Post: #176

(08-25-2015 02:13 AM)Hotwheels Wrote:  So has all the code for Ashely Madison and Established Men been posted up for download?

Looks that way.

That right there is federal time.

Post: #177

(08-25-2015 02:46 AM)SlickyBoy Wrote:  

(08-25-2015 02:13 AM)Hotwheels Wrote:  So has all the code for Ashely Madison and Established Men been posted up for download?

Looks that way.

That right there is federal time.

Yes, this lady and her accomplice are looking at some major time.

Post: #178

I don´t get it how the people in the company behind Ashley Madison have even the guts to talk anything to the public anymore.

They should be sued for everything they have

Post: #179

(08-21-2015 05:26 PM)CJ_W Wrote:  It has been claimed that Ashley Madison used fakes to get more money out of men, now there is proof.

Here is a statistic of the accounts they created:

+--------------------------+--------+-------+
| email | gender | count |
+--------------------------+--------+-------+
| [email protected] | 1 | 6157 |
| [email protected] | 1 | 12 |
| [email protected] | 1 | 9840 |
| [email protected] | 1 | 634 |
| [email protected] | 2 | 92 |
| [email protected] | 2 | 10 |
+--------------------------+--------+-------+
A sample of those accounts:




nickname profile_caption email city gender updatedon
$pimienta$ Lookin For Love [email protected] New York 1 2013-01-25 04:26:48

viajealasestrellas** un tickete a la luna por favor! [email protected] Cleveland 1 2013-01-25 04:29:30

Starr twinkling eyes and bright personality [email protected] Montreal 1 2013-01-24 22:18:24

IRRESISTIBLE Experimentando [email protected] Fort Lauderdale 1 2013-01-25 04:22:14
L4 Mor3N!T4_ d3 L4 512 Alguien hay para mi?

[email protected] Miami 1 2013-01-25 04:22:13
Thalia Amiga, amante y companera

[email protected] Los Angeles 1 2013-01-25 04:22:41
carito la mujer ideal

[email protected] Dallas 1 2013-01-25 04:29:58
CliffHanger Walking a little on the edge

[email protected] Gander 1 2013-01-24 22:23:43
Dentrodeti Persiguiendo la felicidad

[email protected] New York 1 2013-01-25 04:26:48

This is fraud and deception right there, done by the Ashley Madison CEO
and his team.

A class lawsuit action against them should clean up these fraudsters chiefs
of at least few billions in damages

Post: #180

Here's a somewhat refreshing observation about the users of Ashley Madison, and surprisingly written by a woman (expect her to be raked over the coals by the sisterhood):

http://theweek.com/articles/573446/why-a...ey-madison

Post: #181

(08-25-2015 02:10 AM)SlickyBoy Wrote:  Throw in the $500 million dollar reward for their capture and makes it unlikely they'll stay anonymous for very long.

You're off by 3 zeroes. That's $500,000.

McAfee is a bit of a kook, but I'll accept that he knows more about cyber security than I ever will. That said, some of his stuff doesn't make that much sense. AM was not a big company. It's obvious just looking at the site: it's extremely basic, and they rarely added features. I'd be surprised if the dev staff was more than 3 people. Guessing Mysql for storage with a site of that vintage (2000's) isn't much of a guess. Who didn't use Mysql at that time? It's the M in LAMP. Given that it's a small company, I could see org charts and seating charts being posted in an easily accessible spot.

The fact that they went after source code and that they took MYSQL dumps suggests a good level of tech ability and some serious spite for the target, but "creating a competing site"? You could create a competing site with the core features in a few days. It's not rocket science. It's just that nobody went after that market because it's small and it's yucky and regardless of whether people have morals, they generally like to appear to have some.

His discussion of the psychology behind the attacker is more interesting, but again it's hard to tell with the manginas out there, particularly in tech. They go off a lot on the men on the site and never mention the women, but isn't that the way of the world? Still it seems to me that the main bone the attacker had to pick was the $20 delete fee that clearly was fraud. The fake accounts are all exposed too. Haven't looked extremely closely but it appears that the first few accounts were all female accounts and the wording in their descriptions sets off a bunch of internal BS alerts.

Since the DB has signup dates for all the members, it'd be fun to independently verify Biderman's claim that the day after Valentine's and the day after Mothers' day were the top days for female signups.

Post: #182

(08-25-2015 02:10 AM)SlickyBoy Wrote:  

(08-25-2015 01:44 AM)MMX2010 Wrote:  What are the chances that she'll be unmasked?

Not guaranteed, but much greater than you'd think. I read somewhere that the "hackers" left a big, obvious back door open, making it easier for the FBI and RCMP to narrow their search. Since most hackers are male and the manifesto is so female, it's likely just a pissed off insider who had too much access. It also could have been in combination with a real hacker on the outside to aid in the exfiltration of the data. Throw in the $500 million dollar reward for their capture and makes it unlikely they'll stay anonymous for very long.

