Forum home · Politics & War · search

The Syria conflict thread

📄 Rendered from the archive database (the original static capture of this page wasn't kept). Content is complete; styling is simplified.
Pages: 1 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 46
nomadbrah · 2018-04-09 21:26:00 · #1001
I'm not going to post more.

I don't even plan on posting frequently going forward.

Though.. this kind of evil shit really rustles my feathers, what a better world we could have had without this bs. It simply isn't ok that the entire world must constantly be on high alert, constantly be on threat of war, just because one group of people are raging lunatic sociopaths.
puckerman · 2018-04-09 21:36:00 · #1002
(06-02-2017 02:27 PM)911 Wrote:  Neocons have been actively emptying out the near east of its Christian population, the world's oldest, including in Palestine, as Beirut noted above. They're setting up salafi death cults and chaos (and proxy states like Kurdistan) all around Israel so that it can totally dominate the area and take over its resources (see Genie Oil owners Rothschild and co). They want to break down previously stable secular nation-states in that area, which had always had a high degree of religious and cultural minorities that managed to live together, breaking them up into warring ethno-states.

Before the invasion of Iraq, the Christian population in the middle east was doing fairly well and living in peace in nearly every country, except in Israel, where communities in places like Bethlehem have been persecuted and harassed just as much as the muslim palestinians. The neocon coalition has been funding, training and supporting the jihadis in their fight against the multiconfessional national army in Syria.

Most of the neocons are NOT Christians. They were born and raised in another religious tradition.
nomadbrah · 2018-04-09 21:45:00 · #1003
The irony of course is that the media keeps saying "Palestine", while never mentioning the origin of the word:

Philistine.

It was greek.
puckerman · 2018-04-09 21:46:00 · #1004
(04-07-2018 05:05 PM)AManLikePutin Wrote:  A few days ago: US announces plans to pull troops out of Syria

Today: Chemical attack with over 70 dead at a rebel-held territory...being reported all over MSM





During the last two years, Trump has changed his opinions on just about everything. One day he likes Pepsi, and the next day he likes Coke. One day he roots for the Jets, and the next day he roots for the Giants. He's changed his mind and positions on almost everything.

He has never wavered in his love for Israel. He has been consistent about this every single day--on the campaign trail and now in the Oval Office. He worships Israel.

We all know Trump is a competitive guy. Right now, his goal is to suck Netanyahu's cock better than Bill Clinton and Barack Obama did. Every American President since Lyndon Johnson has been a blowjob-on-call for Israel prime ministers, and Trump is no different. He never will be anything else.
CynicalContrarian · 2018-04-09 21:51:00 · #1005
Bigly monologue here from Tucker :

budoslavic · 2018-04-09 22:44:00 · #1006
Deleted. Someone already posted the same video.
TheBoom · 2018-04-09 22:45:00 · #1007
Now that Trump, by signing the spending agreement, caved on the wall, this is the last chance for him to redeem himself at all in my eyes. He has shown he doesn't care about censorship of anyone to the right of Elizabeth Warren and his attempt to drain the swamp is subtle at best. If the Jews get their way and we go into another war/boondoggle to fight Israel's battles for it, then I am writing him off. This latest gas attack hoax is one of the most transparent attempts at political theater I have ever seen.
Simeon_Strangelight · 2018-04-10 01:28:00 · #1008
Quote:Asked yesterday whether Russia’s Vladimir Putin bears responsibility for the atrocity on Saturday in Douma, Mr Trump said: ‘He may, yeah, he may. And if he does it’s going to be very tough, very tough. Everybody’s gonna pay a price. He will, everybody will.’

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...z5CFR2iBCW
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Yup - that's why folk voted in Donald Trump.

To make stupid assumptions - the Russians and Assad did it!

"He Vlad - we are winning and beating back the beheaders. Why not launch a chemical attack in order to celebrate? I know that the Soviets did not even use this as they were fighting the brutal Chechans, but doing it now to the people that I am trying to win over with restraint, that will be good!"

"Da! Let's do it"

Quote:He said the US was investigating the possible involvement of the Iranian and Russian governments, adding: ‘Nothing’s off the table. It was an atrocious attack.’


Ah - glad that they bring up the next target: IRAN!

All in one swoop, because they know that if they bomb Assad's military to the stone age, then the noble rebel beheaders can beat back the Syrians. Never mind that no actual Syrians are among the rebels.

Then we can turn towards bigger fish - Iran has to be liberated and enriched. We should not forget that the ethnic makeup is only 50% Persian there. I am sure that all the different tribes will get along well, when the main power differential is down?
No conflicts and beef between ethnicities and shia/sunni, right?
Duke Castile · 2018-04-10 02:22:00 · #1009
He said Putin “may” have been responsible”.

