Wait, what?

I thought Trudeau was inviting people in. In terms of the Mexicans, his message was not to raise walls, and welcome with open arms instead. Canada then approved the no visa requirement for Mexicans to enter.

But we have record numbers of detained Mexicans now. Did Trudeau give a different message to the media, while giving a different one to border control?

I know he's a virtue-signalling drama boy, and his outbursts are annoying to say the least, but can it be said that at least he's not pulling anything close to a Merkel? That's to say, the message he's giving them is: if you're coming in, it better be for a good reason... What can you offer Canada?

Just thinking out loud here. Correct me if I'm wrong.

(03-19-2017 02:49 PM)Nascimento Wrote:  Wait, what?

I thought Trudeau was inviting people in. In terms of the Mexicans, his message was not to raise walls, and welcome with open arms instead. Canada then approved the no visa requirement for Mexicans to enter.

But we have record numbers of detained Mexicans now. Did Trudeau give a different message to the media, while giving a different one to border control?

I know he's a virtue-signalling drama boy, and his outbursts are annoying to say the least, but can it be said that at least he's not pulling anything close to a Merkel? That's to say, the message he's giving them is: if you're coming in, it better be for a good reason... What can you offer Canada?

Just thinking out loud here. Correct me if I'm wrong.

The visa requirement was lifted in December and of course Little Potato used it to make himself look better than that meanie Trump who is building walls. There was some kind of clause in it though that stated if Canada became flooded with Mexican refugees then they could re-instate the visa, which is why I'm pissed because this will definitely fuck up my Mexican visa free pussy rotation harem!

The next few months will be interesting, we will be getting a ton of refugees who will simply walk across the largest undefended border in the world with their hands out saying "gimme gimme gimme!"

Already started bro!

Peace Arch Border, which is a big transnational park, just lets people walk across illegally. The Canadians just arrest them on sight and take them into custody. Almost every day this is happening, its just not as juicy as the stories of 2yo kids telling her mommy "just leave me here, save yourself. I dont mind if I die" CBC news bullshit.

Whoa...am I reading this right? I honestly don't know if this motion sounds bad because if it does, then it would look like Canada has gone full-blown cucked. It's unfortunate that Canada's SJWs and Feminists are controlling and/or censoring free speech.

(03-24-2017 04:01 PM)budoslavic Wrote:  Whoa...am I reading this right? I honestly don't know if this motion sounds bad because if it does, then it would look like Canada has gone full-blown cucked. It's unfortunate that Canada's SJWs and Feminists are controlling and/or censoring free speech.

A recent counter-motion proposed by the Conservatives intended to criminalize defamation of all religions was rejected outright by the Liberals.

Next step is a study to determine what exactly constitutes "Islamophobia".

By the way, for anyone who is looking at CPC candidates: I don't think she was on anybody's radar, but Lisa Raitt abstained from voting on M-103. That's as good as a 'yes' in my book.

Its blasphemy-lite by sounds of it.

From Canada's own left wing media, barely 20% support this bill.

This will be a massive mistake on the part of the Liberals. Just wait and see, they have already pissed off their turbo lib supporters by going pro pipelines, and now they have alienated most of Canada, which is 87% white, by going full retard on this.

Also keep in mind, with current 'gender fluid' models, all someone has to do is identify as a Muslim in order to short circuit the system. Get charged by a sunni, say you are a kurd or shia.

Playing identity politics now, after what the US went through, just shows the arrogance and stupidity of Canadian parties.

(03-24-2017 08:02 PM)Laner Wrote:  From Canada's own left wing media, barely 20% support this bill.

This will be a massive mistake on the part of the Liberals. Just wait and see, they have already pissed off their turbo lib supporters by going pro pipelines, and now they have alienated most of Canada, which is 87% white, by going full retard on this.

Also keep in mind, with current 'gender fluid' models, all someone has to do is identify as a Muslim in order to short circuit the system. Get charged by a sunni, say you are a kurd or shia.

Playing identity politics now, after what the US went through, just shows the arrogance and stupidity of Canadian parties.

good idea. I now identify as a transgender muslim. Top that commies.

Via Breitbart:

Quote:Canadian Parliament Passes Controversial Islamophobia Motion

The Canadian House of Commons has passed motion M103 which singles out the criticism of Islam as a form of “Islamophobia”. Critics condemn it as an attack on free speech.

Motion M103 was tabled by Iqra Khalid, a Muslim member of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s Liberal Party. It states the government must “condemn Islamophobia and all forms of systemic racism and religious discrimination”, was taken to vote on Thursday evening where a total of 201 MPs voted for it and only 91 voted against, Canadian broadcaster Global News reports.

