(06-15-2017 09:38 PM)void Wrote: (06-15-2017 04:52 PM)JayJuanGee Wrote: [edited out]
Crypto's can be used as money, but currently their "real world application" is more like being a stock/gold. The question is, do we see a shift of investments from stock/gold to coins (as most of them are currently not used like a currency for daily transactions). If so, how much?
I think generally speaking you are correct, but maybe the proper description would be storage of value and speculation rather than currency - even though many of the cryptos can be used as currencies, there is a bit of a lack of development and adoption to cause utility to use them as currencies - so a large number of folks who buy cryptos are speculating regarding their future use cases.
These are early adopter and very wild wild west days when it comes to various cryptos and likely a large number of them are going to become more niche and maybe not deliver what they are supposed to deliver - kind of pump and dumps that might not be developed, but even the most widespread of the adoption of various coins is still little known by mainstream people, so there is still a lot of room for growth for a lot of coins.
Oh yeah, and the level of adoption is going to vary too based on region of the world, but if the planet is 7 billion people, 1% would be 70 million, and .1% would be 7 million. I would be surprised if .3% (that would be 21 million people) have had any kind of exposure to any crypto. So the exposure to crypto remains fairly niche and likely somewhat technical folks, but far from widespread, so there seems to remain an ongoing and continued widespread potential for growth - even to approach 1% of the world population would cause stupendous growth.
By the way, currently, coinbase does claim to have nearly 8 million users worldwide
https://www.coinbase.com/about?locale=en-US
And most estimates put number of bitcoin holders far below .5% (which would be about 35 million)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1925152.0
You would think that studies of the cryptospace more broadly would bring a larger number of users, but even recent studies have not given large numbers of crypto users - recent article asserting only 3 million crypto users (seems to contradict or not account for coinbase statistics)
http://www.newsbtc.com/2017/05/07/three-...ncy-users/
Difficult to know with any precision about the total number of crypto users, but my point still remains that even getting crypto users up to 1% of the worlds population seems to be considerable growth as compared to where
(06-15-2017 09:38 PM)void Wrote: Are they delivering fiat money dividends, no.
Probably, you are largely correct that there are no dividends or interest, but even your highlighting this point seems to be forcing some limited definition regarding what is crypto - even though crypto has a lot of variance and use case possibilities that can attempt to allow for these kinds of applications in future scenarios (not currently applied or developed)
(06-15-2017 09:38 PM)void Wrote: Then let's compare them to Gold.
How much investment will the coins take from Gold market capitalization, I doubt it's going to be more than 50% until the technology is ripe.
Sure, gold is a decent comparison. Gold has been around several thousand of years and has some limitations in portability and practicality that may not be the same encumberances of various cryptos - yet we cannot lump them all together.
Of course, there are lots of articles on this topic, yet you seem to be just jumping ahead in terms of going from zero to 50% at some unspecified future date.. ? We got a long way to go before any cryptos or even the combination of cryptos approach 50% of the market cap of gold.
By the way, currently gold is around $7 trillion market cap, but for round numbers, let's give them benefit of the doubt of $10 trillion market cap. Currently all cryptos are a bit over $100 billion, so currently, the combined market cap seems to be at about 1%. This number has 5x'd in the past several months, and a few months ago, all cryptos were less than $20 billion, so about .5% of gold.
In any event, there can be some use cases that cause for some cryptos to grow more or less and to take from some of the gold's use cases.
I personally consider my investment in crypto to be a hedge that is similar to a gold investment, and therefore I invest in cryptos rather than gold, and surely there are probably quite a few people who have similar thinking, and so the concept and the practice is still evolving since cryptos are less than 9 years old - so a very immature market in which we would not want to speculate too much about its future use cases that are still in the process of developing.
(06-15-2017 09:38 PM)void Wrote: That would leave us with a total capitalization of 3 Trillion USD, but only if institutional investors jump on board .
o.k. we have similar numbers, but I still wonder what you are attempting to achieve by talking about pure numbers in a very immature situation - which is the crypto space. The crypto space may go up and down in terms of market cap, and it could take years and years to reach a $1trillion market cap, but so what? There is a lot going on in the space besides the market cap, which is just one measurement of the industry.
(06-15-2017 09:38 PM)void Wrote: I don't know how big the black market/illegal trading is for drugs and whatever, but that would be also a good indicator for Zcash or other anonymous coins.
There are all kinds of use cases for cryptos and all kinds of articles written on the topics of use cases, and there is some entrances in the various markets by using cryptos and they are still finding their uses in these various niches.
One are that is mentioned a lot is also remittances and sending small amounts or up to millions of dollars in capital worldwide without hardly any costs and without hardly any control by third parties.
This is fucking powerful to potentially avoid capital controls, and governments and financial institutions understand the threat of such power that flows into crypto and flows into crypto more and more as the market increases and liquidity of the market increases.
It's a big fucking threat, so referring to smaller use cases is only part of the picture of various cryptos.
(06-15-2017 09:38 PM)void Wrote: The bubble of shit coins will crash. How about we create our own coin as well, "ICO" and cash in. Seems like an easy fraud. Even naming it JizzCoin, ShitCoin, PumpCoin, WeStealYoMo would not stop people from buying in at the moment.
You are not really asserting anything new here. Of course there are going to be ups and downs in the various coins, and some are obvious scams, and even some folks know that they are investing in scams, but they still invest if they believe that they can get in and get out without being the greater fool.
So, even though a lot of them are going to crash, do you know when that is going to happen?
There have been shit coins and joke coins and bullshit for several years, but the scale of some of the ICO craze and mania has gone up thousands of folds in recent months.. Yeah we can see that it may not end well, but at the same time, there could be a good six more months or even longer before some of this craziness plays out. On the other hand, it could crash tomorrow, but I doubt it. I think that at minimum we have several more weeks and more likely several more months of shit coin craziness pumping and lots of people are going to make a lot of money until it crashes and maybe even during the early stages of a crash, too. You are not really asserting anything new, so I am a bit confused about what point you were wanting to make by denigrating what a large majority of the folks already know is going on.