He then said “everybody’s gotta pay a price”

Which can easily mean “whoever did this is going to pay”.

That language was ambiguous.
Foolsgo1d · 2018-04-10 07:10:00 · #1010
If the plans to do something are taking this long it either means a significant attacks is going to take place or they are waiting for something else.
Gmac · 2018-04-10 07:52:00 · #1011
(04-09-2018 09:16 PM)PharaohRa Wrote:  All

First off, many of you posting here are panicking like scared little schoolgirls. It's pathetic and it makes us all look foolish. We are supposed to be the paragons of the manosphere, not cowardly soyboys. Straighten up. He even frustrates me but you learn to live with it.

Second, everyone and their mother knows that the gas attack in Syria was a false flag. Donald Trump knows it and he did not instigate any attacks on Syria since he knew that Israel was trying to bait him into making an unprovoked attack.

Third, unlike what some of the posters here are writing about (you know who you are) and making assumptions you know nothing about, THERE WILL BE NO WAR. Donald Trump WILL NOT, and I repeat, WILL NOT send our men to die for the neocons and Israel, no how, no such, because if WAR does happen, everyone dies, yes, even (((them))), and the reason why is because there would be war the first time the gas attack false flag occured. From what I have read through the alternative sources, Q, yes Q, and he is NOT A LARP because how he presents himself in his blog is that of an insider who is one of the good guys, the White Hats and Donald Trump have everything under control and are working to get the troops out and drain the swamp. Dealing with the globalists is a messy affair and it will take time but it will be done because getting rid of them is the only way humanity will survive the 21st century. Also, watch what Donald Trump does and read between the lines.

Fourth, want to feel like you have influence?? Call his White House line, send a message through the White House portal, and let him know that you want the wall and you want the troops out of Syria. He listens to us and we are not powerless. Remember, the globalists will when we are apathetic because the psychological is half the battle!

Finally, pay more attention to what Q has to say!

Aside from the Q comment I agreed with everything you said.
rotekz · 2018-04-10 08:22:00 · #1012
Simeon_Strangelight · 2018-04-10 08:30:00 · #1013
(04-10-2018 08:22 AM)rotekz Wrote:  

Locals: "What chemical attack?"

Heh. Ah well .... won't change anything.
Batka · 2018-04-10 11:08:00 · #1014
Jimmy Dore says that the Deep State has Trump by the balls.



Simeon_Strangelight · 2018-04-10 11:56:00 · #1015
(04-10-2018 11:08 AM)Batka Wrote:  Jimmy Dore says that the Deep State has Trump by the balls.




Gulf War 1:

+ Saddam was right and Kuwait was drilling under Iraq's territory
+ Saddam also asked in secrete meetings the US whether his former great allies would be fine with him annexing Kuwait. There are rumors that the US officials said: "Go ahead - we are fine with it."

Gulf War 2:

+ Fake WMD statements and some odd connection to 9/11 - the flimsiest of excuses sufficed. He bad, he must go. So? But is the lack of him any better for the country?

In all instances the countries like Libya end up far worse than they have started, but I guess that is the goal all along. When Assad goes, then Syria will go to shit. After Iran falls, then likely a larger Shia/Sunni war will follow suit and finally encompass the Saudis.
nomadbrah · 2018-04-10 12:02:00 · #1016
(04-10-2018 07:52 AM)Gmac Wrote:  
(04-09-2018 09:16 PM)PharaohRa Wrote:  All

First off, many of you posting here are panicking like scared little schoolgirls. It's pathetic and it makes us all look foolish. We are supposed to be the paragons of the manosphere, not cowardly soyboys. Straighten up. He even frustrates me but you learn to live with it.

Second, everyone and their mother knows that the gas attack in Syria was a false flag. Donald Trump knows it and he did not instigate any attacks on Syria since he knew that Israel was trying to bait him into making an unprovoked attack.

Third, unlike what some of the posters here are writing about (you know who you are) and making assumptions you know nothing about, THERE WILL BE NO WAR. Donald Trump WILL NOT, and I repeat, WILL NOT send our men to die for the neocons and Israel, no how, no such, because if WAR does happen, everyone dies, yes, even (((them))), and the reason why is because there would be war the first time the gas attack false flag occured. From what I have read through the alternative sources, Q, yes Q, and he is NOT A LARP because how he presents himself in his blog is that of an insider who is one of the good guys, the White Hats and Donald Trump have everything under control and are working to get the troops out and drain the swamp. Dealing with the globalists is a messy affair and it will take time but it will be done because getting rid of them is the only way humanity will survive the 21st century. Also, watch what Donald Trump does and read between the lines.

