Post: #51

There was no "Susan". This woman, who is a D-list author, made up the whole thing because she doesn't like Roosh.
She decided that if she put "alleged" in front of her insane, libelous accusations, that would make it okay.

She's about to find out that she was very, very wrong.

Post: #52

If Roosh starts up a legal war chest i'd happily donate for a cause like this.

Sue the fuck out of this idiot.

We should not let it slide when people level false rape allegations or use the internet as a nasty way to disseminate libelous innuendo with people's real names involved.

Post: #53

Relevant as always

Post: #54

(02-18-2016 05:11 PM)Jackreacher Wrote:  

With touches of "magical realism" like unicorns and river fairies, and don't forget rape!

Post: #55

What's interesting is that absolutely no major SJW or site is coming to her defense. They shared her original article, but currently there's deafening silence. The story is hard to defend even for SJW's, and they defend just about any rape accusation imaginable.

Post: #56

Not only is it a blatant lie, but it's not even a very good one. All those "quotes" she has listed are some of the most retarded comments I have ever heard in my life. Not only are they anti-game, they are flat out pathetic. It absolutely stinks of a woman's own fiction.

"Then he asked her to touch his penis."

Unless someone is mentally handicapped [Or a sex starved SJW - Which I guess is interchangeable], no male on planet earth would say 'Excuse me ma'am, could you touch my penis'.

Post: #57

(02-18-2016 09:41 PM)Rush87 Wrote:  Unless someone is mentally handicapped [Or a sex starved SJW - Which I guess is interchangeable], no male on planet earth would say 'Excuse me ma'am, could you touch my penis'.

Post: #58

(02-18-2016 04:24 PM)RedPillUK Wrote:  It seems she is just some silly woman with a small audience judging by her cringe-worthy sex writing. (What kind of man asks that? It reads like she's not even had sex before, let alone read any erotic fiction)

SJWs are such sexually retarded prudes that "touch my butt and bring me pizza" is seriously their idea of good playful sex talk. It doesn't surprise me that an SJW is this transparently horrible at writing sex fiction.

Get em Roosh! No mercy for false rape accusers.

Post: #59

(02-18-2016 09:52 PM)eatthishomie Wrote:  

(02-18-2016 04:24 PM)RedPillUK Wrote:  It seems she is just some silly woman with a small audience judging by her cringe-worthy sex writing. (What kind of man asks that? It reads like she's not even had sex before, let alone read any erotic fiction)

SJWs are such sexually retarded prudes that "touch my butt and bring me pizza" is seriously their idea of good playful sex talk.

It still amazes me how much SJWs and Southern Baptists have in common.

Secular prude "Talking about sex is wrong because it objectifies women"

Religious prude "Talking about sex is wrong because it encourages the sin of lust"

Though even the religious prudes are at least consistent in demanding self-denial of both sexes; the secular PC 'prudery' demands that men be chaste monks, but that women be hedonistically self indulgent; it really just ties in with a nihilistic far-left mindset of trying to revert and destroy all traditional and social institutions.

(02-18-2016 09:41 PM)Rush87 Wrote:  Unless someone is mentally handicapped [Or a sex starved SJW - Which I guess is interchangeable], no male on planet earth would say 'Excuse me ma'am, could you touch my penis'.

Must've been one of the pick up lines one of her male feminist friends tried on her, lol

Post: #60

http://www.writersdigest.com/editor-blog...-jane-gari

' Wrote:When I was four years old, I convinced half the kids in my neighborhood that a shark lived in the pond behind my house. I assumed they knew I was just spinning a yarn to pass the time as we chucked rocks in the water. Apparently one of the kids who listened to my tale suffered from shark nightmares, and a curt conversation between our mothers resulted in a stern lecture imploring me to curb my habitual storytelling. I promised to knock it off, but I was secretly proud. My fiction had made an impression.

Storytelling was addictive.

