Post: #776

Yep. She's not going after him because of his superior game, but because she gets off on the level of control she has over someone that malleable. She's nothing but a self centered narcissist.

Post: #777

(02-08-2018 02:45 PM)ThrustMaster Wrote:  http://www.tuscaloosanews.com/news/20180...n-sex-case

Convicted teacher challenges constitutionality of law banning sex with students...

Both her and her husband were arrested for sex with students. Both worked at the same school. This is all kinds of fucked up.

Post: #778

(02-10-2018 01:36 AM)Suits Wrote:  

(02-08-2018 03:31 PM)Fisto Wrote:  It’s why I said there must be more to the story. Not providing a written statement doesn’t mean much. This is considered a crime against the state, so the state can theoretically proceed without the “victim”. But it’s every citizems’ constitutional right to face their accuser, so if he was unwilling to testify then the case goes nowhere. The only thing that could be done to him is charging him with contempt but that’s aost unheard of to charge a victim of sexual assault woth contempt.

Nope.

The sixth amendment of the United States guarantees the right to cross examine witnesses. Nothing more.

The accuser and the victim do not need to be the same person. For example, in a murder case, the accuser will be the witnesses brought to the stand by the state. If a 3 year old is the alleged victim of a crime, the 3 year old is also not going to be the accuser.

Same goes for a dangerous driving charge. The owner of the car smashed up by the driver charged with dangerous driving might not be the accuser. Unless he actually testifies, the accuser would be the police officer who witnessed the results of the crash and shares evidence from the stand.

I find it odd that so many Americans aren't particularly familiar with their own constitution.

Weird. When I google “Do I have the constitutional right to face my accuser?” It says “yes”.


I find it odd when internet geeks don’t know how to use the internet.

Post: #779

(03-03-2018 10:58 PM)rpg Wrote:  

(02-08-2018 02:45 PM)ThrustMaster Wrote:  http://www.tuscaloosanews.com/news/20180...n-sex-case

Convicted teacher challenges constitutionality of law banning sex with students...

Both her and her husband were arrested for sex with students. Both worked at the same school. This is all kinds of fucked up.

In a just world, both of them would be shot!

Furthermore, there is no constitutionality issue with respect of a law banning sex with students. Those laws exist to protect the students (who are minors)!

Post: #780

(03-04-2018 12:01 AM)Fisto Wrote:  

(02-10-2018 01:36 AM)Suits Wrote:  

(02-08-2018 03:31 PM)Fisto Wrote:  It’s why I said there must be more to the story. Not providing a written statement doesn’t mean much. This is considered a crime against the state, so the state can theoretically proceed without the “victim”. But it’s every citizems’ constitutional right to face their accuser, so if he was unwilling to testify then the case goes nowhere. The only thing that could be done to him is charging him with contempt but that’s aost unheard of to charge a victim of sexual assault woth contempt.

Nope.

The sixth amendment of the United States guarantees the right to cross examine witnesses. Nothing more.

The accuser and the victim do not need to be the same person. For example, in a murder case, the accuser will be the witnesses brought to the stand by the state. If a 3 year old is the alleged victim of a crime, the 3 year old is also not going to be the accuser.

Same goes for a dangerous driving charge. The owner of the car smashed up by the driver charged with dangerous driving might not be the accuser. Unless he actually testifies, the accuser would be the police officer who witnessed the results of the crash and shares evidence from the stand.

I find it odd that so many Americans aren't particularly familiar with their own constitution.

Weird. When I google “Do I have the constitutional right to face my accuser?” It says “yes”.


I find it odd when internet geeks don’t know how to use the internet.

I guess that would be the first time the Internet gave someone bad information.

Victim =/= accuser

Post: #781

(03-04-2018 11:20 AM)PharaohRa Wrote:  

(03-03-2018 10:58 PM)rpg Wrote:  

(02-08-2018 02:45 PM)ThrustMaster Wrote:  http://www.tuscaloosanews.com/news/20180...n-sex-case

Convicted teacher challenges constitutionality of law banning sex with students...

Both her and her husband were arrested for sex with students. Both worked at the same school. This is all kinds of fucked up.

In a just world, both of them would be shot!

Furthermore, there is no constitutionality issue with respect of a law banning sex with students. Those laws exist to protect the students (who are minors)!

