Post: #251

(05-23-2017 04:33 PM)TigOlBitties Wrote:  We need to drop a few more MOABs

ISIS claimed responsibility and we back/support ISIS indirectly. If we drop a MOAB, it will be to help the people that did this act. And then the west will be forced to take in millions more low IQ people that hate us with a passion and will preach hate to their 8 children.

We don't need to drop another MOAB, we need to get the fuck out of the middle east and let Israel and Saudi Arabia do their own fighting.

Post: #252

Post: #253

(05-23-2017 04:40 PM)It_is_my_time Wrote:  

(05-23-2017 04:33 PM)TigOlBitties Wrote:  We need to drop a few more MOABs

ISIS claimed responsibility and we back/support ISIS indirectly. If we drop a MOAB, it will be to help the people that did this act. And then the west will be forced to take in millions more low IQ people that hate us with a passion and will preach hate to their 8 children.

We don't need to drop another MOAB, we need to get the fuck out of the middle east and let Israel and Saudi Arabia do their own fighting.

The MOAB was dropped to take out important ISIS tunnels and they ended up killing dozens of the goat fuckers in the process. I did not support the wars, but I support airstrikes like this.

Strategically dropping MOABs does not mean we will have to bring in millions of refugees. If that were the case, then yeah, forget it.

Post: #254

Quote:"You bombed Muslim countries first" No we didn't. Muslim tribes invaded the entire MIddle East, parts of Africa, India, Europe - all without any aggression back. The first major offensives were actually Charles Martell which saved Europe from Muslim colonization and then the crusades. The West became all-powerful in the 19th and 20th century. Mark my words - if that had been the Ottomans, then the world would all be Ottoman today with a few billion being dead. They would have zero compassion. The West were relatively compassionate colonizers in comparison to how Islamic conquerors usually were.

My argument is much simpler than that.

The Middle East is like a nest of hornets. Hornets do not pollinate things, they do not produce wax, they do not make honey. It is full of nasty, angry, little assholes who will sting the shit out of anything that gets close.

So why the fuck would you stuck your hand in there?

Post: #255

Breaking point?

Post: #256

(05-23-2017 05:07 PM)HighSpeed_LowDrag Wrote:  Breaking point?

Arson attack on a mosque too. The next 48 hours decide how far it escalates. Could get out of hand scarily quickly.

Post: #257

(05-23-2017 05:07 PM)HighSpeed_LowDrag Wrote:  Breaking point?

Doubt it. Probably the same skinhead blokes that would have beaten one up on a different day.

UK and Europe gets no benefit of the doubt until votes start changing.

Post: #258

(05-23-2017 05:07 PM)HighSpeed_LowDrag Wrote:  Breaking point?

nah, and this shit is beyond stupid anyways. It's usually innocents that are targeted and then the media has a white nationalist angle to exploit.

Until a majority of voters start voting for nationalist parties, nothing will change.

The blokes that did this would be better off cracking skulls in an elite neighborhood café in some liberal urban stronghold, that would send a bigger message to the globalists. But the perpetrators of these fires are too dumb to figure that out.

Post: #259

(05-23-2017 05:07 PM)HighSpeed_LowDrag Wrote:  Breaking point?

I doubt it. I'd love to be wrong but Britain seems thoroughly cucked to me.

Hundreds more are going to have to die this way before Britain wakes up.

Hell, how many people that had to wash pieces of little girls out of their hair last night are already posting about "unity" on Twitter today?

EDIT: Guys stop quoting the same image over and over, RIP mobile users.

Post: #260

For context, this is the third time the U.K. has been at threat level critical since the system was introduced in 2006. The previous two times were the foiled transatlantic flight bomb plot in 2006 and the 2007 London and Glasgow terrorist incidents. It's not just for show.

Our U.K. members are a sharp and solid bunch, but even so, stay safe, brothers.

Post: #261

You can get arrested in Europe for criticizing Islam. They are cucked beyond belief.

Post: #262

(05-23-2017 04:22 PM)Dusty Wrote:  

God, Morrissey looks fucked. He looks how I feel.

Hard to hate a man who made a song like this:




I think he was being ironic.

I hope to fuck he was being ironic.

Please tell me he was being ironic.

But don't worry all the local Manc Slebs will keep their poor mouths shut. Afraid of Muslim violence. Not wanting to rock the boat. It's a lose/lose situation for them if they open their pie-holes.

Being on death's door brings out the best (and the worst) in a man.

Still, fair fucking play to the old vegan faggot.

"You're the one for me, fatty..."

