Post: #301

I think this is all getting a bit stupid. I'll repost what Days of Broken Arrows said a while back.

(11-23-2017 11:10 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  Pretty female faces that commercialize difficult male ideas is not a new concept.

Judy Collins, Joan Baez. and Mary Travis (of Peter, Paul and Mary) helped bring Bob Dylan's then-uncommercial songs to the masses. Countless jazz musicians put photos of cute, white models on their record covers and sold their avant-garde sounds that way. Frank Zappa had several women he knew play a character called "Suzie Creamcheese."

In the realm of TV, a lot of programs were able to push barriers because they employed nice-looking female leads to soften the political messages (i.e. "All In The Family," "That Girl," "Mary Tyler Moore").

These Red Pill women might not have many original ideas, and they might have chequered pasts (if the above Reddit post is even true). But I consider them the "spokesmodels" for the Red Pill. They draw in a lot of newbies who can then "graduate" to the men who came up with the ideas to begin with, like Roosh, Forney, Heartiste, Rollo, etc.

It's about time conservatives picked up on the concept of putting a female face on things -- because lefties have used it successfully for years.

If Red Pillers get rid of these spokesmodels (i.e. Southern, Pettibone, and Blonde in the Belly of the Beast), Big Media will step in and replace them with their own -- as MTV tried to do in 2012 with Laci Green.

I worked for Big Media and saw things like this happen. Somewhere in a board room in New York, men are rubbing their hands together and scheming to create and financially back "The left-wing Lauren Southern" or "The feminist Brittany Pettibone."

Yes, there are a lot of media-savvy feminists who do videos. But they mostly reach other women. These girls have "fanboys," and while that's eye-rolling in one way, it's also good in another since it broadens the general audience. Don't think Big Media isn't noticing.

So, while we might not exactly like Southern, I would advise people to at least appreciate her and her kind before the corporate world finds a way to usurp their popularity.

And if anyone thinks the Lauren Southerns of the world are annoying, I would advise them to dig up those old Laci Green videos. You don't know what annoying is until you've witnessed those. A moderate response is wanting to gouge your own eyes out and then jump out a window.

I think he's spot on in everything he said there.

Post: #302

Some more gold from /pol/:

Post: #303

(12-08-2017 10:13 AM)Teedub Wrote:  

(12-08-2017 09:43 AM)fokker Wrote:  Forney just dropped his new article about this: http://www.returnofkings.com/141566/the-...king-women

Quote:For example, I learned recently that a popular tradthot attended a major nationalist event in the past year and had sex with one of the speakers under the guise of interviewing him. Not only is her behavior an affront to her professed Catholic beliefs, exchanging sex for access is a major breach of journalistic ethics.

I knew it was Goldy...called it a few pages back (well, if the guy is also a felon!). Porn star vibes never lie.

I think he may have meant Pettibone.





Notice she's wearing his sweatshirt in the second photo....girls just don't go around wearing a stranger man's hoodie, unless they've just banged.

This was beginning of the Summer if I'm not mistaken.

Post: #304

(12-08-2017 10:13 AM)Teedub Wrote:  

(12-08-2017 09:43 AM)fokker Wrote:  Forney just dropped his new article about this: http://www.returnofkings.com/141566/the-...king-women

Quote:For example, I learned recently that a popular tradthot attended a major nationalist event in the past year and had sex with one of the speakers under the guise of interviewing him. Not only is her behavior an affront to her professed Catholic beliefs, exchanging sex for access is a major breach of journalistic ethics.

I knew it was Goldy...called it a few pages back (well, if the guy is also a felon!). Porn star vibes never lie.

Unless Matt Forney has ironclad proof of BOTH the sexual encounter AND that the sexual encounter was explicitly in exchange for an interview, he's 100% out of line.

If he had an experienced editor (like Doba), and if he were working for a legitimate news service, he wouldn't be allowed to print that shit.

Post: #305

Tara McCarty is really just a fake bitch-the video proves it. Socialist and "I never want kids" in 2015 to Alt Right superstar in 2016? Get the fuck out of here! Man, so transparent...

Post: #306

(12-08-2017 11:24 PM)AManLikePutin Wrote:  

(12-08-2017 10:13 AM)Teedub Wrote:  

(12-08-2017 09:43 AM)fokker Wrote:  Forney just dropped his new article about this: http://www.returnofkings.com/141566/the-...king-women

Quote:For example, I learned recently that a popular tradthot attended a major nationalist event in the past year and had sex with one of the speakers under the guise of interviewing him. Not only is her behavior an affront to her professed Catholic beliefs, exchanging sex for access is a major breach of journalistic ethics.