Legally she has a case...It was NOT a statutory violation as age of consent is 16 in AL but rather law specific to teacher / student.

Quote:“Alabama law does not make it a crime for members of other occupations to have consensual sex with 16-, 17- and 18-year-olds, even when there is a position of trust or authority,” said Parker’s appellate attorney, Virginia Buck of Northport.

In the brief filed Tuesday, Buck noted a hypothetical scenario, saying a 21-year-old janitor working for a Tuscaloosa school system might go to Gulf Shores for spring break and have sex with an 18-year-old senior from Daphne High School. Under the law, she said, he would be guilty of a Class B felony.

“But a 65-year-old doctor, minister, therapist, or attorney is not subject to criminal liability in Alabama for having consensual sex with a 16-year-old over whom he has authority or with whom he holds a position of trust,” she said. She noted that the statute didn’t apply to private school employees until 2016.


Parker Appeal brief
“School employees have been unfairly singled out and are being sent to prison for something that, at most, might cost people their job or their license in any other profession,” she said. “Certainly, anyone who has sexual contact with someone without their consent, or who is under the age of consent, should be criminally punished. But to send someone to prison for a consensual sexual relationship with someone over the age of consent solely because they are a school employee treats school employees differently than everyone else.”

I wonder if "families that fuck students together stay together" is a saying in Alabama or something

Quote:Parker and her husband, both Pickens Academy teachers at the time, were arrested in March 2016. Charli Parker was accused of having sexual contact with a 16-year-old male student 13 times between October 2014 and a few days before her arrest. She was charged with engaging in sex with another 16-year-old student at his home the following June, for encounters that allegedly occurred before the incidents involving the other victim.


Her husband, James “Jamie” Franklin Parker III, 33, was accused of having sexual contact with a former female student six times between December 2014 and May 2015. He pleaded guilty, and has a sentencing date set for June.

Post: #782

(03-04-2018 06:59 PM)Suits Wrote:  

(03-04-2018 12:01 AM)Fisto Wrote:  

(02-10-2018 01:36 AM)Suits Wrote:  

(02-08-2018 03:31 PM)Fisto Wrote:  It’s why I said there must be more to the story. Not providing a written statement doesn’t mean much. This is considered a crime against the state, so the state can theoretically proceed without the “victim”. But it’s every citizems’ constitutional right to face their accuser, so if he was unwilling to testify then the case goes nowhere. The only thing that could be done to him is charging him with contempt but that’s aost unheard of to charge a victim of sexual assault woth contempt.

Nope.

The sixth amendment of the United States guarantees the right to cross examine witnesses. Nothing more.

The accuser and the victim do not need to be the same person. For example, in a murder case, the accuser will be the witnesses brought to the stand by the state. If a 3 year old is the alleged victim of a crime, the 3 year old is also not going to be the accuser.

Same goes for a dangerous driving charge. The owner of the car smashed up by the driver charged with dangerous driving might not be the accuser. Unless he actually testifies, the accuser would be the police officer who witnessed the results of the crash and shares evidence from the stand.

I find it odd that so many Americans aren't particularly familiar with their own constitution.

Weird. When I google “Do I have the constitutional right to face my accuser?” It says “yes”.


I find it odd when internet geeks don’t know how to use the internet.

I guess that would be the first time the Internet gave someone bad information.

Victim =/= accuser

You really don’t know what you are talking about suits.

Post: #783

(03-04-2018 07:05 PM)PapayaTapper Wrote:  

Quote:Parker and her husband, both Pickens Academy teachers at the time, were arrested in March 2016. Charli Parker was accused of having sexual contact with a 16-year-old male student 13 times between October 2014 and a few days before her arrest. She was charged with engaging in sex with another 16-year-old student at his home the following June, for encounters that allegedly occurred before the incidents involving the other victim.


Her husband, James “Jamie” Franklin Parker III, 33, was accused of having sexual contact with a former female student six times between December 2014 and May 2015. He pleaded guilty, and has a sentencing date set for June.

It's illegal for teachers to have sex with former students now?
Sure it's morally grey but I don't think it should be illegal.

Post: #784

http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2018/03/10...5-year-old

"A former middle school cafeteria worker in Minnesota has pleaded guilty to sending sexually explicit text messages and nude pictures to a 15-year-old student.

