It is not as "simple" as the majority of EU leaders sucking.

What happens is that the many years of european project are starting to "dissolve" the figure of the national leader in favour of the European Council, the European Parliament and all those unelected stooges. This makes less room for more influential and charismatic European leaders.

Remove the EU of the equation and things will gradually improve.

Quote:The Refugee Children of Sweden


Recently, the Swedish newspaper Gothenburg-Post wrote a sob story about a 16-year old unaccompanied refugee child who….. appears to be a full-grown man.



Does that person look 16 to you?

What’s even worse is that Avpixlat, a site often labeled as racist, completely destroyed their report simply by going on the guys facebook and looking through pictures and info. They discovered that he registered on a dating site in 2008. If his age was true then he was looking for a fuckbuddy at the age of 8. But as you can see for yourself, his age is 24 on the site.



Do I need to explain to you what a disaster it is that established journalists in the massmedia don’t even look through basic information before writing a sobby character portrait? The guy claims to be a refugee from Afghanistan and painted up this story of miserable experiences at the hands of human smugglers, while his Facebook account is full of pictures with him posing in RayBay-shades wearing a big wrist watch in Istanbul.



Or why not this image of him suffering at the poolside in Southern Europe? No wonder he moved to Sweden, considering how terrible his circumstances were.



His gallery gives the impression of tourism rather than war. In the article with GP he showed the journalists a map of his travel route: Afghanistan – Pakistan – Iran – Turkey – Greece – Makedonia – Serbia – Hungary – Austria – Germany – Denmark – Sweden. Several of these are safe countries yet they don’t ask him any questions about why he’s avoided seeking asylum in them.

When he came to Sweden it was winter and “all he owned was a mobile phone and the clothes he was wearing.” There’s no explanation to how he was able to lose his passport but not his iPhone. Like the majority of people granted asylum in Sweden he hasn’t been able to verify his identity.

Case workers at the Migration board have said that asylum seekers from Syria and Eritrea ger their application granted in nearly 100% of the cases, yet 72% of applicants from Eritrea lack passports and for Syria the number is 98%. They simply don’t know if the person is who they say they are, and they don’t really care either because the order from higher ups is basically to accept as many as possible in as short of a time span as possible.

When case workers at the Migration board turn on their workcomputer a message pops up to remind them of the boards vision: “We view migration as a positive force, something that contributes to making our country richer both financially and culturally.”

A former case worker at the Migration board wrote a debate article saying it’s far too easy for ISIS-terrorists to get into Sweden, because even if the workers get suspicious there’s no time to investigate. Cases are supposed to be handled in max 1.5 hours compared to the 2.5 hours a “normal” asylum application takes.

As a case worker you’re expected to hand in at least 3 finished decisions per week, the number of finished errands decide your individual pay grade and possibility for permanent employment. In other words, the work theme is “the more the merrier” and you are given the choice to either keep your job – or do a good job.

Does this man look like 16 to you?



Does this guy look like 17 to you? Should he be in a school with other 17-year olds?



Or why not that time “the worlds fastest 14-year old” visited a school in Kristianstad in order to inspire the other students?



The number of children seeking asylum in Sweden has exploded over the last ten years, presumably because children are granted asylum much quicker than adults and Swedish authorities don’t verify the age of these so called children. The Migration board is expecting 30’000 unaccompanied refugee children to arrive in Sweden 2015. In Denmark, they put 282 unaccompanied refugee children through age tests and found out that 203 of them were adults lying about their age.

In Norway, teeth x-rays revealed that 9 out of 10 unaccompanied refugee children are above the age of 18. Sometimes they are as much as 10 years older. Asha from Somalia said she was 19 when she was actually 30 and for her that’s entailed life-threatening issues. She has high blood pressure but is wrongly medicated due to her incorrect age. She is quoted in the article saying: “The doctor changes medication all the time but it doesn’t help, but I can’t say anything about my age.”

So put simply: This is fucked up for everyone involved. Immigrants lying about their age can be given the wrong medication which contributes to their death, if they say they’re younger than their actual age they’ll also have to work longer and retire later than what’s normal. It’s also bad for Swedish taxpayers who are financing these con artists, but the ones who get it absolute worst of all are actual refugee children who are starving to death in refugee camps that lack funds.

Some weeks ago the government came out and said that they were going to take 8.2 billion SEK from our humanitarian aid budget and put it on refugees who come to Sweden instead. And they declared this the day after UN came out and said they had to cancel food and water for 360’000 refugees near the conflict area due to lack of funds. Now, our prime minister is saying even more money is gonna have to be taken from the aid budget.

