Post: #26

All this translates in my mind as "don't have sex with any woman in Maryland".

Post: #27

(04-20-2017 04:25 PM)Germanicus Wrote:  

(04-20-2017 02:06 PM)Steve McQueen Wrote:  Words fail me, what a traitor to his own kind that man is, would be poetic if he had a bogus claim lodged against himself under this very law

At least half of these scumbag government officials who praise or sign off on these new laws are pedophiles, pederasts, procurers themselves. If they're not doing it themselves then these guys use their power and position to help cover up the sexual degeneracy their friends and allies in government and business get up to. Yet a man and a woman can't even have normal sex without the man burning for "rape" if the woman, after the fact, decides she didn't like it...

Why do we even bother putting up with this shit?

I believe this all goes back to the theory that government employees/politicans are envious of the people who are succesful in the free market. They are stuck with a job with a bunch or red tape thats all about kissing everybodys ass day in and day out.

Professors at my school were a bunch or has beens that got punked out of the free market.

Everytime I talk to a government employee, even the ones at the lowest of the totem pole talk to me with this authoritarian tone as is they are saying "your asking questions and I have the answers so sit down and shut the fuck up".

Then we have the politicans, who pass laws like this so they can feel superior to the common man who are the producers of the economy who answer to no one (or who have a strong enough resume to have the same freedom).

This combined with rubbing shoulder with large corporate execs helps them go to sleep at night but deep down they know they are nothing but a bunch of puppets to those same execs (except for Trump obviously). So they continue to put the foot on our throats as much as they can.

Its sickening and I honestly don't know how its going to stop, Trump hasn't done anything outside of the Berkley tweet to address shit like this.At least not in a straight forward manner.

Post: #28

Part of me fears that something like this is gonna expand to even more states.

I wish that Trump or even Pence would address something like this.

Post: #29

I think the moment the police call you regarding your having met Miss (x) on the (x) of (x) 20(xx) your only suitable response should be "I vaguely recall it, but I was very drunk, and as a matter of fact I think she might have slept with me without obtaining consent."

Post: #30

The only reason I am posting is this thread needs to stay on top. This and the other thread posted on page 1 because this is what was promised to us in the 90's and it is only going to get worse and with technology accelerate into every country and juridiction in the world. I could be in the middle of the amazon in ten years and this will somehow be taught in MANDATORY public education school. I wonder if my kids will have to have a highschool diploma from "brainwash acadamy" to fly to different countries in the future. I teach my kids how to make money, so they will be flying for business most likely. I wonder if my kids wives will have to be "legally" married to them or be charged by the government with rape. I wonder if the government will take my grankids away from my sons because their wives got pregnant before 21. I think I know the answer. And they dont live in the u.s a. Im going to have to form a family so tight-knit that even interrogation wont break us up. The government will probably shoot at us for being a "gang". We better enjoy our lives now brothers. Because the doors of hell are opening up for everybody. The aztecs had it right. Family for life over life. I am a warrior. Everyday I go into work. If I dont have more money than I had yesterday, I need to fix that.

Post: #31

ALWAYS read the law in question before lighting your hair on fire and running around in a panic. Don't you know the media hypes shit and misleads yet? Don't take your legal analysis from Buzzfeed!

I wrote a thread on How to protect and defend against false rape and domestic violence charges I've tried rape charges, true and false.

This law clarifies what was always supposed to be the law. Evidence of physical resistance was never an element of the crime that had to be proved. That makes no sense - "threat of force" can immobilize a victim, eg gun to the head, knife to the throat.

If cops and prosecutors were requiring it in all cases, it was just cops and prosecutors being lazy.

This was and is rape in Maryland:

Quote:Prohibited--In general
(a) A person may not engage in vaginal intercourse with another:
(1) by force, or the threat of force, without the consent of the other;

Sexual crimes in Maryland

No change, "force or threat of force" still required.

This is all the new law adds:

Quote:3–319.1.
(A) EVIDENCE OF PHYSICAL RESISTANCE BY THE VICTIM IS NOT REQUIRED
TO PROVE THAT A CRIME UNDER THIS SUBTITLE WAS COMMITTED.

