Post: #551

The woman at 6:06 is a visually appealing bag of genetic shit struggling with any concept outside 'your pretty'
The thing at 21:06 is a genetic cul-de-sac so there is something actually good at the end of rainbows
Women should not be allowed to vote....period!

Post: #552

Good example today of how the best laid plans can go awry (not in the direction you were hoping for)

After it became clear that a recording of Dodgy Daz was gunna cause some issues for the Coo-ee-lition, a quick back room dodgy deal was pushed through that the Nats wouldn't run a cantidate in the safest Nats seat in Aus, Home town of Deputy PM Micky Mac, "for the sake of unity".

Premier Berry-Jiggly-Uns flys in for a Multi-Million $$$ promise, and a massive Libs advertising campaign makes sure that there's more pics of Berry Jiggly un's mug about town than even the local Liberal Cantidate's

Result is the biggest swing against the gov in NSW history.

State blame Fed, Fed blame "local issues".

This wasn't news until it backfired. The Nationals could've run the fedora meme guy or literally Hitler as a cantidate and won.

Post: #553

Fucking conservatives. Snatching defeat from the jaws of victory for decades.

Post: #554

I like this Australian blogger who turned from Red Pill Melbourne pussy-chaser into more of a Heartiste:

https://melbuniblog.com/2018/09/09/crime-knows-no-race/

Quote:“We have no African gang problem!”

No sir - it's a Chinese problem for sure.

Post: #555

When the Elections come around. I will put the Liberal Democrats 1st and the Australian Conservative's Party 2nd. I have long disliked both Labor and Liberal Parties.

Post: #556

(09-10-2018 02:50 AM)infowarrior1 Wrote:  When the Elections come around. I will put the Liberal Democrats 1st and the Australian Conservative's Party 2nd. I have long disliked both Labor and Liberal Parties.

The last thing I want to see is Labor in power again. Yet it seems the Liberal party are doing everything they can to neuter their position, so I fully expect Shorten to become PM.

Wonder if the globalists are pulling the strings in the background? They've seemingly lost the White House for now. They may well be telling all their other puppets to heavily swing to the beat of the globalist drum instead.

Macron, May, Castreau. Now Turnbull & Shorten?

Post: #557

No globalist needs to pull the strings in Australia. Our population has no balls, a lot of manjawed women, and enough low-IQ workers willing to support Labor no matter how hard it fucks them or how repeatedly. We have no real interest in agriculture, no pride in our colonial heritage, and an apathetic attitude that will serve until the first Indonesian flotilla sails over the horizon looking to annex the Northwest Shelf.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #558

(09-10-2018 07:44 AM)Paracelsus Wrote:  No globalist needs to pull the strings in Australia. Our population has no balls, a lot of manjawed women, and enough low-IQ workers willing to support Labor no matter how hard it fucks them or how repeatedly. We have no real interest in agriculture, no pride in our colonial heritage, and an apathetic attitude that will serve until the first Indonesian flotilla sails over the horizon looking to annex the Northwest Shelf.

I can readily see a rather stupid sentiment coming into play during the lead up to the next election. If it's not already in play : "Aww yeah; give Labor a fair go. Give them a go this toyum..."
However, some of the decision making from within the Liberal party is rather odd for supposed experienced & self-serving politicians.

Sure it is usually easier to explain many things due to mere mediocrity as opposed to malice, but I did rather enjoy that the last few years have seen much reduced damage because Turnbull did so very little.

Post: #559

Look at this disgraceful act
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-09-10/we...e/10222210
Andrew Bragg considered the frontrunner in the Liberal preselection for the seat of Wentworth which Malcolm is giving up, is withdrawing because he thinks a woman should be picked!
What a fuck head cuckold
The political landscape in Australia is well and truly fucked, Shooters and Fishers Party are looking better by the day

Post: #560

Oh yes, they were rabbiting on about that stuff on the radio yesterday. Must have quotas for women in parliament, but when a bloke says it should be merit based....

Post: #561

Post: #562

(09-10-2018 07:44 AM)Paracelsus Wrote:  No globalist needs to pull the strings in Australia. Our population has no balls, a lot of manjawed women, and enough low-IQ workers willing to support Labor no matter how hard it fucks them or how repeatedly. We have no real interest in agriculture, no pride in our colonial heritage, and an apathetic attitude that will serve until the first Indonesian flotilla sails over the horizon looking to annex the Northwest Shelf.

All of our major parties are compromised, bought and paid for. Liberals are literally tripping over themselves selling our lands (sorry, "leasing" for 70-99 years), natural resources, houses, sea ports and farms to China. Voting Liberals won't do any good for our farmers and workers. Don't worry Indonesia won't come, but that's only because they're scared of China.

Labor in power would be exactly the same. Kevin Rudd's Chinese son-in-law is right now spearheading several massive Chinese investments (with links to the commie party) to buy up Australian lands and resources. I'm sure Shorten is already well compensated by the PRC as well and ready to sign over whatever his masters ask for.

