Post: #26

(01-19-2018 11:45 PM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  Plus at age 37, what's to say it will be an easy & uncomplicated pregnancy?

Its not. After the age of 35, women start to have complications with pregnancy with problems for both mother and child.

Post: #27

Even if the little brat were born half black and autistic the cuck would still proudly stay home and raise it while celebrating his whore-pm wife's sexual freedom.

Post: #28

I am sad to read this. Out of all the English-speaking nations. I've had the most hope for New Zealand. If I was leaving the USA and going to another Anglo country, it would be New Zealand. It makes me wonder if it's so good after all.

How many kiwis do we have no this board?

Post: #29

(01-19-2018 04:11 PM)Transsimian Wrote:  

(01-19-2018 03:56 PM)Dragan Wrote:  Merkel: childless
Macron: childless
Corbyn: childless
May: childless
Juncker: childless

Exactly.

Duterte: 4 children
Trump: 5 children.
Putin: 2 children.
Marine Le Pen: 3 children.
Margaret Thatcher: 2 children. (Not a fan, but at least she wasn't a suicidal nihlist.)

I'm not even too political, but this needs to be made into a meme.

How can a leader be trusted to help construct a bright future when they've got no skin in the game? Not having children has a way of orienting people towards a "enjoy the now" mindset, which can be nihilistic towards the future, whereas having children has a way of orienting people towards a "we've got to make good decisions today so that the children can have a better world to grow up in" mindset.

This raises some very interesting questions.

Post: #30

(01-20-2018 10:57 AM)puckerman Wrote:  I am sad to read this. Out of all the English-speaking nations. I've had the most hope for New Zealand. If I was leaving the USA and going to another Anglo country, it would be New Zealand. It makes me wonder if it's so good after all.

How many kiwis do we have no this board?

I'm not a Kiwi, but if you search the forum and returnofkings, you'll find plenty of writing making a very good case that Kiwi women are of extremely poor quality, both physically and attitude wise. I suspect that the aging horse faced NZ PM would be considered at least an 7 by NZ standards.

I'm not sure if they are as bad as the women of Australia, where postings from the last 3 years or so make a very convincing argument that they may be the absolute worst in the developed world, even worse than Danish or Toronto-Occupied-Ontario women.

The kind of male thirst that these women create makes their countries prime grounds for out of control matriarchal feminism and rapefugee invasion.

Post: #31

This is a blessing in disguise. The relief PM, Winston Peters who also holds the balance of power in the government is a fucking gun. This guy is a no nonsense Maori fella who thinks that affirmative action is bullshit and excessive immigration needs to be canned yesterday. The guy is charismatic and intelligent and he'll essentially be PM even after Jacinda Arden is back from maternity leave.

Post: #32

(01-19-2018 04:11 PM)Transsimian Wrote:  

(01-19-2018 03:56 PM)Dragan Wrote:  Merkel: childless
Macron: childless
Corbyn: childless
May: childless
Juncker: childless

Exactly.

Duterte: 4 children
Trump: 5 children.
Putin: 2 children.
Marine Le Pen: 3 children.
Margaret Thatcher: 2 children. (Not a fan, but at least she wasn't a suicidal nihlist.)

Excellent point. But none of them took six weeks off running the country to have a baby.

Post: #33

(01-20-2018 11:49 AM)Spaniard88 Wrote:  

(01-19-2018 04:11 PM)Transsimian Wrote:  

(01-19-2018 03:56 PM)Dragan Wrote:  Merkel: childless
Macron: childless
Corbyn: childless
May: childless
Juncker: childless

Exactly.

Duterte: 4 children
Trump: 5 children.
Putin: 2 children.
Marine Le Pen: 3 children.
Margaret Thatcher: 2 children. (Not a fan, but at least she wasn't a suicidal nihlist.)

I'm not even too political, but this needs to be made into a meme.

How can a leader be trusted to help construct a bright future when they've got no skin in the game? Not having children has a way of orienting people towards a "enjoy the now" mindset, which can be nihilistic towards the future, whereas having children has a way of orienting people towards a "we've got to make good decisions today so that the children can have a better world to grow up in" mindset.