(B) THE PROVISIONS OF SUBSECTION (A) OF THIS SECTION MAY NOT BE
CONSTRUED TO AFFECT THE ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE OF ACTUAL PHYSICAL
RESISTANCE BY THE VICTIM.

http://mgaleg.maryland.gov/2017RS/bills/hb/hb0429t.pdf

No big deal.

Post: #32

What if you get the video evidence, audio included, and it shows it was perfectly consensual and the girl was enjoying it greatly, but then she regrets it in the morning, accuses you of rape. You have video evidence, but now the fact that she was clearly enjoying it is no longer a defense. What is a non-psychic man supposed to do?

Post: #33

(04-20-2017 02:35 PM)Hypno Wrote:  The audio rule depends on the state. You want to be in a one-party (i.e. you) state.

https://www.rcfp.org/reporters-recording...tate-guide

Of course one would expect the consequences of recording audio to be less than a rape charge, so some people might not worry about the audio rule, but some states make it a separate offense to disclose and some of the states have significant penalties.

However, its not just audio that is a problem. Georgia, for example, also criminalizes video recording made without the consent of all persons filmed; presumably if the camera is not hidden, or there is a warning label on the door of an establishment that one is being recorded, then consent is implied.

Sure, there could be a fine and/or possible jail time for illegally recording, but based on the situation, I would think a lawyer worth his salt should be able to get the audio/video recordings introduced in an all-party state.

A quick search of California recording laws..

Quote:California's wiretapping law is a "two-party consent" law. California makes it a crime to record or eavesdrop on any confidential communication, including a private conversation or telephone call, without the consent of all parties to the conversation. See Cal. Penal Code § 632.

A violation of Penal Code § 632 can lead to a fine of up to $2,500 and/or imprisonment for up to a year. In addition, the violator may be subject to civil liability in the amount of $3,000 or three times the amount of any actual damages sustained as a result. Under the California Public Utilities Commission General Order 107-B(II)(A)(5), a recording is allowed if there is a “beep tone” warning. Under California Penal Code § 633, state law enforcement officials may eavesdrop and record telephone conversations.

Best case scenario, the guy walks out of court a free man, not on the registry, and he prosecutes the woman for false accusations.

Worst case, he pays a $2500 fine and spends a year in jail, he's not on the registry, and he prosecutes the woman for false accusations.

That said, again, a lawyer worth his salt would get the evidence included and the man would walk out of court a free man.

Then he has her prosecuted for the false accusations. No mercy.

Post: #34

Good info Sam Malone - recording saves your butt no matter what. Better face illegal recording than rape charges. I doubt you will get 1 year in jail for that.

Post: #35

As far as the audio part of recording goes, I always wondered, even if you did, couldn't you immediately put it into vlc and extract the sound?

Then when you have to "show" it to somebody it's ... already done. Investigation of that possibility when there is immediate evidence to acquit? Anything's possible, but I doubt it. You'd hope the other side would see clearly that the man is innocent and not do really horrible things in pursuing such made up BS.

Post: #36

(04-20-2017 02:54 PM)Silver_Tube Wrote:  My girl likes to play that 'no, don't, I changed my mind' game with me all the time. She loves to be held down, grabbed, hair pulled, ass smacked and all that. It is scary to think that such play could be used to ruin a man's life.

I'd be careful with that shit, nothing wrong with some play, but the "i changed my mind" stuff is a red flag for me.

Post: #37

(04-20-2017 06:49 PM)CleanSlate Wrote:  All this translates in my mind as "don't have sex with any woman in Maryland".

Wrong. Don't be caught alone in any private space with a woman in Maryland or even in public if the people around are close to her. In fact, don't be in Maryland at all.

You don't actually need to have sex for some crazy bitch to make up a claim against you.

Post: #38

Why is it a problem if you are recording on your own property?
Businesses don't have to disclose that they have a security system, do they?
If it's a problem, just get one of those "This property is monitored by a CC system" stickers and put it on your front door or window.