Post: #263

(05-23-2017 03:28 PM)heavy Wrote:  Is Europe is done?
How far behind Europe is Canada?
Is the U.S. saved, for now, by freedom of speech, which is unique to our country. Have we once again become the beacon of freedom?

Canada is almost as cucked as the UK and western Europe, the differences which gives it more time and safety are as listed...

1. Smaller Muslim population, 2-2.5% so far. Will be more in the future of course.

2. Muslim population contained to large cities, mostly in Toronto and Montreal.

3. Muslim population is less unified, European countries tend to gain immigrants (Moroccans in the Netherlands, former French colonies in france, turks in Germany etc..) from one or two locations in the Islamic word, the Islamic population is more "diverse" here.

4. Due to stricter immigration policies, our muslim population is better educated, immigrated with money and have good jobs. Canada tends to get the best of the best from its mass 3rd world immigration. This does not mean that it eliminates all Islamic attacks but reduces the risk.

5. Large geographical area, I live in the Canadian prairies, you could fit all of western Europe in the regions I travel. If at somepoint the large cities become Islamic strongholds, there is a lot of space to escape to. England on the other hand is like a prison island, except you'll be stuck on it with paki's and not Englishmen in the near future.

6. Geographic location, two oceans on either side, a barren north that stretches for thousands of km with a frigid ocean and then Russia on the other side, as well as a 4000km buffer zone to the south of us, that may be growing in Hispanic presence, but they aren't going to be cutting heads off anytime soon, if ever. Plus i'm a catholic anyways (learning Spanish too!)

7. Back to England's prison island... if in coming years, Shit really starts to hit the fan how are the Englishmen going to defend themselves? With sticks? It's almost impossible to get guns onto the island, as proof of the terrorists past attacks have shown. In Canada we have the biggest gun loving nation on earth just south of us, with the largest undefended border on earth. I guarantee if the SHTF here, our American brethren would be making gun runs for us on the regular if needed. Canadian gun laws as they are, are not nearly as strict as European countries as well.

8. Imo England is just too restrictive of a place, I mean what are Englishmens plan Bs? Hide out in the Scottish highlands? I guess the difference in Canada is you can retreat and then formulate a plan B. In England plan B doesn't exist.

Post: #264

^I'm glad that you mentioned that Canada has a lot of guns, many Americans are under the impression that we're an "unarmed nation" but the truth is that there is a shit ton of guns, mostly rifles, here (of course not to the extent of the US) and a lot of guys who know how to use them. Myself, I'm sending my paperwork away this week and will buy a rifle to do some deer hunting in the fall.

Post: #265

I propose a quick fix to this problem...

If you are guilty of a suicide attack then your family shall stand trial in your place and be stripped of everything they own

Lets see if they can sell that to themselves before pulling the pin on the grenade

Post: #266

(05-23-2017 06:07 PM)scotian Wrote:  Myself, I'm sending my paperwork away this week and will buy a rifle to do some deer hunting in the fall.

Scotian goes full Deer Hunter... some interesting fall they're expecting in Canada!

Post: #267

Steven Crowder's response to the Manchester Bombing.

Post: #268

http://archive.is/XIIjy

UK terror threat level raised to critical:





Live in fear plebs. Only the government knows how to protect you. Give up all your rights. Be data raped. I mean, look how well we sorted you out before.

The fact is the government are inviting in the raping hoards. I wouldn't be surprised if they were planting the bombs themselves and killing their own people all in the name of population control.

My forefathers did not die so a bunch of fucking ingrates could come in and rape our children.

The police act like they are the great big billy bollox, but they protect the raping paedo scum. Cognitive dissonance much?

There is no critical terror threat. Do not believe them.

It's all quiet on the western front until the next time. It dies down. We all go back to sleep and then the cunts hit us and our kids again.

Fuck me, I could write a manual on it: How to keep a population in suspense to obey their masters.


One day, when this is all over, I want first dibs to hang the fucking scum in the BBC. Police are next. I'm about done with all the bullshit now. You know where I live.

Terror threat CRITICAL. No it's fucking not. You lying cunts.

Go back to sleep United Kingdom. You are free to do as we tell you.

To all the police reading this: are you happy to be used as pawn in the game? Do you not see our sheer fucking rage against you? Do you not see there are more of us than there are of you? Do you not see if you take us out one by one, another one will crop up, more militant. We aren't even your enemies. Why do you make us your enemies? Why do you protect muslim scum?

Why do you want to keep us afraid?

The UK is fucked. Fucking cowards.

(I'll probably go to jail for this one lads - see you in a bit)

Oh, and as always, Poe's law might apply. Then again it might not.