This raises some very interesting questions.

It is a meme, in fact. It's an issue because these EU leaders aren't oriented to the future, looking to take care of the best interests of their children, because they have none.

Post: #34

(01-19-2018 04:07 PM)redpillage Wrote:  



Yes, we are fucked.

Speaking as someone with a very strong connection to London, that video seems a bit suspiciously edited - how is it that she never interviewed any South Asians or Muslims, given that there's over a million of them in London? Just about all of them would have said kids and marriage.

I'm not surprised by the white women's answers - white British women are atrocious when it comes to family values.

Post: #35

(01-19-2018 04:07 PM)redpillage Wrote:  I don't have any good answers. The gangrene has gone too deep at this point. Europe pretty much has been invaded by a sleeping army and the U.S. is on the same course with the Donald being our last hurrah. The odds are not in our favor unless we are willing to profound cultural changes. Good news is that the pendulum seems to be swinging back however I fear that it's way too late at this point. I don't think this situation can be resolved peacefully, at least over here in Europe. We all know where things are heading over the next decade or so.

I would say that between reviving the white ethnostate and bringing back traditional sex roles, only the latter is feasible. The Right can develop a universalist program that focuses on law, education, and family instead of race. If immigrants are going to come to the West anyway, rightists should seek out and find common cause with the traditionalists among them. ISIS and other anti-West fanatics aside, properly mobilized and awakened non-whites can help reverse the cultural decline.

For example, a large number of foreign women are faithful and care about family. Ideologies that irrationally value white demographics discourage white men from having children with them, which is stupid considering the alternatives. Either you have enough luck and skill to find one of the few good white women left, or you wife up an old whore who will divorce you, empty your bank accounts, and take your children to raise the next generation of hate-filled Red bastards.

Boys and girls who grow up in stable households that value education are less likely to succumb to leftist and feminist indoctrination. It follows that they will agree with and retain traditional values. It does not matter what culture their parents are from as long as it is a stable one.

The most important tasks right now are to expose feminist propaganda, as Jordan Peterson has done, prevent criminals and terrorists from entering and staying in the country, and support the traditional family. Campaign against ridiculous divorce laws, abortion, and the LGBT garbage that leftists have disguised as "human rights" but are actively implementing in schools and other aspects of daily life.

Post: #36

(01-20-2018 03:34 PM)Lunostrelki Wrote:  I would say that between reviving the white ethnostate and bringing back traditional sex roles, only the latter is feasible. The Right can develop a universalist program that focuses on law, education, and family instead of race.

That's a problem though..the alt right and other associated groups have already put forth an all or nothing approach to race which will invariably create a ton of enemies for them in the short and long run.

There's no compromise with this ideologically speaking so it's going to be a serious problem if they try and walk back some of the more rigid ideological aspects.

Plus if they try and walk back some of this now they will create a deep rift within their own "movement."

They pretty much will have to go outside the legal boundaries of functioning western nations in order to tear it all down and start fresh again.

Many of these guys are outright accelerationists when it comes to the decline of western civilization. They aren't trying to prevent a collapse but usher in a collapse as a reset button.

Post: #37

(01-20-2018 10:57 AM)puckerman Wrote:  I am sad to read this. Out of all the English-speaking nations. I've had the most hope for New Zealand. If I was leaving the USA and going to another Anglo country, it would be New Zealand. It makes me wonder if it's so good after all.

How many kiwis do we have no this board?

You must be mad.

New Zealand is way worse than Australia for political correctness cultism, and it's not like Australia where you have space to escape to. Over there it's like you're trapped in an elevator with the fuckers.

Post: #38

(01-20-2018 03:34 PM)Lunostrelki Wrote:  I would say that between reviving the white ethnostate and bringing back traditional sex roles, only the latter is feasible. The Right can develop a universalist program that focuses on law, education, and family instead of race. If immigrants are going to come to the West anyway, rightists should seek out and find common cause with the traditionalists among them. ISIS and other anti-West fanatics aside, properly mobilized and awakened non-whites can help reverse the cultural decline.
...

There is no evidence whatsoever to suggest that trying to convert minorities from socialism has even a snowball's chance in hell.