Post: #39

Post: #40

The thing about these rape accusations is that it's the ultimate victim card that only women get to play. Normally, when a relationship breaks up, the two parties can accuse each other of being at fault, e.g.: "You were unreasonable!" "No, YOU were unreasonable!"

But when she plays the rape card, you can't really accuse her back, "No, YOU were the one who raped ME!" So she has an advantage when she resorts to that. All you can really say is, "No, I didn't," which means that you're the one on the defensive, rather than on the counteroffensive. It's the same way if she says that you beat her, except that in that case, people might ask, "Where are the bruises?"

For the most part, women don't even need to play the rape card anymore. Nobody cares if she was a slut, because "the past is the past," after all. She also doesn't usually need to file a rape accusation in order to get custody of the kids. Nor does she need to claim victimhood in order to extract resources from the next sympathetic beta to come along, since the state will provide for indigent mothers. Nor does she need to worry about being judged for frivolously dumping the father of her kid, since in this age of no-fault breakups, she can just say that "it didn't work out."

I've known women who even made themselves sound like the better person by saying of their ex, "He wasn't a bad guy. He was just sick. He had a lot of problems, and I wasn't qualified to help him deal with those. He needed professional help." People respond, "Wow, you're so magnanimous, understanding, and forgiving! I really admire how compassionate you're able to be toward him, after having been through so much."

Given the endless array of ways in which women can spin a story to make it seem like she did nothing wrong, why play the rape card? Unless she's just really fuckin' weak and her victimhood is all she has to cling to in this whole wide world. Some girls apparently are lacking in conversation topics because within five minutes of meeting you, they want to talk about how they were raped by their ex.

But even then, she doesn't need to play the rape card; she can play the emotional abuse angle instead, and say, "Every day, he constantly put me down, belittled me, told me I was nothing, etc." Nobody's going to ask, "Where's the evidence," because emotional scars don't leave physical evidence. And if he tries to claim, "No, SHE emotionally abused ME," she can say, "He's just crazy; don't listen to him."

But I guess rape makes for a more dramatic, compelling story and attracts more sympathy. She can write a whole poem comparing the experience to being pushed down a flight of cement steps, run over by a truck, bit on the ankle by a rattlesnake, going head first through a windshield, etc. She can write a 12-page, 7,138-word victim impact statement that gets 8 million views in three days on Buzzfeed. A rape accusation can get a girl more attention than Facebook and Instagram combined. So I guess that's where the temptation arises.

Post: #41

(04-21-2017 04:59 PM)Extinguished Light Wrote:  

(04-20-2017 06:49 PM)CleanSlate Wrote:  All this translates in my mind as "don't have sex with any woman in Maryland".

Wrong. Don't be caught alone in any private space with a woman in Maryland or even in public if the people around are close to her. In fact, don't be in Maryland at all.

Baltimore and Ocean City are okay. Avoid the rest of the state.

Post: #42

Meanwhile in Sweden:

Source: http://madworldnews.com/muslim-refugee-r...udge-frees

Muslim Refugee Brutally Rapes Girl, Judge Frees Him For Saying 3 Sick Words

After a court heard that an asylum seeker had threatened, stalked, and brutally raped a young schoolgirl, the community expected him to be jailed for a lengthy period of time and then deported. However, citizens were shocked and outraged when the judge freed the child-rapist after hearing his unbelievable 3-word excuse.

Sweden, which is widely considered the most liberal country in Europe, subsequently holds the title of “rape capital of the West.” Thanks to its progressive approach to multiculturalism and immigration, 1 in 4 Swedish females is predicted to be raped. Of course, the leftist politicians ignore the fact that 9 out of 10 gang rapists are immigrants mostly from Islamic countries. Unfortunately, the liberal remedy to the nation’s rape epidemic is tolerance, acceptance, and acquittal.

On October 4, 2016, an Iraqi migrant identified only as Abdul by the heavily-censored Swedish media convinced a 14-year-old girl that if she didn’t have sex with him, he would send nude photos of her to her family. After forcing his way into her apartment under duress, Abdul brutally sodomized the girl while filming his devious sex acts on his cell phone. In the graphic footage, the child can be heard repeatedly saying “no” to Abdul.

