Post: #26

*Hits blunt*

What if this site is in reality a Anti Trump site and was put up so that people searching for "cuck" go there instead of finding out the wealth of information available about cucked republican and democratic politicians and their enablers.

And we're helping spread it in search rankings by linking to it in order to make fun of it

Post: #27

this is 100% a dig at Peter T

Post: #28

If you don't read/care about Gawker then this site won't affect you

Post: #29

From the comments

Post: #30

   

Post: #31

I don't mind sitting down to pee. I just hate it when women leave the seat up.

Post: #32

(08-11-2016 02:32 PM)debeguiled Wrote:  I don't mind sitting down to pee. I just hate it when women leave the seat up.

I mean I'll sit and pee too, when I take a shit.

I'm also confused about your second statement. What do you mean "leave the seat up"?

They put it back up for you or they just squat over the bowl altogether?

Post: #33

(08-10-2016 11:52 PM)El Chinito loco Wrote:  ^^^

So in otherwords it's the most convoluted hipster nu-male logic based on trying to be quirky and witty without sounding like salty losers. Trying to make a lifestyle blog in "mockery" of another leftist publication is a strange cycle of the left cannibalizing each other's stupid jokes.

Maybe we can convince them the best form of mockery is allowing some alt-right types to rail their sisters and girlfriends in person while they stand around and "mock" the man doing it.

Something tells me you don't want to bang out the kind of girlfriends these guys have.

(08-11-2016 03:12 PM)Snowplow Wrote:  I mean I'll sit and pee too, when I take a shit.

Is that beta?

Post: #34

(08-11-2016 03:12 PM)Snowplow Wrote:  

(08-11-2016 02:32 PM)debeguiled Wrote:  I don't mind sitting down to pee. I just hate it when women leave the seat up.

I mean I'll sit and pee too, when I take a shit.

I'm also confused about your second statement. What do you mean "leave the seat up"?

They put it back up for you or they just squat over the bowl altogether?

It was a joke. I don't really sit down to pee, and women don't really leave the seat up.

Post: #35

(08-11-2016 03:12 PM)Snowplow Wrote:  I mean I'll sit and pee too, when I take a shit.

Is that beta?
[/quote]

Real men take a shit standing up.

Post: #36

(08-11-2016 04:11 PM)kaotic Wrote:  

(08-11-2016 03:12 PM)Snowplow Wrote:  I mean I'll sit and pee too, when I take a shit.

Is that beta?

Real men take a shit standing up.
[/quote]

Then proceed to this thread for clean up.
/thread-45902.html

Post: #37

(08-11-2016 04:23 PM)Snowplow Wrote:  

(08-11-2016 04:11 PM)kaotic Wrote:  

(08-11-2016 03:12 PM)Snowplow Wrote:  I mean I'll sit and pee too, when I take a shit.

Is that beta?

Real men take a shit standing up.

Then proceed to this thread for clean up.
/thread-45902.html
[/quote]

I knew this was coming.

Hey I found something you like btw:

Post: #38

People like Alex Pareene are the reason I left journalism. His mother is some big-deal editor and that's how he got into the business and climbed the ladder so quickly. That piece of info has since been removed from Wikipedia, but I remember it.

It's an awful feeling to be working for a major news organization and watch twentysomething kids of famous people (Luke Russert; Chelsea Clinton) stroll in and earn ten times more than you right off the bat.

These are the two most obvious examples because those two were on-air personalities. But there are all sort of lower-level editors and writers like Pareene who had doors opened not because of what they did, but because of who they were.

Journalists historically were from blue-collar backgrounds. But that changed in the '80s and now it's getting like the Ivy League, where a large amount of people get in solely because they're "legacies."

This is why journalism changed. They can no longer assess what's fair and what's not is because they themselves are on the "unfair advantage" side in life.

You wonder why it appears journalists have contempt for the "stupid" rednecks who build our houses and keep our streets safe? It's because they do!

I could not imagine people who have *less* of an understanding of working class Americans than these Ivory Tower legacies. Your local barber or tailor is a better source of honest information than the modern-day Little Lord Fauntreloys crowd.

