(10-30-2016 11:27 AM)Slim Shady Wrote:  I completely understand that even cabinet members should have the ability to plead the fifth so as to not incriminate themselves. That is the right of the individual. That is not however, or atleast should not be a right of the OFFICE. I mean this from a philosophical perspective rather than a legal perspective.

So how to reconcile that? She should be able to plead the fifth, but any time a cabinet member or elected official pleads the fifth on any matter pertinent to their office, they must be immediately removed from that office.

There has to be no debate about this. I'd have hoped that the President would follow this out of common sense and pride, but since they lately haven't seemed to have either, let's hope President Trump can promote passing such a law.

That is exactly what I was thinking. We can't have elected officials who are supposed to be serving us please the fifth when they don't want to reveal certain aspects of their job as PUBLIC SERVANTS. Invoking the 5th should definitely be ground for immediate dismissal.

Rumor the files were in a folder called "life insurance"

A lot of people must be fearing for their lives right now.

(10-30-2016 12:15 PM)philosophical_recovery Wrote:  

Rumor the files were in a folder called "life insurance"

AHAHAHAHAHAHA BASED CARLOS DANGER!

Hillary reappears in a Miami bar this morning. Needs a few cocktails to settle the nerves

Wikipedia regarding the Electronic Communications Privacy Act:

Especially noteworthy, in bold, under the Criticism section:

Under ECPA, it is relatively easy for a government agency to demand service providers hand over personal consumer data stored on the service provider's servers.[citation needed] Email that is stored on a third party's server for more than 180 days is considered by the law to be abandoned. All that is required to obtain the content of the emails by a law enforcement agency is a written statement certifying that the information is relevant to an investigation, without judicial review.[citation needed][original research?] When the law was initially passed, emails were stored on a third party's server for only a short period of time, just long enough to facilitate transfer of email to the consumer's email client, which was generally located on their personal or work computer. Now, with online email services prevalent such as Gmail and Hotmail, users are more likely to store emails online indefinitely, rather than to only keep them for less than 180 days. If the same emails were stored on the user's personal computer, it would require the police to obtain a warrant first for seizure of their contents, regardless of their age. When they are stored on an internet server however, no warrant is needed, starting 180 days after receipt of the message, under the law. In 2013 members of the U.S. Congress proposed to reform this procedure.[8]

(10-30-2016 12:47 PM)komatiite Wrote:  



Hillary reappears in a Miami bar this morning. Needs a few cocktails to settle the nerves

This Morning

Haha these Troll campaigns are the best. #StopThePot

I've had a question on my mind recently: What has this election changed, no matter who wins the presidency?

People's eyes have been opened.

1. We now know that Establishment politicians, both Democrats and Republicans, are rigging the primaries as best they can.

2. Neither political party reflects the concerns of large parts of their base. The Democratic leadership did not anticipate how strongly Bernie's candidacy would resonate. The same is true for the RNC regarding Trump.

3. Corruption and influence peddling on both sides of American politics is greater than we ever appreciated before. Even most of Hillary's supporters understand now who she is, even as they pull the lever for her.

4. The media is in bed with the political Establishment. This can no longer be denied in good faith.

5. Social Media has allowed a new kind of political activist (Cernovich, Paul Joseph Watson, Milo, Scott Adams) to get their message out and have a modicum of influence. Citizen journalism will be far more important in the future than in the past.

None of this will fit back in the genie's bottle. The political landscape has been permanently changed. Trump says that if he doesn't win, no good will have come of his candidacy. That may be a smart thing to say during the campaign but it is far from true.

After thinking on this I believe Weiner threw the match on the bonfire intentionally. He was in a 3 way relationship with Huma and Hillary stole her away promising riches. Weiner went down but pulled the pin on everything. So many people are going to jail it will be fucking epic. When it is all laid bare Hillary will have made fools of everybody.

Check this out: a detailed statistical analysis of how Crooked Hillary used electoral fraud to beat Sanders for the nomination.

In fact, the odds of Hillary beating Sanders on her own? 1 in 77 billion.

http://alexanderhiggins.com/stanford-ber...ion-fraud/

Quote:After applying various statistical models to subsets of 2016 primary voting data several academic researchers conclude Hillary Clinton’s win was only possible through widespread vote fraud.

The intro:

Quote: Widespread allegations of election fraud and voter suppression across the United States during the 2016 Democratic Primary has sparked the interest of several academic researchers and what they discovered in their research is disturbing.

The researchers each performed independent studies in which a few different statistical was applied to analyze various subsets of vote data and of the studies came to the same conclusion.

Namely that Hillary’s win was could have only been possible a result of widespread election fraud.

In fact, one of the statistical models applied by Stanford University researcher Rodolfo Cortes Barragan to a subset of the data found that the probability of the “huge discrepancies” of which “nearly all are in favor of Hillary Clinton by a huge margin” was “statistically impossible” and that “the probability of this this happening was is 1 in 77 billion”.

Furthermore, the researchers found that the election fraud only occurred in places where the voting machines were hackable and that did not keep an paper trail of the ballots.

In these locations Hillary won by massive margins.

On the other hand, in locations that were not hackable and did keep paper trails of the ballots Bernie Sanders beat Hillary Clinton.

Analysis also showed repeatedly irregularities and statistically impossible reverses in reported live votes in several locations across the country.