Like Thrust suggested, they went too far when they took software and IP along with the rest - this is industrial espionage.

If McAfee was able to narrow it down to inside and a gender, the FBI should be able to figure out the rest. There are not usually lots of females in any given IT dept, but there are some companies with more than the usual. If it was just a female in any of the departments, the size of the company will be the only deterrent. FBI agents are pretty good investigators in general, so they should find her. If she is found her compatriots will likely get snagged as well unless they were not too sloppy in communicating with her. If those guys were smart they would have stopped talking to her after they received all the files, because the FBI used Sabu(sp?) from LulzSec as a snitch to roll on the others undercover.

Post: #183

The woman who wrote that article kinda gets it - but only kind of. She leaves out the part where when they occasionally do focus on females in this story, it's much more of a cougar, you-go-girl approach that doesn't even come close to vilification.

The numbers too - even ten percent of 40 million accounts is a shitload of women. I bet the ratio isn't much different at most online sites either.

She's right about the double standard among feminists (slut walk one day, victim the next), but also denies the existence of the Rubicock for females - once that line is crossed (somewhere less than ten cocks) there is no turning back. Guys may get a case of oneitis, but that's not at all the same thing as the thousand cock stare.

Post: #184

Is it me, or the website is still up like nothing happened?

Post: #185

(08-25-2015 02:25 PM)Rawmeo Wrote:  Is it me, or the website is still up like nothing happened?

For sure. Verified. Not sure how trusting I would be if contacted. It's hardly a blip with a lot of people.

Post: #186

Breaking news: Deadspin.com is reporting that over 100 ESPN employees signed up for Ashley Madison accounts while at work.

ESPN's writers are the biggest bunch of pandering manginas who never fail to go along with SJW witchhunts and call out men for alleged sexism. I really, really hope some of the Ashley Madison accounts were created by these pompous sports writers and they get hung out to dry.

By the way, I've cited no examples as to the type of editorials they write because I have no links: I stopped reading any sports beyond basic scores. Their articles come off so ridiculously politically correct, they're more like Onion parodies than the real thing.

Post: #187

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...child.html

So a porn star is coming out about how she was "terrified" and tossed around while having rough sex with Duggar. But she was so terrified the first time she fucked him a second time anyway. And now she is "traumatized" and she hopes his wife takes the kids and leaves him a lonely man...because he threw her around in bed. Are you fucking kidding me

Post: #188

(08-26-2015 10:34 AM)DamienCasanova Wrote:  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...child.html

So a porn star is coming out about how she was "terrified" and tossed around while having rough sex with Duggar. But she was so terrified the first time she fucked him a second time anyway. And she hopes his wife takes the kids and leaves him a lonely man...because he threw her around in bed. Are you fucking kidding me

Washed up hag with zero chance of a fruitful future (6 years in porn?) grasping for a final shred of attention before hitting the wall.

But who knows, maybe Duggar was trying to exorcise that pussy.

Post: #189

(08-26-2015 10:37 AM)AntiTrace Wrote:  

(08-26-2015 10:34 AM)DamienCasanova Wrote:  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...child.html

So a porn star is coming out about how she was "terrified" and tossed around while having rough sex with Duggar. But she was so terrified the first time she fucked him a second time anyway. And she hopes his wife takes the kids and leaves him a lonely man...because he threw her around in bed. Are you fucking kidding me

Washed up hag with zero chance of a fruitful future (6 years in porn?) grasping for a final shred of attention before hitting the wall.

But who knows, maybe Duggar was trying to exorcise that pussy.

6 years in porn?
This bitch is on her way out looking for her 15 mins of fame...


WB while yelling "teach me how to duggar!" while listening to this song:

Post: #190

A cuckolded husband speaks:

http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/relatio...7501204983

Quote:My wife, to put it bluntly, was a cold fish in bed throughout our nearly two decades of marriage, so it was devastating to see her explicit fantasies laid out there so unabashedly. When we were together, she wasn’t into oral stuff, she wasn’t into kinky stuff — but on the site, she checked all the boxes: “I like to give oral,” “I like to get oral.”

Alpha fucks, beta bucks.

Quote:Not too long ago, after years of struggling financially, my software company, with a valuation in the billions, had its IPO. We did very well. We lived in a $1 million dream house on the beach just outside of San Francisco. She could do anything she wanted.

Alpha fucks, beta bucks.

Quote:The only thing S couldn’t do was betray me, but I guess I forgot to be clear about that.

LOL in spite of myself.

Quote:I confronted her. Turns out she had been on dates with at least six men from the site in a matter of weeks. Right around the same time we started counselling, my wife’s friend (who, mind you, is a licensed marriage and family therapist) suggested she sign up for Ashley Madison, whose tag line is, “Life is short. Have an affair.”

