomplished because nobody wants the other side to "win". They are constantly thinking about the next election and not actually serving the America people. That put them in office.

Post: #86

Clinton was pretty good I thought in returning budget surpluses. I'll see if I can find a graph.

Post: #87

1992-2000 was a pretty good stretch

Post: #88

I am a huge fan of Clinton. Booming economy, balanced policies, never groveling in wake of the Monica Lewinsky thing (even though he should have done the "tacitly admit but pretend nothing's wrong" Berlusconi-style maneuver instead of "I did not have sex with that woman")... what's not to like? Oh, and he also oversaw a very positive military intervention in Kosovo. Of course I don't think he's flawless or anything, but I'd gladly take him over either of his successors.

Post: #89

watch from 4.02.

clinton is alpha as fuck.

Post: #90

(10-28-2013 08:35 AM)Que enspastic Wrote:  Clinton was pretty good I thought in returning budget surpluses. I'll see if I can find a graph.

He did well, but we also had one of the greatest economic booms in the history of the world in the 1990's with the tech boom. And rather than stock piling money, we just floated even.

And again, he was nothing more than a lame duck doing whatever Newt told him to do.

Post: #91

(10-28-2013 08:32 AM)Clyde Wrote:  I don't have Obama pom poms. But It does surprise me that people truly are drinking the Kool-aid. That if X person was running the country. Things would be different. This truly gives credence to the Simpsons. I voted for Kodos T-Shirt.

McCain/Palin was a horrible ticket. Romney/Ryan was a horrible ticket. They ran a poor campaign and Obama ran a better one. That is just the way I see it. Clinton was probably the greatest Politician I have witnessed.

The worst President in history is going to be a next one up label. The way things are right now. Nothing will ever get accomplished because nobody wants the other side to "win". They are constantly thinking about the next election and not actually serving the America people. That put them in office.

When you have a guy get up there and taunt small business owners, and ram through a 1,200 page bill even those who don't understand it with no partisan support at all, you are doing a terrible job.

Would Romney be better? Probably, he really couldn't be worse. At least it would send a message to DC that no matter how "cool" you pretend to be, you can't just rip the people off.

Post: #92

(10-28-2013 08:50 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  I am a huge fan of Clinton. Booming economy, balanced policies, never groveling in wake of the Monica Lewinsky thing (even though he should have done the "tacitly admit but pretend nothing's wrong" Berlusconi-style maneuver instead of "I did not have sex with that woman")... what's not to like? Oh, and he also oversaw a very positive military intervention in Kosovo. Of course I don't think he's flawless or anything, but I'd gladly take him over either of his successors.

The booming economy had little to nothing to do with Clinton. It was the tech boom, he just got lucky to be there when it occurred and managed to not take advantage of it.

Post: #93

(10-28-2013 09:05 AM)It_is_my_time Wrote:  

(10-28-2013 08:50 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  I am a huge fan of Clinton. Booming economy, balanced policies, never groveling in wake of the Monica Lewinsky thing (even though he should have done the "tacitly admit but pretend nothing's wrong" Berlusconi-style maneuver instead of "I did not have sex with that woman")... what's not to like? Oh, and he also oversaw a very positive military intervention in Kosovo. Of course I don't think he's flawless or anything, but I'd gladly take him over either of his successors.

The booming economy had little to nothing to do with Clinton. It was the tech boom, he just got lucky to be there when it occurred and managed to not take advantage of it.

Not to mention it was a majority republican congress, and they're the ones who set a budget.

If anyone should take credit for the federal surplus, it's Newt Gingrich. Bill Clinton did nothing except not veto bills.

Post: #94

If there were an award for dumb ass thread titles that you'd be embarrassed if someone saw it open on your computer, this would be it.

Post: #95

(10-28-2013 09:05 AM)It_is_my_time Wrote:  

(10-28-2013 08:50 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  I am a huge fan of Clinton. Booming economy, balanced policies, never groveling in wake of the Monica Lewinsky thing (even though he should have done the "tacitly admit but pretend nothing's wrong" Berlusconi-style maneuver instead of "I did not have sex with that woman")... what's not to like? Oh, and he also oversaw a very positive military intervention in Kosovo. Of course I don't think he's flawless or anything, but I'd gladly take him over either of his successors.

The booming economy had little to nothing to do with Clinton. It was the tech boom, he just got lucky to be there when it occurred and managed to not take advantage of it.

Economy weak? Democratic Presidents fault.

Economy strong? Democratic President had nothing to do with it.

Post: #96

(10-28-2013 03:45 PM)thegmanifesto Wrote:  

(10-28-2013 09:05 AM)It_is_my_time Wrote:  

(10-28-2013 08:50 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  I am a huge fan of Clinton. Booming economy, balanced policies, never groveling in wake of the Monica Lewinsky thing (even though he should have done the "tacitly admit but pretend nothing's wrong" Berlusconi-style maneuver instead of "I did not have sex with that woman")... what's not to like? Oh, and he also oversaw a very positive military intervention in Kosovo. Of course I don't think he's flawless or anything, but I'd gladly take him over either of his successors.

The booming economy had little to nothing to do with Clinton. It was the tech boom, he just got lucky to be there when it occurred and managed to not take advantage of it.

Economy weak? Democratic Presidents fault.

Economy strong? Democratic President had nothing to do with it.

It is simply understanding economics.

Clinton was a complete disaster. But the good thing was that he was SO bad that he nearly destroyed his own party and was a lame duck for 6 years just sucking up to Republicans in hopes of not getting impeached.

Obama has spent money in ways so bad that the investors have been pulling out and it is causing lots of damage to the economy.

Post: #97

The economy is so bad that the S&P is at an all time high and banks are bigger than ever.

The clinton thing was in 1998.....near the end of his term so 6 years is quite an exaggeration.

Post: #98

(10-28-2013 04:50 PM)Cattle Rustler Wrote:  The economy is so bad that the S&P is at an all time high and banks are bigger than ever.

The clinton thing was in 1998.....near the end of his term so 6 years is quite an exaggeration.

The Clinton thing was in 1994. His first two years were a complete failure. He tried to do what Obama did and was a disaster. But we had a more informed society back then and they voted the Democrats out and kept them out his last 6 years. So for 6 years he was a lame duck.

The S&P at an all time high is because the economy is bad. The S&P is made up of international companies. The smart people with money are dumping their investments in the USA and putting them into mutli-national companies because they are impacted less by the crap US economy. Add to it, Obama's spending and the interest rates kept at all time lows is forcing people who would rather buy bonds or CD's are forced into buying stocks.

The S&P so high right now, with all the other factors, is just evidence of no respect for Obama's handling of the economy.

Post: #99

The red pill is for a realistic view of women...what color pill does the same for politics? Some guys here need to OD on that one.

Post: #100

double post