In commenting on the research, Barragan stated that some of the models are rock solid and 59 years old and the results seen here have never been witnessed in non-fraudelent election during that time period.

To summarize, at least four different independent studies were conducted with various statistical models applied.

The researchers applied the different statistical models to:

Actual vote counts as they were reported
Discrepancies in polling data verse actual counts.
Various subsets of demographic polling data verse actual vote counts
The results of each study corroborated the with the results of the others and some of the researchers have review the work of the others’ and go onto to confirm the findings in those studies.

It will take months for the studies to undergo peer review.

However, all of their research statistically proved there there must of been widespread fraud to create the discrepancies in the vote counts that exist in all 3 subsets of the data analyzed.

The research of Barragan, done collaboratively with Axel Geijsel of Tilburg University in The Netherlands.

That research corroborates independent mathematical research conducted by Richard Charnin.

Further independent research was conducted by Beth Clarkson of Berkeley who also not only corroborated the two previous studies but reviewed them and after her research was done and confirmed their results.

A PDF Summary of the Barragan/Geijsel study “Are we witnessing a dishonest election? A between state comparison based on the used voting procedures of the 2016 Democratic Party Primary for the Presidency of the United States of America” can be found here.

That's just the intro. The link above goes into much more detail using graphs and statistical analysis.

Spread this far and wide. Don't let Hillary and her foul crew steal another election.

I cant believe this is real life sometimes.

FBI's Weiner probe...

(10-30-2016 02:55 PM)Adonis Wrote:  

I can't decide whether Malik Obama or James Woods should be Trump's Secretary of Shitlording. Can we make it a co-position?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...ected.html

Via Drudge...

Quote:The renewed FBI investigation into Hillary Clinton's handling of classified material could take weeks because agents have found 650,000 emails on Anthony Weiner's laptop.

Weiner, the disgraced husband of Hillary's right-hand woman Huma Abedin, had his laptop seized in September after DailyMail.com exposed his sexting of a 15-year-old girl.

On Sunday, it was revealed that thousands of the messages in the archive that stretches back years could be from Clinton's controversial private server, the Wall Street Journal reported.

The sheer volume of the data means it will take agents until well past the election to assess if any contain classified information, leaving Clinton with the prospect of facing an ongoing investigation even if she is elected president.

The Democratic candidate already shows signs of slipping in the polls after a ABC News/Washington Post tracker poll revealed Trump was just one point behind. That's an 11 point change since last week.

Complicating matters, the FBI still has not obtained the proper warrant to search for emails for classified information, despite realizing they existed early October.

The scandal caused by FBI director James Comey's shock announcement on Friday ago has continued to grow as questions mount over right-hand woman Abedin's future on the Clinton campaign.

Abedin has reportedly pleaded ignorance about how the emails ended up on her husband Weiner's laptop.

Even worse for her situation, Abedin swore under oath while testifying in a lawsuit brought against the State Department by Judicial Watch that she had handed over all of her devices that could hold emails relevant to the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server. If she’s found to have lied she could face up to five years in jail.

The kicker...

Quote:Also on Sunday, New York Times bestseller Ed Klein wrote in an article for DailyMail.com that Comey's decision to revive the investigation of Clinton's email server came after he could no longer resist mounting pressure by mutinous agents in the FBI, including some of his top deputies, according to a source close to the embattled FBI director.

'The atmosphere at the FBI has been toxic ever since Jim announced last July that he wouldn't recommend an indictment against Hillary,' said the source, a close friend who has known Comey for nearly two decades, shares family outings with him, and accompanies him to Catholic mass every week.

'Some people, including department heads, stopped talking to Jim, and even ignored his greetings when they passed him in the hall,' said the source. 'They felt that he betrayed them and brought disgrace on the bureau by letting Hillary off with a slap on the wrist.'

According to the source, Comey fretted over the problem for months and discussed it at great length with his wife, Patrice.

He told his wife that he was depressed by the stack of resignation letters piling up on his desk from disaffected agents. The letters reminded him every day that morale in the FBI had hit rock bottom.

He jumped at this to quell a rebellion at the FBI. Some people at least value a reasonable government. Weeks?

650 thousand emails and Huma pleads ignorance. To my understanding Weiner is singing like a canary and the FBI doesnt need a warrant to look at the emails he has because they are "abandoned".

They say Game saves lives.

In the case of Hillary and whoever else is involved, Game saves elections

"A truckload of manure was dumped in front of Warren County Democratic Party headquarters in Lebanon, Ohio Saturday." (via Chicago Tribune)

Think about it. If Trump wins on the 8th (and I think he will win big now), the republic will have been saved by a freakin' pedophile! Unreal.

> see 'Harry Reid' trending on twitter, think "this must be good"
> see Harry Reid is launching one-man campaign against James Comey and will keep driving this story in the news cycle
> mfw this can probably help Heck in his race for Reid's open senate seat

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/harry-rei...d=43179321

(10-30-2016 06:23 PM)Last Parade Wrote:  > see 'Harry Reid' trending on twitter, think "this must be good"
> see Harry Reid is launching one-man campaign against James Comey and will keep driving this story in the news cycle
> mfw this can probably help Heck in his race for Reid's open senate seat

Every time i check the news ticker there is something new.
Violating the Hatch Act? Desparation.

Back to blaming the Russians again? Hey guys you need some new material that is so played out.

Edit: Just did a search for "Hatch Act" and the media is now running with it. Look for this to be the media talking points for Monday.