A coalition of smaller to tiny parties like Nationals + Australian Conservatives + ALA + Fishers and Shooters (as funny as they may sound) might be the tiniest of hope we have before turning into a Chinese province. Or maybe President Trump will come to our rescue.

Post: #563

< Trust me - becoming a Chinese province is still better than what awaits most of Western countries - either becoming Brazil or an Afro-Islamic shithole with the adjoining countries in EE having to expect future war with the Islamo-enriched European countries.

Yes - China can easily wrestle control over Australia, but ultimately this Chinese control will also keep Australia somewhat sane. It won't be Anglo-dominated Euro-descended Australia, but at least it won't be a violent shithole. The Chinese treatment of African gangs won't be as lenient. There would be just a bill being sent to their parents.

Post: #564

Suffice to say a 99 year lease with Chinese at the helm is worse than selling it to them. They will pollute the fuck out of the land then offshore the profits and declare bankruptcy to avoid cleanup costs while bribing the parties in power to look the other way, guarafuckingteed.

Post: #565

(09-15-2018 04:30 AM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:  < Trust me - becoming a Chinese province is still better than what awaits most of Western countries - either becoming Brazil or an Afro-Islamic shithole with the adjoining countries in EE having to expect future war with the Islamo-enriched European countries.

Yes - China can easily wrestle control over Australia, but ultimately this Chinese control will also keep Australia somewhat sane. It won't be Anglo-dominated Euro-descended Australia, but at least it won't be a violent shithole. The Chinese treatment of African gangs won't be as lenient. There would be just a bill being sent to their parents.

I disagree for the most part. Look at all of China's Asian neighbours. Even the ones with Chinese descendants (e.g Taiwan) do not want to be run by China. And there are about 3000 years of history to explain why none of they wants to be part of China. You do not want to be renting from a Chinese landlord, you do not want to bust your arse on a farm owned by the PRC.

There is some truth to what you say though. My local area has a lot of Chinese internationals (students and professionals, but mostly students) and on the rare occasion African gangs venture here, they are cleaned up by the police and extra private security (from the universities protecting their clients) so much faster than other suburbs in my state.

I'd much rather have Australia back being America's little bro.

Post: #566

(09-15-2018 04:56 AM)StrikeBack Wrote:  

(09-15-2018 04:30 AM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:  < Trust me - becoming a Chinese province is still better than what awaits most of Western countries - either becoming Brazil or an Afro-Islamic shithole with the adjoining countries in EE having to expect future war with the Islamo-enriched European countries.

Yes - China can easily wrestle control over Australia, but ultimately this Chinese control will also keep Australia somewhat sane. It won't be Anglo-dominated Euro-descended Australia, but at least it won't be a violent shithole. The Chinese treatment of African gangs won't be as lenient. There would be just a bill being sent to their parents.

I disagree for the most part. Look at all of China's Asian neighbours. Even the ones with Chinese descendants (e.g Taiwan) do not want to be run by China. And there are about 3000 years of history to explain why none of they wants to be part of China. You do not want to be renting from a Chinese landlord, you do not want to bust your arse on a farm owned by the PRC.

There is some truth to what you say though. My local area has a lot of Chinese internationals (students and professionals, but mostly students) and on the rare occasion African gangs venture here, they are cleaned up by the police and extra private security (from the universities protecting their clients) so much faster than other suburbs in my state.

I'd much rather have Australia back being America's little bro.

I really hope the Anglo spirit can re-awaken and realize we have to unite in order to survive. We conquered the entire world let us stop being an embarrassment to our ancestors.

Post: #567

(09-15-2018 04:56 AM)StrikeBack Wrote:  

(09-15-2018 04:30 AM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:  < Trust me - becoming a Chinese province is still better than what awaits most of Western countries - either becoming Brazil or an Afro-Islamic shithole with the adjoining countries in EE having to expect future war with the Islamo-enriched European countries.

Yes - China can easily wrestle control over Australia, but ultimately this Chinese control will also keep Australia somewhat sane. It won't be Anglo-dominated Euro-descended Australia, but at least it won't be a violent shithole. The Chinese treatment of African gangs won't be as lenient. There would be just a bill being sent to their parents.

I disagree for the most part. Look at all of China's Asian neighbours. Even the ones with Chinese descendants (e.g Taiwan) do not want to be run by China. And there are about 3000 years of history to explain why none of they wants to be part of China. You do not want to be renting from a Chinese landlord, you do not want to bust your arse on a farm owned by the PRC.

There is some truth to what you say though. My local area has a lot of Chinese internationals (students and professionals, but mostly students) and on the rare occasion African gangs venture here, they are cleaned up by the police and extra private security (from the universities protecting their clients) so much faster than other suburbs in my state.

I'd much rather have Australia back being America's little bro.

Of course it would be better to stay more or less independent. All I am saying is that it would not be the worst option out there - besides - they are unlikely to march in with troops. It will probably be a gradual financial and demographic takeover that will create a new Sino-Australia hopefully more akin to Hong Kong than to an actual Chinese province. It's not ideal, but still better than the 200 mio. shitizens that are destined to enrich Europe.

Post: #568

That's assuming China doesn't collapse under the weight of its own cancerous issues.

