(02-25-2016 11:35 AM)Laner Wrote:  

(02-25-2016 09:46 AM)Roosh Wrote:  Migrants getting bold... two of them tried to pull away a woman who was with her German boyfriend.

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=a8b_1456334961

There is a story from where I am from.

A rancher was having some wolf trouble. In the first years, he allowed the wolves to range his land without retribution beyond the normal. However, things were becoming much worse and the wolves were getting bold. They were stealing his calves and eating his foals. These current wolves were not the ordinary pack of wolves, but ones who were now used to being given certain allowances with nothing in return.

One day the rancher had enough. He grabbed his most fierce horse and loaded up his guns and went head on into the pack of wolves guns blazing as the wolves attacked him and his horse. They had been feasting on a fresh cow kill.



Long story short, most men allow certain things to happen naturally. In fact, men respect nature and its differences. But it does not mean we don't have the ability to enforce it when needed. Push too far, and the instinct to protect and set right the wild and unpredictable nature that exists, becomes too great.

Beautiful story, and though I understand the message behind I dont think it still applies to men today. The big difference is, the man in your story is a fucking rancher with a shotgun and can ride a big horse gunblazing. Most guys these days? They run at the sight of cockroach and have been conditioned to receive abuse by the government and feminists all their lives.

We can talk about human nature all we want but look at the shit happening around us. Which part of it is natural? Is it natural to overtaxes your own people to give it to foreign invaders? Is it natural to let them rape your women then conceal it and prosecute those who denounce the crimes? Is it natural for men to act like women? For women to walk naked in the street screaming "stop oppression"?


The "natural" breeds of men is dying out. If things really heat up there might be a chance they will stand up and create something out of this mess. What I fear is that the situation continues in slow trickle so it never has a chance to really blow up, and men are more and more conditioned to the unnatural fifth of European politics.

(02-25-2016 12:00 PM)Dalaran1991 Wrote:  

(02-25-2016 11:35 AM)Laner Wrote:  

(02-25-2016 09:46 AM)Roosh Wrote:  Migrants getting bold... two of them tried to pull away a woman who was with her German boyfriend.

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=a8b_1456334961

There is a story from where I am from.

A rancher was having some wolf trouble. In the first years, he allowed the wolves to range his land without retribution beyond the normal. However, things were becoming much worse and the wolves were getting bold. They were stealing his calves and eating his foals. These current wolves were not the ordinary pack of wolves, but ones who were now used to being given certain allowances with nothing in return.

One day the rancher had enough. He grabbed his most fierce horse and loaded up his guns and went head on into the pack of wolves guns blazing as the wolves attacked him and his horse. They had been feasting on a fresh cow kill.



Long story short, most men allow certain things to happen naturally. In fact, men respect nature and its differences. But it does not mean we don't have the ability to enforce it when needed. Push too far, and the instinct to protect and set right the wild and unpredictable nature that exists, becomes too great.

Beautiful story, and though I understand the message behind I dont think it still applies to men today. The big difference is, the man in your story is a fucking rancher with a shotgun and can ride a big horse gunblazing. Most guys these days? They run at the sight of cockroach and have been conditioned to receive abuse by the government and feminists all their lives.

We can talk about human nature all we want but look at the shit happening around us. Which part of it is natural? Is it natural to overtaxes your own people to give it to foreign invaders? Is it natural to let them rape your women then conceal it and prosecute those who denounce the crimes? Is it natural for men to act like women? For women to walk naked in the street screaming "stop oppression"?


The "natural" breeds of men is dying out. If things really heat up there might be a chance they will stand up and create something out of this mess. What I fear is that the situation continues in slow trickle so it never has a chance to really blow up, and men are more and more conditioned to the unnatural fifth of European politics.

One man yes, but its all it takes to turn things around. This has always been the case, and I can only assume that the other ranchers drank coffee and talked about the wolf problem and what they should do about.