Tino Sanandaji is a kurdish national economist in Sweden and his response to this is as following: “The UN resources for 2.5 million Afghan refugees equals the cost of 300 unaccompanied refugee children for one year. Cutting down on healthcare and schooling for millions of poor in order to afford a few expensive refugees in Sweden isn’t “taking responsibility”, it’s blatant madness. It will only seem as reasonable to our government because they’re captured in mass psychosis. What Sweden is about to do is a misdeed of historical proportions, and those who have pushed this forward have many lives on their hands.”

He links to an article by Reuters which explains that because of the “migrant crisis” dominating headlines and demanding cash, the UNHCR in Pakistan has received only $33.6 million for 2015 out of its $136.7 million annual budget.

So if you support asylum immigration to Sweden, you’re also supporting the oppression of the poor and excluded in other countries. Basically, the world has officially gone full retard. In Sweden you’re considered racist if you don’t want to accept refugees because that means you don’t care about poor foreigners in need. But according to that line of logic you’re also racist if you want refugees in Sweden, because that means you don’t care about poor foreigners in need.

Clearly, everyone is racist.

https://acidmuncher.wordpress.com/2015/1...of-sweden/

(02-26-2016 05:10 PM)Libertas Wrote:  Hearing AfD is expected to make major gains next month, and grew more popular when one of the people there said border guards should shoot invaders if necessary.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/20.../80856410/

This was a real interesting article in the Trump thread that is worth repeating here. Basically it's about "preference falsification" and something we all know about crowd psychology - when an unpopular opinion suddenly becomes popular because it was kept bottled up for fear of social ostracism, regimes change in a cascade. We're seeing this with Trump and may soon see it in Europe.

Trump might have a positive effect on Europe as well.

The Brexit thing may be a closer-run thing than we may have thought, though I still unfortunately predict that Britain will narrowly choose to stay in.

This election is incredibly important. TO be honest, it seems to me most germans/swedes know whats up. they need someone bold enough to take that first step and say what needs to be said. they are afraid of the social consequences of speaking forbidden truths.

A Russian friend of mine told me about his 6 months living in Sweden, that the people there would never even bring up the issue of migration, they were completely afraid to speak their minds. but once he brought the issue up to them, they all, without exception, immediately start agreeing with him. He would compare it to the type of behaviour common during the soviet times, people mindlessly parroting things they are knew full well to be untrue.

point being, I think people should be given a bit more credit. there is a huge undercurrent of tension just waiting to be released. Most importantly, the truth is on our side.

(02-26-2016 05:10 PM)Libertas Wrote:  Hearing AfD is expected to make major gains next month, and grew more popular when one of the people there said border guards should shoot invaders if necessary.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/20.../80856410/

This was a real interesting article in the Trump thread that is worth repeating here. Basically it's about "preference falsification" and something we all know about crowd psychology - when an unpopular opinion suddenly becomes popular because it was kept bottled up for fear of social ostracism, regimes change in a cascade. We're seeing this with Trump and may soon see it in Europe.

Trump might have a positive effect on Europe as well.

The Brexit thing may be a closer-run thing than we may have thought, though I still unfortunately predict that Britain will narrowly choose to stay in.

