Post: #26

(04-04-2017 05:03 AM)Paracelsus Wrote:  

(04-04-2017 04:35 AM)Thomas the Rhymer Wrote:  I saw this story on another news website today as well...

Anyway, it inspired me with a new heuristic:

How good a product is, is inversely proportional to how much sex is required to sell it.

In other words, these clothes must really suck if they have to use pornography to sell it.

Good products don't need sex to sell them. (Even condoms. The best, most reliable condom brands have plain non-descript packaging, at least where I'm from. It's the thin burstable condoms that have pics of busty buxom babes on the box.)

Soooooooo this:



Is worthless?

Would you care about that underwear if a fat bearded chick was wearing it?

Post: #27

OP

The Way We Were ?



Starring Barbara Streisand: Gay icon



OP (((sneaks))) in phaggotry image



OP

Post: #28

Comma? More like fancy Jew period.

Post: #29

(((everything everywhere anytime)))

Post: #30

((( )))

Post: #31

Frankly this is nothing more than the next step along the lines.

All I see here is a massive publicity and the other fashion houses thinking: "Fuck! Why didn't we come up with that first?"

They use real couples for that - of course the gender-fluid bullshit embedded in it. Benetton did plenty of "shocking" leftist advertising 20 years ago. And that family is not ((()))).

Either way - this is not the end of totem pole. Models will soon be required not only to fuck off-the-camera, but in front of the camera. There is a plus and and a minus side to it. But of course you see the pushing of race-mixing, homosexual and trans-propaganda in the ads. The majority of those pics are about those kind of couples - so essentially they depict sex of 2-4% of the population - fuck the normies.

This is nothing yet - pedophilia, bestiality, necrophilia, SNAFF-killing for fun - all of that is yet to come.

Post: #32

I don't know what's funnier.

The replies to the OP or (((H1N1's))) echo meltdown!

Post: #33

Thank you, OP, for alerting me to the fact that (((coincidence detector))) was removed from my browser without my realizing it. Reinstalled.

Post: #34

(04-04-2017 03:59 PM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  ((( )))

Creepy Eel I Pissed myself laughing at this one, thanks for being born.

Post: #35

Post: #36

(04-04-2017 09:13 AM)Atlanta Man Wrote:  I need to know this girls name please. The one with titters on the beach.

If you mean this one:


That is Waikiki Beach. I can drive down and ask her her name, if she's still there.

(((Aloha!)))

Post: #37

(04-03-2017 07:03 PM)budoslavic Wrote:  

(04-04-2017 09:13 AM)Atlanta Man Wrote:  I need to know this girls name please. The one with titters on the beach.

This one is Michelle Keegan.

http://celebrities4free.nl/celebrities/M...Keegan.htm

Post: #38

I bloody keep telling you, Roosh...

Post: #39

^^^ You mean (((Roosh)))

Post: #40

This thread:

Memes and gifs that will instantly trigger reactionaries

Post: #41

I wonder if The Way We Were is still here or Were.