The natural part is that the invaders see on opportunity and are going to exploit it. I don't blame them. If I was born where these guys were, I would most likely be with them. What I do blame is the encouragement of the government and the people to take them in with open arms. At the expense of their own culture and people. Its treasonous and they should pay for it with their lives.

Its no longer about if retribution happens, its only a matter of when and by whom. Then the response of current governments and how they decide to enforce the law. We are seeing a hesitancy to enforce laws unto the invaders, but will this leniency happen when the Norwegians, or French or Swedes push back? Time will tell.

(02-25-2016 12:15 PM)Laner Wrote:  We are seeing a hesitancy to enforce laws unto the invaders, but will this leniency happen when the Norwegians, or French or Swedes push back?

No.
http://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Anarcho-tyranny

Quote:He once defined it this way: “we refuse to control real criminals (that’s the anarchy) so we control the innocent (that’s the tyranny).”

Quote:Long story short, most men allow certain things to happen naturally. In fact, men respect nature and its differences. But it does not mean we don't have the ability to enforce it when needed. Push too far, and the instinct to protect and set right the wild and unpredictable nature that exists, becomes too great.

The rancher in your story is a masculine men who knows how to fight and defend himself.

But how about if he was weak and effeminate? How about if he was trained from years of brainwashing to love the wolf and its destruction on his land? How about if he was given chemicals and entertainments to weaken his masculinity? This weak man can not even control a lamb, let alone fight back against the wolf.

A lot of people are using the Crusades as an example for when the European man got angry and stood up. But there are hardly any men like that in Western Europe today. Today's European man was raised to be weak and impotent. And the few strong men will be crushed first by their own government. In fact, all signs point to their government allying with the Muslim invaders to defeat them.

(02-25-2016 12:22 PM)Roosh Wrote:  In fact, all signs point to their government allying with the Muslim invaders to defeat them.

This is indeed the case.

There seem to be really 3 options for Europe:

1. Nationalist governments can claim power democratically, more-or-less peacefully remove invaders, and re-assert border control, keeping Europe European.

2. No real political change, Europe is basically turned into a mish-mash of the Middle East and Africa within a few generations.

3. Nationalists rebel against their governments and indeed fight real civil wars against invaders and their own governments.

I hope for #1, perhaps Trump's election might lead to some wave of Nationalist parties in Europe, but I fear #2 is most likely.

(02-25-2016 12:41 AM)Quintus Curtius Wrote:  I worked with the military of Norway in Bosnia and they were extremely competent, professional, and masculine, when compared with the decidedly unimpressive militaries from the other Nordic countries.

In fact, they are totally different from all the rest.

I agree. Who else would have the guts to engage in this epic display of shitlording?
(they got demoted and punished for this video, of course, but I don't think they give a fuck)

Kosovo Beach Boys by Norwegian soldiers Wrote:Croatia, Albania, somewhere near Romania
It's Euro, and NATO, why the hell do we go?
Pristina blew up, huh? Head for Macedonia
I'll race ya...

Somewhere far overseas
There's a place called Kosovo
That's where you don't want to go
If you're Albanian at all.

Protecting human rights,
Air strikes and firefights,
And we'll be dropping our bombs
Wherever Serbian bad guys hide
Just up from Kosovo.

Somalia, Grenada,
Or rescuing Kuwait-a
We screwed ya, Rwanda,
Wish we coulda helped ya
Iraqi embargo - That's where we got hustled
Ooo, so now we're helping out in Kosovo
We'll kick some ass and then we'll see how it goes
And then we really don't know
Good luck to Kosovo

Every time we go
To little places like Kosovo
We never really know
What happens after we go
Tough luck for Kosovo

(02-25-2016 11:42 AM)nomadbrah Wrote:  Most of the migrants are not physically imposing, in fact what I've noticed is that they're small of stature also compared to their kin who was born in Europe. Poor nutrition. They have a pack mentality, but 1 vs 1 or 5 vs 5 they would lose to most European men.

