Post: #1

Online British gay news magazine PinkNews has called our future king, Prince George, a gay icon.

Their claim that he is a gay icon is based off this photo:



To me, and I assume anyone else not brainwashed by the sick leftist mindset, this just looks like a small child who is excited to be on a helicopter.

Not only is the magazine calling the future heir to the throne gay, they are sexualising a 4 year old! More proof that paedophilia is slowly being pushed forward by the media elite.

Whether or not you believe people are born or become gay, there is no way a 4 year old knows or cares about his/her sexuality.

The editor of the magazine has stated that the article was 'tongue in cheek'. Right.

'Dad, who is this weirdo?'

Post: #2

Fags wanting to poke a 4 year old boy in his ass? Say it ain't so! The homo world is just one perversion after another.

Can you imagine if Roosh said a 4 year old girl is sexy? People are so afraid of being called "homophobic" that they suppress their natural revulsion for phagotry.

Post: #3

Honestly he does look a little , but that could be down to just britishness.

Agreed they should leave him alone.

He's better dressed than me for sure.

Post: #4

Funny how the media have been relentlessly pushing the sexualisation of children agenda but back off when the royals are subject to the same treatment as everyone else.

Post: #5

I am old enough to remember a time when an article like that would have resulted in a public outcry and immediate arrests and conviction of all responsible parties involved.

As much as I hate Islam I cannot fault them for hating the West with a vengeance. As long as shit like this remains a publicly acceptable lifestyle or code of conduct our side will continue to slide toward the losing side of history.

Skulls need to be crushed. Zero tolerance for sexualizing or sexually coveting innocent children. Fuck this makes my blood boil.

Post: #6

(08-12-2017 06:31 AM)redpillage Wrote:  I am old enough to remember a time when an article like that would have resulted in a public outcry and immediate arrests and conviction of all responsible parties involved.

As much as I hate Islam I cannot fault them for hating the West with a vengeance. As long as shit like this remains a publicly acceptable lifestyle or code of conduct our side will continue to slide toward the losing side of history.

Skulls need to be crushed. Zero tolerance for sexualizing or sexually coveting innocent children. Fuck this makes my blood boil.

Exactly, and I believe that the vast majority of British people think that saying ANY 4 year old is a gay icon (which has obvious sexual connotations) is sick and disgusting, let alone our future King.

Imagine if someone called him a heterosexual icon, it is obviously a sexually charged statement. The same standards should apply to homosexuality.

The globalist media outlets have managed to suppress the overwhelmingly negative reaction to the original article. My bet would be that they pushed the original article to get a litmus test of the reaction it would get, saw it was going badly then did a cover up job.

Post: #7

(08-12-2017 04:01 AM)Frank Sicosus Wrote:  Honestly he does look a little , but that could be down to just britishness.

Post: #8

This is a clear cut case of projection. These degenerates are reading their own worldview into the behavior of an innocent kid. Time to bring back the tradition of tarring, feathering and riding people out of town on a rail.

Post: #9

Little boys of his age are not aware of, nor should they have to be be concerned with, controlling their gestures so that debauched adult perverts won't think of them sexually. Their only job at that age is to have fun, explore, and learn. As they grow older, they naturally learn to emulate the masculine behaviors of the male role models in their lives--but as very young boys, they are just being young kids. Every father, uncle and grandfather to young children realizes this.

To distort the innocent conduct of a young child into some sort of "gay affect" is precisely the type of disgusting pedo-normalization the media intends.

Post: #10

(08-12-2017 04:01 AM)Frank Sicosus Wrote:  Honestly he does look a little , but that could be down to just britishness.

Post: #11

I might get some heat for this, but I think homosexuality invariably leads to pedophilia. I'm not surprised at all that a fag magazine is publishing this perverted filth, they're getting closer to adding "P" to the end of their stupid acronym.

Post: #12

You'll get no heat from me. It is well known that pedos are vastly over represented in the homo population compared to their overalll numbers. It is the best kept secret due to the Old Media homos not letting it out for the public to know.

Post: #13

(08-12-2017 03:03 PM)eskimobobseal Wrote:  I might get some heat for this, but I think homosexuality invariably leads to pedophilia. I'm not surprised at all that a fag magazine is publishing this perverted filth, they're getting closer to adding "P" to the end of their stupid acronym.

I'd say pedophilia leads to homosexuality and the vast majority of homos got molested, and the entire LGBTQPedo movement would collapse from lack of gays if pedophilia was somehow eliminated.

Post: #14

(08-12-2017 03:03 PM)eskimobobseal Wrote:  I might get some heat for this, but...

Nope, I think the majority of this forum would agree with that.