Post: #51

You mean the King Tut that actually has European DNA?

https://www.nature.com/news/mummy-dna-un...ry-1.22069

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/spea...c18cfc9459

Egyptians have much more genetic affinity with the Middle East. Even before the Arabs came over for conquest purposes. Sure. They were brown and not white or whatever. But they were certainly not black though there were naturally some blacks living in the southern part per example. To claim that Tuth who has been proven to have European DNA, and the Ptolemaic dynasty that comes from Greece were potentially blacks... LOL!

Post: #52

LOL

Always up for a debate. But it seems like King Tut had a black father.

Akhenaton also shows a propensity toward Black features. As part of that genetic makeup, he, his wife Kiya, and his son had thick lips. The color reproductions above of Tut and his wife show them with dark, not light colored eyes.

The center picture shows Akhenaton in praise of Ra, the Sun God. He is accompanied by his wife Nefertiti and their two children.

A photograph of the side of Akhenaton's statue shows more strikingly his racial genetic constitution.

Post: #53

Pharaoh Alara was from Nubia, he ruled the City of Napata, which corresponds nowadays to... Karima, Northern SUDAN He also never controlled any region of Egypt. He was a king in Nubia which had been conquered LOOOOONG before by Thuthmose III. Not to mention the Nubian dynasty died at about 650 something BC

Post: #54

Aren't there any white or brown people with thick lips and dark colored eyes? Why. I have two or three in my home alone!

http://humansarefree.com/2014/09/king-tu...rding.html Tuth had a lot of R1B. Guess what is the most prevalent genome in W.Europe... ?

http://www.eutimes.net/2010/06/king-tuts...-european/ Etc etc




Roman era portaits. As little as over 2000 years ago. Obviously far before Islam came around.

Post: #55

The mummies in this video have light and straight hair with distinctly European features. Some people say that the light hair is the result of oxidization or bleaching which is definitely possible, but it still doesn't explain why these mummies have straight hair as opposed to frizzy hair.





All matters aside, I can at least acknowledge rudewboy's point that the Nubians made contributions to Ancient Egypt. They might not have been Pharoahs or architects, but a lot of them were probably involved in constructing the pyramids.

Post: #56

rudebwoy is the black version of Mercenary.

G

Post: #57

The contradicting perspective which holds that ‘old Egypt was inhabited’ from its Neolithic early stages to the end of the local traditions by Black Africans seems to have been the main supposition on the subject from the season of the antiquated Hebrews and Greeks until the conception of study of Egyptology in Europe over a century prior

Post: #58

Did precolonial Africa have agriculture?

Post: #59

(06-27-2017 03:10 PM)LEMONed IScream Wrote:  Aren't there any white or brown people with thick lips and dark colored eyes? Why. I have two or three in my home alone!

http://humansarefree.com/2014/09/king-tu...rding.html Tuth had a lot of R1B. Guess what is the most prevalent genome in W.Europe... ?

http://www.eutimes.net/2010/06/king-tuts...-european/ Etc etc




Roman era portaits. As little as over 2000 years ago. Obviously far before Islam came around.

Disregarding the other stuff, it is some achievement to paint realistic portaits like that 2000 years ago. I think most of those are of Levantines though.

Post: #60

^The paintings have been proven to be BS.

http://earhustle411.com/black-history-20...-africans/

Plenty of YouTube videos talking on why the Europeans whitewashed Egypt. This propaganda has been going on for a long time.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMmvrhdpRP4

Maybe someone can explain to me, why all Egyptian statues have their noses removed?

Post: #61

Like talking to a wall Enjoy.

Post: #62

^Truth hurts I know and you avoided my question.