Krista Ann Muccio, 44, of Inver Grove Heights, pleaded guilty Thursday to a felony count of sending sexually explicit content to a minor after arguing for years that the messages she sent to the student were constitutionally protected free speech under the First Amendment, KARE reported.

The Star Tribune reported that Muccio entered the guilty plea under the condition that the court would drop a charge of possessing pornographic work involving minors.

In November 2014, Muccio—a lunch lady at Inver Grove Heights Middle School—used Instagram’s direct messaging feature to send explicit photos to a 15-year-old student and asked that he send “something in return,” according to the Twin Cities Pioneer Press.

Court documents say the male student responded to the message with explicit photos of his own. A criminal complaint states that the student knew Muccio since he was in eighth grade.

After the boy’s father found the explicit photos saved to an iPad, local authorities began investigating the middle school cafeteria worker.

Muccio reportedly admitted to exchanging explicit content with the boy via Instagram since June 2014.

Muccio’s attorneys tried to argue that Minnesota’s “sexting” law was unconstitutional in Dakota County District Court because they claimed the pictures and texts could be considered First Amendment-protected free speech.

The Minnesota Supreme Court, however, ruled in June 2016 the state law does not violate the Constitution, reversing a state appeals court decision on the matter.

“This statute was enacted for the important purpose of prohibiting sexually explicit speech directed at a child that is intended to cause sexual arousal,” Dakota County Attorney Jim Backstrom said in a statement. “We are pleased to bring Krista Muccio to justice for violating this law.”

Muccio is due back in court for sentencing on April 6."



4/10 WNB

Post: #785

(03-04-2018 11:17 PM)Fisto Wrote:  

(03-04-2018 06:59 PM)Suits Wrote:  

(03-04-2018 12:01 AM)Fisto Wrote:  

(02-10-2018 01:36 AM)Suits Wrote:  

(02-08-2018 03:31 PM)Fisto Wrote:  It’s why I said there must be more to the story. Not providing a written statement doesn’t mean much. This is considered a crime against the state, so the state can theoretically proceed without the “victim”. But it’s every citizems’ constitutional right to face their accuser, so if he was unwilling to testify then the case goes nowhere. The only thing that could be done to him is charging him with contempt but that’s aost unheard of to charge a victim of sexual assault woth contempt.

Nope.

The sixth amendment of the United States guarantees the right to cross examine witnesses. Nothing more.

The accuser and the victim do not need to be the same person. For example, in a murder case, the accuser will be the witnesses brought to the stand by the state. If a 3 year old is the alleged victim of a crime, the 3 year old is also not going to be the accuser.

Same goes for a dangerous driving charge. The owner of the car smashed up by the driver charged with dangerous driving might not be the accuser. Unless he actually testifies, the accuser would be the police officer who witnessed the results of the crash and shares evidence from the stand.

I find it odd that so many Americans aren't particularly familiar with their own constitution.

Weird. When I google “Do I have the constitutional right to face my accuser?” It says “yes”.


I find it odd when internet geeks don’t know how to use the internet.

I guess that would be the first time the Internet gave someone bad information.

Victim =/= accuser

You really don’t know what you are talking about suits.

Fisto, you're showing your true colours here. Even though you're clearly wrong, we've spent most of your life being a tough guy that people avoid disagreeing with in public. You've become convinced that you can be correct just because you say you are. This attitude is feminine at its core and has no place in a discussion between men.

Your last post on the subject, which is quoted above, is of zero value. Absolutely no value. You've done nothing more than say "you're wrong because I saw so." You can't produce any support for your claims, but being wrong would produce more butthurt for you than your ego could handle, so you're choosing to remain stubborn and uneducated.

Here's how you have a reasonable discussion:

Step 1: Introduce supporting information

This is what the sixth amendment actually says.

Quote:In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

Step 2: Explain your argument

This is the constitutional passage guaranteeing the right to face ones accuser. As you can clearly be seen, the phrase "the right to face your accuser" isn't even in the text. All you have is "the right to be confronted with the witnesses against him." This protects the accused from hearsay evidence. It doesn't mean that the injured party has to appear in court. In that case, all murderers would go free.

Hope that's not too complicated for you to understand.

Step 3: Drop a relevant meme

Post: #786

(03-11-2018 07:12 PM)Thot Leader Wrote:  

This bitch looks mannish.