I think your prediction is accurate. I encountered some Brits, a couple of middle-aged working class white broads, on my recent vacation to Cuba as they noticed me reading Trump's "Crippled America" in the resort lobby area. The one broad asked me, "Are you American?" and there was noticeable contempt in her tone. She had been pretty rude to demand my attention as I was clearly exclusively interested in keeping to myself and reading my book. I had not made eye contact or acknowledged her presence whatsoever, yet she seemed to feel entitled to bark her question at me. Normally I would have impulsively shifted into high troll gear and eviscerated the little dear's self-esteem right then and there, but I recognized an opportunity to stump for our Emperor and so I deigned to communicate in a civilized manner with this uncivilized peasant. I said, "No. I'm Canadian." The look of shock on her face was amusing. She then asked, "Do you like Trump?" I replied, "Look honey, I would carry him ON MY BACK to the White House if he asked me to or it would help him win." At this, they both gave me looks of horror. I then went into full speed ahead soap-box gear and gave them the rundown on the glory of Trump's platform. When I was finished, the rude one said, "Well you know, he did say there are no-go zones in England and that's just not true." So then I proceeded to give the poor heathen a free lesson in the finer points of rhetoric and persuasion and illustrate how our Emperor used these tools as effective tactics to win a political election in the face of complete opposition by the media. I then pointed out that she had fallen for a distraction tactic by said media as they had successfully lured her into obsessing over a so-called "lie" made by him instead of thinking about the reality of the issue he is raising. She then said to me, "Well there aren't any no-go zones in England." I just stared at her. Hard. Then she relented, "Well there are, OBVIOUSLY, areas with high concentrations of migrants, but they've built community centres for them and ..." I cut her off with, "And what do you think would happen to a meter maid who tried to venture into one of those areas and issue a parking ticket?" She stared back at me and blinked. Then she went into denial mode and said, "Well, she would just issue the ticket and that would be that." I prodded a little with, "You don't think her safety would be at risk? Not at all?" At this she started to waver a little and I could tell I was beginning to enter into "passing shit test" territory and since I had ZERO interest in these broads sexually, I wrapped it up by pointing out, "There ARE definitive no-go zones in France and other regions of Europe, there is proof a simple google search away, and both of you and the whole of Europe have your heads buried deep so deep in the sand, you won't see the danger of soft jihad until it's too late to do anything about it. Europe would be LUCKY to have a man like Trump, but you wouldn't recognize him if he came along because you would let yourself be distracted by media hit-jobs against him." At that truth-bomb, I started packing up to move to a more quiet reading space so I could finish the excellent book written by our Emperor AWAY from the irritations of the unwashed. The rude one went into acceptance mode and declared that she was "a little disappointed" in herself for falling for the media's tricks in smearing our Emperor. The two of them enthusiastically invited me to go swimming with them on the beach. I warned them about sharks and proceeded to get the FUCK away from them.

Europeans need to wake up and smell the soft jihad. The soft jihad is REAL.

(02-27-2016 06:27 AM)Cosmonaut Wrote:  He would compare it to the type of behaviour common during the soviet times, people mindlessly parroting things they are knew full well to be untrue.

Being in Poland, it's been essential to use the Communism comparison when explaining why it's better to have a conservative government than a liberal one. Anyone who is convinced liberalism is both a gift from Western society and the way forward, is quick to change their mind when I tell them that Communism was about not being able to speak negatively about the government while Liberalism is about not being able to speak negatively about anything.

(02-27-2016 07:24 AM)Ghost Tiger Wrote:  

(02-26-2016 05:10 PM)Libertas Wrote:  Hearing AfD is expected to make major gains next month, and grew more popular when one of the people there said border guards should shoot invaders if necessary.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/20.../80856410/

This was a real interesting article in the Trump thread that is worth repeating here. Basically it's about "preference falsification" and something we all know about crowd psychology - when an unpopular opinion suddenly becomes popular because it was kept bottled up for fear of social ostracism, regimes change in a cascade. We're seeing this with Trump and may soon see it in Europe.

Trump might have a positive effect on Europe as well.

The Brexit thing may be a closer-run thing than we may have thought, though I still unfortunately predict that Britain will narrowly choose to stay in.

