Post: #501

When she comes to Melbourne, she can do a comparison between Dandenong and Sydney's Lakemba. I've always wondered which one is worse.

Post: #502

^
As in Southern?
She's already passed through Melbourne. I believe the two of them are on their way to N.Z.

Post: #503

"Hi, I am your waiter today, but first I am legally bound to apologize for my White privilege."

Post: #504

I had no idea the former Aussie Pm Malcolm Fraser was so redpilll. Old man railed against Jewish influence and criticized Australia's military alliance with the US.

Post: #505

(08-07-2018 07:10 AM)TigerMandingo Wrote:  I had no idea the former Aussie Pm Malcolm Fraser was so redpilll. Old man railed against Jewish influence and criticized Australia's military alliance with the US.

Fraser was a bit of a bleeding-heart centrist or at least a guy who didn't feel he had to have a coherent political ideology in order to support a bad idea. He was of a slightly different Liberal Party, the one that called itself centrist back in a time when centrist in Australia basically meant centre-right.

He let in lots of Vietnamese migrants via refugee boats, though thankfully the Viets seem more determined to kill us with salmonella in their restaurants than bombing us like the average Arabic cultural enricher does. He was also a devoted multiculturalist, which makes his distaste for transnationals amusing since it appears he'd prefer demographic destruction rather than economic, but whatever.

Didn't like the idea of transnationals, but also wanted to piss on the US alliance, which is and always was a dumb idea unless and until we bite the bullet and formally become China's battle thralls, since there's no other way Australia can defend itself conventionally. And for a guy who supposedly didn't like transnationals, he had no problem cheering on sanctions against South Africa for apartheid (see how that's turning out) and spitting venom against white minority rule in Rhodesia (also another place where there's a lot more to the story than the standard leftie account of Bad White Colonials, and which ended up with Mugabe leading the joint.) Practiced Keynesian economics, which meant he was an idiot, albeit most politicians liked the concept and therefore were idiots anyway.

More recently, supported communist Greens candidates for elections. Renounced his Liberal Party membership after Tony Abbot became leader of the Liberal Party - he didn't much like the idea of the party swinging hard right to become a party of conservatives.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #506

How is Fraser red pilled by railing against our military alliance with the US? What's the other option, "alliance" with China? Give me a break.

Quote:He let in lots of Vietnamese migrants via refugee boats, though thankfully the Viets seem more determined to kill us with salmonella in their restaurants than bombing us like the average Arabic cultural enricher does.

I can tell you that those Viet people he let in would be the first to say hell no to China!

Post: #507

^^how about neither?

Fraser made good points that the Aussies get unnecessarily dragged into whatever bullshit war the US cooks up.

Post: #508

What do you guys think about the Blair Cottrell interview controversy?

Post: #509

In answer, who gives a fuck what happens on a MSM channel?

I prefer my shitlording in Parliament:

Quote:QUEENSLAND crossbench senator Fraser Anning has laid out a radical immigration agenda, calling for a “final solution” plebiscite on which migrants come to Australia.

The Katter’s Australia Party upper house MP called for an end to Muslim immigration and a program that favours “European Christian” values. In his maiden speech to Parliament today, he claimed a majority of Australian Muslims live on welfare and do not work.

“While all Muslims are not terrorists, certainly all terrorists these days are Muslims,” Senator Anning said.

“So why would anyone want to bring more of them here?” He called for the government to ban all welfare payments to migrants in the first five years of living in Australia, labelling many asylum seekers as “welfare seekers”.

Senator Anning also wants a plebiscite on who comes to the country to allow people to decide whether they want “wholesale non-English speaking immigrants from the third world”.

“The final solution to the immigration problem is of course a popular vote,” he said.

Labor frontbencher Chris Bowen said the use of the term ‘final solution”, which has been historically associated with the Nazi plan in World War II for killing millions of Jews, was “utterly unacceptable”.

“You don’t use that term. That is an unacceptable use of the term,” he told ABC Radio on Tuesday.

“It has connotations and meanings to history which it are deeply offensive to right-thinking people, not only in Australia but across the world.” Senator Anning also said Australia was entitled to insist migrants were predominantly of the “historic European Christian composition”. “Ethno-cultural diversity - which is known to undermine social cohesion - has been allowed to rise to dangerous levels in many suburbs,” the Queensland senator said.

“In direct response, self-segregation, including white flight from poorer inner- urban areas, has become the norm.” Senator Anning called for a cultural counter-revolution to restore traditional values and redefine national identity.

He said anyone persuaded to advocate the “false claim” there was an infinite number of genders had surrendered their political soul.

“To describe the so-called safe schools and gender fluidity garbage being peddled in schools as cultural Marxism is not a throwaway line, but a literal truth,” Senator Anning said.

The 68-year-old outlined plans to boost agriculture through re-establishing rural state banks and re-establishment of marketing of farm goods through grower co-operatives.

Other issues he noted were countering the growing threat of China, slashing government spending, building coal-fired power plants and taking back culture from left-wing extremists.

Senator Anning said Joh Bjelke-Petersen’s reign as Queensland premier was the state’s “golden age”.

Labor frontbencher Chris Bowen said the use of the term ‘final solution”, which has been historically associated with the Nazi plan in World War II for killing millions of Jews, was “utterly unacceptable”.

“You don’t use that term. That is an unacceptable use of the term,” he told ABC Radio on Tuesday.

