Post: #201

Now would be a good time to start a new brand and fraternity that isn't related but has similar goals.

Post: #202

In the meantime, male feminist/social justice warrior Jian Ghomeshi still on trial for aggravated rape of multiple women - yet the basement dwellers are more outraged over a satirical blog post - lol

Reminds me of the Catholic Church extolling the virtues of abstinence while simultaneously covering for it's pedophile priests.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/ji...-1.3432707

Post: #203

(02-04-2016 09:37 AM)not-a-pua Wrote:  Damn the story made it to Drudge, he links to http://dfw.cbslocal.com/2016/02/03/blogg...-concerns/

This might be the biggest exposure yet. Drudge headline: "Blogger Behind 'Make Rape Legal' Meetups Cancels Events Over Safety Concerns..."

Post: #204

(02-03-2016 08:09 PM)CynicalContrarian Wrote:  If "they" really want to curb traditional masculine behaviour. They'll have to shutdown Tinder & all the other apps.
Shutdown every online dating site.
Prohibit every straight male from attending any bars, clubs etc.
Implement nightly curfews for straight men.

After-all, it's for the children (or kidults as the case may be).

The problem is nobody outside of RoK/these forums views this as a traditional masucline meetup. This has been labeled as a 'pro-rape' movement by the media, and everyone is jumping on this train.

Post: #205

I want to get in contact with the original host for my city.

Obviously this poses some major privacy issues, so does anyone have a recommendation for figuring this out? Perhaps a pm on this site? Or a proxy email?

If you're in/around Charlottesville, send me a private message.

Post: #206

(02-04-2016 10:35 AM)Hazardous Wrote:  I want to get in contact with the original host for my city.

I wonder how many of these low post count low rep posters are femnazi moles? Three posts, zero rep...I wouldn't trust this person to keep information about a local meeting contact confidential.

Post: #207

Sorry guys with no/low post counts and rep, you may need to try again next time. Unless you have been personally vetted by your city's group leader beforehand there's not much likelihood in you getting invited to these at present moment.

Post: #208

I remember reading, a few months ago, a thread on this forum discussing whether MRA/MGTOW ideas should be banned on this forum. And someone very astutely pointed out that you don't go around banning discussion of opposing ideas unless you see them as a threat, either in that they expose the sand foundation of your own ideology, or they expose your unwillingness/inability to adequately defend your own ideas in the face of scrutiny.

Being British myself, all this talk of making RoK a proscribed "hate group" is admittedly a scary wake up call....1984 indeed. However, even as a relatively inactive member of this group, far more than fear I am filled with a sense of pride at being part of a group of men who aren't cowed by the people who can shout the loudest. Men with the conviction to defend their beliefs in the face of the mob.

This forum is of course not a "rape-advocacy" group, but the single greatest self-help resource out there for men today. While I don't fully subscribe to the ethereal "New world order" idea of a global elite trying to keep men on their knees, I can't help but wonder why there appears to be such a vested interest in the targeting and dismantlement of this group? As has been discussed already here, the massive media shitstorm will only serve to direct more traffic here, bring more men on board, and for those already here, highlight the seriousness of today's threat.

On the note of operational security, veteran members have already put forward a number of solid plans of action. But as far as individual security goes, it is definitely time to take things more seriously. For anybody who hasn't already done so, link your RooshV forum account to a disposable email address. Mine was previously linked to the email address I use for Facebook, which I realised had the potential to cause me real problems in the future.

And finally, on a lighter note, whilst I didn't catch the Parliamentary debate (it sounds like it wasn't much worth watching anyway), the fact that Roosh is now being debated in Parliament highlights just how far this movement has come. As I said at the start of this post...if you're not a threat, they won't try to silence you.

Onwards and upwards brothers...

-MLC

Post: #209

Now that my shitty government knows about Roosh and ROK and wants to punish followers, should I worry that Roosh and ROK is among my Facebook likes?

Post: #210

(02-04-2016 10:26 AM)yeppels Wrote:  The problem is nobody outside of RoK/these forums views this as a traditional masucline meetup. This has been labeled as a 'pro-rape' movement by the media, and everyone is jumping on this train.