Abdul was arrested and admitted to knowing that his victim was underage. The court believed that he had threatened, blackmailed, and sexually assaulted the child. Because the victim had said “no” to the sexual advancement, as is the requirement to uphold allegations of rape, the Gothenburg District Court found him guilty of child rape. However, they only sentenced him to 10 months in youth custody, alleging that the migrant is a “child refugee.” Unfortunately, Abdul wouldn’t even receive that punishment.

According to Swedish news outlet Fria Tider, Abdul appealed his paltry sentence in a higher court on April 7. The judge immediately acquitted Abdul of child rape, reclassifying his crime as sexual exploitation of a child because he “suspected ADHD problems” in Abdul that would have made it “difficult to interpret” what the girl meant when she screamed “no.”

The sentence was reduced at the same time as Abdul suffers “ADHD problems,” meaning that according to the Court of Appeal, he would have found it “difficult to interpret and interact with other people and realize the standards he is expected to live up to.” There was also a video recording of the alleged rape, which shows a short sequence when Abdul penetrates the girl anally. She said “no” several times but the Court of Appeal believes that she only received anal intercourse and therefore does not need to be concerned about any rape.

Abdul’s sentence was reduced to probation, and he was released from having to pay his victim over $15,500 in compensation for mental anguish, which was part of the original ruling by the district court. Charges related to child pornography were also dismissed, allowing Abdul to get away with threats, blackmail, and rape of a minor child.

Abdul had only been living in Sweden after arriving from Iraq less than 5 years before his conviction. Despite committing heinous crimes just shortly after seeking asylum, the prosecutor, who has the responsibility to defend the child victim, refused to consider requesting deportation.

Sweden is the harbinger of what’s to become of the West if they adopt the same liberal policies during this so-called refugee crisis. By opening their doors to the world’s most dangerous and oppressive nations, they are transforming their own backyard into a third world country.

Post: #43

Girl's grandfather is where?

Girl's father is where?

Girl's brothers are where?

Any sister of mine. Any daughter of mine. Any grand-daughter of mine.

Abdul would get the Princess Bride treatment and the judge would get a dirt nap.

This is the question I am perpetually forced to ask when I see this sort of insanity. Where are the men? What male relative could allow this to slide and still look at himself in the mirror for long enough to even shave?

Post: #44

Yeah I agree but it shows the double standard.

I mean we see guys getting put away for nothing more than the word of a woman in our courts but if you are a muslim you are given free reign.

I truly despise those responsible for this fucked up state of affairs, that prick should be strung up by his ballsack.

Post: #45

(04-22-2017 09:32 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  Girl's grandfather is where?

Girl's father is where?

Girl's brothers are where?

Any sister of mine. Any daughter of mine. Any grand-daughter of mine.

Abdul would get the Princess Bride treatment and the judge would get a dirt nap.

This is the question I am perpetually forced to ask when I see this sort of insanity. Where are the men? What male relative could allow this to slide and still look at himself in the mirror for long enough to even shave?

I agree totally. The sad part is that I believe that most males naturally and instinctively want to protect females. Modern society is undermining those instincts. They are not standing up for real victims, but are standing up for pseudo-victims. It's just plain strange.

Post: #46

(04-22-2017 09:13 AM)Steve McQueen Wrote:  Meanwhile in Sweden:

Source: http://madworldnews.com/muslim-refugee-r...udge-frees

Muslim Refugee Brutally Rapes Girl, Judge Frees Him For Saying 3 Sick Words

After a court heard that an asylum seeker had threatened, stalked, and brutally raped a young schoolgirl, the community expected him to be jailed for a lengthy period of time and then deported. However, citizens were shocked and outraged when the judge freed the child-rapist after hearing his unbelievable 3-word excuse.

