It is funny when the Dalai Lamma is less hip than Western hipsters think he is.

^No doubt. Muslims tore the hell out of India.

I dated a punjabi girl, extremely dark, for a very brief time before I found out that not only did she have a tumblr, but she was a loonie feminist. That aside, great lay.

But one of the things that she taught me (other than reminding my hard-headedness about not banging feminists) was how much the muslims wrecked life for Sikhs. Then I did some reading on them: total badasses.

They were used as bodyguards, until they took out the only female prime minister of India because they sent a tank crashing through their temple. Tangential, but interesting:

Quote:Operation Blue Star was an Indian military operation which occurred between 3 June and 8 June 1984, ordered by Prime Minister Indira Gandhi[11] in order to establish control[12] over the Harmandir Sahib Complex in Amritsar, Punjab, and remove Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale and his armed followers from the complex buildings. Bhindranwale had earlier taken residence in Harmandir Sahib and made it his headquarters in April 1983.

The operation had two components—Operation Metal, confined to the Harmandir Sahib complex, and Operation Shop, which raided the Punjabi countryside to capture any suspects.[13] Following it, Operation Woodrose was launched in the Punjab countryside where Sikhs, specifically those carrying a kirpan and protesting,[14] were now targeted.[15][16] The operation was carried out by Indian Army troops with tanks, artillery, helicopters, armored vehicles and tear gas.[17][18][19] Casualty figures of Operation Blue Star given by Kuldip Singh Brar put the number of deaths among the Indian army at 83 and injuries at 220.[20] According to the official estimate presented by the Indian government, 492 civilians were killed,[9][10] though numbers put forward by independent human rights organizations are significantly higher.[21]

In addition, the CBI is considered responsible for seizing historical artifacts and manuscripts in the Sikh Reference Library, before burning it down.[22] The military action led to an uproar amongst Sikhs worldwide and the increased tension following the action led to assaults on members of the Sikh community within India. Many Sikh soldiers in the Indian army mutinied, many Sikhs resigned from armed and civil administrative office and several returned awards and honours they had received from the Indian government.[23]

Four months after the operation, on 31 October 1984, Indira Gandhi was assassinated by Satwant Singh and Beant Singh who were her two Sikh bodyguards, in what is viewed as an act of vengeance. Subsequently, more than 3,000 Sikhs were killed in the ensuing anti-Sikh riots in 1984.[24] Within the Sikh community itself, Operation Blue Star has taken on considerable historical significance and is often compared to what Sikhs call "the great massacre", following the invasion by the Emir of Afghanistan, Ahmad Shah Durrani, the Sikh holocaust of 1762

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Blue_Star

(06-02-2016 12:38 AM)N°6 Wrote:  It is funny when the Dalai Lamma is less hip than Western hipsters think he is.

The Dalai Lama's stance doesn't actually surprise. He's a theocratic ethnonationalist. He believes in a free Tibet for Tibetans and preservation of Tibetan religious traditions above all else.

If he threw his lot in with the globalist agenda he'd be indirectly selling out his own agenda too. He's not a leftist in the western sense at all to begin with and never was.

Only problem is by taking this stance he's throwing dirt on his own rep in Hollywood and amongst the limousine liberals who bankroll his movement. His CIA handlers are probably having fits too.

(06-02-2016 12:18 AM)WalterBlack Wrote:  ...
These statues were built in a Buddhist area of Afghanistan before Islam existed - how many Buddhists are there in Afghanistan nowadays?

This is an example of why Buddhism, despite being quite a pleasant religion, will always be doomed against other forces like islam.

For muslims to beat buddhists they only have to adhere to islam.
For buddhists to beat muslims they have to put most of their religion on hold for long enough to learn how to fight, and even if they win they're compelled to feel bad about it and forge their swords back to ploughshares.

Sadly, modern Christianity fares little better.

(06-02-2016 03:00 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  For muslims to beat buddhists they only have to adhere to islam.
For buddhists to beat muslims they have to put most of their religion on hold for long enough to learn how to fight, and even if they win they're compelled to feel bad about it and forge their swords back to ploughshares.

Sadly, modern Christianity fares little better.