Whites are actually among the strongest groups of people in the world, as Caucasians are bigger and stronger than other races naturally. 1v1 on average the White man wins versus anyone but a random Caucasian, but 1v5 he loses.

The situation changes drastically with numbers, as it does for all K-selected species.

5v5 the White man wins, and 5v10 the White man still wins. In fact it can go as high as 5v25 and the White group wins. The natural superiority of a single unit becomes exponentially stronger in larger groups, which is why White armies are the most dangerous and always have been.

Hence why there are so many examples of outnumbered White armies crushing bigger armies which go far back as the Greeks destroying the Persians, to the Crusaders crushing the Muslims, all the way to the Americans slaughtering Asians.

This phenomenon is mainly limited to Caucasians as the most K-selected selected of the races, with the Whites being the most K-selected of them all, but there has also been examples of K-selected Asian armies dominating with superior stock, as was such the case of the Mongol armies, or the Japanese.

This is why the current elites do whatever they can to keep White men from organizing, because once they are organized there is no way to stop them other than to build a better White army.


NOTE: Some guys think this means it would be logical to support a "White-only" state, but not true. People do not understand that Whites can easily assimilate other races into their gene pool and have been doing so for thousands of years, as long as there is a White majority backbone Whites never have anything to fear from a mild amount of race mixing. White genes are recessive, which means they breed out dominant genes over time. I plan on writing a post about this genetic fact in the deep forum soon.

Applauding the norwegians for not having bought into the Eurozone bs,its a nice country with hearty people.
If its true that its citizens will fight for their due,then I salute them again.


Nomadbrah:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CPznMbNcfO8

From /r/European:

Quote:I had a talk with someone who is a long standing SPD member recently, who is politically active and supports the current policies of the German government.
We talked about the migrant crisis and I went into it expecting him and all of his kind to be dumb ideologues who just want to "help," who are in it for the feels.
Turns out I was wrong.
The UN has produced several studies that argue that Europe, especially Germany, needs several million migrants each year to meet the targeted economical growth. They also claim that immigration is a general net positive in terms of taxes, lower government spending(dont ask me how, I havent looked into their reasoning) and allows for stronger EU integration.
This is supported by several studies of US and EU think tanks. These people really believe in indefinite growth, which cant be achieved by a stagnating or declining population. After everyone of these has a car, a fridge, a TV, where is the demand for new products coming from? How do we grow?
This is their number one concern. Their solution: Import new consumers. Millions each year. For them these are numbers, it doesnt matter if they are culturally compatible, educated or whatever. They are new consumers that have nothing and need everything. Perfect for the economy.
This is also were socialism shows its true face. To pay for all of this the government takes money from their own people and gives it to the migrants who subsequently pump it into the economy. Socialism is nothing but a giant redistribution of wealth from the indeginous people to the rich elites who enforce policies through the government to make them more money.
This is our ideology. Economical growth about everything else. At the cost of cultural suicide, at the cost of rising tensions, higher crime, all of this does not matter to them because you, the normal indigenous person pays for it.
The companies, the elites do not pay shit. They evade taxes were they can, they dont get migrant centers build in their gated communities, they do not participate in society outside of their circles.
This is what is so horrible about it. Merkel is trying to meet the criteria that was set by these globalists to keep the economy growing. They dont care about side effects, they win either way. Want to protect yourself against higher crime rates? Well, find a private company that does that for you. Dont want your children to sit in classes with 90% migrants? Get it to a private school. Dont want to live in areas that have turned into little Beirut, little Bagdad or little Kabul? Go pay the excessively high rent in upper class areas.
The economy wins either way. If you dont pay for it the government will. They will take your money, funnel it to the migrants and they will spend it instead of you.
Remember the times when taxes were high but you got so much free shit? When our societies were still ethnically clean, homogenous? When the rich were taxed by 90%, yes, even in the US?
But then they slowly took over. Welfare was openend to migrants, schools, public libraries, swimming pools, youth centers were closed. Your taxes went up, taxation of the rich went down. Floodgates were opened. All to the benefit of those who have.
They dont care about the safety of your children. About your wellbeing. All they care about is growth and numbers.

Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/european/commen..._about_36/

You should read the whole thread because the guy made several other interesting comments.

(02-25-2016 12:41 AM)Quintus Curtius Wrote:  I worked with the military of Norway in Bosnia and they were extremely competent, professional, and masculine, when compared with the decidedly unimpressive militaries from the other Nordic countries.

In fact, they are totally different from all the rest.

(02-25-2016 12:35 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

(02-25-2016 11:42 AM)nomadbrah Wrote:  Most of the migrants are not physically imposing, in fact what I've noticed is that they're small of stature also compared to their kin who was born in Europe. Poor nutrition. They have a pack mentality, but 1 vs 1 or 5 vs 5 they would lose to most European men.

Whites are actually among the strongest groups of people in the world, as Caucasians are bigger and stronger than other races naturally. 1v1 on average the White man wins versus anyone but a random Caucasian, but 1v5 he loses.

The situation changes drastically with numbers, as it does for all K-selected species.

5v5 the White man wins, and 5v10 the White man still wins. In fact it can go as high as 5v25 and the White group wins. The natural superiority of a single unit becomes exponentially stronger in larger groups, which is why White armies are the most dangerous and always have been.

Hence why there are so many examples of outnumbered White armies crushing bigger armies which go far back as the Greeks destroying the Persians, to the Crusaders crushing the Muslims, all the way to the Americans slaughtering Asians.

This phenomenon is mainly limited to Caucasians as the most K-selected selected of the races, with the Whites being the most K-selected of them all, but there has also been examples of K-selected Asian armies dominating with superior stock, as was such the case of the Mongol armies, or the Japanese.

This is why the current elites do whatever they can to keep White men from organizing, because once they are organized there is no way to stop them other than to build a better White army.


NOTE: Some guys think this means it would be logical to support a "White-only" state, but not true. People do not understand that Whites can easily assimilate other races into their gene pool and have been doing so for thousands of years, as long as there is a White majority backbone Whites never have anything to fear from a mild amount of race mixing. White genes are recessive, which means they breed out dominant genes over time. I plan on writing a post about this genetic fact in the deep forum soon.

I agree and disagree. I think this phenomenon is more social than genetic. Look how much ass was kicked by (American) Asian and Black battalions during WW2. Over the last 2,000 years, Western civilization has emphasized practicality, adaptability and camaraderie. African and Middle Eastern society is disorganized. Asian society is hierarchical and more focused on tradition than focusing their energy on winning. The west wins due to their lack of tradition and their ability to be ruthlessly pragmatic. Those who assimilate to Western culture inherit those traits through social exposure, not what is programmed in their DNA.

(02-24-2016 08:07 PM)Roosh Wrote:  The Soldiers of Odin operates in Finland and now Norway to protect citizens. The government of Norway spoke out against them.

Today, Islamists announced they are starting a group in Norway to directly fight against Soldiers of Odin.

Quote:Persons linked to Islamist circles in Oslo reported that they had formed a group they call "Allaah soldiers."

Via a centrally positioned person in the Islamist environment VG has been sent a statement and photographs of the planned uniform. Group has been named "Jundullaah" - as they translate into Norwegian with "Allaah soldiers."

https://translate.google.com/translate?s...t=&act=url

What has happened:

-Nationalist group fights against migrant crime to protect citizens
-Government speaks out against nationalist group
-Less than one week later, Islamists state intentions to fight against nationalist group

This is guaranteed to happen: government cracks down on nationalist group before they crack down on Islamists.

This may happen: government secretly supports and protects the Islamist group, maybe even arming them.

I remember when Samseau said that EU governments would give weapons to Muslims. I thought that was a wild idea, but it's getting in the realm of possibility.

Well at least finland is acting as I expected. I wouldn't use the word pussy to describe rural finlanders and loggers I had a chance to work with, especially when vodka fueled. They were also very nationalistic.