I think your prediction is accurate. I encountered some Brits, a couple of middle-aged working class white broads, on my recent vacation to Cuba as they noticed me reading Trump's "Crippled America" in the resort lobby area. The one broad asked me, "Are you American?" and there was noticeable contempt in her tone. She had been pretty rude to demand my attention as I was clearly exclusively interested in keeping to myself and reading my book. I had not made eye contact or acknowledged her presence whatsoever, yet she seemed to feel entitled to bark her question at me. Normally I would have impulsively shifted into high troll gear and eviscerated the little dear's self-esteem right then and there, but I recognized an opportunity to stump for our Emperor and so I deigned to communicate in a civilized manner with this uncivilized peasant. I said, "No. I'm Canadian." The look of shock on her face was amusing. She then asked, "Do you like Trump?" I replied, "Look honey, I would carry him ON MY BACK to the White House if he asked me to or it would help him win." At this, they both gave me looks of horror. I then went into full speed ahead soap-box gear and gave them the rundown on the glory of Trump's platform. When I was finished, the rude one said, "Well you know, he did say there are no-go zones in England and that's just not true." So then I proceeded to give the poor heathen a free lesson in the finer points of rhetoric and persuasion and illustrate how our Emperor used these tools as effective tactics to win a political election in the face of complete opposition by the media. I then pointed out that she had fallen for a distraction tactic by said media as they had successfully lured her into obsessing over a so-called "lie" made by him instead of thinking about the reality of the issue he is raising. She then said to me, "Well there aren't any no-go zones in England." I just stared at her. Hard. Then she relented, "Well there are, OBVIOUSLY, areas with high concentrations of migrants, but they've built community centres for them and ..." I cut her off with, "And what do you think would happen to a meter maid who tried to venture into one of those areas and issue a parking ticket?" She stared back at me and blinked. Then she went into denial mode and said, "Well, she would just issue the ticket and that would be that." I prodded a little with, "You don't think her safety would be at risk? Not at all?" At this she started to waver a little and I could tell I was beginning to enter into "passing shit test" territory and since I had ZERO interest in these broads sexually, I wrapped it up by pointing out, "There ARE definitive no-go zones in France and other regions of Europe, there is proof a simple google search away, and both of you and the whole of Europe have your heads buried deep so deep in the sand, you won't see the danger of soft jihad until it's too late to do anything about it. Europe would be LUCKY to have a man like Trump, but you wouldn't recognize him if he came along because you would let yourself be distracted by media hit-jobs against him." At that truth-bomb, I started packing up to move to a more quiet reading space so I could finish the excellent book written by our Emperor AWAY from the irritations of the unwashed. The rude one went into acceptance mode and declared that she was "a little disappointed" in herself for falling for the media's tricks in smearing our Emperor. The two of them enthusiastically invited me to go swimming with them on the beach. I warned them about sharks and proceeded to get the FUCK away from them.

Europeans need to wake up and smell the soft jihad. The soft jihad is REAL.

Honestly, all you need to say back to them is this:

"Do you let your husband watch when you bang your muslim lover?"

Followed up by a, "enjoy your burqa".

(02-27-2016 08:55 AM)The Beast1 Wrote:  Honestly, all you need to say back to them is this:

"Do you let your husband watch when you bang your muslim lover?"

Followed up by a, "enjoy your burqa".

They ARE both married. They didn't hide that fact, they were on vacation WITHOUT their husbands, and they weren't subtle about their interest in infidelity. Rude one's husband is a soldier in the British military. I could tell she had a thing for military-looking guys. I am often told that I look like a U.S. Marine (flat-top haircut).

Lmfao. Enjoy your fucking burqa indeed. Whores.

(02-27-2016 08:14 AM)AntiMediocrity Wrote:  

(02-27-2016 06:27 AM)Cosmonaut Wrote:  He would compare it to the type of behaviour common during the soviet times, people mindlessly parroting things they are knew full well to be untrue.

Being in Poland, it's been essential to use the Communism comparison when explaining why it's better to have a conservative government than a liberal one. Anyone who is convinced liberalism is both a gift from Western society and the way forward, is quick to change their mind when I tell them that Communism was about not being able to speak negatively about the government while Liberalism is about not being able to speak negatively about anything.

One of many gems from Theodore Dalrymple from this interview:

Quote:Political correctness is communist propaganda writ small. In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, nor to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is to co-operate with evil, and in some small way to become evil oneself. One's standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control. I think if you examine political correctness, it has the same effect and is intended to.

(02-27-2016 09:16 AM)Ghost Tiger Wrote:  

(02-27-2016 08:55 AM)The Beast1 Wrote:  Honestly, all you need to say back to them is this:

"Do you let your husband watch when you bang your muslim lover?"

Followed up by a, "enjoy your burqa".

They ARE both married. They didn't hide that fact, they were on vacation WITHOUT their husbands, and they weren't subtle about their interest in infidelity. Rude one's husband is a soldier in the British military. I could tell she had a thing for military-looking guys. I am often told that I look like a U.S. Marine (flat-top haircut).

Lmfao. Enjoy your fucking burqa indeed. Whores.

Missed the part that it was two women. I thought it was a guy and gal.

Women on vacation without their husbands eh? Gosh, why would they go and do something like that! Must be looking for some cultural enrichment

Well, this looks promising...

Quote:An online political poll at a German university has revealed broad support for right wing ideas among students.

The poll conducted at the University of Cologne has shocked the general student committee who expected that like most universities there would be a much more pro-left wing outcome. Katharina Letzelter who sit on the board of the committee went so far as to say the results were “frightening.”

Der Spiegel‘s youth magazine Bento.de reports that 1660 or so students answered 25 questions on the subject of identifying problems within the university. The project is under a broader scope of tackling racism on campus. The group found the results “problematic” when many students confirmed that they felt nationalistic or negative toward the mass migration that has been occurring since last year.

