Post: #51

I nominate the term degenerate:

1. (adjective) - having lost the physical, mental, or moral qualities considered normal and desirable; showing evidence of decline.

2. (noun) - an immoral or corrupt person.

It inverts their own self-conception of being 'progressive' with the reality that they and their ideals lead to personal and societal decay.

It's also a word with an extremely negative connotation that isn't considered explicit, and would thus be publishable in wider media.

Personally, I think "the Degenerate Left" sounds perfect.

Post: #52

(08-08-2016 12:58 PM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  I'm going to stick with Useful Idiot.

It's accurate.
It's historical (supposedly from ol' Lenin himself).
It demonstrates that their 'masters' care nothing for them.
Plus that the idiots are just mere pawns in a much grander game.

I agree with CynicalContrarian, "Useful Idiots" is what their puppeteers call them. We should use it because it's not only the most apt term for them, but the most insulting too.

Post: #53

Communist. Marxist.

The proper words for them already exist.

G

Post: #54

(08-08-2016 05:05 PM)Geomann180 Wrote:  Communist. Marxist.

The proper words for them already exist.

G

going off that. "Comrade" would work well. It ads an element of a subtle jab to it...like "cool story bro"..."good idea comrade, you can be the first to offer up your spare bedroom to a syrian immigrant"

Post: #55

Libocrites.

Post: #56

(08-08-2016 05:42 PM)debeguiled Wrote:  Libocrites.

Post: #57

Lerbs

Post: #58

Things that directly contradict a leftist's view of himself:

Establishment ("I haven't heard such revolutionary opinions since the last time I watched television.")
Outdated ("You must have been raised by hippies. Sad to see people so indoctrinated and stuck in the past.")
Parochial ("You have no respect for traditional cultures. If you could, you'd turn the world into the white-picket suburb from which you were spawned, because you can't understand or tolerate anything else.")
Ignorant (Mix and match the above)

Post: #59

"Feminazi" already fits fairly well.
Maybe "cuntsplainers"
"Larpies" (liberal harpies)

Post: #60

(08-08-2016 01:06 PM)EDantes Wrote:  Ironically though even Mill was against the notion of "hate speech" because he feared it could be used to censor opposing views. So maybe cultural Marxist is a good term for the radical left in America.

The "left" as it exists in the U.S. is just deeply authoritarian in nature.

It is something that needs to be taken seriously as a threat because all the shit policies you see now in Europe were filtered in from up high through academia. The same thing will happen in the U.S. if the left is allowed control over the reins.

When you dissect the nature of the regressive left in the U.S. it's all about planned societies, thought policing, and specific power tiers based on race/creed, and taking agency away from the individual.

In an "ideal" leftist system you're essentially stuck in your social tier with a designated role you're supposed to play in society. They talk about freedom and what not but this is sure as hell not what they really believe in.

This is exactly how a lot of hardline communist societies organized themselves.

Post: #61

(08-07-2016 11:52 PM)Alsos Wrote:  Jacobin is (chillingly) accurate, but most people have no idea what the word means.

Snowflake is already in active use. It would be easier to appropriate it for this purpose than inventing a new term. Same for Pajama Boy, but it's not quite as pithy (one advantage of "cuck" is that it's a single syllable).

Think about what makes "cuck" so effective. It's viscerally offensive to those it's used against, not because of its supposed origins in white supremacist forums but because it pushes several psychological buttons in conservatives. Even though the term is used metaphorically, referring to their political positions and actions, it implies that they are sexual deviants, that they are lacking in masculinity, that they acquiesce in the violation of their vows and integrity, that they are shamefully impotent and subordinate, etc., all of which stab at the core of their self-image as the defenders of traditional values and norms of behavior. Simply calling them cowardly enablers of or even shameful accomplices in the destruction of everything they claim to value and stand for is nowhere near as effective as triggering their sexual insecurities by metaphorically equating that behavior with a sexual perversion. It's Vox's rhetoric/dialectic thing in action.

What accusation would get under a leftist's skin in the same way?

One possibility is not taking their ideas and values seriously. Leftists are very earnest people when it comes to their politics. "Snowflake" actually works on that level by making a mockery of identity politics and speech policing (sneering at hairsplitting uniqueness in the one case, and fragility in the other).

Since they are majority women, it has to be a term that hits womens' sexual insecurities.

My contribution is:
Sharia Sluts

It:

• shows their hypocrisy
• shows their willingness to sell out their supposed progressive values in order to get votes for more free stuff
• insults them sexually in a way that women really don't like
  

But 4 syllables is pushing it.
Though it does have alliteration going for it.

Besides being called a slut, what really gets women? I can't think of a term that says "all you can get is beta - no alpha will ever have anything to do with you" that would get underneath a woman's skin.

Post: #62

(08-08-2016 07:31 PM)Krivo Wrote:  "Feminazi" already fits fairly well.
Maybe "cuntsplainers"
"Larpies" (liberal harpies)

I was trying to figure out how to use the word "cunt". "cuntsplainers" is excellent.