Nah. China and a large part of SEA all repelled muslim invaders at different points in history. That's why muslims are still a minority today in most of those countries. They are mostly buddhist as well up until the present day with the exception of China. Although China still maintains a healthy cultural respect for Buddhism combined with Confucian values. Islam is still considered the religion of the arab even to this day.

Islam finally had to slip into SEA along ancient merchant sea routes through influencing native royalty via arab merchants. It wasn't so much direct conquest like it happened on the subcontinent and central asia.

The muslims flipped Indonesia but that was the foundation of their kingdom in southeast asia and if you drew a radius it includes modern day Malaysia, southern tip of Thailand, and the southern part of the Philippines. However the islamist tips of Thailand and the Philippines are being diminished because they are extremist and do not have popular support.

Their advance was halted there for a lot of other reasons as well. Asia understands islam better than the west and the danger it poses and has always handled it with caution. Islam has always been a clear and present danger for NE and SE Asia.

Western Europe forgot the dangers of islam and the result is a pretty good probability of getting pozzed into cultural oblivion as a consequence of this complacency.

(06-02-2016 03:13 AM)El Chinito loco Wrote:  ...
The muslims flipped Indonesia but that was the foundation of their kingdom in southeast asia and if you drew a radius it includes modern day Malaysia, southern tip of Thailand, and the southern part of the Philippines. However the islamist tips of Thailand and the Philippines are being diminished because they are extremist and do not have popular support.

Their advance was halted there for a lot of other reasons as well. Asia understands islam better than the west and the danger it poses and has always handled it with caution. Islam has always been a clear and present danger for NE and SE Asia.

Western Europe forgot the dangers of islam and the result is a pretty good probability of getting pozzed into cultural oblivion as a consequence of this complacency.

Indonesia being so close to Australia probably skews my perspective on this. But I don't think Western Europe is going to suffer cultural oblivion due to islam. Hard times ahead, yes. War, certainly. But I have every faith that once the greenhouse of Keynesian economics collapses then the hothouse weeds of progressivism will shrivel and die, leaving the heirloom stock to flourish.

(06-02-2016 04:09 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  

(06-02-2016 03:13 AM)El Chinito loco Wrote:  ...
The muslims flipped Indonesia but that was the foundation of their kingdom in southeast asia and if you drew a radius it includes modern day Malaysia, southern tip of Thailand, and the southern part of the Philippines. However the islamist tips of Thailand and the Philippines are being diminished because they are extremist and do not have popular support.

Their advance was halted there for a lot of other reasons as well. Asia understands islam better than the west and the danger it poses and has always handled it with caution. Islam has always been a clear and present danger for NE and SE Asia.

Western Europe forgot the dangers of islam and the result is a pretty good probability of getting pozzed into cultural oblivion as a consequence of this complacency.

Indonesia being so close to Australia probably skews my perspective on this. But I don't think Western Europe is going to suffer cultural oblivion due to islam. Hard times ahead, yes. War, certainly. But I have every faith that once the greenhouse of Keynesian economics collapses then the hothouse weeds of progressivism will shrivel and die, leaving the heirloom stock to flourish.

Parts of Indonesia are a hotbed of fundamentalism and fuels the arab muslim version of extremism in Asia. Jakarta is "moderate" in the sense that they mostly don't care what you do if you're a foreigner because they are poor at the moment and lack the proper government controls and moral imperative to exert the will of the elites who are in power.

Plus a lot of their economic solvency relies on their ethnic Chinese population which is not muslim. They learned what happens in '98 when you push the extremism too far and push out the leading producers and brains of your country. It just collapses your entire economy and vast amounts of capital goes to your nearest competitors (Singapore and China mainly.)

It's always been this way though.

Indonesia claims to be "moderate" but have always been privately accused of being a proxy country for arab islamicism.

Malaysia is like their retarded little brother who is actually more economically adept. They have differing views when it comes to sectarian issues though which will keep them divided.

Brunei is the older retarded muslim brother who won the super lotto and flips double birds at everyone else in the region, wears gold chains, a doo rag, and tries to talk with a faux British gangster accent like Ali-G.

All of them are jokes though. The only reason Indonesia is a threat to Australia is because they have a huge population and can send human waves of refugees to any country. Now that Australia's refugee policy seems air tight it won't be an issue unless Australia goes insane and allows SJWs to commandeer the government and commit cultural seppuku like western Europe is right now.