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/02/...-assaults/

The "general student committee" is shocked and frightened by these problematic results. The members of the "committee" seem confused over what can be done about these thoughtcrimes. They seem unable to figure out how this wrongthink will ever be be stopped now that Trump has let the genie out of the bottle.

Sail on little thought pirates. Sail on.

Looks like Canadians are getting angry too...





http://en.cijnews.com/?p=27656

There's a lot of women in that rally. Interesting.

(02-27-2016 06:27 AM)Cosmonaut Wrote:  

(02-26-2016 05:10 PM)Libertas Wrote:  Hearing AfD is expected to make major gains next month, and grew more popular when one of the people there said border guards should shoot invaders if necessary.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/20.../80856410/

This was a real interesting article in the Trump thread that is worth repeating here. Basically it's about "preference falsification" and something we all know about crowd psychology - when an unpopular opinion suddenly becomes popular because it was kept bottled up for fear of social ostracism, regimes change in a cascade. We're seeing this with Trump and may soon see it in Europe.

Trump might have a positive effect on Europe as well.

The Brexit thing may be a closer-run thing than we may have thought, though I still unfortunately predict that Britain will narrowly choose to stay in.

This election is incredibly important. TO be honest, it seems to me most germans/swedes know whats up. they need someone bold enough to take that first step and say what needs to be said. they are afraid of the social consequences of speaking forbidden truths.

A Russian friend of mine told me about his 6 months living in Sweden, that the people there would never even bring up the issue of migration, they were completely afraid to speak their minds. but once he brought the issue up to them, they all, without exception, immediately start agreeing with him. He would compare it to the type of behaviour common during the soviet times, people mindlessly parroting things they are knew full well to be untrue.

point being, I think people should be given a bit more credit. there is a huge undercurrent of tension just waiting to be released. Most importantly, the truth is on our side.

Well, just wait for the elections and watch the AfD barely push the 20% mark - if that. And even IF, by some miracle, they'll reach 25% or 30% then the quartet of liberal parties (SPD/CDU-CSU/Green/Left) is simply going to circle the wagons against them - just like Hollande and his ilk did in France (and predicted by Houllebeqc's Soumission).

And after that phase 2 will begin - a.k.a. the double down - just like in Sweden. There's a reason why immigration case workers are approving huge amounts of 'unaccompanied children' (who clearly are much older) without passports or documentation. They know long term their open border policies will backfire and are flooding the country with as much dark meat as they can.

Germany is fucked. France most likely is fucked (unless we see a military coup).



Sweden is proper fucked.

(02-27-2016 02:44 PM)Ghost Tiger Wrote:  Well, this looks promising...

Quote:An online political poll at a German university has revealed broad support for right wing ideas among students.

The poll conducted at the University of Cologne has shocked the general student committee who expected that like most universities there would be a much more pro-left wing outcome. Katharina Letzelter who sit on the board of the committee went so far as to say the results were “frightening.”

Der Spiegel‘s youth magazine Bento.de reports that 1660 or so students answered 25 questions on the subject of identifying problems within the university. The project is under a broader scope of tackling racism on campus. The group found the results “problematic” when many students confirmed that they felt nationalistic or negative toward the mass migration that has been occurring since last year.

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/02/...-assaults/

The "general student committee" is shocked and frightened by these problematic results. The members of the "committee" seem confused over what can be done about these thoughtcrimes. They seem unable to figure out how this wrongthink will ever be be stopped now that Trump has let the genie out of the bottle.

Sail on little thought pirates. Sail on.

Like I said earlier, more Europeans will radicalize. I disagree with the majority of the doomsayers on this thread that say that Europe won't fight back because of the effects of cultural marxism, feminism, political correctness, and white guilt. I seriously doubt that the fifty to sixty year indoctrination of these ideologies on the West completely succeeded in changing and overriding the thousand year old psychology of most Europeans. The success of cultural marxism, feminism, political correctness, and white guilt heavily depends on the safety and wealth of the country. As Europe gets poorer and more dangerous, most people will stop paying heed to these destructive ideologies.

Unfortunately, the opposition leaders are not that good. The leader of the AFD is a short-haired woman that looks like a lesbian. Although I like Marine and Marion le Pen, I think they're too weak. Nigel Farage still accepts the frame of the liberals. I like Geert Wilders but whenever I see his interviews he appears too intellectual and does not have the charisma to galvanize a movement.