***

Also, Pareene is really overweight and has been for a long time. There was a recently study that said being fat ages your brain prematurely so take him about as seriously as you would the senile patients in a nursing home.

Post: #39

(08-11-2016 04:11 PM)kaotic Wrote:  

(08-11-2016 03:12 PM)Snowplow Wrote:  I mean I'll sit and pee too, when I take a shit.

Is that beta?

Real men take a shit standing up.
[/quote]

Back in the day I knew a guy who got nicknamed "wolf" because one time he got drunk, went out onto the balcony, took off his pants, and shit standing up. Like a wolf.

Semi-related; did you know that in the Ukraine people are so savage that they sit down to pee but stand up to take a dump? Almost as bad as France, where they just go in the middle of the living room and kick dirt over it. Absolute savages - and in BOTH countries they speak a made up language.

Post: #40

(08-11-2016 07:28 PM)Aurini Wrote:  

(08-11-2016 04:11 PM)kaotic Wrote:  

(08-11-2016 03:12 PM)Snowplow Wrote:  I mean I'll sit and pee too, when I take a shit.

Is that beta?

Real men take a shit standing up.

Back in the day I knew a guy who got nicknamed "wolf" because one time he got drunk, went out onto the balcony, took off his pants, and shit standing up. Like a wolf.

Semi-related; did you know that in the Ukraine people are so savage that they sit down to pee but stand up to take a dump? Almost as bad as France, where they just go in the middle of the living room and kick dirt over it. Absolute savages - and in BOTH countries they speak a made up language.
[/quote]

Depends™.

Post: #41

Quote:

(08-11-2016 04:29 PM)kaotic Wrote:  

(08-11-2016 04:23 PM)Snowplow Wrote:  

(08-11-2016 04:11 PM)kaotic Wrote:  

(08-11-2016 03:12 PM)Snowplow Wrote:  I mean I'll sit and pee too, when I take a shit.

Is that beta?

Real men take a shit standing up.

Then proceed to this thread for clean up.
/thread-45902.html

I knew this was coming.

Hey I found something you like btw:

Post: #42

The real question is, how is Gawker launching anything after how badly they just got schlonged in court?

Post: #43

(08-11-2016 09:34 PM)eatthishomie Wrote:  The real question is, how is Gawker launching anything after how badly they just got schlonged in court?

They're so desperate to make money, they are putting out content to a group they hate. They even named it properly to futher jab at their market, all to gain ad revenue to pay off their new bull (Hogan) as a way to keep their pathetic job.

Post: #44

(08-11-2016 06:01 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  People like Alex Pareene are the reason I left journalism. His mother is some big-deal editor and that's how he got into the business and climbed the ladder so quickly. That piece of info has since been removed from Wikipedia, but I remember it.

It's an awful feeling to be working for a major news organization and watch twentysomething kids of famous people (Luke Russert; Chelsea Clinton) stroll in and earn ten times more than you right off the bat.

These are the two most obvious examples because those two were on-air personalities. But there are all sort of lower-level editors and writers like Pareene who had doors opened not because of what they did, but because of who they were.

Journalists historically were from blue-collar backgrounds. But that changed in the '80s and now it's getting like the Ivy League, where a large amount of people get in solely because they're "legacies."

This is why journalism changed. They can no longer assess what's fair and what's not is because they themselves are on the "unfair advantage" side in life.

You wonder why it appears journalists have contempt for the "stupid" rednecks who build our houses and keep our streets safe? It's because they do!

I could not imagine people who have *less* of an understanding of working class Americans than these Ivory Tower legacies. Your local barber or tailor is a better source of honest information than the modern-day Little Lord Fauntreloys crowd.

***

Also, Pareene is really overweight and has been for a long time. There was a recently study that said being fat ages your brain prematurely so take him about as seriously as you would the senile patients in a nursing home.

I'm not sure about America, but this has most definitely not been the case in the UK.

Journalism has always, going back hundreds of years, been the preserve of the independently wealthy and connected.