Sweden, which is widely considered the most liberal country in Europe, subsequently holds the title of “rape capital of the West.” Thanks to its progressive approach to multiculturalism and immigration, 1 in 4 Swedish females is predicted to be raped. Of course, the leftist politicians ignore the fact that 9 out of 10 gang rapists are immigrants mostly from Islamic countries. Unfortunately, the liberal remedy to the nation’s rape epidemic is tolerance, acceptance, and acquittal.

On October 4, 2016, an Iraqi migrant identified only as Abdul by the heavily-censored Swedish media convinced a 14-year-old girl that if she didn’t have sex with him, he would send nude photos of her to her family. After forcing his way into her apartment under duress, Abdul brutally sodomized the girl while filming his devious sex acts on his cell phone. In the graphic footage, the child can be heard repeatedly saying “no” to Abdul.

Abdul was arrested and admitted to knowing that his victim was underage. The court believed that he had threatened, blackmailed, and sexually assaulted the child. Because the victim had said “no” to the sexual advancement, as is the requirement to uphold allegations of rape, the Gothenburg District Court found him guilty of child rape. However, they only sentenced him to 10 months in youth custody, alleging that the migrant is a “child refugee.” Unfortunately, Abdul wouldn’t even receive that punishment.

According to Swedish news outlet Fria Tider, Abdul appealed his paltry sentence in a higher court on April 7. The judge immediately acquitted Abdul of child rape, reclassifying his crime as sexual exploitation of a child because he “suspected ADHD problems” in Abdul that would have made it “difficult to interpret” what the girl meant when she screamed “no.”

The sentence was reduced at the same time as Abdul suffers “ADHD problems,” meaning that according to the Court of Appeal, he would have found it “difficult to interpret and interact with other people and realize the standards he is expected to live up to.” There was also a video recording of the alleged rape, which shows a short sequence when Abdul penetrates the girl anally. She said “no” several times but the Court of Appeal believes that she only received anal intercourse and therefore does not need to be concerned about any rape.

Abdul’s sentence was reduced to probation, and he was released from having to pay his victim over $15,500 in compensation for mental anguish, which was part of the original ruling by the district court. Charges related to child pornography were also dismissed, allowing Abdul to get away with threats, blackmail, and rape of a minor child.

Abdul had only been living in Sweden after arriving from Iraq less than 5 years before his conviction. Despite committing heinous crimes just shortly after seeking asylum, the prosecutor, who has the responsibility to defend the child victim, refused to consider requesting deportation.

Sweden is the harbinger of what’s to become of the West if they adopt the same liberal policies during this so-called refugee crisis. By opening their doors to the world’s most dangerous and oppressive nations, they are transforming their own backyard into a third world country.

Source is MadWorldNews.com ... seems like fake news

Post: #47

Its up on Infowars aswell, I just googled as was listening to their podcast and thought of this thread

Post: #48

Nah - it is true about Sweden rapists being released when claiming to be under-age and Muslim, but the site is just worded in a dumb way.

There are dozens of reports like that from credible sources:

http://www.dailywire.com/news/14812/musl...exit-modal
http://www.friatider.se/muhameds-comment...-community

Post: #49

(04-20-2017 09:56 PM)coyoix Wrote:  The only reason I am posting is this thread needs to stay on top. This and the other thread posted on page 1 because this is what was promised to us in the 90's and it is only going to get worse and with technology accelerate into every country and juridiction in the world. I could be in the middle of the amazon in ten years and this will somehow be taught in MANDATORY public education school. I wonder if my kids will have to have a highschool diploma from "brainwash acadamy" to fly to different countries in the future. I teach my kids how to make money, so they will be flying for business most likely. I wonder if my kids wives will have to be "legally" married to them or be charged by the government with rape. I wonder if the government will take my grankids away from my sons because their wives got pregnant before 21. I think I know the answer. And they dont live in the u.s a. Im going to have to form a family so tight-knit that even interrogation wont break us up. The government will probably shoot at us for being a "gang". We better enjoy our lives now brothers. Because the doors of hell are opening up for everybody. The aztecs had it right. Family for life over life. I am a warrior. Everyday I go into work. If I dont have more money than I had yesterday, I need to fix that.