@Sonsowey Yes I agree, no. 2 is the most likely outcome but only for certain European countries: Germany, Sweden, Austria, NL, BE, France, UK, Denmark and (due to their unfortunate geographical position re the invaders)Italy and Greece too.

Finland and Norway and Spain will succumb to some extent but less so than the previously mentioned countries.

Ireland and Portugal (also Iceland) because of their geographical positions on the edge of Europe and less attractive welfare compared to some countries near them will maintain a majority indigenous population, in coming decades and hopefully after that as well (also Irish natives have relatively high birthrates compared to most EU countries).

The Visegard countries have balls and pride in their nations and barring severe action from the EU and so long as no leftist parties get into power, will remain European for generations to come I expect.

Switzerland thank Christ is not in the EU, however it still has a high number of non-Swiss living there (many Iberian, many Turks, Yugos, quite a few EE too, some Russians, some Indians, also some Africans, Middle-Easterners but not enough to cause problems yet anyway).
Geographically with it's mountains, I think it's quite lucky, it will always have a high proportion of Swiss natives.
The challenge for CH will be to not allow too many women to dictate Government policy as has been the case in recent times.
So long as they do not capitulate to the pressure from Germany and other cucked nations to take invaders, I think the outlook for CH is reasonably good, at least for the next generation.

The Balkan countries are a mixed bag, I think each one will fare differently.
Romania and Bulgaria also are less likely than Western Europe to allow themselves to be cucked by migrants unless the sheer force of numbers spill over into their countries due to the bottlenecking in Greece.
Even were that to happen, I suspect the lack of welcome for migrants and lack of welfare lends itself to these countries not being overly filled with invaders in the foreseeable future.

I think the next route is Greece-Albania-Italy, probably using albania's ports to ship them to southern italy.

The macedonian border is now closed and thats the only route left. Unless they take the Greece-Albania-Montenegro-Croatia route, but that's very far fetched.


Whats up with this Nato ship plan to patrol turkish greek coast in agean. Will it have any impact?

(02-25-2016 12:35 PM)Samseau Wrote:  NOTE: Some guys think this means it would be logical to support a "White-only" state, but not true. People do not understand that Whites can easily assimilate other races into their gene pool and have been doing so for thousands of years, as long as there is a White majority backbone Whites never have anything to fear from a mild amount of race mixing. White genes are recessive, which means they breed out dominant genes over time. I plan on writing a post about this genetic fact in the deep forum soon.

Still fighting, I see. Samseau, you're a good guy, I like you a lot. I'm honestly sorry for what happened. I really mean it.

Just out of curiosity: In your opinion - how big must this White majority be in order for it not to suffer from miscegenation? Do you have a specific percentage in mind? If so, why _XY_ percentage?

Hitler's 'Mein Krampf' is now a best-seller in Germany

Quote:Reprinting Hitler's autobiography "Mein Kampf" (My Struggle) was long prohibited in Germany — a country that considered the book too dangerous to be read.

Now, it's a German best-seller.

An annotated version currently ranks second in nonfiction on the German weekly Der Spiegel's bestseller list, which is considered an authority in German literature circles.

It's almost certainly not because of anything German bookstores are doing: In fact, most had virtually hidden the book from customers, according to a BBC report in January. Some had refrained from advertising it, while others ordered only a single copy. But online sales picked up, and in-store sales soon followed.

The German copyright for "Mein Kampf" was held by the state of Bavaria, which upheld a ban on reprinting the book for 70 years. Bookstores as well as federal regulators and historians were worried that Hitler's autobiography could be used for right-wing propaganda.

"This book is too dangerous for the general public,” library historian Florian Sepp told The Washington Post last year.

German authorities kept official copies of the book like a state secret. Access was granted only to professionals who formally requested it. Critics had claimed that banning the book from being reprinted added to the mystery surrounding it and did more harm than good.

The secrecy ended when the copyright expired in December.

