Post: #1

http://www.vice.com/read/is-reducing-the...r-problems

It's an obvious troll (look up "Femitheist Divine" where the person being interviewed admits she was playing a character) but makes you think: why is it so many of the people who took Roosh's "make rape legal" article at face value and getting outraged not doing the same for this article? If you ever hear anyone talking about how Roosh is "pro-rape" based on that article he wrote , be sure to bring this article up as a counterpoint and ask if the person you are talking to also thinks someone is seriously suggesting culling 90% of the male population in the world.

Post: #2

I presume this 90% includes children and baby boys? Good luck persuading the population of that.

Media reaction: nil.

Post: #3

Works for me as long as the 10% are all rvf men

Post: #4

Archive link:
https://archive.is/M3wph

Don't give clicks/money to genocidal man haters.

Post: #5

It's.... too.... much!

Post: #6

Disclaimer: satirical.

I guess God or nature made a serious mistake on the way women were designed. They have too many flaws. For mankind sake, we better fix the women. We have technology, lets put it to use.

Hey man scientists of the world, follow this plan:

1) Genetically modify women so they become:
1.1 Sexier
1.2 Always fit (body and health) to almost the EOL.
1.3 Much dumber to the level of a cat. We only need them for sex and motherhood. From then on, education and nurturing will be done only by man. That cannot be trusted to women.
1.4 Remove shit testing, flaking, psychopathy, dark triad, etc from their brain. We need a basic brain, just for sex, reproduction and almost no talk.

2) Test these genetically modified women to see if they have no issues. Run trials and experiments.

3) Once perfected, farm these new women in to large numbers so that we can supply them to man.

4) Wipe out the non genetically modified women, using a virus that targets them, by releasing to the earth atmosphere, so we make sure there are no standard women survivors left.

This would be eternal happiness for man and peace on earth!

Post: #7

Post: #8

(02-09-2016 04:02 PM)kent4 Wrote:  Disclaimer: satirical.

I guess God or nature made a serious mistake on the way women were designed. They have too many flaws. For mankind sake, we better fix the women. We have technology, lets put it to use.

Hey man scientists of the world, follow this plan:

1) Genetically modify women so they become:
1.1 Sexier
1.2 Always fit (body and health) to almost the EOL.
1.3 Much dumber to the level of a cat. We only need them for sex and motherhood. From then on, education and nurturing will be done only by man. That cannot be trusted to women.
1.4 Remove shit testing, flaking, psychopathy, dark triad, etc from their brain. We need a basic brain, just for sex, reproduction and almost no talk.

2) Test these genetically modified women to see if they have no issues. Run trials and experiments.

3) Once perfected, farm these new women in to large numbers so that we can supply them to man.

4) Wipe out the non genetically modified women, using a virus that targets them, by releasing to the earth atmosphere, so we make sure there are no standard women survivors left.

This would be eternal happiness for man and peace on earth!

You SAY it's satire, but I think world governments should meet to ban you, MSM needs to whip up violent mobs worldwide on the basis that you're organising 'murder meet-ups', and everyone you know should be doxxed.

DIE CIS SCUM

Post: #9

The question is, if they kept 10%, would their polyamorous ways extend to to the fatties?

Post: #10

(02-09-2016 05:24 PM)PolymathGuru Wrote:  The question is, if they kept 10%, would their polyamorous ways extend to to the fatties?

This 10% nonsense would be terrible for the average woman. The 10% they'd keep would be the men they want to fuck, i.e. the alphas. Alphas don't go for neon haired fatties, and in a 10-1 situation would only fuck 8's and above and still leave millions of 8's and above without dick.

Unless she's advocating that this 10% be subject to RAPE, of course...but no woman would ever endorse that sort of thing - not even satirically - would they?

Post: #11

(02-09-2016 05:33 PM)Matsufubu Wrote:  

(02-09-2016 05:24 PM)PolymathGuru Wrote:  The question is, if they kept 10%, would their polyamorous ways extend to to the fatties?

This 10% nonsense would be terrible for the average woman. The 10% they'd keep would be the men they want to fuck, i.e. the alphas. Alphas don't go for neon haired fatties, and in a 10-1 situation would only fuck 8's and above and still leave millions of 8's and above without dick.

Unless she's advocating that this 10% be subject to RAPE, of course...but no woman would ever endorse that sort of thing - not even satirically - would they?

Or maybe they plan on using the minority of men as workhorse slaves by outnumbering them. As for their sexual pleasure, they'll just clit fuck each other, however that would work.

