Post: #76

^Age appropriate is informed by culture, Zelscorpion just earned a rep point for completely changing my perspective. I still do not like watching 13 year old girls whore themselves out, but I guess it is just how I was raised and the times I live in. If I was born in the another time 13 would be fine, Lolita was about a 12 year old now that I think about it. It just fucks with my head because I have relatives that are 13, I would hate to see them twerking on Snapchat.

Edit: Already repped you, I wish I could do it again-Guess he always has something insightful to add to discussions.

Post: #77

Indeed that is why the legal age in many countries in the world is 13-14 which is pretty much when, like it or not, most of these girls are grown enough to give birth. And in other times, sure, prostitution from such a similar age was one of the ways the early development of adolescent girls manifested itself. Nowadays, it is the internet, the freedom to search for whatever content you want, and the freedom to broadcast yourself and whore yourself out for attention as much as you want. Without these "tools", these girls would be a lot more pleasant and a lot less crazy. Instead of twerking live to 50,000 viewers, a 14 year old girl might get her first boyfriend, get her heart broken, write in her diary about her heartbreak, cry to her mother, bake cakes with her mother etc. Now it's press a few buttons and satisfy your need for attention by virtually whoring yourself out to the entire world. As women age they decline both in pleasantness and in appearance, but it sure would be a lot slower without the internet and social media. Maybe Malu was never going to be the most stable of women, or the sharpest tool in the toolbox, but she would have been a hell of a lot better without instagram etc. etc. When they become legal, they can add online dating sites to their sources of e-worship. Anyone who has lived in the west can correlate the rise of online dating with the decline in quality and quantity of women, both in looks and in personality.

Many of us remember a time when there was no internet, or where there was internet but it had not reached mainstream use yet. Far more pleasant women instead of burnt out whores before they are even 18. Girls who valued real life interactions with men because there weren't these intoxicating sources of worldwide attention.

The saddest part, and it comes back to the original post of this thread, is that normal men are being classed as pedophiles and punished as such. I've seen a few comments along the lines of "Malu is hot", "WB DGAF YOLO" etc. immediately followed by "Pedophile!!! or "Have fun getting raped in jail sick pedophile!!!" etc. There are tons of countries which have legal age of 14, isn't Peru 13-14 and Japan 13, for example, and the list goes on. The laws of countries which do not recognize fertility and sexual maturity at this kind of age are those countries which produce such inflammatory vitriol in response to any mention of technically underage (within their jurisdiction) e-whores such as Malu in a sexual manner because that jurisdiction has in Law punishments (i.e. long jail sentences) which correspond to the level of vitriol spewed for normal men who happen to express those "WB" thoughts in real life. It's just an online mirror to what happens if you do that shit in real life. The man in the original post of this thread was, as I have said, very lucky, because usually men get locked up for quite some time for indiscretions such as this. I would call a man who bangs a sexually mature 14 year-old in a jurisdiction where the arbitrary age set by that jurisdiction is 16 stupid, however this same man is not a pedophile.

It beggars belief that one should have to explain an obvious scientific fact to 99% of the adult population who should have learned this in highschool, but a pedophile is a person who is sexually attracted to prepubescent children. We're talking 2 year olds, 6 year olds, that kind of shit. To me, this is inconceivable. But clearly there are men (and women) born with this, and sometimes they are exclusively attracted to prepubescent children, an even greater curse. The actions of pedophiles who put their desires into action are obviously abhorrent, but that doesn't meant to say one cannot feel sorry for them at the same time. Especially the so-called "non-practising", and among those, especially pedophiles who have an exclusive attraction to children. On this forum we all take for granted that we are attracted to hot women. We can't imagine anything else, nor have we known anything else. At age 11,12,13... it just "appeared" and never went away. What if "hot women" were replaced with "exclusively 5 year old boys" and that's that, nothing you can do about it? There is no class of human beings who are collectively despised by society more than pedophiles. A man can murder 1000 people yet be held in far higher regard than a pedophile, even, perhaps, a pedophile who has not even yet acted upon his/her desires.

However this thread is not even about a pedophile. Nor are the "WB" youtube comments about Malu or Cashme or whatever other online attention whore made by pedophiles. My problem is that, depending on where you live, and the arbitrary age cut-off point determined by the Law in your jurisdiction, you are, in the eyes of the Law, either a pedophile or not. The man in the original post as I have said on numerous occasions before was very lucky because this kind of involvement in a "Weapon of Ass Destruction" usually leads to unjustly grave consequences for men, perhaps sometimes naive and/or stupid men, but normal men nonetheless. There are lightyears between being duped by 14 going on 18 Cashmeousside and being attracted to 3 year old toddlers. The increasingly misandric Law in the Anglosphere is so idiotic that it reduces the effective distance from "lightyears" to "within walking distance", and society follows. By this screwed up logic, my neighbor lives nextdoor ten meters away, and Alpha Centauri is the cornerstore.

Post: #78

Relevant: from "Get Ready To Be Boyzvoiced" - Norwegian mocumentary from 2000...

Post: #79

@ Skankhunt, though I think Roosh will probably want to avoid such discussions (while feminists teacher want to pose nude in front of schoolchildren for "Sexual Education"), the Law regarding Age of Sexual Consent was as low as 12 in Latin America-Caribbean and even 14 in Canada up to 2004-2006, before the feminist movement started to increase in power.