I knew it was Goldy...called it a few pages back (well, if the guy is also a felon!). Porn star vibes never lie.

I think he may have meant Pettibone

Notice she's wearing his sweatshirt in the second photo....girls just don't go around wearing a stranger man's hoodie, unless they've just banged.

This was beginning of the Summer if I'm not mistaken.

If that's the case it means she cheated on her boyfriend with him. Ha, this is like a flipping gossip column.

Post: #307

This is how you properly handle THOTs :

twitch video clip, suitable for work etc...

begone THOT

Post: #308

Post: #309

(12-09-2017 03:33 AM)Glaucon Wrote:  This is how you properly handle THOTs :

twitch video clip, suitable for work etc...

begone THOT

i laughed way too hard at that

Post: #310

(12-09-2017 12:16 PM)loremipsum Wrote:  

Girls should be allowed as long as they're willing to be subjected to hazing.

Post: #311

(12-09-2017 03:54 PM)Vladimir Poontang Wrote:  

(12-09-2017 12:16 PM)loremipsum Wrote:  

Girls should be allowed as long as they're willing to be subjected to hazing.

Allowed where?

The main problem with women in groups isn't that you can't banter as much anymore, but that women purposefully create cliques. This fucks up the hierarchy.

Post: #312

Post: #313

(12-09-2017 03:54 PM)Vladimir Poontang Wrote:  

(12-09-2017 12:16 PM)loremipsum Wrote:  

Girls should be allowed as long as they're willing to be subjected to hazing.

No.

10 men in a room will conduct 100 percent of their energy to achieving the group's goals, leading to 1000% overall contribution to the stated goal.

9 men and 1 woman in a room will result in the woman contributing nothing and the men spending at least 50% of their energy jostling for position over who gets to control the attention of the one woman. The room with 10 people is now contributing a measly 450% overall contribution to the stated goal. And that's not even quantifying the interpersonal drama such a situation creates.

I have actually watched a group of 8 roosters who were previously cool with each other turn around the next day and kill each other down to the last when a solitary hen was added to the mix. Women are never to be tolerated in male spaces.

Post: #314

Jeez, I was just kidding.

Post: #315

(12-09-2017 07:25 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  No.

10 men in a room will conduct 100 percent of their energy to achieving the group's goals, leading to 1000% overall contribution to the stated goal.

9 men and 1 woman in a room will result in the woman contributing nothing and the men spending at least 50% of their energy jostling for position over who gets to control the attention of the one woman. The room with 10 people is now contributing a measly 450% overall contribution to the stated goal. And that's not even quantifying the interpersonal drama such a situation creates.

I have actually watched a group of 8 roosters who were previously cool with each other turn around the next day and kill each other down to the last when a solitary hen was added to the mix. Women are never to be tolerated in male spaces.

This is an important aspect to note.

The policy of "no girls allowed" is as much to control the flaws of women as it is to control the flaws of men. Men simply have shitty focus once females get involved. This is a weakness of ordinary men, and there's no shame in recognizing it.

Post: #316

(12-04-2017 08:42 PM)DJ-Matt Wrote:  SHOTS FIRED!





Something else I found funny, if you search "tradthot" on youtube, one of the videos that come up is from that Lauren Rose chick, a new thot.

This is a great video, but now I just feel sorry for Roosh having to listen to these chicks' videos to make a response.

My question, Roosh says "THot". Is it pronounced THot or Tot?

Post: #317

I guess we could call alt-right chicks Thotenkopfs.

Post: #318

(12-09-2017 11:31 PM)Captainstabbin Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 08:42 PM)DJ-Matt Wrote:  SHOTS FIRED!





Something else I found funny, if you search "tradthot" on youtube, one of the videos that come up is from that Lauren Rose chick, a new thot.

This is a great video, but now I just feel sorry for Roosh having to listen to these chicks' videos to make a response.

My question, Roosh says "THot". Is it pronounced THot or Tot?

The former, THot

Post: #319

(12-05-2017 05:04 PM)DJ-Matt Wrote:  

(12-05-2017 04:26 PM)meetjoeblack Wrote:  

That picture is a perfect example of why you can't trust these hoes. Megyn Kelly revealed herself to be nothing more than a lame attention-whore liberal faking conservative views during the election.

Mate, if you read my post, I said the same thing about what FDR/Stefan M said about waiting for the state to fail and for women to need men again (war, famine, plague, virus etc).

The beautiful women pictured are conservative but, a classic example of female hypergamy.

Then again, WTF is the alternative? become a MGTOW? Take your fucking ball and go home?