Post: #63

(08-08-2016 07:45 PM)beta_plus Wrote:  

(08-07-2016 11:52 PM)Alsos Wrote:  Jacobin is (chillingly) accurate, but most people have no idea what the word means.

Snowflake is already in active use. It would be easier to appropriate it for this purpose than inventing a new term. Same for Pajama Boy, but it's not quite as pithy (one advantage of "cuck" is that it's a single syllable).

Think about what makes "cuck" so effective. It's viscerally offensive to those it's used against, not because of its supposed origins in white supremacist forums but because it pushes several psychological buttons in conservatives. Even though the term is used metaphorically, referring to their political positions and actions, it implies that they are sexual deviants, that they are lacking in masculinity, that they acquiesce in the violation of their vows and integrity, that they are shamefully impotent and subordinate, etc., all of which stab at the core of their self-image as the defenders of traditional values and norms of behavior. Simply calling them cowardly enablers of or even shameful accomplices in the destruction of everything they claim to value and stand for is nowhere near as effective as triggering their sexual insecurities by metaphorically equating that behavior with a sexual perversion. It's Vox's rhetoric/dialectic thing in action.

What accusation would get under a leftist's skin in the same way?

One possibility is not taking their ideas and values seriously. Leftists are very earnest people when it comes to their politics. "Snowflake" actually works on that level by making a mockery of identity politics and speech policing (sneering at hairsplitting uniqueness in the one case, and fragility in the other).

Since they are majority women, it has to be a term that hits womens' sexual insecurities.

My contribution is:
Sharia Sluts

It:

• shows their hypocrisy
• shows their willingness to sell out their supposed progressive values in order to get votes for more free stuff
• insults them sexually in a way that women really don't like
  

But 4 syllables is pushing it.
Though it does have alliteration going for it.

Besides being called a slut, what really gets women? I can't think of a term that says "all you can get is beta - no alpha will ever have anything to do with you" that would get underneath a woman's skin.

This is not exactly what I was getting at, but it's a brilliant phrase. We should use it as much as possible. It's much more viscerally powerful than "Islam apologist" or something like that.

I think a bigger point here is that we need to make more like Heartiste and start defining phrases because they're a great way to communicate. "Cuck," "shiv," "Sharia sluts" all of 'em are good. We should compile a list.

Post: #64

Another one that came to mind was:
progstitutes

but being called a whore just doesn't bother chicks as much.

Here is a link to Thesaurus.com for all synonyms for slut. Some of them are really for whore or archaic, but they may provide rhyming/alliteration/or other device that slut synonyms don't.

Post: #65

(08-08-2016 12:05 AM)aeroektar Wrote:  We can refer to liberals as cucks too, they fit the description, like the one bellow, a truly pathetic cuck, a poor excuse for a man.

My god, there is so much I want to analyze about this picture alone, I could write book about it.

Post: #66

I remember that picture from the Migrant Invasion thread, I did my own basic "analysis" of it:
/thread-50253...pid1183543

Post: #67

(08-08-2016 10:22 PM)Latinopan Wrote:  My god, there is so much I want to analyze about this picture alone, I could write book about it.

That chicks devious smile is probably worth a whole chapter alone.

Post: #68

(08-07-2016 11:52 PM)Alsos Wrote:  Think about what makes "cuck" so effective. It's viscerally offensive to those it's used against, not because of its supposed origins in white supremacist forums but because it pushes several psychological buttons in conservatives. Even though the term is used metaphorically, referring to their political positions and actions, it implies that they are sexual deviants, that they are lacking in masculinity, that they acquiesce in the violation of their vows and integrity, that they are shamefully impotent and subordinate, etc., all of which stab at the core of their self-image as the defenders of traditional values and norms of behavior. Simply calling them cowardly enablers of or even shameful accomplices in the destruction of everything they claim to value and stand for is nowhere near as effective as triggering their sexual insecurities by metaphorically equating that behavior with a sexual perversion. It's Vox's rhetoric/dialectic thing in action.

What accusation would get under a leftist's skin in the same way?

Well the root insecurity in a liberal is going to be the need to be seen as having the correct political opinion on everything. Perhaps looking at how they attack each other would be illuminating. Sargon did a recent This Week in Stupid where he mentioned a feminist forum that had become toxic just because no one could post without having a mod jump down their throat for the slightest perceived insensitivity. ("You just said men and women? What about intersex LGBTABCDEFGs, you fucking bigot!", that sort of thing)

What's really needed is a cutting 1-2 syllable word that accuses the target of being a hypocritical privileged poseur that's secretly just as bigoted underneath as the badwhites he/she/it constantly derides. Something that's snappier than "champagne liberal", basically.

Perhaps more visceral than even that would be the idea that the target is just a bad person masquerading as a good person. A narcissist faking moral superiority to hide their malign impulses, seeking to unleash them on socially accepted scapegoats as the only means of release.

Post: #69

Speech Dictators

You don't need something that makes people agree with us laugh.

