No way. WNB. Take the fancy lighting, airbrushing and make up away and that's just a fat chick.

The cellulite is a huge turn-off. That and the fact that her legs are definitely photoshopped in image 2.

5/10, WNB.

And like Blue Streak said, there's a lot of lighting and airbrushing. Its always the fat models who're airbrushed like that.

Also pretty easy to see when its done. That's why I can't stand reading Maxim or FHM.

Edit: Found a less photoshopped image of her, WB so hard. (still 5/10 but the type of 5 I like) Weird how photoshop is a huge turn-off, I got a boner from a less photoshopped image!

I'd definitely fuck the tubby pillow fat yellow swim suit wearing tramp... so many times...

they have comforting pussies. very accommodating

You chubby chasers are only encouraging women to be fat. Stop it!

And she won't be airbrushed or properly lit when you meet her. If she's nice she'll cover herself in flour to help you find her vagina. Would be a shame if you were just sticking your penis in a roll of fat.

How about this? The world is falling apart when fat women think this is ok to photograph or offer to men. It is from a real craigslist ad that I regrettably clicked.

Ok done ranting.
   

^^^ I made a fart sound upon seeing this pic

EDIT: just because I WILL fuck a nicely even proportioned tubby (within reason tubby) chick. DOES NOT mean I am a "chubby chaser". I'm a "will fuck a chubby bitch if she makes my dick hard in the right way"

nothing wrong with having a little Debbie snack cake every blue moon

(06-19-2014 11:57 PM)jariel Wrote:  

Instant erection.

(06-21-2014 12:58 AM)xpatplayer Wrote:  The cellulite is a huge turn-off. That and the fact that her legs are definitely photoshopped in image 2.

5/10, WNB.

And like Blue Streak said, there's a lot of lighting and airbrushing. Its always the fat models who're airbrushed like that.

Also pretty easy to see when its done. That's why I can't stand reading Maxim or FHM.

Edit: Found a less photoshopped image of her, WB so hard. (still 5/10 but the type of 5 I like) Weird how photoshop is a huge turn-off, I got a boner from a less photoshopped image!

^^^ Shit, I'd hit it raw.

(06-21-2014 07:01 PM)Mr. Butterworth Wrote:  ^^^ I made a fart sound upon seeing this pic

EDIT: just because I WILL fuck a nicely even proportioned tubby (within reason tubby) chick. DOES NOT mean I am a "chubby chaser". I'm a "will fuck a chubby bitch if she makes my dick hard in the right way"

nothing wrong with having a little Debbie snack cake every blue moon

Fair enough, I wasn't trying to be totally mean. Different strokes for different folks. I would just rather jerk off than deal with a chubby chick.

That bitch above is fat, no euphemism is going to change that.

She's also breaking a fat girl rule, which is if you're gona be fat, have some big ass titties.

Back to the show...

No, no, no, no fat chicks.

(06-22-2014 05:07 AM)jariel Wrote:  

I might if I was super horny. Geez, what is that, a .5 hip to waist ratio? And why are her legs so short?

^^ I don't think her legs are short, it just seems like her ass is so large it makes it seem like she has no legs. Crazy is her waist is that of a thin chick. And her arms are big. Seems like a weird photoshop experiment.

am I the only one who doesn't like thick likes like the black one above and the women in yellow?

(06-22-2014 03:54 PM)L M McCoy Wrote:  am I the only one who doesn't like thick likes like the black one above and the women in yellow?

You are not alone.

(06-21-2014 12:58 AM)xpatplayer Wrote:  

If you had her on all fours and oinking it would be considered bestiality.

I've spent way too much time around farm animals to fuck fat chicks. Too many similarities.

I can deal with butter faces on occasion, but fat pigs are another thing.

(06-22-2014 03:54 PM)L M McCoy Wrote:  am I the only one who doesn't like thick likes like the black one above and the women in yellow?

I wouldn't get serious with a woman with that body type, but just to bang, sure.

(06-22-2014 10:32 PM)speakeasy Wrote:  

(06-22-2014 03:54 PM)L M McCoy Wrote:  am I the only one who doesn't like thick likes like the black one above and the women in yellow?

I wouldn't get serious with a woman with that body type, but just to bang, sure.

Drunk or nah?

(06-22-2014 05:06 AM)jariel Wrote:  That bitch above is fat, no euphemism is going to change that.

She's also breaking a fat girl rule, which is if you're gona be fat, have some big ass titties.

Back to the show...

had a LTR with a chick with a similar rack but bigger nips. 36DD... lotsa fun. so much boob lol im fine with flatchested chicks now, had my filling. long as the butts nice..

(06-21-2014 07:13 PM)speakeasy Wrote:  

(06-19-2014 11:57 PM)jariel Wrote:  

Instant erection.

Squirtle. WB.

(06-19-2014 11:57 PM)jariel Wrote:  

She's fat, but only a few months of hard work away from being thin. Imagine those tits on a thin girl.

(06-22-2014 02:28 PM)speakeasy Wrote:  

(06-22-2014 05:07 AM)jariel Wrote:  

I might if I was super horny. Geez, what is that, a .5 hip to waist ratio? And why are her legs so short?

WB. I have a bit of a thing for black girls, though. You don't get many in Australia. I had one years ago and have always wanted to try another.

(06-22-2014 04:59 PM)General Mayhem Wrote:  If you had her on all fours and oinking it would be considered bestiality.

I've spent way too much time around farm animals to fuck fat chicks. Too many similarities.

I'd get her on all 4s, put a piggy snout on her and fuck her. Just for the laughs.

Plus I don't mind 5s who are slightly fat (like her) so long as they aren't hambeasts.