Post: #269

(05-23-2017 06:54 PM)Going strong Wrote:  

(05-23-2017 06:07 PM)scotian Wrote:  Myself, I'm sending my paperwork away this week and will buy a rifle to do some deer hunting in the fall.

Scotian goes full Deer Hunter... some interesting fall they're expecting in Canada!

Post: #270

4th victim named. 32 year old Kelly Brewster died shielding her 11 year old niece from the blast. RIP

Post: #271

(05-23-2017 07:41 PM)Turnus Wrote:  4th victim named. 32 year old Kelly Brewster died shielding her 11 year old niece from the blast. RIP

Yeah, but those great kabob restaurants.

Post: #272

(05-23-2017 03:45 PM)Rigsby Wrote:  So, now you have a bit of background.

This attack was payback. This attack was a warning.

I take no credit for these thoughts. Not my idea at all. I've been going round in circles with all of it like most of you the last 24 hours, trying to make sense of it all. Not doing a very good job of it. Till I saw this:





Watch this video. Watch every single minute of it. It explains exactly what went on with this attack. Why it happened. The message it was meant to send out. The implications of said attack.

These Muslims specifically targeted this concert because it was payback for little white sluts having the temerity to kick back against their slavers and captors. That, in the primary. Of course, the secondary being your common or garden terrorist attack aimed at striking fear in to us all. But this was personal. It was personal against little white female whore children, little cock-teasers that they are. This will teach them a lesson. And next time they are kidnapped, drugged and raped, well, just know that Muslims are psycho enough to do this so don't go getting any funny ideas of escape. Or testifying in court
.....

I disagree with the premise of the video - the rape gangs are almost 100% Pakistani, and Salman Abedi is Libyan. There's almost nobody of Arab extraction involved in places liked Rotherham or Rochdale.

The only thing linking these two stories is the religion of the perpetrators.

Regarding the rapes I blame Pakistani culture in combination with Islam more than Islam myself. Pakistani culture is a sick culture - I'm of Indian heritage and the only difference between me and a Pakistani is the fact that I'm not a Muslim, apart from that there's a lot of things the same - however, Pakistani stuff is even more fucked up because they use Islam to do backwards shit like treating women like slaves and inbreeding. The Pakistanis think the white girls are worthless because they are not Muslims.

Are you guys aware that a lot of non-Pakistani Muslims despise Pakistanis?

I watched the BBC drama about the Rochdale girls - for what it is, is a good drama. but it totally skirts over the religious dimension. It is more concerned with police not doing anything.

Regarding the rapists, it only happens because the local police let it happen - do you think this kind of shit could happen in Pakistan to young girls? Well it doesn't but there are kids in Pakistan that nobody gives a fuck about - poor and homeless boys. They're the ones that get raped and abused.

The bus driver who has raped 12 little boys (and doesn't think he's done anything wrong): Why thousands of Pakistani children are falling prey to paedophiles

Quote:Ijaz, a bus conductor in his early twenties, spends his days travelling through the bustling streets of Peshawar in northern Pakistan, working hard to scrape a living.

The pay is low and the hours are long, and Ijaz, like many of his colleagues, remains unwed and has no family.

Instead of going home come nightfall, he, and many others, spend their time with street children, paying them as little as 75p for sex and when they have no money, brutally abusing them.

But the children falling prey to these men aren't the ones you might expect. With girls kept at home by their parents, the majority of victims are boys - some as young as six years old.

'Once, there was a boy on the bus and everyone had sex with him,' confesses Ijaz who admits to raping 12 different children during his career as a bus conductor.

'I did it too but what else could I do? They invited me. And he was that kind of boy anyway.'

Sexual abuse in Pakistan is rife. An estimated four million children in the country are forced into work from an early age due to poverty and of those, more than a million live on the streets where they are easy prey for men like Ijaz.

A recent survey of 1,800 men found that a third believe that not only is raping little boys not a crime, it's not even a bad thing to do.

As a result, an estimated 90 per cent of street children have been victims of sexual abuse at some point in their lives.

One such boy is Naeem, 13, who has been on the streets, off and on, since running away from his violent brother who repeatedly beat him following their parents' death. He was eight at the time.

His world is one of drugs and violence. He talks casually of a street where you'll find 'all the paedos'.

He is addicted to heroin and regularly abuses his own fragile body, cutting and stabbing himself in an attempt to deal with his anger.

Although he has sold himself to pay for drugs, he also tells, with tears in his eyes, of a time when he was attacked by a gang of men.

'I was lying here sleeping and four people grabbed me and threw me into a car,' he sobs. 'One was a bus driver, the others were heroin addicts. All four of them raped me.'