Okay, so, beautiful equates to hypergamy. FDR suggests waiting for the state to fail and need a ATM male. MGTOW takes their ball and goes home.
RooshV came out with the black Pill video, age 38, no wife, children, and painted a bleak outcome despite social status, entrepreneur, investor, money, GAME etc!

Traditionalism has failed. Women have shown their true nature. Even the said conservative women when younger were skiing down cawk mountain, running through dudes, and then, seeking to play homemaker.

I am at a fucking lost for FINDING A FUCKING SOLUTION! This includes spamming cold approach since 2009. I wish there were traditional women. The times have changed. Women have evolved. Its sloot gonna sloot and then, homemaker and good girl shtick when SMV craters.

Men need to evolve. The question remains, what to evolve since, I don't see MGTOW has the whole answer. I think PURPOSE > Women is key but, I prefer Deida's approach. Having a wife or children shouldn't excuse following one's dream. I don't see the value in marrying cratered SMV, allocating resources, risking half networth, and likely getting cucked int he process.

I would love to hear an actual solution but, I have yet to hear one.

Post: #320

I don't think women have evolved or changed in any way. Nor do I think they're bad people. I shake my head whenever anyone talks about women in a way where they're expecting them to be morally perfect, given that men aren't morally perfect either.

What's happened is that they've been elevated, let off the hook, raised badly, etc, for a long long time, and now it looks as though women are worthless. Yes, a lot of them are, but women, in their true form, as in what a woman truly is / is supposed to be, are very different. There's a difference between the nature of the species, and any member of it.

You just have to go to where the normal ones are. If that means a third world country, so be it. if it means a third tier city in a third world country, so be it. If it means a village, so be it. They're still out there, lots of them. It may be 1 planet, but it contains many very different worlds. Tune out what you don't want.

Post: #321

(12-09-2017 01:56 PM)gonzoman925 Wrote:  

(12-09-2017 03:33 AM)Glaucon Wrote:  This is how you properly handle THOTs :

twitch video clip, suitable for work etc...

begone THOT

i laughed way too hard at that

don't worry we all did

Post: #322

Don't fall for the Nazbol bullshit and other enemies trying to undermine the AltRight (if you consider yourself AltRight).
Lot's of Astroturfing going on, many MGTOW idiots.
Look in the mirror and tell me your life was always spotless and you never changed your mind. Watch Millenial Woes latest video, he sums it up nicely. It's not about "following a womens lead" - it's about welcoming them and encouraging them to speak up. Also, they are great at networking.

Post: #323

As a rule of thumb, I ignored topics like "the Women Question and the Alt Right" because it represents a highly americanized phenomenon and Europe is a different kind of animal. I stopped using the Alt-Right term myself a long time ago. Thankfully Im naturally not inclined to listen to women. That used to be a huge problem in school and I got in trouble because of that. The only woman I followed was Lauren Southern. And, hands down, she did some ballsy stuff. But I am not attracted to her in the slightest - too masculine. Maybe thats why she was so ballsy in her activism. Nevertheless, I sometimes felt there was something off regarding the cryptoJQ. I don't care about Tara, never watched a single video. I only know Brittany because Martin Sellner is dating her. Not going to say a bad thing about that.

That being said, this shitty "Thotgate" drama was ultimately the death blow to the Alt Right brand, if not the Right itself. The division it caused will be used for Social Engineering by Globalists and Leftists. It will create more damage than positive effects. This has become clear to me after watching Millenial Woes latest video about that.

This purge will represent a break within the right, too. For me personally it already has. Roosh and Forney were the main instigators and they made good points. Especially Roosh offers really good perspectives. But like MW said, at the end of the day, is he one of us? Issues like these make questions like these pop up. And I only can say no to that. Matt Forney seems to be really popular here. Saying that I am not really enthusiastic about him would be a massive understatement. Regardless, he has spoken out against the Alt Right in the past. So he can be considered an attacker too.

This will result in endless divide and conquer. I will step back from political drama shitshows to get a broader perspective. I will rethink my opinions about certain figureheads and see where I stand after the storm has settled.

Post: #324

(12-09-2017 11:31 PM)Captainstabbin Wrote:  

(12-04-2017 08:42 PM)DJ-Matt Wrote:  SHOTS FIRED!





Something else I found funny, if you search "tradthot" on youtube, one of the videos that come up is from that Lauren Rose chick, a new thot.

This is a great video, but now I just feel sorry for Roosh having to listen to these chicks' videos to make a response.

My question, Roosh says "THot". Is it pronounced THot or Tot?

Who has made response videos this far? Any of note to check out ?

Post: #325

(12-10-2017 10:16 AM)kosko Wrote:  Who has made response videos this far? Any of note to check out ?

I just did a search but there's nothing. However, I did find this rather masculine gentleman :