More importantly, the Europeans don't have guns or any means to protect themselves from the rapefugees and their authoritarian government. Just imagine what would happen if the fathers of the raped girls Rotherham scandal, the French guys who attacked the Jungle, or the 200 Swedes who stormed the Stockholm metro had guns. The Europeans are sitting ducks for the rapefugees and the government - even when they begin to fight back.

(02-27-2016 04:29 PM)quino_16 Wrote:  

(02-27-2016 02:44 PM)Ghost Tiger Wrote:  Well, this looks promising...

Quote:An online political poll at a German university has revealed broad support for right wing ideas among students.

The poll conducted at the University of Cologne has shocked the general student committee who expected that like most universities there would be a much more pro-left wing outcome. Katharina Letzelter who sit on the board of the committee went so far as to say the results were “frightening.”

Der Spiegel‘s youth magazine Bento.de reports that 1660 or so students answered 25 questions on the subject of identifying problems within the university. The project is under a broader scope of tackling racism on campus. The group found the results “problematic” when many students confirmed that they felt nationalistic or negative toward the mass migration that has been occurring since last year.

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/02/...-assaults/

The "general student committee" is shocked and frightened by these problematic results. The members of the "committee" seem confused over what can be done about these thoughtcrimes. They seem unable to figure out how this wrongthink will ever be be stopped now that Trump has let the genie out of the bottle.

Sail on little thought pirates. Sail on.

Like I said earlier, more Europeans will radicalize. I disagree with the majority of the doomsayers on this thread that say that Europe won't fight back because of the effects of cultural marxism, feminism, political correctness, and white guilt. I seriously doubt that the fifty to sixty year indoctrination of these ideologies on the West completely succeeded in changing and overriding the thousand year old psychology of most Europeans. The success of cultural marxism, feminism, political correctness, and white guilt heavily depends on the safety and wealth of the country. As Europe gets poorer and more dangerous, most people will stop paying heed to these destructive ideologies.

Unfortunately, the opposition leaders are not that good. The leader of the AFD is a short-haired woman that looks like a lesbian. Although I like Marine and Marion le Pen, I think they're too weak. Nigel Farage still accepts the frame of the liberals. I like Geert Wilders but whenever I see his interviews he appears too intellectual and does not have the charisma to galvanize a movement.

More importantly, the Europeans don't have guns or any means to protect themselves from the rapefugees and their authoritarian government. Just imagine what would happen if the fathers of the raped girls Rotherham scandal, the French guys who attacked the Jungle, or the 200 Swedes who stormed the Stockholm metro had guns. The Europeans are sitting ducks for the rapefugees and the government - even when they begin to fight back.

I never said Euros wouldn't fight back - I said the countries were doomed. It won't be a total extinction event, but it will be the death of the following countries: Germany, Sweden, France, and Britain.

Germans, Swedes, French, and British will still survive, but their countries will not. For example, after the Turks captured Constantinople, Greeks still survived and lived in Greece and around in Turkey, but the old Byzantine Empire was no more.

Another example is when the USSR died - there are still Russians. Or when the Ottoman Empire broke apart - there were still Muslims.

In times of War, political entities, i.e. the country, are always the first casualties - but the idea that all the people will be erased is of course nonsensical, as it takes a serious effort to create a system genocide even capable of such conditions. I see the old political order being killed first, and many natives of these countries will either expatriate and flee to safe zones or they will form mini-states of resistance within their homeland.

The EU leaders just need to follow the same sales pitch Obama used when pushing the ACA, just with a slight variation. "If you like your clitoris, you can keep your clitoris."

(02-27-2016 04:02 PM)redpillage Wrote:  

(02-27-2016 06:27 AM)Cosmonaut Wrote:  

(02-26-2016 05:10 PM)Libertas Wrote:  Hearing AfD is expected to make major gains next month, and grew more popular when one of the people there said border guards should shoot invaders if necessary.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/20.../80856410/

This was a real interesting article in the Trump thread that is worth repeating here. Basically it's about "preference falsification" and something we all know about crowd psychology - when an unpopular opinion suddenly becomes popular because it was kept bottled up for fear of social ostracism, regimes change in a cascade. We're seeing this with Trump and may soon see it in Europe.

Trump might have a positive effect on Europe as well.

The Brexit thing may be a closer-run thing than we may have thought, though I still unfortunately predict that Britain will narrowly choose to stay in.