Hola Senor,

Tha Feminazi Gestapo are already traveling in 5-star vacations to Latin America & Caribbean.

There was this one white woman from USA who was in Colombia on vacation for a month (how can she afford that? The average American from 18-40 doesn't even have at least $1,000 in emergency savings in the savings account), and on her blog she complained about "street harassment" at a busy market area where Street Vendors sell various goods and services to the public.

Plus, in Caribbean, they are already women from Canada and USA stirring up shit. In a previous thread, there was a Toronto-area woman who was on action in the Dominican Republic with her boyfriend & other white knight, and they falsely accused a Black local military person of "sexual assault", and they probably tried to form a lynch mob against him, which pissed off the Army man because he probably felt the KKK was after him in that instance.

So the army man utilized his police connections which caused the Toronto woman, her boyfriend to serve a short incarceration until they were able to pay a "fine" to leave the country. Canadian media claim that Toronto woman was the victim, of course.

A few years ago in that same region, a Toronto woman on vacation to Guiana claimed that she consented to vaginal sexual intercourse with, wait...an Army Official of the Guiana Defence Force, but she later claimed that she was "raped" because she falsely accused that man of sexually assaulting her by sodomy or some shit.
HOWEVER, a hospital forensic analysis discovered that there was no visible penetration into her anus in any form or way.

She went to the local media to also falsely accuse the man by claiming that "she wanted to send her daughter to Guiana, but she does not trust the man (implying that the man is a you-know-what)". These fucking Toronto women defaming innocent men for a feminist cause. It appeared that she can also afford to "travel back to Guiana to press charges in court".

Trinidad & Tobago are already feminist because of the influx of American women to those Women's Day parades in Port-of-Spain.

Brasil is already turning into an SJW faggot paradise. See thread labelled Twatter.

Jamaica is under pressure to legalize homosexuality, while Sizzla is banned from his local Jamaican sting in order for that UK lesbian rapper to take over the reggae scene in Jamaica.

Venezuela is the country of sexy senoritas with YUGE milk jugs and sexy white tanned feature, but right now they have more things to worry about such as Maduro enforcing martial law on the country.

Your hometown of Mexico City was featured for that feminist campaign on "transit harassment", funded by American feminazis of course.

HOWEVER, unlike Canada and USA where white women live a life of comfort and luxury, forcing feminist shit in poorer countries become apparent. Even in the rural parts of the USA where people aren't that rich as city people.

Is it a co-incidence that when the world economies are printing cheap credit at very low near 0% interest rates, that the feminist agenda appear to fund feminist to travel abroad to promote Feminazi shit to the entire world from the assistance of the 0% cheap credit from the Federal Reserve Bank in America?

It appears that modern Western feminism is a form of cultural war which is funded by cheap credit.

Post: #50

Jesus Christ, feminism is touching Brazil, Mexico, Colombia of all places? My God, they don't let up, do they?

It's funny how they like to pick on lesser countries as the ones above, that have some of the most beautiful women on Earth. I don't know why the local governments don't shut this feminist nonsense down. I know Berkeley said that they risk losing funding or something, but to be honest, I'd take the risk instead of letting feminists take over my country...

It's funny how you never see these feminists in countries such as Iran, Egypt, Morocco, Somalia, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, and the United Arab Emirates.

Sadly, (and I hope this doesn't happen, and if it does, it's all but game over) I can see Jamaica eventually legalizing homosexuality. I can foresee pressure being applied on countries such as Jamaica to be feminist-friendly. They already got Trinidad & Tobago.

From the "Dear Colleague" letter in 2011 to the "rape culture" hysteria, and the fact that a state is citing Buzzfeed of things as the reason to change the law like this, it's a wonder why millennials are having less sex.

Nowadays, third-world migrants can get away with sexual assault in countries like Germany, Sweden and the UK, but in Canada/North America, God forbid a man tries to run game on a woman, and someone freaks out and calls the cops on him...he's labeled a creep, pervert, every term in the book...

The times, they are a changing....and not in a good way.