I'm starting to look at the Chinese coming to Australia as rats fleeing a sinking ship, only if too many rats arrive before the ship sinks then it'll be rats running shit here the same way they did on the late SS China.

Trump ripping into China's economy will be painful for us in the short term but in the long term it could mean the difference between maintaining majority founding stock or being submerged into Asia as a whole. I would rather be poor and still be Australia than be slightly less poor and be South China.

Post: #569

I'm a big believer that the chinese settling here are NOT the ones we want. They're, for the most part, the ones who've made their money through corruption and are sending it somewhere safe, then moving there to keep their own skin intact.
Not the sort of people we really want as citizens.

There's good reason both the major parties are on the nose. Not helped that anytime there's a hint to push back against the SJW/left agenda by anyone there's pretty much an immediate scandal. Look at Peter Dutton speaking out against African crime, then not long later SCANDAL! It's transparent and bullshit.

Post: #570

7:30 with Leigh "Softball Question" Sales will air an interview with Barnaby Joyce's accuser tonight.

https://www.9news.com.au/national/2018/0...-interview

Some analysis:

Quote:A WA businesswoman who alleges Barnaby Joyce sexually harassed her says the ordeal took away “the control I had over my own identity”.

Say that to every man dragged through the coals after amorphous sexual harassment or assault allegations, guys who have their photos and private lives shown in every national newspaper and on the nightly bulletins of every TV station.

Quote:Earlier this year, Catherine Marriott filed a confidential sexual harassment complaint to the National Party against Mr Joyce, who was the party leader and deputy prime minister at the time.

Yeah, never care about the confidentiality of the man accused!

Quote:Within days, the complaint was leaked to the media and Mr Barnaby denied the allegations.

Again, no one complains when the allegations against the accused are leaked (or plain given to the press freely because the accused can always be named and the accusers can almost always remain anonymous).

Quote:An eight-month investigation was launched and concluded without having reached a determination.

This almost always means "there was no fucking evidence".

Post: #571

Andrew Bolt is at his usual best with the following analysis of Barnaby Joyce's accuser's story.

https://www.heraldsun.com.au/blogs/andre...89e6ade297 [clicks encouraged]

Quote:SMEARING BARNABY WITH TEARS

BARNABY Joyce is just the latest victim of a devastating new form of denunciation — particularly of men.

On Tuesday, the former Nationals leader was accused on the ABC of sexually harassing a woman in a way so “traumatic” that she later “burst into tears” and “couldn’t sleep for a week”. When this “terrified” woman later told her friends, they were “absolutely shocked”.

Wow. From that description of the effects, you’d assume the cause was a form of assault so brutal that I don’t dare describe it for legal reasons.

You’d probably also assume the victim rushed to the police to report a crime.

But I said this is a new form of denunciation — one that now dominates political debate and leaves men unable to defend themselves.

You see, this accusation, made by West Australian businesswoman Catherine Marriott, was aired publicly without a single detail of what allegedly occurred.

Neither Marriott nor the ABC would describe what kind of harassment they were talking about so you could know where it fitted on the vast scale from an innocuous wink to a rape. No detail was given that Joyce could then rebut or put in context.

The ABC audience was asked, instead, to judge by Marriott’s subjective feelings, not any objective facts: “(After the incident) I walked up to my hotel room and I burst into tears. I then couldn’t sleep that whole night. I didn’t actually sleep for a week.”

But how could anyone judge if Marriott was indeed the victim of something serious, or was wildly overreacting?

Joyce, himself, “absolutely denies” any misbehaviour and denounces the allegations as “spurious and defamatory”.

Post: #572

Oh.., so now Labor want to shoot themselves in the foot?
Carry on Billy Boy, carry on. Let Tyrant Tanya crack that whip...

Gender pay gap would be public under Labor

If Labor wins the next election it would legislate to force companies with more than 1000 staff to reveal how much they pay women compared to men.

Australian companies with more than 1000 employees would have to publicly reveal how much they pay women compared to men under a federal Labor government.
Labor says the gender pay gap is "stubbornly high" and women working full time still get paid almost 15 per cent less than men working full time.
"It is unacceptable this has barely changed over the last two decades," said a joint statement from Deputy Opposition Leader Tanya Plibersek and opposition employment spokesman Brendan O'Connor on Sunday.

https://www.news.com.au/national/breakin...d54cc9f48d

Post: #573

No reason for us not to have some fun :

Post: #574

I would really respect any politician who had the balls to call out the gender pay gap for what it is rather than pander to sheep

Post: #575

(10-14-2018 04:41 PM)Que enspastic Wrote:  I would really respect any politician who had the balls to call out the gender pay gap for what it is rather than pander to sheep

Fuck I hate that thing, is fun to do the feminism=equality play working into why should women be paid the same as men if they work less just for head explosions as they try and unwind the previous comments.

Like yes, men work more so they get paid more over their life times so there is a gap but it's illegal in most countries to pay a woman less to do the same job, the only time you can even do it is if she was shittier at negotiating which is a genuine skill and thus she is getting paid less because she is less skilled.