WNASETMANP (Would Not Accept Sexually Explicit Text Messages and Nude Pictures)

Post: #787

Gentlemen, we have a winner.



https://bustedcoverage.com/2018/03/23/br...t-details/

Post: #788

Quote:At her initial appearance in court, Zamora told Commissioner Melissa Zabor that she would "love to go home, to be released. … I’d love to go home to my husband."

Quote:The parents also told police on Wednesday that Zamora's husband, whose name was redacted in the court record, "harassed" the teen's father over the phone, calling him and pleading with him not to contact police. Court records say the husband told the teen's father that his wife had "made a big mistake, but that she loved the kids." He suggested they "meet up" and "settle this." The boy's father declined and hung up the phone.

These hoes ALWAYS have a husband.

The husband is ALWAYS a cuck and defends the wife.

Post: #789

(03-23-2018 04:22 PM)kaotic Wrote:  These hoes ALWAYS have a husband.

The husband is ALWAYS a cuck and defends the wife.

From this website:

Quote:

how we met

Brittany and I met when we were 16 years old. We were walking into our first job interview and arrived at the building at the same time. We locked eyes shortly after. Both distracted and mesmerized, we secretly kept staring at each other from across the room. Because of our instant connection, neither of us can remember what we said in the interview.

The good news is that we were both hired. We ended up in the same orientation and, as fate would have it, assigned seating had us sitting right next to each other. We started talking right away and began getting to know each other, sharing way too many laughs in the process!

In talking and sharing stories, we found so many wonderful qualities in one another and we immediately became best friends. We also found out that we were going to the same high school and, from there on, became inseparable. We took the same classes, passed notes and met each other for lunch.

It didn’t take long for a beautiful relationship to blossom. Filled with some of the best memories life has to offer, four years of high school and five years of working together flew by. I guess it’s true that time does fly when you’re having fun!

Several more years passed and Brittany graduated from college and became a teacher, while I went on to work at the nation’s largest nuclear plant, Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station. With steady careers and more than five years of dating, it was definitely time to pop the big question!



how he asked

I reached out to everyone in Brittany’s immediate family to ask for her hand in marriage, which was happily given by all parties. After receiving permission, I tried to figure out what kind of ring Brittany would be interested in. While in a jewelry store, I said, “Who knows, I may want to ask for your hand sometime in the future.” She literally jumped for joy and we began the hunt. We went from store to store, all over Arizona, trying to find the perfect ring. For a great while, luck was not on our side. Every store we visited had pushy salespeople who were trying to rush us into a purchase. Feeling diminished and like we had hit a dead end, we heard a Shane Co. commercial on the radio and decided to check it out.

The customer service at Shane Co. was unlike any other place I had ever been. The staff was soft-hearted and friendly, caring and understanding. They took their time getting to know us and our styles, and they made us feel as if we were family. After exploring all of the options with Brittany, I came back by myself so that the ring would be a surprise on the special day. Beautiful and elegant, with a sparkle beyond comprehension, the ring I selected was more than perfect.

Knowing how special the proposal would be, I wanted to do something spectacular; something so exceptional that it would instantly take her breath away and be talked about for ages. From the moment we first saw each other, we had been “falling” for one another. So, it was only appropriate to ask Brittany while “falling”; a.k.a. skydiving. Also, knowing that she wanted a fall wedding, it seemed even more fitting that I propose to her during a 15,000-foot fall. I started thinking about places we could perform the dive, but that was no simple task. Being Arizona residents, I didn’t want a dusty dive where we could fall into mesquite trees or a cactus. I looked into every possible option and zeroed in on Red Rocks Skydiving. They advertised a dive which involved flying over the Red Rocks of Sedona, known by many tourists, websites, and magazines as one of the most beautiful places in America. I gave them a call and spoke with the owner. She was more than happy to set the stage for my proposal and, after discussing dates, I decided on Brittany’s birthday (which happened to be a pretty cool date: 1/5/15). After securing the location and the ring, I ordered a huge “Will You Marry Me?” sign that could easily be seen from high in the sky.