However, the book that is currently topping the German bestseller lists is far different from Hitler's original version. The new 2,000-page edition is heavily annotated with remarks by experts to help put Hitler's comments into context.

The publishers think that this solution exposes Hitler's destructive and violent ideology.

Today's right-wing movements, which include the Alternative für Deutschland party, whose leadership recently advocated for shooting refugees at the German border to stop them from entering the country, have so far refrained from using Hitler's brutal ideology to justify their contemporary goals.

Most of today's right-wing politicians acknowledge that "Mein Kampf" laid out a violent vision that would lead to the Holocaust and World War II.

The German right recently has made gains as it condemns an influx of refugees that has led to frustration in some parts of eastern Germany in particular. In the city of Bautzen, locals cheered as an asylum home that was under construction burned down last weekend. Only dozens of miles away in Clausnitz, angry protesters surrounded a bus of refugees arriving in the village Thursday. Chanting "We are the people," the crowd made children cry — a situation that ended in a chaos that the German government later described as "shameful."

Joke aside I expect more Europeans to radicalize as the situation worsens.

Remember the future for most Westerns is bleak. An economic collapse and more mass immigration are imminent.

(02-25-2016 12:35 PM)Samseau Wrote:  Whites are actually among the strongest groups of people in the world, as Caucasians are bigger and stronger than other races naturally. 1v1 on average the White man wins versus anyone but a random Caucasian, but 1v5 he loses.

The situation changes drastically with numbers, as it does for all K-selected species.

5v5 the White man wins, and 5v10 the White man still wins. In fact it can go as high as 5v25 and the White group wins. The natural superiority of a single unit becomes exponentially stronger in larger groups, which is why White armies are the most dangerous and always have been.

Hence why there are so many examples of outnumbered White armies crushing bigger armies which go far back as the Greeks destroying the Persians, to the Crusaders crushing the Muslims, all the way to the Americans slaughtering Asians.

This phenomenon is mainly limited to Caucasians as the most K-selected selected of the races, with the Whites being the most K-selected of them all, but there has also been examples of K-selected Asian armies dominating with superior stock, as was such the case of the Mongol armies, or the Japanese.

This is why the current elites do whatever they can to keep White men from organizing, because once they are organized there is no way to stop them other than to build a better White army.


NOTE: Some guys think this means it would be logical to support a "White-only" state, but not true. People do not understand that Whites can easily assimilate other races into their gene pool and have been doing so for thousands of years, as long as there is a White majority backbone Whites never have anything to fear from a mild amount of race mixing. White genes are recessive, which means they breed out dominant genes over time. I plan on writing a post about this genetic fact in the deep forum soon.

Which color army do you pick when you play Risk?

Interesting observations though. Through history whites do seem to organize and mobilize the best.

(02-25-2016 01:20 PM)Requiem Wrote:  

(02-25-2016 12:35 PM)Samseau Wrote:  NOTE: Some guys think this means it would be logical to support a "White-only" state, but not true. People do not understand that Whites can easily assimilate other races into their gene pool and have been doing so for thousands of years, as long as there is a White majority backbone Whites never have anything to fear from a mild amount of race mixing. White genes are recessive, which means they breed out dominant genes over time. I plan on writing a post about this genetic fact in the deep forum soon.

Still fighting, I see. Samseau, you're a good guy, I like you a lot. I'm honestly sorry for what happened. I really mean it.

I'm confused. Sorry for what? Did I miss some important event?

(02-25-2016 12:35 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

(02-25-2016 11:42 AM)nomadbrah Wrote:  Most of the migrants are not physically imposing, in fact what I've noticed is that they're small of stature also compared to their kin who was born in Europe. Poor nutrition. They have a pack mentality, but 1 vs 1 or 5 vs 5 they would lose to most European men.

Whites are actually among the strongest groups of people in the world, as Caucasians are bigger and stronger than other races naturally. 1v1 on average the White man wins versus anyone but a random Caucasian, but 1v5 he loses.