So how do we change that? Roosh got a lot of publicity with his more provocative articles, but now they're defining him (and us) by those some statements. Yes, we know they satirical and designed to generate web traffic. But still - how do we demonstrate this is a group to help men deal with men's issues in a world that has become hostile to men? Perhaps enumerate what those issues are, do charitable events for worthy causes...I'm just throwing out ideas. It does seem that, to move forward as anything but a pariah, we need to reform our image. Perhaps there are non-lefty bloggers/media types who can help. Drudge? Others? Something has to be done, no? All this bad publicity drives web traffic and book sales...but does it allow this group to move forward as a movement to truly help men? Or does it limit us?

This really bothers me and I'd welcome ideas/viewpoints.

Post: #211

(02-04-2016 10:41 AM)placer Wrote:  

(02-04-2016 10:35 AM)Hazardous Wrote:  I want to get in contact with the original host for my city.

I wonder how many of these low post count low rep posters are femnazi moles? Three posts, zero rep...I wouldn't trust this person to keep information about a local meeting contact confidential.

Just saw this after writing the above. I think while security is an issue, SJW sleepers should be fairly easy to root out from genuine members who just happen to have less of an online presence.

"Hazardous", join date "Jan 2016", 3 posts, all of which are about meetups? Looks like a mole to me...but then what do I know?

Post: #212

I'll just leave this here.

Post: #213

To be fair, many dormant accounts were resurrected when RVF was set to private and required a login.

That said since the media flare up there's been some 'Down with those uppity broads eh bros. They should get back in the kitchen' and other troll-like posts around, along with calls to action (read: waste time on useless or even potentially harmful activities). I've no doubt there are at least a few trolls/SJW infiltrators on this forum.

Post: #214

(02-04-2016 10:51 AM)The Father Wrote:  

(02-04-2016 10:26 AM)yeppels Wrote:  The problem is nobody outside of RoK/these forums views this as a traditional masucline meetup. This has been labeled as a 'pro-rape' movement by the media, and everyone is jumping on this train.

So how do we change that? Roosh got a lot of publicity with his more provocative articles, but now they're defining him (and us) by those some statements. Yes, we know they satirical and designed to generate web traffic. But still - how do we demonstrate this is a group to help men deal with men's issues in a world that has become hostile to men? Perhaps enumerate what those issues are, do charitable events for worthy causes...I'm just throwing out ideas. It does seem that, to move forward as anything but a pariah, we need to reform our image. Perhaps there are non-lefty bloggers/media types who can help. Drudge? Others? Something has to be done, no? All this bad publicity drives web traffic and book sales...but does it allow this group to move forward as a movement to truly help men? Or does it limit us?

This really bothers me and I'd welcome ideas/viewpoints.

Quintus Curtius, through your podcasts, I've come to know you as one of our most thoughtful members. Can you share some thoughts on the above? I would've PM'd you but I deleted them all, as suggested, after the doxx scare.

Post: #215

Any low post count accounts activated around Roosh's World Tour and The Battle Of Canada time with no reps should be suspected too, it's highly likely some of the smart ones signed up for an account back then and waited for another opportunity.

Post: #216

Speaking of the right buying into the narrative:





Ramz did a video about this, look at the comments section. Full of 1488 white knights siding with their supposed archnemesis the SJW's because da whyte wimminz!

Half of them are probably shills, but this is not a good sign. Feminism has converged with part of the right.

Post: #217

6 things we can obtain from this:

1.The red guards are everywhere:



While most of these people are losers that failed in life, similar to Venezuela they are helped by the establishment media and government. Eventually they will fall and fall hard but its a little early for that.

2. Alt-right guys are obsessed with race and will likely break principle a long as the victim of the establishment is non-white. According to them, an non-white eye for a white eye is much better than actually supporting causes and values. I can't foresee any further alliance with those guys.

3. Australia could possibly be worse than Canada.



4. Journalism is dead, the north korea news service does better investigation than this.


VS


5. The texas governer is a cuck



6. Roosh should start a crowd-funding campaign for further events. Its not just about money, its about commitment and raising awareness.

Post: #218

I've said it once, I'll say it again. As we move on, comments on our outlets need to moderated. 1488 purity fags must be ruthlessly purged from our outlets.