Brittany’s birthday arrived and it was time for her first surprise. I showed her the skydiving tickets and she was super excited! I called Red Rocks Skydiving, whom I had been in constant contact with, and made sure we were still good to go. After getting the green light, we got in the car and headed to the dive site. Upon arrival, there was light snow contrasted by the beautiful red rock mountains and fresh greenery. We got suited up and I made sure I had the ring, banner and a Bluetooth speaker. It was my first time in a plane, and I was going to jump out of it! Love will make you do some crazy things! Up, up, and away: we were soon in the sky and, sure enough, the view was gorgeous and much more than I had bargained for. Brittany was ecstatic, just as I hoped she would be.

I dove out of the plane first so that I could hit the ground and have time to set up for the proposal. Upon landing, I laid out the sign, grabbed the Bluetooth speaker, started playing “Marry Me” by Jason Derulo, and got the ring ready. A few minutes later, Brittany landed with tears of joy in her eyes. In that moment, I dropped to one knee, popped open the ring box, and she saw it for the first time. Her eyes lit up like the North Star, emulating the ring and its brilliant sparkle.







She said “yes” and I placed the stunning stone on her finger; we were engaged! It was the best moment of our lives.

Post: #790

(03-23-2018 06:14 PM)AneroidOcean Wrote:  

(03-23-2018 04:22 PM)kaotic Wrote:  These hoes ALWAYS have a husband.

The husband is ALWAYS a cuck and defends the wife.

From this website:

Quote:

how we met

Brittany and I met when we were 16 years old. We were walking into our first job interview and arrived at the building at the same time. We locked eyes shortly after. Both distracted and mesmerized, we secretly kept staring at each other from across the room. Because of our instant connection, neither of us can remember what we said in the interview.

The good news is that we were both hired. We ended up in the same orientation and, as fate would have it, assigned seating had us sitting right next to each other. We started talking right away and began getting to know each other, sharing way too many laughs in the process!

In talking and sharing stories, we found so many wonderful qualities in one another and we immediately became best friends. We also found out that we were going to the same high school and, from there on, became inseparable. We took the same classes, passed notes and met each other for lunch.

It didn’t take long for a beautiful relationship to blossom. Filled with some of the best memories life has to offer, four years of high school and five years of working together flew by. I guess it’s true that time does fly when you’re having fun!

Several more years passed and Brittany graduated from college and became a teacher, while I went on to work at the nation’s largest nuclear plant, Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station. With steady careers and more than five years of dating, it was definitely time to pop the big question!



how he asked

I reached out to everyone in Brittany’s immediate family to ask for her hand in marriage, which was happily given by all parties. After receiving permission, I tried to figure out what kind of ring Brittany would be interested in. While in a jewelry store, I said, “Who knows, I may want to ask for your hand sometime in the future.” She literally jumped for joy and we began the hunt. We went from store to store, all over Arizona, trying to find the perfect ring. For a great while, luck was not on our side. Every store we visited had pushy salespeople who were trying to rush us into a purchase. Feeling diminished and like we had hit a dead end, we heard a Shane Co. commercial on the radio and decided to check it out.

The customer service at Shane Co. was unlike any other place I had ever been. The staff was soft-hearted and friendly, caring and understanding. They took their time getting to know us and our styles, and they made us feel as if we were family. After exploring all of the options with Brittany, I came back by myself so that the ring would be a surprise on the special day. Beautiful and elegant, with a sparkle beyond comprehension, the ring I selected was more than perfect.

Knowing how special the proposal would be, I wanted to do something spectacular; something so exceptional that it would instantly take her breath away and be talked about for ages. From the moment we first saw each other, we had been “falling” for one another. So, it was only appropriate to ask Brittany while “falling”; a.k.a. skydiving. Also, knowing that she wanted a fall wedding, it seemed even more fitting that I propose to her during a 15,000-foot fall. I started thinking about places we could perform the dive, but that was no simple task. Being Arizona residents, I didn’t want a dusty dive where we could fall into mesquite trees or a cactus. I looked into every possible option and zeroed in on Red Rocks Skydiving. They advertised a dive which involved flying over the Red Rocks of Sedona, known by many tourists, websites, and magazines as one of the most beautiful places in America. I gave them a call and spoke with the owner. She was more than happy to set the stage for my proposal and, after discussing dates, I decided on Brittany’s birthday (which happened to be a pretty cool date: 1/5/15). After securing the location and the ring, I ordered a huge “Will You Marry Me?” sign that could easily be seen from high in the sky.