I suspect that the US during that period you mention was an anomaly rather than the rule.

Post: #45

This brings to mind African American appropriation of the n-word to refer to themselves.... or feminist trying to empower themselves by calling themselves sluts.

(08-10-2016 11:00 PM)Speculation Wrote:  ..... As for calling it 'The Cuck', do you remember the social outcast in school who tried to call himself the same nickname the bullies gave him to show how it didn't hurt him, ......

Post: #46

(08-12-2016 12:08 AM)CrashBangWallop Wrote:  

(08-11-2016 06:01 PM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  People like Alex Pareene are the reason I left journalism. His mother is some big-deal editor and that's how he got into the business and climbed the ladder so quickly. That piece of info has since been removed from Wikipedia, but I remember it.

It's an awful feeling to be working for a major news organization and watch twentysomething kids of famous people (Luke Russert; Chelsea Clinton) stroll in and earn ten times more than you right off the bat.

These are the two most obvious examples because those two were on-air personalities. But there are all sort of lower-level editors and writers like Pareene who had doors opened not because of what they did, but because of who they were.

Journalists historically were from blue-collar backgrounds. But that changed in the '80s and now it's getting like the Ivy League, where a large amount of people get in solely because they're "legacies."

This is why journalism changed. They can no longer assess what's fair and what's not is because they themselves are on the "unfair advantage" side in life.

You wonder why it appears journalists have contempt for the "stupid" rednecks who build our houses and keep our streets safe? It's because they do!

I could not imagine people who have *less* of an understanding of working class Americans than these Ivory Tower legacies. Your local barber or tailor is a better source of honest information than the modern-day Little Lord Fauntreloys crowd.

***

Also, Pareene is really overweight and has been for a long time. There was a recently study that said being fat ages your brain prematurely so take him about as seriously as you would the senile patients in a nursing home.

I'm not sure about America, but this has most definitely not been the case in the UK.

Journalism has always, going back hundreds of years, been the preserve of the independently wealthy and connected.

I suspect that the US during that period you mention was an anomaly rather than the rule.

Yes, good call.

Journalism by the people for the people was very much a mid-20th century American thing. But that said, it shaped a lot of what the country would come to think, in topics ranging from politics to the arts.

If anyone wants to know what newsrooms were like back then -- and what kind of people worked in them -- I'd suggest watching the old TV series "Lou Grant" (1977-82). You have the Italian-from-Jersey tough guy reporter, the gangly hippie photographer, and the gruff city room editor. The only highfalutin character on this series was the publisher.

Yes, it's done with a liberal bias because its star, Ed Asner, was very left wing. But it's old-style equal-opportunity-for-all leftism, not the new "special snowflake/safe space" brand of journalism.

Here's the first episode:

Post: #47

What do they hope to accomplish by parodying themselves? I've never seen anything like that before.

Post: #48

(08-10-2016 10:37 PM)General Stalin Wrote:  Here is Editor in cheif Alex Pareene:

On fairly rare occasions I come across people who just...I don't know what causes it...but just have a smarmy-looking face that I wish I could punch. Know what I mean?

This is one of those cases.

Post: #49

https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2015/12/...ournament/

He earned an honorable mention for most punchable face of the year.

Post: #50

(08-12-2016 05:40 PM)XPQ22 Wrote:  

(08-10-2016 10:37 PM)General Stalin Wrote:  Here is Editor in cheif Alex Pareene:

On fairly rare occasions I come across people who just...I don't know what causes it...but just have a smarmy-looking face that I wish I could punch. Know what I mean?

This is one of those cases.

What baffles my mind is why anyone would listen to anything such a creature had to say about...well, any topic you can name. He's a fat communist piece of garbage. He has nothing to say worth listening to. His opinions are as common as dogshit and just as valuable besides. The bottom of the barrel, thinking its the cream of the crop.

Whether its fitness and sports, women, literature and ideas, or anything else; you can take one look at him and determine right there that he's got nothing credible to tell you.

And that smirk. It is unjust in the karmic sense for this cunt to not get a fist to that pudgy face.