Post: #26

(02-18-2016 07:30 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

(02-18-2016 10:45 AM)Kaizen Wrote:  ^ The Bible?

Didn't know this was an Evangelical forum.

When arguing ethics I will include both secular and Biblical arguments to make my arguments impenetrable.

That you provided no rebuttal aside a weak non-sequitur proves my point.

You are more than welcome to use works of fiction as a reference.

Post: #27

She's likely inadvertently a "war bride of Europe." Rollo wrote about this phenomenon: http://therationalmale.com/2016/02/03/th...of-europe/

TL;DR - In her mind, her choice was between the guy she's pictured with, or this:

Post: #28

(02-19-2016 12:29 AM)Kaizen Wrote:  

(02-18-2016 07:30 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

(02-18-2016 10:45 AM)Kaizen Wrote:  ^ The Bible?

Didn't know this was an Evangelical forum.

When arguing ethics I will include both secular and Biblical arguments to make my arguments impenetrable.

That you provided no rebuttal aside a weak non-sequitur proves my point.

You are more than welcome to use works of fiction as a reference.

Keep ignoring the secular arguments presented. It just makes you look bad.

Post: #29

(02-19-2016 08:42 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

(02-19-2016 12:29 AM)Kaizen Wrote:  

(02-18-2016 07:30 PM)Samseau Wrote:  

(02-18-2016 10:45 AM)Kaizen Wrote:  ^ The Bible?

Didn't know this was an Evangelical forum.

When arguing ethics I will include both secular and Biblical arguments to make my arguments impenetrable.

That you provided no rebuttal aside a weak non-sequitur proves my point.

You are more than welcome to use works of fiction as a reference.

Keep ignoring the secular arguments presented. It just makes you look bad.

The Bible, and a few other religious, sacred books, are of course an important part of History, mankind and society... so, refusing to hear or consider even a short quote from them, is refusing to understand part of our world. It's like, willingly limiting one's ability to debate and understand. On top of that, and apart from faith itself, there is much to learn in these books, on several aspects and points of view...

Post: #30

Posted for the intro. Note that the film eventually becomes comedically NSFW.

Post: #31

(02-19-2016 05:05 PM)Aurini Wrote:  Posted for the intro. Note that the film eventually becomes comedically NSFW.

70's cartoons were really fucking strange.

Post: #32

(02-18-2016 08:31 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

(02-18-2016 03:18 PM)quino_16 Wrote:  

(02-18-2016 12:21 PM)redpillage Wrote:  In a nutshell - she probably loves black cock and her hamster somehow funneled that passion into an altruistic endeavor that she thinks 'makes a difference'.

Confirmed.

She owns an orphanage.

Here is a picture with her African boyfriend and mulatto son.



This story probably demonstrates everything what is wrong with the West and the woman herself is a metaphor of the imminent extinction of the West.

You can go viral on an alt right forum with that photo.

In defence of collective sanity; posting a picture of a white vase, and black vase next to each other on an alt-right dominated forum will ensue hilarity.

The real question here is...



WYB?

Post: #33

Wizard of Oz tattoo,WNB

Post: #34

(02-21-2016 12:06 PM)DjembaDjemba Wrote:  

(02-18-2016 08:31 PM)Roosh Wrote:  

(02-18-2016 03:18 PM)quino_16 Wrote:  

(02-18-2016 12:21 PM)redpillage Wrote:  In a nutshell - she probably loves black cock and her hamster somehow funneled that passion into an altruistic endeavor that she thinks 'makes a difference'.

Confirmed.

She owns an orphanage.

Here is a picture with her African boyfriend and mulatto son.



This story probably demonstrates everything what is wrong with the West and the woman herself is a metaphor of the imminent extinction of the West.

You can go viral on an alt right forum with that photo.

In defence of collective sanity; posting a picture of a white vase, and black vase next to each other on an alt-right dominated forum will ensue hilarity.

The real question here is...



WYB?

She is too old, but WB if in her youth, I think she was probably hot when young and partied too much with bad boys.

Post: #35

(02-18-2016 03:18 PM)quino_16 Wrote:  

Blonde, Christian woman.
African, Yoruba boyfriend.
Their kid is wearing an Idde.

This picture is only one element away from sending stormfront/pol into a complete meltdown.

Post: #36

I've watched the original doc, can't find it, I thought her boyfriend was staff or her adopted son, because she speaks/orders him around like that. I have no doubt a lot of these women like the idea of being so financially superior they can pretty much be as dominating as they want.

Post: #37

One thing that has been mostly overlooked lately is subsaharan Africa was cannibalist until colonialism. They would fucking eat each other regularly as a food source. Ibn Battuta had alot to say about it.

Post: #38

(02-17-2016 09:16 PM)tynamite Wrote:  I saw this on The Daily Mail. I like the pictures.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...witch.html

Quote:

• Nigerian boy, now named Hope, found emaciated and riddled with worms after wandering streets for eight months
• Finally rescued by Danish aid worker Anja Ringgren Loven who gave him food and water and took him to hospital
• Hope has been treated to remove worms from his belly and daily blood transfusions to replenish his red blood cells
• Ms Loven, whose own son now plays with Hope, said: 'He's a little strong boy. This is what makes life so beautiful'
  

....

That's what religion does. I read a story in the news about a muslim woman who got raped then she reported it to the police. She got arrested for pre-marital sex and was stoned to death. While her family and friends watched, her father told her that he disowned her Religion gave men easy sex in the form of marriage, but thanks to feminists and the sexual revolution, that's over.

Get the fuck out of here with that "thats what religion does". Are you telling me that this is a photo of mother theresa just before she declared this child a witch?



Here's a bunch of christians with filipino children just before the summarily execute them for not having shoes



Who do you think is still in Haiti rebuilding and helping after all of the governments and celebrities decided it was old news by the end of 2010? Christian missionaries.

The news loves to throw up stories about how religions produce kid fuckers, head choppers and witch doctors but when was the last time you saw a story on the news about the international or domestic people that have been helped by church missions that serve people regardless of their faith? It happens all the time, but its not newsworthy.

This tatted up cunt is a drop in a sea of christian missionaries in africa doing the same kind of thing, building orphanages and creating local infrastructure and they have been doing it for years. Thats what religion does.

Post: #39

I think it's good she's saving little kids. Even if they never amount to anything I'm glad she eases their suffering.

It's easy to say she could be doing something else more productive to change things.

But at the end of the day she is just a woman, who is doing more than some of her critics to make the world a better place.

How much more can we really expect from some dumb tatted up Euro trash girl?

There is something else that seems to be going unnoticed; passion.

This woman is passionate about helping these children.

That's a good thing and she'll do more in this area than trying to solve Europe's problems which she obviously doesn't care much about.

Whether she's virtue signaling or attention whoring or whatever, I don't care. I'm glad that kid has a temporary reprieve.

Post: #40

Quote:How much more can we really expect from some dumb tatted up Euro trash girl?

She could have gotten married young to a man from her own culture, had many children, supported her husband and contributed to the cohesion and well-being of her community. She could have encouraged and supported her husband to participate in politics and care for the well-being of their neighbors.

The same things her female ancestors had done for thousands of years.

Post: #41

(02-22-2016 12:41 AM)Fisto Wrote:  I think it's good she's saving little kids. Even if they never amount to anything I'm glad she eases their suffering.

It's easy to say she could be doing something else more productive to change things.

But at the end of the day she is just a woman, who is doing more than some of her critics to make the world a better place.

How much more can we really expect from some dumb tatted up Euro trash girl?

There is something else that seems to be going unnoticed; passion.

This woman is passionate about helping these children.

That's a good thing and she'll do more in this area than trying to solve Europe's problems which she obviously doesn't care much about.

Whether she's virtue signaling or attention whoring or whatever, I don't care. I'm glad that kid has a temporary reprieve.

Agree, it's easy to sit back and denounce what she is doing.

I don't think helping someone's life becoming better is a bad thing no matter how it impacts the issues others think is "more" important.

Post: #42

(02-21-2016 09:34 PM)Dr. Howard Wrote:  Get the fuck out of here with that "thats what religion does". Are you telling me that this is a photo of mother theresa just before she declared this child a witch?



Here's a bunch of christians with filipino children just before the summarily execute them for not having shoes



Who do you think is still in Haiti rebuilding and helping after all of the governments and celebrities decided it was old news by the end of 2010? Christian missionaries.