“It has connotations and meanings to history which it are deeply offensive to right-thinking people, not only in Australia but across the world.” Senator Anning also said Australia was entitled to insist migrants were predominantly of the “historic European Christian composition”. “Ethno-cultural diversity - which is known to undermine social cohesion - has been allowed to rise to dangerous levels in many suburbs,” the Queensland senator said.

“In direct response, self-segregation, including white flight from poorer inner- urban areas, has become the norm.” Senator Anning called for a cultural counter-revolution to restore traditional values and redefine national identity.

He said anyone persuaded to advocate the “false claim” there was an infinite number of genders had surrendered their political soul.

“To describe the so-called safe schools and gender fluidity garbage being peddled in schools as cultural Marxism is not a throwaway line, but a literal truth,” Senator Anning said.

The 68-year-old outlined plans to boost agriculture through re-establishing rural state banks and re-establishment of marketing of farm goods through grower co-operatives.

Other issues he noted were countering the growing threat of China, slashing government spending, building coal-fired power plants and taking back culture from left-wing extremists.

Senator Anning said Joh Bjelke-Petersen’s reign as Queensland premier was the state’s “golden age”.

Fraser Anning not so much shifting the Overton Window as just smashing the fucker out with a sledgehammer and hurling it into orbit.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #510

Did Australian politics just become entertaining...?

Make AusPol entertaining again!

Post: #511

I'd go further on the whole welfare thing, make it so that people can only claim as much as they've paid in taxes throughout their life, meaning those who've contributed to society are eligible for pensions and those who haven't are not, the whole welfare society does not work. Added bonus that it solves the whole welfare-seeker thing up without specifically targeting them.

His plans don't sound terrible to me, of course no one is going to look at any of it because "final solution" derp. Do love the attack on left-wing extremists, Australia is one of the worst countries in the world for this.

Post: #512

I mean it is amusing, yet at the same time it shouldn't be.

Just because a person uses two words in unison - final & solution.
Yes there's the historical connotation.
Yet all the same, those are just two words in the English language.

Of course the pearl clutching progressive types just could not help but be offended none-the-less...
Probably reacted so quickly in an emotive knee-jerk fashion it never occurred to them that he did it on purpose.

I suppose Australia now has 'Nazis' in the upper house of government...?

Post: #513

Its just useful rhetoric to attack his phrasing rather than his argument. I don't think they're offended at all, but this is the most expedient way of addressing his points while signalling left tribe allegiance.

Post: #514

(08-14-2018 09:21 PM)Speculation Wrote:  Its just useful rhetoric to attack his phrasing rather than his argument. I don't think they're offended at all, but this is the most expedient way of addressing his points while signalling left tribe allegiance.

Yet they still give more 'life' to the situation as a result.
Had they said nothing & had the media said nothing, barely anyone would have noticed. We're heading into sports ball finals season after-all.

Post: #515

(08-14-2018 09:36 PM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  

(08-14-2018 09:21 PM)Speculation Wrote:  Its just useful rhetoric to attack his phrasing rather than his argument. I don't think they're offended at all, but this is the most expedient way of addressing his points while signalling left tribe allegiance.

Yet they still give more 'life' to the situation as a result.
Had they said nothing & had the media said nothing, barely anyone would have noticed. We're heading into sports ball finals season after-all.

Labor pollies and the media both gain through the promotion of mustache twirling villains like they will frame this senator to be.

Post: #516

He might not get the same traction as Donald Trump, but the reaction certainly illustrates he knows how to get the entire Australian media and political scene talking about him. And the genius of it is that they basically can't report on the story without repeating the essential message he has: stop bringing in cultural enrichers and make Australian at least a bit European again.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #517

Look at what the Greens spent $22,000 of taxpayer money on:



There are even cops at the event taking selfies with drag queens, just like on Airstrip One.

Post: #518

Looks like someone took their Joy this morning..

Post: #519

Rainbow street aye?
How to signal to the Apex arseholes how one is ripe for attack...

Post: #520

There was also a leadership spill today, where Turnbull was almost deposed by Peter Dutton (Aussie interior minister, who famously tried getting Roosh banned from Oz around the time of the meetup outrage and called for White South African farmers to come here as refugees), however Turnbull won by a few points. Dutton hopes to try again in a few days.

Post: #521

That confirms Turnbull is cooked.

At least Dutton talks some sense, instead of ignoring the problems that are showing. Doing something on the other hand....

Post: #522

I don't know how I feel about this...

I think Dutton will be a far better leader than Turnbull, but at the same time I think he's not a good choice for the Libs right now. I mean nobody on the left will be voting for him, and One Nation have already sealed most of the far-right vote.

I can't imagine him polling well.

Post: #523

(08-21-2018 05:37 AM)Bizet Wrote:  I don't know how I feel about this...

I think Dutton will be a far better leader than Turnbull, but at the same time I think he's not a good choice for the Libs right now. I mean nobody on the left will be voting for him, and One Nation have already sealed most of the far-right vote.

I can't imagine him polling well.

I agree, yet all the same. Turnbull is far from a sure bet.
Being so close to a Federal election it's probably better to stick with Turnbull purely as a means of keeping Shorten out.

'Short'-en...
Probably fitting considering how short sighted so many in this cucked country can be...

Post: #524

(08-21-2018 05:55 AM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  Being so close to a Federal election it's probably better to stick with Turnbull purely as a means of keeping Shorten out.

The only member of the Liberal Party I can see beating Shorten right now is Julia Bishop.

Don't get me wrong, I don't think she'd be any better than Turnbull. However, I can see her appealing to a lot of undecided voters, plus she might steal a lot of the feminist vote from the Green Party.

Post: #525

Brain dead Dutton will win no swinging voters