Post: #12

The piece was clearly trolling, the only thing that concerns me is how ready some outlets were to embrace or broadcast it's message. I think at one point she faked her own suicide? Now she seems to style herself as some kind of anti-feminist.

What I'm pretty sure of, is that she's a single mom with entirely too much time on her hands. Nearly always this means she's not doing her job as a parent.

The powers that be don't want men dead, they want them alive and producing/consuming to their benefit.

Post: #13

The killing of most men seems like a joke, but when you have liberal organizations calling for more women on the board, a woman CEO, a woman President, to the point where the most important qualification for the job is that she be a woman, isn't that a killing of men?

She just took it to the extreme, but when you do that you do expose truth. In this case the truth is what the liberal, feminist agenda is all about. It's not about equality. If that were the case, it would not matter what gender the board or congress consisted of. People would be selected on merit.

The truth is the feminist agenda is about women having power over men. They have already gained much of it via divorce/family/rape/harassment laws. I suppose the next steps downward into that dark agenda would be enslavement, castration, then genocide. I think at that point men may find their balls again.

Post: #14

@onto

I know so many young women who landed cushy government jobs it's ridiculous. So many people and companies struggling to survive, yet government scoops up young women by the droves and puts them on the government payroll. It is deliberate.

Post: #15

(02-09-2016 05:38 PM)PolymathGuru Wrote:  

(02-09-2016 05:33 PM)Matsufubu Wrote:  

(02-09-2016 05:24 PM)PolymathGuru Wrote:  The question is, if they kept 10%, would their polyamorous ways extend to to the fatties?

This 10% nonsense would be terrible for the average woman. The 10% they'd keep would be the men they want to fuck, i.e. the alphas. Alphas don't go for neon haired fatties, and in a 10-1 situation would only fuck 8's and above and still leave millions of 8's and above without dick.

Unless she's advocating that this 10% be subject to RAPE, of course...but no woman would ever endorse that sort of thing - not even satirically - would they?

Or maybe they plan on using the minority of men as workhorse slaves by outnumbering them. As for their sexual pleasure, they'll just clit fuck each other, however that would work.

Post: #16

(02-09-2016 06:11 PM)Onto Wrote:  The killing of most men seems like a joke, but when you have liberal organizations calling for more women on the board, a woman CEO, a woman President, to the point where the most important qualification for the job is that she be a woman, isn't that a killing of men?

She just took it to the extreme, but when you do that you do expose truth. In this case the truth is what the liberal, feminist agenda is all about. It's not about equality. If that were the case, it would not matter what gender the board or congress consisted of. People would be selected on merit.

The truth is the feminist agenda is about women having power over men. They have already gained much of it via divorce/family/rape/harassment laws. I suppose the next steps downward into that dark agenda would be enslavement, castration, then genocide. I think at that point men may find their balls again.

What's so gutting is that MEN GAVE THEM THIS. Everything they have is down to men! We say that women hate women, but men hate men!

Post: #17

(02-09-2016 07:16 PM)Matsufubu Wrote:  

(02-09-2016 06:11 PM)Onto Wrote:  The killing of most men seems like a joke, but when you have liberal organizations calling for more women on the board, a woman CEO, a woman President, to the point where the most important qualification for the job is that she be a woman, isn't that a killing of men?

She just took it to the extreme, but when you do that you do expose truth. In this case the truth is what the liberal, feminist agenda is all about. It's not about equality. If that were the case, it would not matter what gender the board or congress consisted of. People would be selected on merit.

The truth is the feminist agenda is about women having power over men. They have already gained much of it via divorce/family/rape/harassment laws. I suppose the next steps downward into that dark agenda would be enslavement, castration, then genocide. I think at that point men may find their balls again.

What's so gutting is that MEN GAVE THEM THIS. Everything they have is down to men! We say that women hate women, but men hate men!

Yes, men have stopped believing in themselves.

Post: #18

(02-09-2016 04:02 PM)kent4 Wrote:  Disclaimer: satirical.

I guess God or nature made a serious mistake on the way women were designed. They have too many flaws. For mankind sake, we better fix the women. We have technology, lets put it to use.

Hey man scientists of the world, follow this plan:

snip

4) Wipe out the non genetically modified women, using a virus that targets them, by releasing to the earth atmosphere, so we make sure there are no standard women survivors left.

This would be eternal happiness for man and peace on earth!

You needn't release into the air. Instruct every Starbuck to add the agent to their frappucinos(or however you spell that shit) and all the standard women will be dead in 72 hours or less.

Post: #19

(02-09-2016 05:11 PM)Matsufubu Wrote:  

(02-09-2016 04:02 PM)kent4 Wrote:  Disclaimer: satirical.