The news loves to throw up stories about how religions produce kid fuckers, head choppers and witch doctors but when was the last time you saw a story on the news about the international or domestic people that have been helped by church missions that serve people regardless of their faith? It happens all the time, but its not newsworthy.

This tatted up cunt is a drop in a sea of christian missionaries in africa doing the same kind of thing, building orphanages and creating local infrastructure and they have been doing it for years. Thats what religion does.

Mother Theresa is not a pure saint. She got a lot of critics for her behaviour. About her abusive conditions in her hospitals / dying houses and her glorification of poverty. Also some chrisitan missionaries care more about their new church and the preaching of the bible then build a fountain for clean water.

Religion do nothing, people do good and bad things. Some are inspired by humanity others by religion. Be a christian doesn't make you a better human being. Beside that I agree that christian people better know for help people then Muslims, Buddhist or other religious groups. Also more then attention whoring celebrities.
The negative consequences of this chrisitan faith is, that they consider everyone equal.
Like the Churches in Germany, they want to bring in all the poor poor refugees to help them. Many christian people love to quote: Love your next but then forget to add - like you love yourself. Many of those people are driven by self hate. This is a very negative root for building something.

Post: #43

(02-22-2016 01:29 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

Quote:How much more can we really expect from some dumb tatted up Euro trash girl?

She could have gotten married young to a man from her own culture, had many children, supported her husband and contributed to the cohesion and well-being of her community. She could have encouraged and supported her husband to participate in politics and care for the well-being of their neighbors.

The same things her female ancestors had done for thousands of years.

So what are you going to do?

Force her at gunpoint to do that?
Cross your fingers and hope she does that?

Or are you going to ask why she did that?

On the last question, the answer is that it's about incentives.

Thanks to socialism (feminism is just socialism for women), just as traditional masculinity is at best marginalized in the West, as we've experienced, so too is traditional femininity.

In other words, had she done what you proposed, she'd be ridiculed. Doing the same thing where she's at now? Praised.

Thus, if you really want Western men and women to embrace traditional masculinity and femininity in the West, you've got to get Western socialism tossed aboard.

Whether the entity that is the West adapts, or whether the market replaces that entity, ultimately, time will tell.

Post: #44

(02-22-2016 09:53 AM)262 Wrote:  Thus, if you really want Western men and women to embrace traditional masculinity and femininity in the West, you've got to get Western socialism tossed aboard.

Get rid of the woman's vote. Limit the male vote to those who contribute to the state in a meaningful way. Voting is a privilege, not a right.

Marriage laws must become sacrosanct again. No more divorce rape.

Mandatory birth control for women who go on welfare due to out-of-wedlock pregnancies.

Repeal all forms of affirmative action. It is not for races as commonly believed, but for women.

The above would be a great start.

Post: #45

(02-22-2016 10:02 AM)Samseau Wrote:  Get rid of the woman's vote. Limit the male vote to those who contribute to the state in a meaningful way. Voting is a privilege, not a right.

Marriage laws must become sacrosanct again. No more divorce rape.

Mandatory birth control for women who go on welfare due to out-of-wedlock pregnancies.

Repeal all forms of affirmative action. It is not for races as commonly believed, but for women.

The above would be a great start.

I find this ironic considering you're a self-proclaimed libertarian.

Post: #46

(02-22-2016 10:17 AM)Huey Wrote:  

(02-22-2016 10:02 AM)Samseau Wrote:  Get rid of the woman's vote. Limit the male vote to those who contribute to the state in a meaningful way. Voting is a privilege, not a right.

Marriage laws must become sacrosanct again. No more divorce rape.

Mandatory birth control for women who go on welfare due to out-of-wedlock pregnancies.

Repeal all forms of affirmative action. It is not for races as commonly believed, but for women.

The above would be a great start.

I find this ironic considering you're a self-proclaimed libertarian.

I find it ironic you post one sentence and expect it to mean anything.

Post: #47

(02-22-2016 10:35 AM)Samseau Wrote:  I find it ironic you post one sentence and expect it to mean anything.

The libertarian philosophy rests on the non-aggression principle, no? I'm just pointing out that I find it ironic that you (a libertarian) would suggest mandatory birth control. Isn't that the exact opposite of what a libertarian would say?