The situation changes drastically with numbers, as it does for all K-selected species.

5v5 the White man wins, and 5v10 the White man still wins. In fact it can go as high as 5v25 and the White group wins. The natural superiority of a single unit becomes exponentially stronger in larger groups, which is why White armies are the most dangerous and always have been.

Hence why there are so many examples of outnumbered White armies crushing bigger armies which go far back as the Greeks destroying the Persians, to the Crusaders crushing the Muslims, all the way to the Americans slaughtering Asians.

This phenomenon is mainly limited to Caucasians as the most K-selected selected of the races, with the Whites being the most K-selected of them all, but there has also been examples of K-selected Asian armies dominating with superior stock, as was such the case of the Mongol armies, or the Japanese.

This is why the current elites do whatever they can to keep White men from organizing, because once they are organized there is no way to stop them other than to build a better White army.


NOTE: Some guys think this means it would be logical to support a "White-only" state, but not true. People do not understand that Whites can easily assimilate other races into their gene pool and have been doing so for thousands of years, as long as there is a White majority backbone Whites never have anything to fear from a mild amount of race mixing. White genes are recessive, which means they breed out dominant genes over time. I plan on writing a post about this genetic fact in the deep forum soon.

It is at least verifiable fact that white europeans are the tallest in the world. Watching strong man contests it is always Icelandics, Americans (with Nordic heritage) or a few Slavs who can compete.

Olympic weightlifting is dominated by Slavs and Caucasians, but there is a large technical component here, where you have to start training at very young age, so not that indicative of strength.

Whites have actually been devolving both in size and brain volume.

The earliest European humans 40.000 years ago, the Neanderthal-Sapiens hybrid called Cro-Magnons were 175cm on average - that's men AND women. Several male fossils have been found as more than 195cm - 6'5'' inches. Men are estimated to be 183cm tall.

In addition the brain volume of the Cro-Magnon was 1600cc significantly larger than today's largest brained population - the Scadinavians with 1484cc today.

This at a time when the latter invading middle eastern farmers (not semittic) were only 163 inches in comparison.

We have a population - the Cro-Magnon - who would literally be taller, smarter, healthier, stronger and maybe better looking than any population on earth today.

There's no other conclusion than we devolved. However, the purest of Cro-Magnon stock is still found in Scandinavia as now proven genetically by geneticist Eske Willerslew. The earliest European found - 37.000 years ago, after the 50.000 year old split between Europeans and Asians - is closest today to modern day Scandinavians.

This is what is so important for Scandinavians to understand - THEY are the real, original Europeans, Scandinavians have lived in Europe for 40.000 years!

All other populations, including the Mediterranean (10.000 years ago) are newcomers. The people of the Ice and Snow are the original inhabitants of Europe, there simply are no doubts about it.

It is important to understand the impact of this timeline.

The West African ethnic group is only 10.000 years old, the earliest Han chinese findings are also only 10.000 years old.

Cro-Magnon - 183cm tall, 1600cc brain, is 40.000 years old.

Are Europeans just going to let that go extint?

Police cover up the crimes. Nothing new but this get more and more into public. Its not that they cover it up by a law or an order. They do it to not disturb the public and mostly because of the political climate. Police know what they should better not report and also what they should not investigate. Because if so, you can shorten your career a lot. They call it lack of public interest why they don't cover those crimes.

http://www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/a...ngere.html

Quote:Peter Beuth said what an interior minister these days just as says when it comes to fear of terrorists, pickpockets and grave Schern. "Security is a basic need," the Christian Democrat said the Wiesbaden parliament at the beginning of his government statement on the Hessian crime statistics 2015. Before he in the next 20 minutes to speak his police and praised himself, he pointed out that the sense of security "of the objectively measurable parameters of crime statistics "quite could differ. "The already recognized the Greek philosopher Epictetus, who said: 'It is not the things themselves that trouble us, but the ideas and opinions of things.'"