Post: #61

(02-18-2016 10:15 PM)delicioustacos Wrote:  When I was four years old, I convinced half the kids in my neighborhood that a shark lived in the pond behind my house. I assumed they knew I was just spinning a yarn to pass the time as we chucked rocks in the water. Apparently one of the kids who listened to my tale suffered from shark nightmares, and a curt conversation between our mothers resulted in a stern lecture imploring me to curb my habitual storytelling. I promised to knock it off, but I was secretly proud. My fiction had made an impression.

Storytelling was addictive.

Boy I bet she's "secretly proud" now! It's so addictive, to be a liar. At least it looks that way she still hasn't grown out of spinning those little tales!

Post: #62

I am just surprised more stories like this haven't been fabricated.

After all, our captain has banged half the female population, I am very surprised they can't find one, pump her with lies and parade her out into the spotlight.

Post: #63

I don't think that at the moment that these liars make a false accusation against one of ours, they are aware enough to know that every thing that they've ever written is going to be found, dissected, pulled apart and analyzed.

She is out of her depth.

Post: #64

1. A commentor on Gari's site nailed it:

Quote:@Jane Gari

In other words you want to turn a mob against the man without technically breaking the law... to suggest that he raped a woman, and if the due-process-be-damned lynch mob that goes after him misunderstood the word "allegedly," well then gee, "I don't know how they could miss that!"

The truth is, you use the crowd to win arguments, rather than using arguments to win the crowd, which is fine.

The later [sic] is necessary for doing things like building the intellectual framework for academic honesty, innovation, leadership -- what has so far been the work of men. Female power is only effective when buttressed by male power (and not uncommonly with resort to lying).

By yourself, you're weak, dishonest."

2. I hope Roosh's legal action sets a widespread precedent whereby men with the means to do so will seek to wipe anybody who opens their mouth to utter deliberate falsehoods against them off the face of the earth.

Post: #65

It's clearly fake.

Quote:She finally agreed to be interviewed after seeing how he continues to spout his poisonous, misogynist rhetoric with sickening bravado. I hope her courage will inspire other possible Roosh victims to come forward as well.

Why not simply print the interview with "Susan"?

Oh that's right. Because there is no "Susan."

Post: #66

What do you expect from a woman who "allegedly" champions women's issues but praises John Lennon who beat his wife.

Post: #67

I notice that there has been complete radio silence from Jane ever since Marc Randazza sent her legal notice to take down her fabricated accusations on Tuesday.

Post: #68

The level to which these people have fallen to is pathetic. American women (and their little bitch boys) must be truly deluded and have serious mental issues if they are now actually fabricating stories in order to persecute someone who they feel goes against their grain of thought.

Post: #69

Time to predict how this case plays out, through gifs and whatnot.

Roosh instructs his lawyer how to proceed before trial:



Roosh testifies:



The defendant testifies:



The judge listens to the defendant's arguments:



Judge announces the verdict for the plaintiff:



Driving off with the cash:

Post: #70

Post: #71

Argh. I knew this would happen. While it's all well and good to be proud of Roosh for fighting his corner against the ridiculous libel that we all saw coming, it's still disappointing and frustrating that Roosh has to deplete financial resources, which he has worked so very hard to accumulate, simply because of one horrible woman who thinks it is fine to completely fabricate stories of serious crimes. The calibre of legal representation Roosh has hired is some of the best in the world and will come at a huge price. The suggestion of a legal fund is a good one. For anyone fearful of being associated with Roosh, perhaps the lawyer would accept payments directly with a certain code/message attached to credit the payment to Roosh's account.

This present story may be a blatant fabrication, but do not underestimate that the tactics may become more sophisticated, at least. There is mention of some women in Poland. This would only require one woman, possibly upset by the end of a relationship with Roosh, combined with verbal coercion and financial reward, to suddenly appear and conveniently accuse Roosh of rape. I mentioned before how that little asian reporter in the DC press conference wrote an appeal to any women who have had any intimate relationship with Roosh to contact him. Why would that be, I wonder?