This episode proved that they are not interested in promoting nationalism or traditional Western values. They are the right wing version of SJW's. Don't attack them if they're not attacking others on the right, but they need to be marginalized. I do believe they are a minority, and half of them are probably shills from the SPLC and ADL, but their entryist tactics need to be recognized and counteracted, just as SJW entryism does. Look at what happened to Ramzpaul's videos in the space of a couple of months. He didn't purge them. Now his outlet is full of nonsense and the sensible things he says get immediately discredited.

Post: #219

^
I had to look up what in the world 1488 meant.

Yet another group to steer away from.

Post: #220

I can't believe this shit. And at the same time I can.

I'm lost for words.

Freedom is an illusion. Man is cruel.

Post: #221

Where do you see these 1488 conspiracies Libertas? Is it simply because of anonymous Youtube comments? Don't forget one of the most notorious trolls on the internet - Joshua Goldberg - was posting articles at Neo-Nazi website in addition to posting as a radical muslim and trying to goad a muslim into blowing himself up.

Here is an internet troll - jewish - who is able to get his troll articles on the biggest 1488 sites on the internet, and you take anonymous Youtube comments as gospel? Trolling and disinformation on the internet is serious business. I've noticed these '1488' trolls on ROK too. They usually have some very strange collections of beliefs, mixing truth with outrageous claims. This is a common tactic of disinformation. Guilt by assocation.

I've noticed a recent trend in fearmongering about neo-nazis infiltrating the alt-right. In reality they make up a miniscule part of the internet and what is really happening is an attempt to deny the nationalist/tradcon part of the alt-right by linking them to a few deranged nazis.

Post: #222

Seriously 1488 retards siding with the SJW Narrative, and they have the nerve to say "un cucked" whites?



Left meet Right - 2 sides of the same coin.

It's all an illusion.

Post: #223

(02-04-2016 11:54 AM)kaotic Wrote:  Seriously 1488 retards siding with the SJW Narrative, and they have the nerve to say "un cucked" whites?



Left meet Right - 2 sides of the same coin.

It's all an illusion.

Same vein. One of anonymous's tweets from today "Those who praise scam artists such as rooshv are still out there, and we need to figure out as a society how to reintegrate them"

Reintegrate into society? What kind of PC big brother language is that? They should have just wrote "Roosh's followers have committed thought crimes, please report them to the authorities for reeducation"

Post: #224

(02-04-2016 11:51 AM)nomadbrah Wrote:  Where do you see these 1488 conspiracies Libertas? Is it simply because of anonymous Youtube comments? Don't forget one of the most notorious trolls on the internet - Joshua Goldberg - was posting articles at Neo-Nazi website in addition to posting as a radical muslim and trying to goad a muslim into blowing himself up.

Here is an internet troll - jewish - who is able to get his troll articles on the biggest 1488 sites on the internet, and you take anonymous Youtube comments as gospel? Trolling and disinformation on the internet is serious business. I've noticed these '1488' trolls on ROK too. They usually have some very strange collections of beliefs, mixing truth with outrageous claims. This is a common tactic of disinformation. Guilt by assocation.

I've noticed a recent trend in fearmongering about neo-nazis infiltrating the alt-right. In reality they make up a miniscule part of the internet and what is really happening is an attempt to deny the nationalist/tradcon part of the alt-right by linking them to a few deranged nazis.

I unambiguously said half of them (probably more) are shills.

You buttress my case. This is why they need to be purged. At best, their values are antithetical to masculine nationalism. At worst, it is at deliberate attempt to poison the well - just when we're beginning to gain traction and break through the left's narrative.

Recognize their entryism and act accordingly.

Edit: By the way, I'm getting a few messages that "I've been blocked?" What's up with this?

Post: #225

(02-04-2016 10:23 AM)EDantes Wrote:  In the meantime, male feminist/social justice warrior Jian Ghomeshi still on trial for aggravated rape of multiple women - yet the basement dwellers are more outraged over a satirical blog post - lol

Reminds me of the Catholic Church extolling the virtues of abstinence while simultaneously covering for it's pedophile priests.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/ji...-1.3432707

Just addressing a pet peeve of mine:

Priests are the safest people to leave your kids around. School teachers are 1000 times as likely to rape them as your priest is.

Furthermore, porn addicts tend to be the thirstiest guys out there; sex addicts are little better. Obsessing over your dick is what leads to perversion and patheity. Go ahead and enjoy sex, but don't worry too much about it; doing so will take you down a dark road.