I wouldn't rule that last possibility out yet..

(06-02-2016 04:23 AM)El Chinito loco Wrote:  ...Now that Australia's refugee policy seems air tight it won't be an issue unless Australia goes insane and allows SJWs to commandeer the government and commit cultural seppuku like western Europe is right now.

I wouldn't rule that last possibility out yet..

Our conservative leader already got ousted and replaced by a centrist snake, and in Australia centrist = left wing.

The differences between the two major parties are now irrelevant. The Liberals are keeping the refugees out until the election is over. Labor has obviously engaged in a gentleman's agreement not to bring the issue up so that nobody has to make any unpleasant promises about border security, so I fully expect the floodgates to open after the election regardless of who wins.

The current Rakhine state conflict also comes to mind.

In Bangladesh too, the Chittagong Hill Tracts whose indigenous population is mostly made up of various Buddhist tribes speaking Tibeto-Burmese languages saw open warfare until the late 1990s. There was virtually no muslim presence in the Hill Tracts until the 1960s but today migrants from the Bangladesh lowlands account for more than 45% of the 'locals'.

It is undeniable that muslim expansion, which had been put to a halt by European imperialism, has now resumed.

See the southwards push of extremist muslim insurgencies in Africa. The African jihad poses the most serious threat to the security of Europe. As the French were set on taking possession of the Senegal and Niger rivers basins in the 1850s, the whole of West Africa was being attacked by a self-proclaimed islamic caliphate. I advise those interested in learning more on this topic to research the campaigns of Louis Faidherbe. Gunboat imperialism essentially prevented (or rather, delayed) the spread of Islam further South.

Rubin Report had a great interview last week with Tino Sanandaji (a Kurdish Economist doctor at Stockholm Uni) about Sweden's migrant issues and Apache culture and how it all started. Funny it has taken an immigrant to speak the truth here. Really great watch and he discusses it mostly from economic perspective , and how it barely saves a life anyways. Also about paranoia of Swedish people about rise of a new Hitler.

I have ignored this thread for a while because it kept me too distracted from the work I needed to do, but I have to comment on this.

Sweden is going to hell? "Let it burn!"

Germany is going to hell? "Let it burn!"

First of all, the United States is going to hell as well and I don't see any resistance coming from the majority population there. Higher crime rates and unlimited immigration for decades and nobody does anything despite having 200 million firearms in private possession! Those cucked Europeans at least had Breivik who with his savagery managed to make his country vote more right in the following elections.

Europe is being shock-and-awed. People are kept unaware of what is really going on and every normal person here thinks that we're living in a free democracy with an independent press, and that included me until a couple of years ago. Most people do not understand the severity of the third-world invasion because all we see is pictures of some sad refugee families, and violent right-wing protesters. How do you think people should react when they are unaware? That's not even taking into consideration the decades worth of liberal programming about equality and our bad history.

It takes a while for the people to understand what's going on.

And then it's the question of getting organized and prepared. We all know whose side the elites are on and it's not our side. And even when one European country does manage to elect a populist right party into power than they will be stopped by the other countries still under globalist control: That is why so many Europeans on this forum want Donald Trump to win the election.

And letting it burn? Leave the country you inherited from your ancestors to the conquerors? And fuck the women because they caused it? Maybe understand the nature of the human condition and instead of hating women for being women decide to take responsibility of the future of your people. Women can fuck it up because the men have let them. Invaders can come into our lands and homes and steal, assault and rape with impunity because, again, we let them.

Women are not political animals. They desire dominance and when their men are so weak as to not protect them, physically and spiritually, they will seek out men who will. Seeing their countries being filled with aggressive foreigners, even before the migrant crisis, and the superior Western men being browbeaten, apologetic pussies that have never learned what their rightful place in this world is, what do you think the women do? How can they survive? By clinging on to men who are scared themselves? Any Western girl who goes for a third-world immigrant is a girl that would have been happy with a strong Western man if her culture had still provided enough of those.

That's not white knighting: It's accepting that there's no point in placing blame in externals. Has our culture been corrupted? Has our government been infiltrated? Yes and yes. But have we become decadent and complacent? Rome was once great and it's not anymore. To the victor belong the spoils and if the spoils make you comfortable you will soon be replaced by someone more hungry, someone more aggressive.

Let it burn?

How about we fight and really fight.

If our collective answer is going to be that we can't fight because that's been made illegal, that it's immoral, that people not on our side might judge us, that we might perish... Then the invaders have indeed been right that our lands were ripe for the picking and our traitorous elites were indeed right that they could psychologically disarm and submit us.

(06-02-2016 08:55 AM)sixsix Wrote:  I have ignored this thread for a while because it kept me too distracted from the work I needed to do, but I have to comment on this.

Sweden is going to hell? "Let it burn!"

Germany is going to hell? "Let it burn!"

First of all, the United States is going to hell as well and I don't see any resistance coming from the majority population there. Higher crime rates and unlimited immigration for decades and nobody does anything despite having 200 million firearms in private possession! Those cucked Europeans at least had Breivik who with his savagery managed to make his country vote more right in the following elections.

Europe is being shock-and-awed. People are kept unaware of what is really going on and every normal person here thinks that we're living in a free democracy with an independent press, and that included me until a couple of years ago. Most people do not understand the severity of the third-world invasion because all we see is pictures of some sad refugee families, and violent right-wing protesters. How do you think people should react when they are unaware? That's not even taking into consideration the decades worth of liberal programming about equality and our bad history.

It takes a while for the people to understand what's going on.

And then it's the question of getting organized and prepared. We all know whose side the elites are on and it's not our side. And even when one European country does manage to elect a populist right party into power than they will be stopped by the other countries still under globalist control: That is why so many Europeans on this forum want Donald Trump to win the election.

And letting it burn? Leave the country you inherited from your ancestors to the conquerors? And fuck the women because they caused it? Maybe understand the nature of the human condition and instead of hating women for being women decide to take responsibility of the future of your people. Women can fuck it up because the men have let them. Invaders can come into our lands and homes and steal, assault and rape with impunity because, again, we let them.

Women are not political animals. They desire dominance and when their men are so weak as to not protect them, physically and spiritually, they will seek out men who will. Seeing their countries being filled with aggressive foreigners, even before the migrant crisis, and the superior Western men being browbeaten, apologetic pussies that have never learned what their rightful place in this world is, what do you think the women do? How can they survive? By clinging on to men who are scared themselves? Any Western girl who goes for a third-world immigrant is a girl that would have been happy with a strong Western man if her culture had still provided enough of those.

That's not white knighting: It's accepting that there's no point in placing blame in externals. Has our culture been corrupted? Has our government been infiltrated? Yes and yes. But have we become decadent and complacent? Rome was once great and it's not anymore. To the victor belong the spoils and if the spoils make you comfortable you will soon be replaced by someone more hungry, someone more aggressive.

Let it burn?

How about we fight and really fight.

If our collective answer is going to be that we can't fight because that's been made illegal, that it's immoral, that people not on our side might judge us, that we might perish... Then the invaders have indeed been right that our lands were ripe for the picking and our traitorous elites were indeed right that they could psychologically disarm and submit us.

A noble sentiment, sixsix. But really, is there anything left to fight for in the west anymore? Every institution has been subverted. The culture has been flipped upside down, and nothing short of total war will restore it. The women have been corrupted, they don't want to be defended, and what's more why should we defend them? Let them have their cake and eat it too. I have ZERO sympathy for the majority of western women.

As for what you have said about Donald Trump, you are for the most part correct. I have little hope that he will be able to turn around our corrupted culture. I think it's far too late for anything to be done about that. A best case scenario Trump presidency is that he improves the economy enough so that young men such as myself can get a foothold, make enough money and GTFO, and that he makes us keep to ourselves for the most part, keeping degeneracy from further infecting greener pastures.

Open borders proponent Peter Sutherland(mentioned earlier in this thread) recently tweeted about the need to accept more rapefugees and soulmates.

https://twitter.com/PDSutherlandUN/statu...8557806596



Every reply is slating him, which gives me some hope.

Sadly most of the UK is cucked up, and they're going to vote to remain in the referendum. They could stop those deaths in the Med by voting leave.

(06-02-2016 10:01 AM)rw95 Wrote:  A noble sentiment, sixsix. But really, is there anything left to fight for in the west anymore? Every institution has been subverted. The culture has been flipped upside down, and nothing short of total war will restore it. The women have been corrupted, they don't want to be defended, and what's more why should we defend them? Let them have their cake and eat it too. I have ZERO sympathy for the majority of western women.

As for what you have said about Donald Trump, you are for the most part correct. I have little hope that he will be able to turn around our corrupted culture. I think it's far too late for anything to be done about that. A best case scenario Trump presidency is that he improves the economy enough so that young men such as myself can get a foothold, make enough money and GTFO, and that he makes us keep to ourselves for the most part, keeping degeneracy from further infecting greener pastures.

There are no greener pastures. After the West falls, most of the world will be living hell. I wouldn't even count on Asia being safe once unrestricted Chinese aggression is unleashed.

The fact is, the men of the West are the true heart and soul of the civilization, and wherever they go they will have the West with them. Hence it's probably better just to fight a bloody war in America/Europe and carve out some new territory than it is to run.

(06-02-2016 12:38 AM)N°6 Wrote:  It is funny when the Dalai Lamma is less hip than Western hipsters think he is.

Tibetan Buddhism has an end-times belief in a great war between Islam and themselves. They witnessed centuries of conflict that culminated with Islam cleaving India in two, close to Tibet.

The Dalai Lama has been in exile his entire life due to communists, and they continue to hold his nation under their thumb. They destroyed countless temples and sent monks to re-education camps. They even want to pick the next Dalai Lama.

SJW know-nothings mistake his depth for camaraderie with them.

The reality is that they are projecting their distorted perception of themselves onto a person who is their human opposite.

The Dalai Lama represents a spiritual nobility that does not have an allegiance to political correctness. They represent animal social instincts that dictate that their morality is continuously determined by the interests of the lowest of society.

They don't understand him. He understands them.

(06-02-2016 10:12 AM)Lizard King Wrote:  Open borders proponent Peter Sutherland(mentioned earlier in this thread) recently tweeted about the need to accept more rapefugees and soulmates.

https://twitter.com/PDSutherlandUN/statu...8557806596

These guys have to be directly facilitating the crossings in some way. I can't wait until that is discovered.

That Kurdish economist above confirmed what we have been saying for a while: people like Merkel are responsible for these drowning deaths.

Implement an Australian style policy and the boats will be greatly reduced by removing the incentive to cross illegally.

(06-02-2016 10:16 AM)Samseau Wrote:  There are no greener pastures. After the West falls, most of the world will be living hell. I wouldn't even count on Asia being safe once unrestricted Chinese aggression is unleashed.

The fact is, the men of the West are the true heart and soul of the civilization, and wherever they go they will have the West with them. Hence it's probably better just to fight a bloody war in America/Europe and carve out some new territory than it is to run.

I must respectfully disagree with you Samseau. The west may have once been the greatest civilization on Earth, but that day is past. Today the west is simply the breeding grounds for degeneracy and globalism, and because of its hegemony over the world, it is spreading things like feminism and socialism to places with traditional cultures and feminine women. The best thing that could happen is for the west to either fall or contain its degeneracy to itself. There is nothing left to preserve and there is no reason to fight. The only answer (other than war) is containment and exodus.

(06-02-2016 10:16 AM)Samseau Wrote:  There are no greener pastures. After the West falls, most of the world will be living hell. I wouldn't even count on Asia being safe once unrestricted Chinese aggression is unleashed.

The fact is, the men of the West are the true heart and soul of the civilization, and wherever they go they will have the West with them. Hence it's probably better just to fight a bloody war in America/Europe and carve out some new territory than it is to run.

Indeed. This is how nations formed in the past. The borders are not set in stone. The big cities will be affected most, the countryside much less. If you move out of the city and have a few month worth of canned food could make all the difference, and reliable red blooded neighbors. And weapons if you are in the US.

http://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/a...ndern.html

Quote:Case of vigilantism in Saxony: In a supermarket, a vigilante group went after a mentally ill refugee because he allegedly stole something. Now determined the state protection.

In the video can be seen, as the Iraqis discussed in the checkout area of a net market with several employees. In his hand he holds a bottle. The staff ask him to repeatedly issue these. But the man did not respond.

Then several men dressed in black appear, take him the bottle off and drag him forcibly out. When the man resists, they beat him and abuse him. At the end of the video, a woman's voice says: "It's bad that you need a vigilante."

The police Saxony announced that officers found the fugitive tied with cable ties to a tree. The men said, therefore, they wanted to prevent him from fleeing.

Some people take action.

(06-02-2016 10:01 AM)rw95 Wrote:  A noble sentiment, sixsix. But really, is there anything left to fight for in the west anymore?

Your friends and family, the heritage given to you by your ancestors, a future for your children, beautiful art and culture, great and smart people.

And most importantly, your dignity.

Quote:Every institution has been subverted.

Institutions are built and destroyed and built again. Send our people to an uninhabited new land and we can create an entire new civilization from scratch so we can obviously restore our institutions at home.

Quote:The culture has been flipped upside down, and nothing short of total war will restore it.

Sound like you're not willing to go that far.

"If you are not prepared to use force to defend civilization, then be prepared to accept barbarism."

Millions of men have died selflessly to protect our way of life, and you would give up before the first drop of blood has hit the floor? If previous generations had quit this quickly we would not have existed. This mindset, this unnatural and submissive outlook is exactly why we are in this predicament to begin with.

Our culture is rotten because our minds are weak. Being willing to walk away without a fight is the culture rot.

Quote:The women have been corrupted, they don't want to be defended, and what's more why should we defend them? Let them have their cake and eat it too. I have ZERO sympathy for the majority of western women.

Do children want a strict parent? No. But that doesn't mean we don't parent our children. Women are corrupted, you say. And the future of our societies is in their hands and not yours, apparently. Lead and people will follow.

Do I have a problem with the leftists getting what they deserve from the savages they have invited? No, let them have it. But the rest of us, of all the beautiful women and innocent children, will also be targeted. And bitterness about less-than-autonomous female minds makes you think everyone deserves it?

Quote:As for what you have said about Donald Trump, you are for the most part correct. I have little hope that he will be able to turn around our corrupted culture.

It's not gonna be just Donald Trump. It has to be all of us and a non-globalist US president would just make it easier to resist our own governments. Seek the power within yourself and not in external factors.

Quote:I think it's far too late for anything to be done about that.

What have you tried so far? I doubt you're typing this from a coffin or a prison cell.

Did the Spartans give up? Did the WWII soldiers give up? You say the culture is corrupted but we are the culture. Undo the programming that makes you want to submit to your enemies, reclaim your mind and reclaim your land.

(06-02-2016 01:29 PM)sixsix Wrote:  

(06-02-2016 10:01 AM)rw95 Wrote:  A noble sentiment, sixsix. But really, is there anything left to fight for in the west anymore?

Your friends and family, the heritage given to you by your ancestors, a future for your children, beautiful art and culture, great and smart people.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Families for we younger men, sixsix, are not in the cards. Our lines die with us.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quote:Every institution has been subverted.

Institutions are built and destroyed and built again. Send our people to an uninhabited new land and we can create an entire new civilization from scratch so we can obviously restore our institutions at home.

Quote:The culture has been flipped upside down, and nothing short of total war will restore it.

Sound like you're not willing to go that far.

"If you are not prepared to use force to defend civilization, then be prepared to accept barbarism."
------------------------------------------------------------------------
You're right, I am not willing to go that far. I stand to gain nothing and lose everything if war comes. I'm not going to die for a civilization that doesn't give a fuck about me.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quote:The women have been corrupted, they don't want to be defended, and what's more why should we defend them? Let them have their cake and eat it too. I have ZERO sympathy for the majority of western women.

Do children want a strict parent? No. But that doesn't mean we don't parent our children. Women are corrupted, you say. And the future of our societies is in their hands and not yours, apparently. Lead and people will follow.

Do I have a problem with the leftists getting what they deserve from the savages they have invited? No, let them have it. But the rest of us, of all the beautiful women and innocent children, will also be targeted. And bitterness about less-than-autonomous female minds makes you think everyone deserves it?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is the big one. How many low-notch/virginal girls are there in the west. Not many. Of these few, how many are decently attractive, have homemaking skills, and want to have children? Even fewer. The majority of western women are simply dead weight (pun intended). Save the ones that can be saved, but they are very few in number.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quote:As for what you have said about Donald Trump, you are for the most part correct. I have little hope that he will be able to turn around our corrupted culture.