They are grasping at straws. Yet their desperation doesn't mean Roosh will get off the hook. It is naive to think that today's legal system in the West is anywhere near perfect. Completely false rape accusations put men in jail with alarming frequency. Given Roosh's infamy, the likelihood of one of these coming through is high, and the expectation of due process and lack of gender bias is naive to say the least, even with such preeminent legal counsel.

Would it be possible for you to flee to Russia, just in case of more false accusations, or would you be required to be present in court in civil proceedings?

Something tells me that Roosh would stay to fight on principle, and one can only applaud him for that. But is also not unreasonable to take a realistic view of the rigged system Roosh is fighting in and flee.

Finally, if you are going to stay and fight, then don't go half-assed. I figure you know this already. If you go after her, go for her with absolutely no mercy, ruin her. Legally of course. Try your best to set an example so that lying SJWs in the future would never have the courage or stupidity to falsely accuse you of any crime in the future. This would in turn help all men falsely accused of crimes, in particular of sex related crimes, setting valuable precedent for men in the future who are fighting this nonsensical rape hysteria on every front.

Post: #72

A thought: when I arrived at the conclusion that NO state action could be considered anything other than coercive force, it became viscerally sickening to me to pay taxes. Yet what good would it ultimately do to rot in jail as a tax protestor?

Fake accusations will come. Show trials may be held. I would humbly counsel that living to fight another day is infinitely more principled than gambling with the Western justice system. I encourage no quarter for the lying accuser, but at the same time I hope Roosh can mostly stay at arm's length in Eastern Europe.

Post: #73

(02-18-2016 09:41 PM)Rush87 Wrote:  "Then he asked her to touch his penis."

"Bad girls put it in."

You're welcome.

Post: #74

(02-19-2016 12:07 AM)placer Wrote:  I notice that there has been complete radio silence from Jane ever since Marc Randazza sent her legal notice to take down her fabricated accusations on Tuesday.

Because she's shitting herself.

Post: #75

She wrote this story without thinking it through at all. She saw numerous big media platforms slamming on Roosh, some guy she thought was an easy target, and decided to add to the fire and become popular. Unfortunately for her, she didn't realize mainstream journalists have a legal department advising them.

Below her blog post after changing it to avoid legal trouble. She is most definitely scared and aware of the possible consequences.

Quote:Roosh Obama Accused of Rape*

(*These are allegations that have not been brought formally, nor has he been found guilty of a crime in court.)

Quote:

• I hope her courage will inspire other possible Roosh victims to come forward as well.
• And then, according to Susan, he raped her.
• Susan went to counseling for the depression that ensued after the alleged rape but never formally accused Obama.
• We can encourage all of his possible victims to stand up to him.
• He thinks his tactics of preying on drunk women, getting them alone, following them, not taking no for an answer and then raping being forceful with them if necessary is his right as an “aggressive man” who believes, “women should submit to men.”
• Please share this post to spread the word and encourage other possible victims to come forward.
  

What the hell is she thinking?

(02-19-2016 12:07 AM)placer Wrote:  I notice that there has been complete radio silence from Jane ever since Marc Randazza sent her legal notice to take down her fabricated accusations on Tuesday.

Even after her panic-mode editing the article is still accusing Roosh in her own words. She finishes her superficial recounting of the incident in Susan's voice and then says: "So what can we do for Susan and the others who have remained silent?" And she returns to her own voice:

Quote:Roosh is a perpetrator of the worst kind because he hides behind his self-righteousness and is so arrogant he thinks he will never be brought to justice. He thinks his tactics of preying on drunk women, getting them alone, following them, not taking no for an answer and then raping them if necessary is his right as an “aggressive man” who believes, “women should submit to men.”

According to her, Roosh is in fact a perpetrator and one of the worst kind. He preys on drunk women, isolates them and ultimately rapes them. That's not telling Susan's story (like she didn't make that source up) but her own conclusion.

In other words: