Post: #26

(04-28-2016 03:16 PM)EDantes Wrote:  .......
It'll be hard for them to oppose it outright without coming across as complete hypocrites.
.......

Doubethink. Orwell nails it again.

Post: #27

This is a scheme to increase birthrates. Imagine they begin to draft young men an women, then a big conflict gets started. The number of "accidental" pregnancies would skyrocket and all these new mothers to be would get to sit out of it.

Post: #28

(04-30-2016 06:29 PM)rw95 Wrote:  

(04-30-2016 04:57 PM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  

(04-28-2016 12:08 PM)rw95 Wrote:  

(04-28-2016 11:52 AM)Foolsgo1d Wrote:  If it does pass I don't see how it is a positive net-gain for the US, or any western power to have their women drafted into a major war effort.

Lets be honest here guys, women are the spoils of war for more than just a thing to fuck and have your way with once you slaughter their men and enslave their cities.

A country can afford to lose hundreds of thousands of men but can you say the same for a woman who can give birth to the next generation who will rebuild the country and fight for it down the line?

Most western women have already voluntarily removed themselves from the gene pool by riding the carousel. I don't see how this makes any difference in the long run.

Let them have their equality. Every last bit of it.

Do you really want a sub par fighting force by your side when it comes down to it? I'm sure they will be turned into baby factories should they be captured.

The west is probably dead no matter what happens. The demographics simply aren't there. If these women who slut around die in battle it really makes no difference in the long run.

But they won't all die in battle, the same way not all women died when a city was under siege. They were captured and used to give birth to the next generation of warriors for that tribe.

You say women should be given all of it regardless of the consequences, that is how we have gotten into this mess in the first place. By pandering to women, children and weak men we will expose our civilisation to extinction.

I don;t know you personally, whether you are for or against some sort of reset and mass chaos but I'd like to see our society live a bit longer than what I have left. After that I don't really care.

It is the duty of a man to say no to the demands of a woman or child, even if they want to step in front of a train.

Post: #29

^ I have no great desire for a great reset or mass chaos, but let's face it, a large number of western women are nothing but dead weight, pun somewhat intended.

Our civilization is probably done for anyway. All we can really do at this point is prolong the decline period before the collapse. I don't give a fuck anymore if these cunts die in battle. They've already thrown away any chance they've had to become wives and mothers by riding the carousel. I have absolutely no pity for the majority of western women.

Post: #30

Senate Votes to Require Women to Register for the Draft

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/15/us/pol....html?_r=0

“Allowing our daughters to be forced into combat if there is a draft is a clear example of Washington placing more value on liberal social engineering than military objectives and preparedness,” one such group, Heritage Action for America, said in a news release.

Post: #31

Also, in order to qualify for college financial aid, all males register for selective service, aka the draft.

If this law fully passes, females would have to do the same.

Lol! We are in a weak society, even some of my liberal friends are starting to see it finally.

Post: #32

Yeah but not until Jan 2018 does it really take effect.
I'm sure it will be overturned by then.

Post: #33

Was just thinking how if it wasn't for this ruling, any man who wanted to could exempt himself from the draft by just claiming he "feels like" he's a woman, lol

Post: #34

Could they make a draft with a provision that only obese, fat, and feminist women must be drafted?

G

Post: #35

Or just single childless women over 30. Nobody needs those.

Post: #36

(06-15-2016 08:54 PM)Geomann180 Wrote:  Could they make a draft with a provision that only obese, fat, and feminist women must be drafted?

G

That would destroy morale even faster than allowing any women. Soldiers would want to die.

Post: #37

http://freebeacon.com/politics/hillary-c...ary-draft/

Apparently 46% of women opposed having to register for the draft.

I'm sure a percentage of them have no problem with women being eligible to serve in combat however.

Post: #38

This might be a watershed moment we've almost missed.

Four days ago, the (relatively) non-partisan political Website Politico ran an article with a headline: "Clinton: I support women registering for the draft."

My brother saw this and was ranting about it today at a Father's Day celebration. He has two daughters and he's hopping mad. A lifelong Democrat, he's now squarely in the Trump camp. This is a guy who used to walk around wearing a shirt with Bush and Cheyney's face that said "mean people suck."

Has anyone from the Trump campaign seized on this? Because "Hillary wants to send your daughter off to war to die" sure sounds like a killer soundbite to me.

If anyone is in touch with Trump's people (via Twitter or whatever) they need to use this --and quick. This might play with the Men's Rights crowd and feminists, but I don't think the average parent will take this well.