You need something that insults their supposed highest core values and makes them defensive.

Post: #70

SJW in common use

Post: #71

(08-08-2016 05:42 PM)debeguiled Wrote:  Libocrites.

I could get used to this, still "cuck/s" fits them well. Also "Libtard" describes their mindset and actions pretty good.

Post: #72

My post from the Trump thead back in April ( /thread-48360...pid1275495 ):

Words I like to describe establishment idiots/libtards/anti-speech types/people who sell out their nation:

1. Faggot
2. Traitor
3. Faggot Traitor
4. Libtards
5. Cucks

But I think I have some good candidates for a new buzzword (a few possible varations):

1. SJW Red Guards (SJWRGs)

2. SJ Red Guards (SJRGs)

3. Neo-Red Guards (NRGs)

I like the latter two the best but especially the last one (NRGs) since it removes any pretense of being about about "justice" in any capacity. It also can be applied to anyone of any political affiliation who is anti-free speech and believes that using unjustified violence and intimidation is a proper course of action to get their way.

I also like the use of Red Guard since it really brings home what SJWs/libtards/the modern left and the kind that associate with them are really all about. They are not warriors; they have more in common with Chinese Red Guards. You don't have to build up viciousness of the phrase since it already has negative associations; similar to how anti-Trump retards throw the word "Hitler" around for effectiveness.

Think of how Trump uses phrases that play on what a lot of people are already thinking below the surface (Lyin Ted, Low Energy Bush, etc) to great effect. It's not a stretch at all to call the modern libtard a Neo-Red Guard. The similarities between SJW/libtards and the Chinese Red Guard are very strong.

From wiki:

Quote:Attacks on culture quickly descended into attacks on people. Ignoring guidelines in the 'Sixteen Articles' that stipulated that persuasion rather than force were to be used to bring about the Cultural Revolution, officials in positions of authority and perceived 'bourgeois elements' were denounced and suffered physical and psychological attacks.[12] On August 22, 1966, a central directive was issued to stop police intervention in Red Guard activities.[17] Those in the police force who defied this notice were labeled "counter-revolutionaries." Mao's praise for rebellion was effectively an endorsement for the actions of the Red Guards, which grew increasingly violent

Quote:Public security in China deteriorated rapidly as a result of central officials lifting restraints on violent behavior.[19] Xie Fuzhi, the national police chief, said it was "no big deal" if Red Guards were beating "bad people" to death.[20] The police relayed Xie's remarks to the Red Guards and they acted accordingly.[20] In the course of about two weeks, the violence left some one hundred teachers, school officials, and educated cadres dead in Beijing's western district alone. The number injured was "too large to be calculated."

Quote:The most gruesome aspects of the campaign included numerous incidents of torture, murder, and public humiliation. Many people who were targets of 'struggle' could no longer bear the stress and committed suicide. In August and September 1966, there were 1,772 people murdered in Beijing alone. In Shanghai there were 704 suicides and 534 deaths related to the Cultural Revolution in September. In Wuhan there were 62 suicides and 32 murders during the same period.[21]

Intellectuals were to suffer the brunt of these attacks. Many were ousted from official posts such as university teaching and allocated manual tasks such as "sweeping courtyards, building walls and cleaning toilets from 7am to 5pm daily" which would encourage them to dwell on past "mistakes".[22] An official report in October 1966 reported that the Red Guards had already arrested 22,000 'counterrevolutionaries

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Guards_%28China%29

Oh yeah, another option:

4. American [or any country] Red Guards (ARGs)

=================

Neo-Red Guards (NRGs) is probably the best overall term of the bunch since that is really what the modern liberal is essentially these days.

Post: #73

I've always thought that promoting the term "Social Justice Warrior" was nothing less than pumping up the image of your enemy. While we can't stop them from using it, we're mad to follow suit.

Sad Awful Progressives (SAPs)?

(I would typically use profanity but we'd be better off adapting something the media could actually pick up on.)

Post: #74

Cucks leading to cuckservatives was unique in that it wasn't initially a play on words but simply a word itself that had an extremely limited usage outside of its newfound importance. We might be pushing in the wrong direction on this.

Considering that the left is composed of a smattering of minorities and their white, hetero, liberal enablers then how about;

Zookeepers.

It infers that the minorities are animals and also carries negative connotations that the white, hetero, liberal enablers (and LGBT/BLM handlers) are their political owners.

The zoo is a place that civilised people go to see dangerous or freakish animals while safely behind bars. This robs the minorities of agency and pits them against their "privileged keepers". Merit?

Post: #75

I'm not sure about a word, but I know what animal [Or should I say reptile] they are: The Australian White-throated Snapping Turtle: also called the "bum-breathing turtle" can get nearly 70% of its oxygen through its cloacal bursae, or butt. As far as I am aware, Liberals do a lot of stuff with their ass.

I would have gone with serpent but at least the snake convinced Eve to eat the apple. Liberal's can't even convince their friends to stop getting cucked. I guess it's hard to convince anyone of anything using only strawman logic.