Watch your woman's bitches.

Quote:She tried arguing that it would help our marriage, bring some spice into the relationship, and that being on Ashley Madison was a plus: Since everyone’s married, there’s no incentive to expose the other person. It was as though I was talking to a complete stranger, some bohemian. No one I knew would say something like that.

“You shouldn’t judge me,” S said. “You’re seeing things in black and white when there is so much more nuance to it.”

But really, there wasn’t. She was bored with me and wanted to play. It was very simple.

All familiar territory, I know, fellas, but still. At least it sounds like he took the Red--

Quote:Being divorced after nearly two decades of marriage because my wife was cheating on me on a site like Ashley Madison wasn’t the future I had envisioned. Back when we were together, I thought what we had was good. Only in retrospect, now that I’m separated and in a new relationship, do I understand how good it can be. My life is 1,000 per cent better.

Now I understand what love is. It’s when someone appreciates you for who you actually are, and has your back. And when you’re not with them, you feel like something’s missing. And you can trust them with your life.

--ah, shit. No, he didn't. He still doesn't get it.

Post: #191

If I were a hacker I'd be bluffing the hell out of companies right now and laughing all the way to the bank.

Nobody wants to be the next Ashley Madison.

Post: #192

Some possibly reputable data analyst over at Gizmodo said that basically there were no actual women on the site, and something like 80% of the female accounts there were made once (under Ashley Madison's IP) and never logged in again.

This is consistent with a lawsuit that a former employee of Ashley Madison's made - that she got carpal tunnel or something after having created a thousand fake accounts on the site in 3 months as part of her job.

I won't link the post but it's easy to find on google.

Apparently the gender ratio on the website was ridiculous almost to the point of not making any sense - to the tune of like 90 million men on the site for only about 12k actual women.

If anybody here has ever gotten laid or talked to (in person) an actual women who wasn't a robot that you met from the site you might as well let the general community know, since a dating website scam of this magnitude is pretty unprecedented and I'd be interested to hear if they're going to be held accountable for it.

I can generally see the lack of attraction that this site would have for women, it's not like they'd have a hard time finding dick anywhere.

Post: #193

(08-26-2015 11:57 PM)Hades Wrote:  Some possibly reputable data analyst over at Gizmodo said that basically there were no actual women on the site, and something like 80% of the female accounts there were made once (under Ashley Madison's IP) and never logged in again.

This is consistent with a lawsuit that a former employee of Ashley Madison's made - that she got carpal tunnel or something after having created a thousand fake accounts on the site in 3 months as part of her job.

I won't link the post but it's easy to find on google.

Apparently the gender ratio on the website was ridiculous almost to the point of not making any sense - to the tune of like 90 million men on the site for only about 12k actual women.

If anybody here has ever gotten laid or talked to (in person) an actual women who wasn't a robot that you met from the site you might as well let the general community know, since a dating website scam of this magnitude is pretty unprecedented and I'd be interested to hear if they're going to be held accountable for it.

I can generally see the lack of attraction that this site would have for women, it's not like they'd have a hard time finding dick anywhere.

I think I might have mentioned it earlier in this thread, but I did once meet a woman who said she had used the site. She was the stereotypical bored housewife type and told me she signed up but quit after a month because she was inundated with messages from men, to the tune of something like 40-50 messages a day, too many for her to sort through. She said it was completely overwhelming so she quit it and started using a different site.

Post: #194

Here is a link.. What a hilarious scam. God I hope they get fucked so hard in the courts.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/ashley-mad...58251.html

Post: #195

(08-27-2015 01:51 AM)bacan Wrote:  Here is a link.. What a hilarious scam. God I hope they get fucked so hard in the courts.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/ashley-mad...58251.html

Annalee Newlitz from Gizmodo crunched the data, which is why I said "possibly reputable" - she has her doctorate in english literature or something similar, and works as a journalist for Gawker Media.

Post: #196

Here it is. So lol.

http://gizmodo.com/almost-none-of-the-wo...1725558944

Post: #197

I still don't trust Gizmo and the fact it was researched by a woman. Obvious bias in defending her gender.

However, the evident is pretty damning.

Post: #198

Regardless of how many existed, women members probably didn't last long once they got a mailbox full of old fat guys and dic pics in the space of a week.

Post: #199

(08-27-2015 04:52 PM)SlickyBoy Wrote:  Regardless of how many existed, women members probably didn't last long once they got a mailbox full of old fat guys and dic pics in the space of a week.

Apparently you haven't seen girls inboxes on dating apps.

Post: #200

I hope the douchebag owner of AM ends up broke and in prison.

Charging people to delete their account and not actually deleting it.

Complete lack of business ethics -- regardless of the ethical nature of the site.

This is the same asshole that did after all, offer $1 million for verifiable evidence that Tim Tebow wasn't a virgin.