It's not gonna be just Donald Trump. It has to be all of us and a non-globalist US president would just make it easier to resist our own governments. Seek the power within yourself and not in external factors.

Quote:I think it's far too late for anything to be done about that.

What have you tried so far? I doubt you're typing this from a coffin or a prison cell.

Did the Spartans give up? Did the WWII soldiers give up? You say the culture is corrupted but we are the culture. Undo the programming that makes you want to submit to your enemies, reclaim your mind and reclaim your land.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
No man is an island. We are too few in numbers. To be fair, maybe things will change. Maybe there will be a great awakening, and a pushback against the globalists. I'm not getting my hopes up, though. I've already laid out what I think the best case scenario is.

I don't want to sound too hostile, only judgmental.

You are a defeated men, in other words, the male equivalent of the fat slut you despise.

Have you no desire for conquest? For retribution? This society has done nothing for you so you wan't do anything for it in return. What about making it your own, be a mover instead of a passive pawn. You want to let your competitors win? They get everything that rightfully belongs to you, your birthright, and you rationalize your fear.

Suit it yourself but remember you are the fat slut equivalent and your attitude is what created that slut.

Edit: How can you even get your hands to type that your bloodline ends with you? Ultimate humiliation. We are all from a 4.5 billion year unbroken chain of successfully reproducing winners and you are the end. Nothing. Like sperm in a sock after a wank. Fuck man, you're my fellow forum member, keep your chin up and man up. Let's make America and Europe great again.

(06-02-2016 10:01 AM)rw95 Wrote:  A noble sentiment, sixsix. But really, is there anything left to fight for in the west anymore? Every institution has been subverted. The culture has been flipped upside down, and nothing short of total war will restore it. The women have been corrupted, they don't want to be defended, and what's more why should we defend them? Let them have their cake and eat it too. I have ZERO sympathy for the majority of western women.

You crack me up - first you insinuate that there is nothing left worth fighting for. And then you follow up with several reasons why we SHOULD fight!

• Culture flipped upside down. TAKE IT BACK!
• Women have been corrupted. CHANGE THEM BY RE-ESTABLISHING UNAPOLOGETIC WESTERN MASCULINITY!
• Institutions have been subverted. LEVERAGE THE COMING CIVIL WAR TO HUNT DOWN AND VANQUISH THE TRAITOROUS BUREAUCRATS RESPONSIBLE FOR OUR DECLINE.
  

There is so much to be done and you're hiding behind excuses. Yes, I am frustrated as well but give me a band of brothers to back me up and I will step up and do my part.

(06-02-2016 10:01 AM)rw95 Wrote:  You're right, I am not willing to go that far. I stand to gain nothing and lose everything if war comes. I'm not going to die for a civilization that doesn't give a fuck about me.

That's recursive defeatism. Change the civilization by making a difference and the civilization that succeeds it will celebrate you as a hero and remember your name for generations.

(06-02-2016 01:29 PM)sixsix Wrote:  Did the Spartans give up? Did the WWII soldiers give up?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Sphacteria

Quote:An Athenian force under Cleon and Demosthenes attacked and forced them to surrender.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Leuctra#Battle

Quote:Seeing their right wing beaten, the rest of the Peloponnesians, who were essentially unwilling participants, retired and left the enemy in possession of the field.

* * *

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philippine..._(1941–42)

Quote:Late on 6 May, Wainwright asked Homma for terms of surrender. Homma insisted that surrender include all Allied forces in the Philippines. Believing that the lives of all those on Corregidor would be endangered, Wainwright accepted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Singapore

Quote:It resulted in the capture of Singapore by the Japanese and the largest surrender of British-led military personnel in history.[3] About 80,000 British, Indian and Australian troops became prisoners of war, joining 50,000 taken by the Japanese in the earlier Malayan Campaign. British Prime Minister Winston Churchill called the ignominious fall of Singapore to the Japanese the "worst disaster" and "largest capitulation" in British military history.[4]

Quote:You say the culture is corrupted but we are the culture.

We are the anti-culture; the media and those who follow it (99%) are.

Quote:Undo the programming that makes you want to submit to your enemies, reclaim your mind . . . .

Already did that