Many of Pakistan's abusers are bus drivers. One man who knows this all too well is Hassan Deen, an entrepreneur who rents beds - and sometimes boys - to drivers at Peshawar's largest bus depot.

'A bus driver rents a bed from me and he says he'll pay an extra 50 (50p) or 100 rupees (£1) if I can get him a boy,' explains Mr Deen.

'There's often a kid wandering the streets alone. We tell these boys we'll provide food and shelter if they come with us. That's how we lure them in.'

Others, addicted to the cheap heroin that pours across the border from neighbouring Afghanistan, will have sex with these men for a price.

'If I don't make enough money picking trash, I sell my body,' admits Naeen. 'The first time I sold myself, I didn't have any money.

'So I did it three times with a man and in return, he gave me 3,000 rupees (£17). I was eight and a half. I was little.

'The first time I did it, I hadn't eaten for two to three days. Afterwards, I cried all night, asking myself, "What have I done?" I did this to myself to make some money.'

And Naeen isn't alone. Another street child, nine-year-old Akeeb has also been approached by men on the street but has so far managed to escape.

'I don't get scared if I have a friend with me,' he says. 'I get bothered a lot by the bus driver, the van driver. They tell me to climb on the roof of the bus and do bad things with them. Sometimes they offer me a soft drink in return.'

Unsurprisingly, the impact of this abuse on the children is severe. Along with psychological problems, a Save the Children report showed that as many as one in 10 are murdered by the men who abuse them.

Others go on to become abusers themselves, among them 13-year-old Naeem. 'There was a boy, about 10 or 11,' he confesses, shame-faced.

'I took him to the cinema and spent money on him and he was OK with it. But when we left the cinema, he said he didn't want to do it anymore so then I grabbed his hand and forced him.'

Although there are laws in place to protect children, police rarely bother themselves with the plight of the street children, with many saying that the ever-present threat of Taliban bombs trumps saving small boys.

One man who might be able to help is politician Imran Khan.

'It's one of the most sad and shameful aspects of our society,' he says. 'I'm totally embarrassed by this. It's really shameful for us that we have not been able to protect them.'

For now, boys like Naeem continue to fall victim to predatory paedophiles like serial rapist Ijaz, a man who claims to want a 'good woman' for a wife one day and children of his own.

'I'm going to look for a good wife who's read the Quran and prays,' he says. 'A good, respectable woman. Religion is very important because I'm Muslim.'

That, however, hasn't stopped him from attacking boys. 'What can we do?,' he whines. 'We know it's totally against Islam. God doesn't like it. But we're helpless against our desire.'

The Ariana Grande concert was probably chosen because it was a soft target. If you want to kill loads of kids in the UK, then this is one of the easiest ways to do it. UK Schools are like fortresses now and it's pretty hard for outsiders to get in.

Post: #273

From r/T_D

Post: #274

(05-23-2017 07:50 PM)Dusty Wrote:  Yeah, but those great kabob restaurants.

If only they would hand over the recipes, all this violence could stop.

Post: #275

(05-23-2017 04:14 PM)iop890 Wrote:  

UK Equalities Chief Who Popularised The Term ‘Islamophobia’ Admits: ‘I Thought Muslims Would Blend into Britain… I Should Have Known Better’

Quote:The former head of Britain’s Equalities and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), Trevor Phillips, has admitted he “got almost everything wrong” on Muslim immigration in a damning new report on integration, segregation, and how the followers of Islam are creating “nations within nations” in the West.

Phillips, a former elected member of the Labour Party who served as the Chairman of the EHRC from 2003-2012 will present “What British Muslims Really Think” on Channel 4 on Wednesday. An ICM poll released to the Times ahead of the broadcast reveals:

One in five Muslims in Britain never enter a non-Muslim house;
39 per cent of Muslims, male and female, say a woman should always obey her husband;
31 per cent of British Muslims support the right of a man to have more than one wife;
52 per cent of Muslims did not believe that homosexuality should be legal;
23 per cent of Muslims support the introduction of Sharia law rather than the laws laid down by parliament.

Writing in the Times on the issue, Phillips admits: “Liberal opinion in Britain has, for more than two decades, maintained that most Muslims are just like everyone else… Britain desperately wants to think of its Muslims as versions of the Great British Bake Off winner Nadiya Hussain, or the cheeky-chappie athlete Mo Farah. But thanks to the most detailed and comprehensive survey of British Muslim opinion yet conducted, we now know that just isn’t how it is.”

Phillips commissioned “the Runnymede report” into Britain and Islamophobia in 1997 which, according to both Phillips himself and academics across the country, popularised the phrase which has now become synonymous with any criticism – legitimate or not – of Islam or Muslims.

