Post: #76

Music festivals are centers of degeneracy, attention whoring, heavy hard drug use, drunkenness, and intoxicated casual sex (many times including both parties). Not a good place for tits out.

As a dude I can't stand the level of attention whoring present at these things. Also large crowds, and the out of control behavior. Don't forget that large crowds and chaotic environments give abusers/ gropers the cover they need to get away with stuff.

A better place to go tits out is a nude beach, where the nudity is supposed to be non-sexual.

Post: #77

Madeline Anello-Kitzmiller

Red flag, correct?

"Now Madeline Anello-Kitzmiller, 20, whose breasts were covered in just glitter when the man grabbed her, has said shaming women for what they wear "promotes rape culture""

How does she know? Has she tried wearing something?

Post: #78

If you are a female under 40, and you have breasts larger than a C cup, and a waist less than 28"... I strongly encourage you to go topless. As long as you are not my relative or my girlfriend.

Enjoy the decline?

Post: #79

If a woman bares her titties, she should expect a man to grab them sooner or later. In her mind, she wanted Chad Thundercock to grab them since her goal was to have him grab them, not John Beta Doe

Post: #80

(01-02-2018 02:10 PM)debeguiled Wrote:  Yeah, and he probably told them not to walk around with glitter boobs.


Anyway, look at the video:






Have you ever seen pre-teen kids playing in a park?

That's what they look like, as if they hung up their adulthood for a few moments and played like children.

The women are acting just like girls walking through the middle of the boys' football game with tongues stuck out, trying to get a reaction.

She was relieved someone finally did something. She was starting to think no one noticed.

And the dude, like a kid, took the bait and did something rude, which he enjoyed thoroughly, just like she did.

Then, as is customary, the boy runs away, and the girl now has to chase him and pretend to be all offended. The fake outrage as she turns and goes after him with that emotive "oh no you didn't" body language.

It was like watching actors with a script.

They both play their parts. He covers up. She gives him a few ceremonial whacks to prove she didn't like him grabbing her even though she did. More attention for both of them.

They were both having a ball, enjoying themselves immensely.

I see nothing wrong with the joys of temporary arrested development.

With no internet, they both would have gone home with a great story to tell.

With the internet, the story won't be over till he loses his job and all his friends are interviewed and forced to disavow him as in, I always knew there was something off about him.

It's good to have you back, LOZ.

G

Edit: Oh fuck, that's debeguiled!

Post: #81

(01-04-2018 04:01 PM)Dragan Wrote:  A better place to go tits out is a nude beach, where the nudity is supposed to be non-sexual.

She should get over herself, It doesn't have to be sexual, she's making it weird.

Post: #82

Not attributing any responsibility to the victim is just another facet of western societies continuous push to absolve individuals of any responsibility for the consequences of their own actions/behavior or the need to have any kind of common sense.

To use the example given earlier in this thread, if you park your car in a bad neighborhood and leave your Macbook on the front seat in full view and someone steals it, yes that person is a thief and has committed a crime, BUT, you also bear some responsibility for putting yourself in the situation where you enabled/increased the chances of something bad occurring.

Clearly this girl was not given any decent advice from her parents, or ignorantly chose to ignore it.

Post: #83

"Feminist Move To Desexualize Breasts Could Allow Men To Squeeze Them With Impunity"

http://www.returnofkings.com/129317/femi...h-impunity

"Touching a woman’s breasts without her consent is a textbook example of sexual assault (if sufficiently proven in a court). Yet a growing number of feminists argue that both female breasts and the nipples on them should be “desexualized.” If this rather moronic policy proposal is ever implemented, it would be entirely illogical and indeed unfair for any person touching a woman’s breasts to ever be accused, let alone convicted of sexual assault."

She can't have it both ways. Though I argue, like in my article, that breasts are clearly sexual, this girl has desexualized 99% of the surface of her breasts, aside from the nipples, by wearing nothing on them.

They're sexual in the sense that she complains when a guy touches them, but non-sexual in the sense that she doesn't feel public exposure laws would apply to her.

Post: #84

(01-04-2018 06:43 PM)Vladimir Poontang Wrote:  Madeline Anello-Kitzmiller
Red flag, correct?
"Now Madeline Anello-Kitzmiller, 20, whose breasts were covered in just glitter when the man grabbed her, has said shaming women for what they wear "promotes rape culture""
How does she know? Has she tried wearing something?

You have to love the girls from Portland. My suggestion is to bang this girl now, because by 23 she is going to be tatted up like an aged porn star.

Also... if this guy had known in advance she was from Portlandia... just giving her $5 would have made her happy. She would probably let him motorboat that shit for $10.

Post: #85

(01-08-2018 07:17 AM)david.garrett84 Wrote:  "Feminist Move To Desexualize Breasts Could Allow Men To Squeeze Them With Impunity"

http://www.returnofkings.com/129317/femi...h-impunity

"Touching a woman’s breasts without her consent is a textbook example of sexual assault (if sufficiently proven in a court). Yet a growing number of feminists argue that both female breasts and the nipples on them should be “desexualized.” If this rather moronic policy proposal is ever implemented, it would be entirely illogical and indeed unfair for any person touching a woman’s breasts to ever be accused, let alone convicted of sexual assault."

She can't have it both ways. Though I argue, like in my article, that breasts are clearly sexual, this girl has desexualized 99% of the surface of her breasts, aside from the nipples, by wearing nothing on them.

They're sexual in the sense that she complains when a guy touches them, but non-sexual in the sense that she doesn't feel public exposure laws would apply to her.

Just like sexual harassment. It's only harassment when shes not attracted to the guy doing it.
Like most things to do with modern feminism, they want to have thier cake and eat it to.

This will also be my defence the next time some girl touches my gym sculpted pecs (at least I had to work for them rather than just born like a girl) and I punch her in the face in self defence for sexually assaulting me.
How dare she objectify me? It's bad enough the looks they give, running their eyes over me. Creeps.

Post: #86

Nah, Just say "Get over yourself, girl. This doesn't need to be sexual. You're making it weird"

Post: #87

(01-10-2018 05:07 AM)Conscious Pirate Wrote:  Nah, Just say "Get over yourself, girl. This doesn't need to be sexual. You're making it weird"