Fourth, want to feel like you have influence?? Call his White House line, send a message through the White House portal, and let him know that you want the wall and you want the troops out of Syria. He listens to us and we are not powerless. Remember, the globalists will when we are apathetic because the psychological is half the battle!

Finally, pay more attention to what Q has to say!

Aside from the Q comment I agreed with everything you said.

I just sent an email on https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/

Takes 30 seconds.

Everyone who cares about this should call or email, it takes no time at all.
nomadbrah · 2018-04-10 12:05:00 · #1017
I maintain that if Trump, Macron, May attacks Syria this time, then it means our governments have gone from covert dictatorships to overt dictatorship.

The people are against this big time. They know it's a lie. If they attack this time, it is basically the elite dropping the pretense of democracy.
TigerMandingo · 2018-04-10 12:13:00 · #1018
(04-10-2018 12:05 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  I maintain that if Trump, Macron, May attacks Syria this time, then it means our governments have gone from covert dictatorships to overt dictatorship.

The people are against this big time. They know it's a lie. If they attack this time, it is basically the elite dropping the pretense of democracy.

I don't think the governments give a shit. Iraq war had a huge opposition worldwide and they still went along with it. I don't even see protests this time around.

The problem is Western people have been far removed from war and don't know what it is like anymore. The US/NATO drops bombs on people in the ME every single day and we don't even lift a finger to protest it. They do it in a very discreet way and hide it from the public. Then we wonder why they hate us.
Syberpunk · 2018-04-10 12:14:00 · #1019
[Image: W4jjCA3.jpg]
budoslavic · 2018-04-10 12:31:00 · #1020

Edit. The United Nations Security Council page has a list of who the Current Members are.
Quote:Permanent and Non-Permanent Members

The Council is composed of 15 Members:

five permanent members: China, France, Russian Federation, the United Kingdom, and the United States,
and ten non-permanent members elected for two-year terms by the General Assembly (with end of term date):
Bolivia (2018)
Côte d’Ivoire (2019)
Equatorial Guinea (2019)
Ethiopia (2018)
Kazakhstan (2018)
Kuwait (2019)
Netherlands (2018)
Peru (2019)
Poland (2019)
Sweden (2018)

Non-Council Member States

More than 60 United Nations Member States have never been Members of the Security Council.

A State which is a Member of the United Nations but not of the Security Council may participate, without a vote, in its discussions when the Council considers that country's interests are affected. Both Members and non-members of the United Nations, if they are parties to a dispute being considered by the Council, may be invited to take part, without a vote, in the Council's discussions; the Council sets the conditions for participation by a non-member State.
SamuelBRoberts · 2018-04-10 12:33:00 · #1021
Well, that's fine with me.
Duke Castile · 2018-04-10 12:44:00 · #1022
Sent an email for what good it will do.
Batka · 2018-04-10 12:47:00 · #1023
(04-10-2018 12:31 PM)budoslavic Wrote:  

Huge if true. There seems to have been a walk back and cooler heads prevailed. Either the neo-cons realised that they did not have the public's support, or Putin in no way made it clear that a mass attack would mean that a few US Navy vessels would end up at the bottom of the Med.

Anyway, as they say, the devil is in the detail. We shall wait and see.
Batka · 2018-04-10 12:50:00 · #1024
(04-10-2018 12:31 PM)budoslavic Wrote:  Permanent and Non-Permanent Members

The Council is composed of 15 Members:

five permanent members: China, France, Russian Federation, the United Kingdom, and the United States,
and ten non-permanent members elected for two-year terms by the General Assembly (with end of term date):
Bolivia (2018)
Côte d’Ivoire (2019)
Equatorial Guinea (2019)
Ethiopia (2018)
Kazakhstan (2018)
Kuwait (2019)
Netherlands (2018)
Peru (2019)
Poland (2019)
Sweden (2018)

Non-Council Member States

More than 60 United Nations Member States have never been Members of the Security Council.

A State which is a Member of the United Nations but not of the Security Council may participate, without a vote, in its discussions when the Council considers that country's interests are affected. Both Members and non-members of the United Nations, if they are parties to a dispute being considered by the Council, may be invited to take part, without a vote, in the Council's discussions; the Council sets the conditions for participation by a non-member State.
[/quote]

The only pro Russian states on the UN Security Council are China, Bolivia and Kazakhstan.
FilipSRB · 2018-04-10 13:18:00 · #1025
(04-09-2018 05:55 PM)SamuelBRoberts Wrote:  I don't care if he burns Syria to the ground as long as I get my wall, really.

Now that's a healthy Imperial citizen attitude.
Pages: 1 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 46