This election is incredibly important. TO be honest, it seems to me most germans/swedes know whats up. they need someone bold enough to take that first step and say what needs to be said. they are afraid of the social consequences of speaking forbidden truths.

A Russian friend of mine told me about his 6 months living in Sweden, that the people there would never even bring up the issue of migration, they were completely afraid to speak their minds. but once he brought the issue up to them, they all, without exception, immediately start agreeing with him. He would compare it to the type of behaviour common during the soviet times, people mindlessly parroting things they are knew full well to be untrue.

point being, I think people should be given a bit more credit. there is a huge undercurrent of tension just waiting to be released. Most importantly, the truth is on our side.

Well, just wait for the elections and watch the AfD barely push the 20% mark - if that. And even IF, by some miracle, they'll reach 25% or 30% then the quartet of liberal parties (SPD/CDU-CSU/Green/Left) is simply going to circle the wagons against them - just like Hollande and his ilk did in France (and predicted by Houllebeqc's Soumission).

And after that phase 2 will begin - a.k.a. the double down - just like in Sweden. There's a reason why immigration case workers are approving huge amounts of 'unaccompanied children' (who clearly are much older) without passports or documentation. They know long term their open border policies will backfire and are flooding the country with as much dark meat as they can.

Germany is fucked. France most likely is fucked (unless we see a military coup).



Sweden is proper fucked.

I agree Sweden are Germany are done for but France still has some spirit in them, their nationalist party scores much higher too. The French are still very patriotic.

I posted a couple of quotes from /pol/ thread a couple of pages back where a French military guy said Hollande was afraid of coupe and that's why send so much soldiers away to other countries. There have also been a couple of generals who have said they're sick and tired of it.

(02-27-2016 04:38 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

(02-27-2016 04:29 PM)quino_16 Wrote:  

(02-27-2016 02:44 PM)Ghost Tiger Wrote:  Well, this looks promising...

Quote:An online political poll at a German university has revealed broad support for right wing ideas among students.

The poll conducted at the University of Cologne has shocked the general student committee who expected that like most universities there would be a much more pro-left wing outcome. Katharina Letzelter who sit on the board of the committee went so far as to say the results were “frightening.”

Der Spiegel‘s youth magazine Bento.de reports that 1660 or so students answered 25 questions on the subject of identifying problems within the university. The project is under a broader scope of tackling racism on campus. The group found the results “problematic” when many students confirmed that they felt nationalistic or negative toward the mass migration that has been occurring since last year.

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/02/...-assaults/

The "general student committee" is shocked and frightened by these problematic results. The members of the "committee" seem confused over what can be done about these thoughtcrimes. They seem unable to figure out how this wrongthink will ever be be stopped now that Trump has let the genie out of the bottle.

Sail on little thought pirates. Sail on.

Like I said earlier, more Europeans will radicalize. I disagree with the majority of the doomsayers on this thread that say that Europe won't fight back because of the effects of cultural marxism, feminism, political correctness, and white guilt. I seriously doubt that the fifty to sixty year indoctrination of these ideologies on the West completely succeeded in changing and overriding the thousand year old psychology of most Europeans. The success of cultural marxism, feminism, political correctness, and white guilt heavily depends on the safety and wealth of the country. As Europe gets poorer and more dangerous, most people will stop paying heed to these destructive ideologies.

Unfortunately, the opposition leaders are not that good. The leader of the AFD is a short-haired woman that looks like a lesbian. Although I like Marine and Marion le Pen, I think they're too weak. Nigel Farage still accepts the frame of the liberals. I like Geert Wilders but whenever I see his interviews he appears too intellectual and does not have the charisma to galvanize a movement.

More importantly, the Europeans don't have guns or any means to protect themselves from the rapefugees and their authoritarian government. Just imagine what would happen if the fathers of the raped girls Rotherham scandal, the French guys who attacked the Jungle, or the 200 Swedes who stormed the Stockholm metro had guns. The Europeans are sitting ducks for the rapefugees and the government - even when they begin to fight back.

I never said Euros wouldn't fight back - I said the countries were doomed. It won't be a total extinction event, but it will be the death of the following countries: Germany, Sweden, France, and Britain.

Germans, Swedes, French, and British will still survive, but their countries will not. For example, after the Turks captured Constantinople, Greeks still survived and lived in Greece and around in Turkey, but the old Byzantine Empire was no more.

Another example is when the USSR died - there are still Russians. Or when the Ottoman Empire broke apart - there were still Muslims.