That was the beginning of February and the most recent attempt to capture the accusation from the media and the opposition, his police inform the subject of crime among refugees inadequately - or not at all.

This suspicion had already crept a few days after New Year's Eve. Background was a report of the "image" shortly after the attacks in Cologne. The article spoke of a nationwide "muzzle-adoption". The Journal appealed to a "senior police officers" of Frankfurt am Main. Both the Minister and all police press offices of the country deny the existence of an instruction to conceal committed by refugees crime deliberately.

However, just on the day on which the Minister presented the crime statistics with much pathos in the parliament, put the "image" according to newspaper. She cited comprising an internal report of the state criminal police (LKA) "Classified - for official use only". He is on several pages "outstanding events" of the weekend 23 and 24 January again, including six offenses, the applicant had been involved allegedly or actually, about fights and an attack on a heavily pregnant woman. None of these cases had been made public.

in asylum beat "in the course of a dispute about the common pocket money" of his pregnant wife in the seventh month with his fist in the face and kicked her in the stomach.

The CDU politician confirmed the mentioned in the document incidents and reiterated before the committee, there was "no deliberate concealment" and "no political views." The police had waived at the detailed examination of the processes in a publication "lack of public interest"

Indeed Beuth had himself declared on January 21 in the Committee on Home Affairs to have stopped the police to be particularly sensitive to the contracting approach to the issue of refugees. The press offices have to consider carefully whether the personality protection or the public interest in information have priority.

but his opinion drives "the scissors in the head" in politics and police men to Petry Party. The FDP parliamentarian refers to a recent survey by Infratest Dimap for Hessian Radio, in the declared 58 percent of respondents said they did not feel the power of order adequately informed.

However, the police moved in any case in a field of tension that, as a "political expectations" designated chairman of the German police union, Rainer Wendt, the 'no' muzzle-adoption 'requires ". Every official knows exactly what was wanted, he expressed in the debate on the implications of the Cologne New Year's Eve. A Hessian colleague Wendt, who wishes to remain anonymous, says: "I know of no statement, there is certainly no But I'm afraid the press offices prefer to make a message less than too much.."

While Beuth tried to make the "muzzle" discussion behind him, he launched a hunt for the mole in the state police. "The management reports of LKA is no information to the public, but confidential. I have therefore placed a complaint because of betrayal of state secrets." The LKA has confirmed to determine internally.

An other report just say, 130,000 refugees get lost in Germany. Imagine 130,000 people now strive around and nobody know who and where they are.

^Don't believe those numbers. Only 130,000 would be peanuts. It is multiple times this amount for sure.

The 130,000 are out of the 1,1 Million they did register. They are not in their camps. Where are the ones that did not get any registration is also unknown. Then to add the about 230,000 criminal offenders.

From what I've been seeing typical middle class house Germany, most people feverishly follow the news and many are actually repeating the "we need them" mantra,andd of course the "they will integrate,and because they reproduce we will be fine and mixed and integrated" one

When you add then, that police do not report those crimes, many stuff is not out there in the big media. When you do not pay close attention because the whole topic do not affect your daily life now, then you miss how important it is. Many Germans are not confronted with the consequences of this politic direct. And where they are and protest, they get blame and shame. On the other side, there are those reports out there like the Berlin one, so its not like the stuff is hidden complete. Its more a mix, strange to describe. Like everyone is aware that something is going on but you get only little pieces. And no one takes action. Not the police because they have to stand still for the political agenda behind.
58 % of Germans think, media do not inform them good about the refugee situation. So they feel like there is a climate where you can not dare to speak about this and even more where politics do not want to do something against it. Also many fear hard consequences of their actions. When the police show force, they feel bad. Germans want the police to be nice and soft. Violence and strength scares many Germans. So they lack the spirit to survive.
Personal I'm scared of this because when it get to much then this passive cuck mentality turn into something different. In full rage where they go on berserk mode.

About Norway, I guess Norway is also different because its not part of the EU.