I guess God or nature made a serious mistake on the way women were designed. They have too many flaws. For mankind sake, we better fix the women. We have technology, lets put it to use.

Hey man scientists of the world, follow this plan:

1) Genetically modify women so they become:
1.1 Sexier
1.2 Always fit (body and health) to almost the EOL.
1.3 Much dumber to the level of a cat. We only need them for sex and motherhood. From then on, education and nurturing will be done only by man. That cannot be trusted to women.
1.4 Remove shit testing, flaking, psychopathy, dark triad, etc from their brain. We need a basic brain, just for sex, reproduction and almost no talk.

2) Test these genetically modified women to see if they have no issues. Run trials and experiments.

3) Once perfected, farm these new women in to large numbers so that we can supply them to man.

4) Wipe out the non genetically modified women, using a virus that targets them, by releasing to the earth atmosphere, so we make sure there are no standard women survivors left.

This would be eternal happiness for man and peace on earth!

You SAY it's satire, but I think world governments should meet to ban you, MSM needs to whip up violent mobs worldwide on the basis that you're organising 'murder meet-ups', and everyone you know should be doxxed.

DIE CIS SCUM

The author should at least have the UK parliament debate for a half hour regarding banning her from the country.

Post: #20

Onto Wrote:The truth is the feminist agenda is about women having power over men. They have already gained much of it via divorce/family/rape/harassment laws. I suppose the next steps downward into that dark agenda would be enslavement, castration, then genocide. I think at that point men may find their balls again.

Exactly. It is a slippery slope and as crazy as enslavement and genocide sounds, that is the trajectory we are heading in. Whether this actually happens depends whether the trend can be broken before it gets to that extreme. Maybe we have some part to play in that.

Post: #21

Yeah, she's trolling. Comment on articles says: "This woman is an MRA activist named Krista Milburn. She created the character 'Femitheist' as fictional satire.
https://plus.google.com/+FemitheistDivine/posts"

If you look there you'll find a lot of stuff in support of men.

I find this especially hilarious if she (or he?) was trolling Vice without their realizing it.

"The individual has always had to struggle to keep from being overwhelmed by the tribe. To be your own man is a hard business. If you try it, you'll be lonely often, and sometimes frightened. But no price is too high to pay for the privilege of owning yourself." - Rudyard Kipling

Post: #22

350 million men against 3.5 billion women. I still think the men would rule over all the women. These guys would congregate and live like kings. Even the dumbest and ugliest among them would have a few hundred brides. It's probably a feminists dream to cull 90% of the male population but it would hilariously backfire and the surviving men would benefit greatly.

Post: #23

By consulting ancient texts we can see how matriarchies are formed and how they collapse after pumping and dumping.

Quote:Hypsipyle
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In Greek mythology, Hypsipyle (Ὑψιπύλη) was the Queen of Lemnos, daughter of Thoas and Myrina.

During her reign, Aphrodite cursed the women of the island for having neglected her shrines. (According to Bibliotheca 1.9.17, the women were afflicted with an evil smell.) The men took up with female slaves taken on raids on Thrace. The women of the island decided upon revenge and, in one night, killed all their male relatives. Hypsipyle alone spared a male. She hid her father, Thoas, from the vengeful plan.

Soon after the androcide, Jason and the Argonauts stopped at Lemnos on their way to Colchis. The Argonauts remained on Lemnos for two summers and two winters, during that time, had extensive relations with the island's women. Jason impregnated Hypsipyle and swore eternal fidelity to her. The product of that pregnancy was twins, Euneus and Nebrophonus (or Deiphilus or Thoas). Jason, however, sailed away and quickly forgot his vows.

The Lemnian women, angry at her having spared her father, forced Hypsipyle to flee for her life. She and her sons were taken by pirates and sold to Lycurgus, king of Nemea. She was given charge of Lycurgus's son, Archemorus.

When the Argives (of Aeschylus's Seven Against Thebes or Statius' Thebaid) marched against Thebes, they met Hypsipyle and made her show them a fountain where they could get water. She set down Archemorus when she did this, and he was killed by a snake in her absence. Lycurgus wanted revenge upon Hypsipyle, but she was protected by Adrastus, the leader of the Argives.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypsipyle

Relevant to today:

Aphrodite has cursed Western women who exhibit an evil countenance (blue hair, sassiness, obesity and a thirst for coin). Then men find foreign women of lower social status instead. The accursed women cut down their menfolk for this but get soaked with the sight of migrants arriving by boat. These men are not soulmates however and they leave to be true to their higher calling (finding the Golden Fleece of welfare). The pumped and dumped matriarchy implodes with in-fighting.