Brittany’s birthday arrived and it was time for her first surprise. I showed her the skydiving tickets and she was super excited! I called Red Rocks Skydiving, whom I had been in constant contact with, and made sure we were still good to go. After getting the green light, we got in the car and headed to the dive site. Upon arrival, there was light snow contrasted by the beautiful red rock mountains and fresh greenery. We got suited up and I made sure I had the ring, banner and a Bluetooth speaker. It was my first time in a plane, and I was going to jump out of it! Love will make you do some crazy things! Up, up, and away: we were soon in the sky and, sure enough, the view was gorgeous and much more than I had bargained for. Brittany was ecstatic, just as I hoped she would be.

I dove out of the plane first so that I could hit the ground and have time to set up for the proposal. Upon landing, I laid out the sign, grabbed the Bluetooth speaker, started playing “Marry Me” by Jason Derulo, and got the ring ready. A few minutes later, Brittany landed with tears of joy in her eyes. In that moment, I dropped to one knee, popped open the ring box, and she saw it for the first time. Her eyes lit up like the North Star, emulating the ring and its brilliant sparkle.







She said “yes” and I placed the stunning stone on her finger; we were engaged! It was the best moment of our lives.

Damn that's a sweet story with a sad ending. This poor bastard is probably crushed.

Post: #791

^ Probably feels like he is starting over from zero.

Puts my everyday problems in perspective.

Post: #792

She changed her Instagram page to hidden but it used to say.

Quote:brittanyzamora_

Brittany Zamora
Proud Wifey Dog momma x2 6th grade teacher ‍. Teacher of the Year

Family. Faith. Love. Blessed.

Post: #793

"Dog momma x2" touts family. Wonder if her man was/went sterile or maybe impotent.

Nothing more dangerous to monogamy than a woman watching the shot-clock run down while her man can't get her pregnant.

Post: #794

(03-23-2018 04:16 PM)bbgun Wrote:  Gentlemen, we have a winner.



https://bustedcoverage.com/2018/03/23/br...t-details/

Saw her on my local Arizona Fox News report the other night.
Her walk of shame into the booking jail was quite enticing in itself.
A+ for the student who got her.

Post: #795

The husband's writing is feminine, like it's too detailed, too wordy, too emotive and quirky. It's reflective of his soy boy smile in the skydiving picture.

Post: #796

(03-23-2018 11:34 PM)estraudi Wrote:  

(03-23-2018 04:16 PM)bbgun Wrote:  Gentlemen, we have a winner.



https://bustedcoverage.com/2018/03/23/br...t-details/

Saw her on my local Arizona Fox News report the other night.
Her walk of shame into the booking jail was quite enticing in itself.
A+ for the student who got her.

She is breathing deeply while that photo was being taken. Unreal.

Keep your eyes out for that look on women, fellas. If a woman's neck, chin and cheeks look like that, you are advised to bring her to the nearest private location.

Post: #797

(03-23-2018 04:16 PM)bbgun Wrote:  Gentlemen, we have a winner.



https://bustedcoverage.com/2018/03/23/br...t-details/

That is one really hot teacher.

WB

Post: #798

(03-23-2018 06:14 PM)AneroidOcean Wrote:  [quote='kaotic' pid='1756043' dateline='1521840122']
These hoes ALWAYS have a husband.

The husband is ALWAYS a cuck and defends the wife.

From this website:

Quote:

Several more years passed and Brittany graduated from college and became a teacher, while I went on to work at the nation’s largest nuclear plant, Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station.



After securing the location and the ring, I ordered a huge “Will You Marry Me?” sign that could easily be seen from high in the sky...

Always a relief to see such easily pliable cucks running the nation's critical infrastructure.

Post: #799

If the back story is true this teacher was crawling the walls for some random cock. She mistakenly thought banging a 13 year old would be safe. Hamster on blast. This kid must have been a huge player if his PARENTS were monitoring his texts! Nuclear power plant husband should have knocked her up asap. The struggle of childbirth would have slowed her down some and given her those embarassing stretch marks.

Post: #800

This guy is a victim of society. He did everything "right". Jumped through hoops to impress and please her like he was told he was supposed to do.

What a brutal reality check he's in for.

Eventually he'll figure it out.