Plus, those laws weren't even enforced strictly unless it was considered serious such as impregnating a 12-year-old or rape, etc.

It's only the feminist movement in the 21st century which started the Witch-hunt to change the Age of Consent to 18 and beyond, which punishes the teens they claim to protect (no Romeo & Juliet provision or excusing an Aspie 21-year-old from losing his virginity to a 13-year-old to 16-year-old Cash Me Ousside Instagram chick).

It was considered in Hitlery Clinton's policy to force other countries to set their Age of Consent to at least 18, even up to 21 in cases of "exploitation".

Then you have these fucking Westernized educated feminazi cunts travelling abroad to bully foreign governments to raise the age of consent to 18 and beyond infinity and beyond like Buzz Lightyear, yet those feminazis would likely "teach" a starving 4-year-old Black or Middle Eastern refugee how to suck her pussy.

Current Age of Consent legislation is a feminist weapon used against masculinity and hot chicks. Yes, hot chicks are affected by the Age of consent feminist hysteria.

There were 16 & 17-year-old Swiss chicks who were pissed off when the country increased the legal prostitution age to 18. Even in the city of Amsterdam, old fucking feminist cunts were forcing the EU to increase that city's prostitution age to 21.

Post: #80

It's a fact that teenagers looks at least 4 years older today and going through puberty 2 years younger (growth hormones in food) compare to 50 years ago! If you ask me Western teenagers look at least 6 years older and hit the wall so much faster due to poor food and lifestyle today.

The problem isn't young teenagers having sex, it's pop culture which is excessively encouraging children to act and be sluts! Compare this to 100 years ago where you saved yourself for marriage.

Post: #81

(04-14-2017 03:02 PM)RBerkley Wrote:  @ Skankhunt, though I think Roosh will probably want to avoid such discussions (while feminists teacher want to pose nude in front of schoolchildren for "Sexual Education"), the Law regarding Age of Sexual Consent was as low as 12 in Latin America-Caribbean and even 14 in Canada up to 2004-2006, before the feminist movement started to increase in power.

Plus, those laws weren't even enforced strictly unless it was considered serious such as impregnating a 12-year-old or rape, etc.

It's only the feminist movement in the 21st century which started the Witch-hunt to change the Age of Consent to 18 and beyond, which punishes the teens they claim to protect (no Romeo & Juliet provision or excusing an Aspie 21-year-old from losing his virginity to a 13-year-old to 16-year-old Cash Me Ousside Instagram chick).

It was considered in Hitlery Clinton's policy to force other countries to set their Age of Consent to at least 18, even up to 21 in cases of "exploitation".

Then you have these fucking Westernized educated feminazi cunts travelling abroad to bully foreign governments to raise the age of consent to 18 and beyond infinity and beyond like Buzz Lightyear, yet those feminazis would likely "teach" a starving 4-year-old Black or Middle Eastern refugee how to suck her pussy.

Current Age of Consent legislation is a feminist weapon used against masculinity and hot chicks. Yes, hot chicks are affected by the Age of consent feminist hysteria.

There were 16 & 17-year-old Swiss chicks who were pissed off when the country increased the legal prostitution age to 18. Even in the city of Amsterdam, old fucking feminist cunts were forcing the EU to increase that city's prostitution age to 21.

Totally agree. Both bitter women and bitter men have successfully criminalized much of normal sexual behavior because they don't want the hot girls and attractive men to have fun. The women who push for further criminalization of normal sexual behavior (in the direction against men, of course) are bitter because they are ugly, old, masculine. The bitter men who are unfortunately even more numerous are bitter because they are unattractive losers with fat old wives as their only option, if that. They will be damned if the hot young girls are getting banged by attractive men who naturally or through learning have game. In most countries of the world the age of consent is 14-16, in the vast majority 16 is legal, and 18 pretty much the world over, and these are the kind of girls most judges, politicians and other legislators desperately want to fuck but cannot, so the only other option is to try to raise the age of consent to 18 or 21 for places with 16 or 18 respectively so that any guy who successfully and fairly games one of these hot girls gets 5-10 years. At least that will calm some of the internal rage.

You would of course expect such malicious attack against men and normal sexual behavior from bitter old feminist hags, but one cannot help but be a bit disappointed in the men, who despite having considerable intellectual strength choose to persecute their fellow man rather than go for what they truly want, deep down in the gut, all for that fleeting feeling of satisfaction, that if they cannot get hot girls, then no one can. With girls in the Anglosphere and western Europe being spoiled at increasingly lower ages, 14 is comfortably the new 16, 16 comfortably the new 18, so pushing draconian legislation to increase ages of consent to 21 or locking up men for up to a decade for a genuine mistake with a 15 year old going on 20, fake IDs in tow, that effectively cuts out the best, least ruined girls from the supply. Most girls I know in the US who are 21 have banged at least 3-5 guys already and are pretty well indoctrinated. They're either single mothers or soon to be college graduates. Sex appeal aside, they were just far more pleasant in high school. Even at 21, I see the masculine, militant feminist, man hating, smartphone addicted qualities pretty deeply ingrained in them.

If the law means that we cannot talk to any girl under 21, then the bitter women and bitter men have their wish, they further restrict us to the worst of women. And we will have no choice in the matter. Given recent witch hunt like trends in rape and pedo hysteria over the past few years, I can't say I'm surprised though.