Post: #3101

(05-02-2019 11:43 AM)Manbeline Wrote:  E Michael Jones is my Jordan Peterson. Jordan says some good things, but he is still a liberal, and still condones some morality feats. For instance, he doesn't believe in the ability for white supremacists to gather. He thinks that's toxic or wrong. E Michael Jones on the other hand, being a religious person, thinks people being together is what keeps society integrated and together, and forges better bonds than the loner view that JP elicits.

Perhaps the term you're looking for is "separatists".

It's important not to use the language of the enemy.

Post: #3102

Also, EMJ is against the use of "white" identity, because it dilutes our heritage and also because it plays into the enemy's race war hegelian dialectic, which seeks to vilify people of European backgrounds.

If you're Irish or Polish, you have nothing to do with slavery or Jim Crow, in fact you've suffered tremendously (but have moved on and don't bludgeon people with that history).

If you're just "white", then you're disconnected with your cultural heritage, your faith, your cuisine and traditions. And of course you've been a colonial oppressor of "people of color", responsible for everything, from slavery, to the patriarchy, on to the hole in the ozone layer.

Post: #3103

(05-03-2019 11:58 AM)911 Wrote:  Also, EMJ is against the use of "white" identity, because it dilutes our heritage and also because it plays into the enemy's race war hegelian dialectic, which seeks to vilify people of European backgrounds.

If you're Irish or Polish, you have nothing to do with slavery or Jim Crow, in fact you've suffered tremendously (but have moved on and don't bludgeon people with that history).

If you're just "white", then you're disconnected with your cultural heritage, your faith, your cuisine and traditions. And of course you've been a colonial oppressor of "people of color", responsible for everything, from slavery, to the patriarchy, on to the hole in the ozone layer.

This is why I'll usually use the term European - I only use White in terms of American White/Black politics.

Post: #3104

Delete.

Post: #3105

(05-03-2019 11:58 AM)911 Wrote:  Also, EMJ is against the use of "white" identity, because it dilutes our heritage and also because it plays into the enemy's race war hegelian dialectic, which seeks to vilify people of European backgrounds.

If you're Irish or Polish, you have nothing to do with slavery or Jim Crow, in fact you've suffered tremendously (but have moved on and don't bludgeon people with that history).

Isn't that kind of exactly what I've been saying for freaking YEARS now?

Yet somehow bringing that up is exactly what they want us to do, because what they're really afraid of is white identity.



I stand by my original viewpoint. Identifying as "white" is playing directly into the dialectic they've set.

Post: #3106

It pays to be able to keep some level of mental nuance about the situation.

It's like having a national football team during the Olympics. The players are Manchester United or Liverpool or Arsenal players within the UK but when you zoom out for a global battle they're just England.

There's no need to be too autistic about it. During WW2 people fought on the same side and there were no arguments about whether people identified as ANZACs or "allied troops". Everyone knew who was a friend and foe without having to discard their personal and national identity. In actual fact some people fought harder because they wanted to show the rest of the players on their side who the real MVP's on the team were.

Virtually all whites are Europeans of some nature if you go back far enough but they also have enough micro-history to wall them themselves off from the larger body if they choose to be too autistic about it.

Better to simply be both. White when you're marching with your rifle and Irish or German or French or whatever when you're teaching your kids about their history. The globalists are not the least bit concerned about 100 different white ethnicities withdrawing to their one psychological stomping grounds. Divide and conquer. That's why they sent shills to pol to distribute shit like this for a full year.



Nobody imagines that on the other side of a war against the globohomo that all white nations will be dissolved into a big pot of generic "whiteness" but there's no value in being exclusive about your identity to the point where you dig up old grievances against your neighbors and split your allegiances against the overwhelming pressure leveled against us from the globohomo cartels and their useful idiots.

Probably fully a third to a half of whites are intra-white mutts anyway.

Post: #3107

I haven't watched a new Jordan Peterson video in months. Feels like he said what he had to and it has been assimilated into culture.

Post: #3108

I found this video via youtube, guardian journalist attempts to understand the Peterson phenomenon by interviewing males outside his UK lecture. And, she is fair, big surprise! In the process, she ends up talking to a business owner with face tattoos... And to back up for a second, she gives all these people a fair, fighting chance.

Well, she talks to the tattooed guy because he's so articulate, and because of that, it becomes the basis of her second episode of her series.

bottom line is i'm really impressed with what the guardian has done for this youtube series... they've really decided to follow the conversation wherever it goes. they did a great job, full stop. No hostility at all detected.:

Post: #3109

These are a good watch. The chick is somewhat bangable.

But it's the cynical part of me laughs that her first in-depth interview is the jacked, face-tattooed, heavily-masculine successful entrepreneur. Totally random, that! It's just because of his views that she wanted to spend a lot more time talking to him.

Post: #3110

Nice vid and picture of an individual who has his room clean facing a group of Muslims working as one:





That is symbolic what will happen to the West while they are all busy having their balls and rooms clean.

Though as I said - that is why the elite are supporting Jordan Peterson and giving the people the utmost acceptable figure on the "right" to sheer for - similar to how they support Ben Shapiro. I personally doubt that Jordan Peterson is this dark schemer and true globalist minion. They like those men to be aware of a ton more details.

Peterson in a way is a true believer, but one of a higher caliber than the intellectual street scum at the bottom.