Post: #48

(02-22-2016 10:55 AM)Huey Wrote:  

(02-22-2016 10:35 AM)Samseau Wrote:  I find it ironic you post one sentence and expect it to mean anything.

The libertarian philosophy rests on the non-aggression principle, no? I'm just pointing out that I find it ironic that you (a libertarian) would suggest mandatory birth control. Isn't that the exact opposite of what a libertarian would say?

First of all, be careful with labels. A lot of guys will say, "I'm a libertarian" and then proclaim a ton of bullshit in the name of libertarianism.

Libertarianism is not pacifism. Libertarianism is based on classical liberal ideas, which involve that the state manages and regulates people insomuch they cannot harm one another.

Some say, in a "pure" libertarian state, there is no welfare because all individuals are responsible for one another. Single mothers would be left to abandon their children on the streets to exposure and death.

However, by the same logic of the non-aggression principle, children should not need to suffer for the actions of their shitty mothers. Children have rights too. Therefore, women must be regulated for the children they produce. Throwing single mothers in jail does not solve any problems as the child still needs care. And since paying unlimited welfare for slutty women results in tons of children with no fathers, the only sensical solution is to enforce mandatory birth control for single mothers while giving them assistance for their children they are required by law to care for.

But this is all by libertarian logic. I like libertarian ideas, but I do not consider myself a libertarian because there are too many idiots in the movement. Too many morons who cannot apply logic. Too many leftists hijacking the movement.

I don't really care to call myself any label, because I find them to be meaningless over enough time. What I promote is Truth and Justice, and the code of morality that God will judge as by revealed to us by Jesus. That is ultimately the only code that makes any sense and stands the test of time, as we know from history. No one from any Western nation would exist without Christ. It is obvious the morality from that man was superior at minimum, and most likely divine.

Post: #49

(02-22-2016 02:15 AM)Parzival Wrote:  

(02-21-2016 09:34 PM)Dr. Howard Wrote:  Get the fuck out of here with that "thats what religion does". Are you telling me that this is a photo of mother theresa just before she declared this child a witch?


Here's a bunch of christians with filipino children just before the summarily execute them for not having shoes


Who do you think is still in Haiti rebuilding and helping after all of the governments and celebrities decided it was old news by the end of 2010? Christian missionaries.

The news loves to throw up stories about how religions produce kid fuckers, head choppers and witch doctors but when was the last time you saw a story on the news about the international or domestic people that have been helped by church missions that serve people regardless of their faith? It happens all the time, but its not newsworthy.

This tatted up cunt is a drop in a sea of christian missionaries in africa doing the same kind of thing, building orphanages and creating local infrastructure and they have been doing it for years. Thats what religion does.

Mother Theresa is not a pure saint. She got a lot of critics for her behaviour. About her abusive conditions in her hospitals / dying houses and her glorification of poverty. Also some chrisitan missionaries care more about their new church and the preaching of the bible then build a fountain for clean water.

Religion do nothing, people do good and bad things. Some are inspired by humanity others by religion. Be a christian doesn't make you a better human being. Beside that I agree that christian people better know for help people then Muslims, Buddhist or other religious groups. Also more then attention whoring celebrities.
The negative consequences of this chrisitan faith is, that they consider everyone equal.
Like the Churches in Germany, they want to bring in all the poor poor refugees to help them. Many christian people love to quote: Love your next but then forget to add - like you love yourself. Many of those people are driven by self hate. This is a very negative root for building something.

I have bolded things that I agree with. You make some good points. Doctors without borders is a good secular example of the same thing, they do good work but also have volunteers that are total prima donnas that care more about being able to say that they were part of the organization than actually doing something.

Post: #50

(02-22-2016 01:29 AM)Samseau Wrote:  

Quote:How much more can we really expect from some dumb tatted up Euro trash girl?

She could have gotten married young to a man from her own culture, had many children, supported her husband and contributed to the cohesion and well-being of her community. She could have encouraged and supported her husband to participate in politics and care for the well-being of their neighbors.

The same things her female ancestors had done for thousands of years.

I'll repeat my question "How much can we really expect from a DUMB, TATTED UP, EUROTRASH GIRL"?