Durham University’s Anthropology Journal noted in 2007: “It has been a decade since the Commission on British Muslims and Islamophobia was established, a Commission that through its 1997 report, “Islamophobia: a challenge for us all” (“the Runnymede report”) not only raised an awareness of the growing reality of anti-Muslim and anti-Islamic hostility in Britain, but also marked the onset of what might be described as ‘the first decade of Islamophobia’. In doing so, the Runnymede report propelled the word ‘Islamophobia’ into the everyday common parlance and discourses of both the public and political spaces.”

Phillips says his new data shows “a chasm” opening between Muslims and non-Muslims on fundamental issues such as marriage, relations between men and women, schooling, freedom of expression and even the validity of violence in defence of religion. He notes – echoing an article on Breitbart London just two weeks ago which reveals a growing disparity between older and younger Muslims in Britain – that “the gaps between Muslim and non-Muslim youngsters are nearly as large as those between their elders”.

And while he is cautious to note that many Muslims in Britain are grateful to be here, and do identify with role models such as Hussain and Farah, there is a widening gap in society with many Muslims segregating themselves.

“It’s not as though we couldn’t have seen this coming. But we’ve repeatedly failed to spot the warning signs,” he admits.

“Twenty years ago… I published the report titled Islamophobia: A Challenge for Us All, we thought that the real risk of the arrival of new communities was discrimination against Muslims. Our 1996 survey of recent incidents showed that there was plenty of it around. But we got almost everything else wrong.”

His comments will come as a blow to those who continue to attack elements in British society who are concerned about Muslim immigration and integration, and in fact may even go some way to shoring up comments made by U.S. Presidential candidates Donald Trump and Ted Cruz seeking to slow down or pause the rate of Muslim immigration into the West.

“We estimated that the Muslim population of the UK would be approaching 2 [million] by 2020. We underestimated by nearly a million. We predicted that the most lethal threat to Muslims would come from racial attacks and social exclusion. We completely failed to foresee the urban conflicts of 2001 that ravaged our northern cities. And of course we didn’t dream of 9/11 and the atrocities in Madrid, Paris, Istanbul, Brussels and London.”

“For a long time, I too thought that Europe’s Muslims would become like previous waves of migrants, gradually abandoning their ancestral ways, wearing their religious and cultural baggage lightly, and gradually blending into Britain’s diverse identity landscape. I should have known better.”

And Mr. Phillips even acknowledges that the mass sexual grooming and rape scandals that are plaguing heavily Muslim populated towns across Britain are because of Muslim – not ‘Asian’ – men. He writes: “The contempt for white girls among some Muslim men has been highlighted by the recent scandals in Rotherham, Oxford, Rochdale and other towns. But this merely reflects a deeply ingrained sexism that runs through Britain’s Muslim communities” – in a nod to those who have long protested this to be the case in the face of political, media, and even police cover ups.

Even left wing columnist Yasmin Alibhai-Brown told him: “[W]e [liberal Muslims] are a dying breed — in 10 years there will be very few of us left unless something really important is done.”

Phillips comments: “Some of my journalist friends imagine that, with time, the Muslims will grow out of it. They won’t.”

And indeed he lays the blame at the feet of the liberal, metropolitan elite, media classes: “Oddly, the biggest obstacles we now face in addressing the growth of this nation-within-a-nation are not created by British Muslims themselves. Many of our (distinctly un-diverse) elite political and media classes simply refuse to acknowledge the truth. Any undesirable behaviours are attributed to poverty and alienation. Backing for violent extremism must be the fault of the Americans. Oppression of women is a cultural trait that will fade with time, nothing to do with the true face of Islam.”

“Even when confronted with the growing pile of evidence to the contrary, and the angst of the liberal minority of British Muslims, clever, important people still cling to the patronising certainty that British Muslims will, over time, come to see that “our” ways are better.”

In terms of solutions, Mr. Phillips opines on “halting the growth of sharia courts and placing them under regulation” ensuring that school governance never falls into the hands of a single-minority group, “ensuring mosques that receive a steady flow of funds from foreign governments such as Saudi Arabia, however disguised, are forced to reduce their dependency on Wahhabi patronage” and an end to the “silence-for-votes understanding between local politicians and Muslim leaders — the sort of Pontius Pilate deal that had such catastrophic outcomes in Rotherham and Rochdale”.

Mr. Phillips’s comments echo those of the Czech president, and research from across Europe that revealed attitudes amongst Muslims on the continent have hardened. The younger the Muslim, the more likely they are to hold hard-line views, one recent study found.