In times of War, political entities, i.e. the country, are always the first casualties - but the idea that all the people will be erased is of course nonsensical, as it takes a serious effort to create a system genocide even capable of such conditions. I see the old political order being killed first, and many natives of these countries will either expatriate and flee to safe zones or they will form mini-states of resistance within their homeland.

(02-27-2016 06:49 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  

Fixed.

(02-27-2016 04:38 PM)Samseau Wrote:  I never said Euros wouldn't fight back - I said the countries were doomed.

Actually I wasn't referring to you.

----

Here's the crazy Hungarian truck driver that tried to run over some migrants last fall.

(02-27-2016 08:16 PM)quino_16 Wrote:  Here's the crazy Hungarian truck driver that tried to run over some migrants last fall.

There's Trump's VP right there.

Until recently we would joke about retaking Constantinople, but I think Putin might actually have some ideas. I believe Putin has secret aspirations to recreate the Byzantine Orthodox Empire with Moscow as the capital. It's well known that Moscow considers itself Third Rome, but I was suprised to learn that Putin apparantly told the Turkish ambassador to hand over control of the Hagia Sophia to the Christian Church.

This shows that Putin might actually have such ideas.

He'd get instant support from Greece of course. Serbia certainly too, Assad and the Kurds would help out. Armenia might like to settle an old score.

Hey, it's a long shot, but stranger things have happened.

I haven't seen this posted yet, may have missed it.

Zuckerberg Says U.S. Should Imitate Europe's Example And Take Millions Of Refugees

Quote:Mark Zuckerberg praised Germany for their “inspiring” refugee policies during a visit to the country and reiterated his commitment to combating “hate speech” on Facebook.

Speaking at a town hall event in Berlin, the 31-year old billionaire said German leadership in the refugee crisis has been “insipiring” and a “role model for the world.”

“I hope other countries follow Germany’s lead on this,” he added. “I hope the U.S. follows Germany’s lead on this.”

Speaking at the same event, Zuckerberg also emphasised his commitment to tackling “hate speech” on Facebook.

“Hate speech has no place on Facebook and in our community,” he said. “Until recently in Germany I don’t think we were doing a good enough job, and I think we will continue needing to do a better and better job.

These migrants are huge fans of people with Zuckerberg's religion.

(02-27-2016 09:01 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  Until recently we would joke about retaking Constantinople, but I think Putin might actually have some ideas. I believe Putin has secret aspirations to recreate the Byzantine Orthodox Empire with Moscow as the capital. It's well known that Moscow considers itself Third Rome, but I was suprised to learn that Putin apparantly told the Turkish ambassador to hand over control of the Hagia Sophia to the Christian Church.

This shows that Putin might actually have such ideas.

He'd get instant support from Greece of course. Serbia certainly too, Assad and the Kurds would help out. Armenia might like to settle an old score.

Hey, it's a long shot, but stranger things have happened.

Wouldn't that be amazing to see it turn back to normal?

Imagine that happening in our lifetimes, the Hagia Sophia restored after 563 years. I didn't think anybody had any interest in returning it back to it's roots.

Granted, the city would still be called Istanbul, but it's still a huge milestone.

(02-27-2016 11:24 PM)Lucky Wrote:  I haven't seen this posted yet, may have missed it.

Zuckerberg Says U.S. Should Imitate Europe's Example And Take Millions Of Refugees

Quote:Mark Zuckerberg praised Germany for their “inspiring” refugee policies during a visit to the country and reiterated his commitment to combating “hate speech” on Facebook.

Speaking at a town hall event in Berlin, the 31-year old billionaire said German leadership in the refugee crisis has been “insipiring” and a “role model for the world.”

“I hope other countries follow Germany’s lead on this,” he added. “I hope the U.S. follows Germany’s lead on this.”

Speaking at the same event, Zuckerberg also emphasised his commitment to tackling “hate speech” on Facebook.

“Hate speech has no place on Facebook and in our community,” he said. “Until recently in Germany I don’t think we were doing a good enough job, and I think we will continue needing to do a better and better job.

These migrants are huge fans of people with Zuckerberg's religion.

I do not get what the fuck is wrong with Jews outside of Israel... why they usually support people who want them dead?

And even, not an insignificant amount is working to undermine not only the West, but Israel as well (NIF Fund, the organizers of 2010 Gaza Flotilla were Jews, one of the leaders of BDS is Jewish...).

What the fuck? I have a feeling that Israelis and their kin are from totally different planet (apart from some idiots) - they do not have problems with European (and American) populist right.