Carved from solid rock, the Sphinx portrays an Afrikan Pharaoh. The nose is missing because Europeans (Napoleon's soldiers), in an effort to obscure powerful, blatant, undeniable evidence of Black Afrikan achievement, blew off the broad Africoid nose and part of the generous lips with cannon fire! The Los Angeles Times (June 4, 1990) actually reported that "When Napoleon visited the Sphinx in 1798, everything but the head was buried in sand...his soldiers reputedly used the Sphinx for target practice." While the Sphinx had already suffered nose damage prior to Napoleon, the greatest destruction took place during Napoleon's occupation of Egypt, as documented by Tony Browder, and testified by the collection of Sphinx portraits he has assembled on page 225 of his book Nile Valley Contributions to Civilization. These six portraits, drawn over a period of 100 years from 1698 to 1798, are the only current evidence available which shows the progression of the nose destruction. Besides the Sphinx, a large percentage of Africoid Kamite statues are missing their noses, whereas European-looking figures are intact. Faces of Africoid sculptures were also altered to appear Caucasoid by Kamit's European conquerors. A Sphinx statue on display in the British Museum actually admits that the "face of the stature was reworked" during the Roman occupation of Egypt. Reporting on the "riddle" of the racial identity of the ancient Egyptians, Count C. Volney, a distinguished French scholar who visited Egypt in the late 1700s, wrote with astonishment "...when I visited the Sphinx, its appearance gave me the key to the riddle. Beholding that head typically Negro in all its features..." He later added "...the Egyptians were true Negroes of the same type as all native-born Africans." The Sphinx's broad nose, full lips, and prognathism are evident in an early drawing of the Sphinx as it was found by the French in the late 1700s.
.
.


Sphinx, Ark Ur Early Sphinx drawing, Africoid
The Sphinx, currently. Early drawing of the Sphinx shows
its Africoid features.






Sphinx up close, color

One of the best photos of the Sphinx. Its Africoid features are undeniable.
HER FEMININE character is also evident.
From Egypt Pyramid History.com

Post: #63

You avoided definitive genetic evidence pages back. The discussion should have ended there and then. But ah well. It ends now.

Post: #64

I was reading this a few days ago.

I knew I'd check back in today and still see every one going back and forth about what color ancient Egyptians were, haha.

Weren't they most likely semitic looking people? Like they are today? Just google "Egyptian man". Who's to say they didn't look pretty much the same in ancient Egypt?

Post: #65

^There was an Arab invasion and a Muslim invasion.

There is a big black population in the south of the country.

Look at Europe, what will that look like in 1000 years.

Post: #66

If Ancient Egypt was dominated by an African elite class, why don't we similar civilizations pop up in the rest of Africa? You see structures in North Africa where the Ancient Romans occupied, but you don't see practically any in sub-saharan Africa.

Post: #67

500 years ago America had no white people, look at it now.

The Olmecs statues in Mexico show a negroid race of people that lived in Mexico. No trace of them today in modern Mexico.

The same thing could be said about Canada.

Australia has a few Aborigines that they don't like to talk about, on the island of Tasmania they were completely wiped out.

Get the picture.

Post: #68

(07-01-2017 06:54 PM)rudebwoy Wrote:  500 years ago America had no white people, look at it now.

The Olmecs statues in Mexico show a negroid race of people that lived in Mexico. No trace of them today in modern Mexico.

The same thing could be said about Canada.

Australia has a few Aborigines that they don't like to talk about, on the island of Tasmania they were completely wiped out.

Get the picture.

That's how they try to explain it away.

I believe in Thor Heyerdahls account, read it here.

Post: #69

^Look at the back of them, they have cornrows.

Nice try.

http://realhistoryww.com/world_history/a...ericas.htm

I have seen them in person and the tour guide admitted they were African!

Post: #70

^ I agree with you there, but most don't. Then again, most don't believe that Phonecians travelled there either like Heyerdahl believes.









Native Americans don't have red hair or beards either, but there they are, in pre-Inca Peru.

Post: #71

My Grandfather passed away a couple years back, and I was always told that I was pretty much exclusively Scandinavian with German and Irish thrown in. I was always told he was Norwegian, but the thing is he looked nothing like Norwegian. He had dark brown hair and a different face than most Scandinavian people. He also had a grandmother with the last name Sena, which in Greek means blessed. I did a search on that name and only about 200 people in Scandinavia have that name. I also recently did a Nat Geo DNA test and found that most of my DNA matches that of a typical German. If you draw a line from the Faroe Islands (a province of Norway) to parts of Greece, they meet in Germany. Following that path of reasoning, I could be 50% Faroese and 50% Greek. The Faroe Islands is also similar to Greece because it has a cross in its flag, and the writing system is Latin. If you have Latin ancestry, your bound to have to have Greek ancestry, and if you have Greek ancestry you are bound to have Semitic ancestry. The weird thing is I was in a store a few months back to get some work done on a car part, and lo and behold I see a man that looks just like my Grandfather, and I also see a picture of him in Greece. The question I've always asked myself is do our ancestors really die, or do they live with us everyday, and we just don't know it?