The very reason the elites are shoehorning the entire world into previously white nations is as a divide and conquer strategy. While whites are paying the majority of taxes (which will persist long after they become a numerical minority) you will never convince minorities in swing-level numbers to vote against tapping that resource to the maximum extent possible.

It's got nothing at all to do with principles and everything to do with who's taking what from who. You simply refuse to contend with the possibility that the American system has no widespread psychological foothold in any race other than whites, that mentality being arguably rare even beyond anglos.

Chinese don't give a shit about whites and never will.
Latinos don't give a shit about whites and never will.
Blacks don't give a shit about whites and never will.
Indians don't give a shit about whites and never will.

You want minorities to suddenly become "conservative"?

Eliminate welfare. Take the total government expenditure per year. Divide it by the number of citizens. That is every man, woman and child's new tax bill.

Otherwise you're only attempting to convince people to vote against their own wallet, and good luck with that.

p.s. Bringing back a white ethnostate is not only possible but it's inevitable. It just wont be under the current border arrangements we know today. Every race now has a homeland but whites. That arrangement will not persist for long.

Post: #39

^
Yep.
Demoralize, divide & conquer the existing population by bringing in an ever increasing 5th column as your new welfare dependent voting base.

Post: #40

They don't even need to be "welfare dependant". Most indians and asians aren't. In those cases they are simply happy to erode white hegemony because on a genetic level it irks them and they still identify as indians and asians rather than Americans, and after all, they can go back home at any time.

Post: #41

(01-20-2018 09:38 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  They don't even need to be "welfare dependant". Most indians and asians aren't. In those cases they are simply happy to erode white hegemony because on a genetic level it irks them and they still identify as indians and asians rather than Americans, and after all, they can go back home at any time.

From the perspective of the Indian or Asian migrant & coming from rather industrious cultural backgrounds; they may not be too fussed about welfare.
Yet the sinister swines imposing the strategy of divide & conquer, their ultimate intent would be absolute control.
Control freaks that they appear to be.

Post: #42

(01-20-2018 09:07 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  Chinese don't give a shit about whites and never will.
Latinos don't give a shit about whites and never will.
Blacks don't give a shit about whites and never will.
Indians don't give a shit about whites and never will.

You want minorities to suddenly become "conservative"?

Eliminate welfare. Take the total government expenditure per year. Divide it by the number of citizens. That is every man, woman and child's new tax bill.

Otherwise you're only attempting to convince people to vote against their own wallet, and good luck with that.

p.s. Bringing back a white ethnostate is not only possible but it's inevitable. It just wont be under the current border arrangements we know today. Every race now has a homeland but whites. That arrangement will not persist for long.

Are you sure about that?

The Conservatives have stolen the British Indian vote from Labour – here's how [This article was written before the 2017 UK General Election

Quote:As the 2017 UK general election nears, Labour is facing a probable loss of seats for the fifth consecutive time. It may also suffer further disintegration of its historical relationship with British voters of Indian origin.

The 2015 election saw the Conservatives receive 1m ethnic minority votes for the first time in its electoral history. And those votes came largely at Labour’s expense. A post-election survey by British Future showed the Tories enjoyed an eight percentage point advantage over Labour among Britain’s Hindu and Sikh communities. The Conservatives have 49 per cent popularity among both ethno-religious groups, to Labour’s 41 per cent.

This reported advantage sharply contrasts with the 2010 election figures. A report produced by think-tank Theos after that vote reported that Labour had secured a 13 per cent advantage over the Tories among British Hindus, and were ahead of the Conservatives by 48.5 percentage points among British Sikhs.

The upcoming general election may well mark an all-time low in relations between Labour and British Indian voters. Under the leadership of Jeremy Corbyn, the party is severely disadvantaged among many British Indian voters. Particular pressure points include the economy, welfare, housing, issues surrounding caste and even foreign policy.

Corbyn’s old-fashioned social democratic model of political economy – high taxes funding an all-encompassing welfare state designed for mass wealth redistribution – is unlikely to command much support among aspirational British Indian voters. The reality is that if many had reservations over the interventionist nature of the economic policies promoted under Ed Miliband’s leadership, they are also likely to find the core tenets of Corbynism unpalatable.

Corbyn’s passionate protection of the welfare state is itself a problem for many British Indians. After describing cuts to welfare spending under David Cameron “rotten and indefensible”, Corbyn may have proven himself to be out-of-touch with much of this key demographic.

Out of Britain’s sizeable ethnic minority groups, British Indians are the most likely to work in salaried professions. Research from 2010 also showed the fertility rate within the British Indian community fell below the UK average. And according to the 2011 census, only 31 per cent of Indian women aged 16-64 were economically inactive.

When combining the realities of greater occupational advancement, low fertility rates and relatively high female economic activity, the archetypal British Indian family is comparatively small, self-sufficient and minimally reliant on welfare assistance. So comprehensive welfare commitments are unlikely to appeal to them.

Corbyn’s opposition to the caste system also puts him at odds with those British Hindus and Sikhs who object to politicians intervening on culturally sensitive issues. They have found the Conservatives to be more sympathetic to their concerns.

Following the election of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi in May 2014, the Conservative government has stepped up its Indian charm offensive. Former prime minister David Cameron not only invited Modi to address a packed Wembley Stadium on a visit to London, but essentially served as his warm-up act.

The event showed just how popular Modi is among British Indian Hindus. But Corbyn does not share their enthusiasm, tending to side with his critics more often than his supporters. This could help push British Indian voters – particularly Gujarati Hindus – towards the Tories.

Meanwhile, Theresa May continues to emphasise the importance of India as a post-Brexit trading partner.

Whether it’s economic management, welfare, housing, the caste system, or foreign policy towards a Modi-led India, Corbyn is out-of-sync with much of the British Indian population. Labour were once able to rely on the loyalty of British Indians at the ballot box. Times have changed. June 8 could well mark a full Tory takeover of Labour’s Indian estate.

Post: #43

Would bang raw and cuck the "first gentleman" of the country.

Post: #44

(01-20-2018 10:57 AM)puckerman Wrote:  Out of all the English-speaking nations. I've had the most hope for New Zealand. If I was leaving the USA and going to another Anglo country, it would be New Zealand.

Why would you assume that?(NZ having the most hope). Not only is that plain wrong, I struggle to think of why you would think that. What exactly is wrong with Canada? I'm mildly kidding but you can't base a major decision like that without knowing what you're getting yourself into...

Post: #45

(01-21-2018 03:18 AM)The Catalyst Wrote:  What exactly is wrong with Canada?

加拿大是个以英文为母语的国家吗？

Post: #46

(01-21-2018 04:18 AM)Transsimian Wrote:  加拿大是个以英文为母语的国家吗？

What I do know is that they have their own alphabet : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tSTWw6-ueIs

Post: #47

(01-19-2018 09:34 AM)gework Wrote:  Is anyone taking bets that he is not the real father?

Looks like a model of heterosexual virility to me.



... and that's me, not going low. There's multiple pics of him crossdressing online.

Between Horseface and Gayface, it's going to be one bloody ugly kid.

Post: #48

^ Further on that, note the lack of heat and the weird body language between him, the PM, and even his ex-girlfriend.

This resembles a childhood hug from your creepy and 'funny' uncle.



A truly happy couple. Look how genuinely in love they are:



Just try making that facial expression. Do you feel the void inside you?

I bet he's the type of Gay Man who calls women 'Fish'. You can sense his disgust.





My High School had a Kid who made the exact same facial expression as the next one. He used to break out into Annie Lennox impersonations on the playground. Admittedly, they were very good impersonations, but he then ended up moving to Surrey Hills in Sydney and always took great care to mention his 'partner' when I ran into him years later, like everyone in School didn't know he was, well, Flaming.







What a weird, creepy, completely-fake couple.



Note that they're both guarding their balls.



Note that NOW he leans in more enthusiastically and actually looks human:



Look, it's Current Year +3. Surely almost everyone can recognise what Gay looks like by now, and, since we're repeatedly-told it's nothing to be ashamed of, then how come no-one is saying the obvious?

Post: #49

That scarf says more than enough.

Post: #50

Would it affect my visa application if I give a WYB rating to the Prime Minister?