The text of the motion does not clarify what constitutes “Islamophobia” and has led many to speculate what that may mean in the future, with some critics fearing it could lead to Shariah law courts. This concern has led to the circulation of an anti-Shariah petition on the Parliament of Canada website, which has so far been signed by over 24,000 people.

Ms. Khalid, who was born in Pakistan and moved to the UK and then to Canada, said the definition of Islamophobia was: “The irrational hate of Muslims that leads to discrimination.”

When Conservatives asked her to remove Islamophobia from the motion, she said: “I will not do so, any more than I would speak to the Holocaust and not mention that the overwhelming majority of victims were six million followers of the Jewish faith and that anti-Semitism was the root cause of the Holocaust.”

Another part of the bill that has stirred controversy is the passage that asks the government to “recognise the need to quell the increasing public climate of hate and fear”. It is currently unknown what measures the government will take to “quell” “hate and fear” as the motion is not classified as a law and has no effect on current criminal law.

The Conservative Party of Canada are currently holding leadership elections and many of the candidates have come out against M103 including one of the frontrunners, Quebecer Maxime Bernier. Mr. Bernier, a conservative with libertarian free market leanings, said he voted against the bill tweeting: “Free speech is the most fundamental right we have. I am opposed to #m103. Canadians should be treated equally regardless of religion.”

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who during the election campaign championed Muslim women wearing hijabs and full face niqabs, dropped an appeal by the previous government that would not allow women to wear niqabs to Canadian citizenship ceremonies.

Trudeau has also appeared at many mosques, including one where the women weren’t allowed in the main prayer room with the men but were forced to pray in a separate area upstairs.

The self-proclaimed “feminist” Prime Minister said: “Diversity is a source of strength, not just a source of weakness, and as I look at this beautiful room — sisters upstairs — everyone here, (I see) the diversity we have just within this mosque, within the Islamic community, within the Muslim community in Canada.”

Just a heads up, today is the deadline for Conservative Party membership. Sign up today if you want to vote in the leadership election.

From the little of the actual debates I've watched, Bernier looks like the candidate to best beat Trudeau. O'Leary has potential but not being French-Speaking will hurt him. Scheer also looks like a solid candidate.

I'd vote for nearly any of them (except for Chong) over the clown in office right now

(03-24-2017 04:01 PM)budoslavic Wrote:  Whoa...am I reading this right? I honestly don't know if this motion sounds bad because if it does, then it would look like Canada has gone full-blown cucked. It's unfortunate that Canada's SJWs and Feminists are controlling and/or censoring free speech.

I wonder if Roosh will be able to host another World Tour in Canada this time? Roosh predicted Islamophobia in his YT Video "Canadian feminists are Dangerously Islamophobic".

Roosh does look like a Muslim when he is bearded, and when he shaved he looks Jewish Israeli a bit. Roosh can claim the Islamophobia & Anti-Semitic card at the same time.

But I'm not sure if Armenians are a protected class in Canada. I know for sure they aren't treated humanely in Turkey!

"Refugees" walking into to Canada by the thousands now. Nigerians and Somalis fuck off.....

The government has done nothing to fix this and it has been happening for a long time. These people actually want to get caught once they hit Canadian soil so Faggoty Trudeau can cut them a cheque.

Mad Max in Steyns studio.

I thought this was sort of amusing. George Soros funded a school in Hungary called Central European University for grad students in Marxism etc. I saw somewhere that Orban wants to shut down the school and I noticed the name of the University President in the article:

https://people.ceu.edu/michael_ignatieff


Edit, link for context
https://beta.theglobeandmail.com/news/wo...ice=mobile

Bill Whatcott is a damn hero.

Toronto Sun Wrote:Anti-gay activist ordered to name names



Protesters who infiltrated the Pride Parade last summer to distribute anti-gay messages will not be able to hide behind their green zombie suits much longer.

Longtime anti-homosexual activist Bill Whatcott has been ordered to unmask the identities of his co-conspirator Gay Zombies, who have the ABCDEF pseudonyms of Adam Zombie, Brian Zombie, Christopher Zombie, Doug Zombie, Edward Zombie and Frank Zombie.

He’s also been told by Ontario Superior Court Justice Paul Perell to divulge his sources of funding.

Whatcott has already vowed to ignore the court order.

“Generally Christians should comply with secular courts, but not when complying harms the innocent or when the order is unjust in the eyes of God,” he wrote on the Free North America website.

Whatcott and his green bodysuited colleagues were disguised as the “Gay Zombies Cannabis Consumers Association” to surreptitiously gain access to march during Pride and distribute 3,000 leaflets packaged as a “Zombie Safe Sex Package.” The pamphlet message was actually a disgusting diatribe against the LGBTQ community — “disease, death and confusion are the sad and sordid realities of the homosexual lifestyle” — complete with photos of anal warts and allegations that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Premier Kathleen Wynne were supporting and involved in child sexual assault.

Last August, gay activist Christopher Hudspeth and former Liberal MPP George Smitherman launched a $104 million class action lawsuit against Whatcott and his fellow zombies, claiming their flyers promote hatred and were defamatory.

This isn’t the first time he’s faced these accusations. In 2014, Whatcott used the same ruse to infiltrate the Vancouver Pride Parade as the Calgary Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster where he and his supporters handed out 2,500 anti-gay pamphlets disguised as free condoms. In 2013 the Supreme Court of Canada found his “Sodomites in our Public Schools” pamphlets that he’d distributed in Saskatoon were hate speech.

Whatcott denied the zombies’ message at Pride was hate speech and claimed the lawsuit was an attempt to “intimidate, chill and crush legitimate political freedom of expression.”

The judge accused both sides of filing documents that were “diatribes, ad hominies, polemics, and propaganda pieces far removed from proper pleadings and proper legal argument.” He especially lamented the “angry, bitter, vindictive” tone in Hudspeth and Smitherman’s statement of claim.

The judge found that they did have a cause of action, but not as a class-action. He advised them to refile with specific individuals who “opt in” to the claim and granted their request to have Whatcott compelled to reveal his fellow green-suited parade crashers and their financial backers.

Hudspeth, who owns Pegasus Bar in Toronto’s gay village, sees the decision as an important first step. Raised in a Pentecostal family, he found Whatcott’s vile pamphlets particularly upsetting.

“This was preached to me from the pulpit every Sunday that I was going to hell for being who I was,” he recalled.

Whatcott’s lawyer Charles Lugosi said they have until Tuesday to decide whether they will appeal. But the anti-gay activist, who says he’s already spent $250,000 in legal fees, has begun appealing to his supporters to fund a court challenge.

“I don’t actually want to be put in jail indefinitely for contempt,” he wrote, “or to have to spend the rest of my life making it as difficult as possible to prevent these hate-filled homosexuals from taking my property or somehow getting access to who my friends and supporters are and then going after their homes and life savings.”

If he refuses to unmask his fellow zombies, Whatcott faces being found in contempt of court and jailed.

“Do I want that to happen? No, that would be awfully ridiculous on his part,” said Hudspeth. “It would be better for him to be open and honest.

“Those are the teachings of Christ. And to be loving — which is something he hasn’t shown so far.”

Note how the faggot (gay activist Christopher Hudspeth, owner and operator of Pegasus Bar in Toronto’s gay village) disingenuously appeals to Christianity when it fucking suits him.

May his gay ass burn in hell for eternity.

Anal warts? Hahaha

Quote:“I don’t actually want to be put in jail indefinitely for contempt,” he wrote, “or to have to spend the rest of my life making it as difficult as possible to prevent these hate-filled homosexuals from taking my property or somehow getting access to who my friends and supporters are and then going after their homes and life savings.”

^ This. These LGBT faggot lesbian feminazis from Toronto want to Doxxx People using the Legal system in Ontario.

That's why I usually tell men in Toronto that they should at least park their life savings & assets somewhere out of Canadian jurisdiction if they plan to engage in challenging the pro-LGBT status quo.

Why the fuck would a Canadian "court" force some random person to serve on a silver platter:

Info on his supporters, source of income, etc, when the alleged "crime" was infiltrating a pro-faggot event where fruity faggots (not dangerous faggots like Milo), dykes, lesbos, feminazis, etc all pose nude in front of little children at this "pro-family event", where public domain photos illustrate nude gay faggots indecently exposing their cocks in front of little girls (who will later grow up to become a feministe to "fight sexual abuse" by vilifying college-age men on campus rather than the gay/lesbo fucks who forced their cock up her pee-pee at Toronto Pride).

The courts in Toronto are treating that man like if he was involved in a grand scheme of International organized Child Trafficking & Money Laundering or some shit.

I wouldn't be surprised if the Toronto courts forced that man to wear an electronic bracelet like if he was pro-teacher Ben Levin...Fuck Toronto!

Alt news blogger confronts our hapless leader in a photo-op at a Prairies Y, I'm not sure about his approach, but you've got to love his moxie:





He's 100% correct on the issue of carbon tax, he states his case well in the end of the video.

The carbon tax might be Trudeau's worst economic policy, -so far-. Hopefully he won't cave in on the upcoming wave of illegals coming from South of the Border. If it gets worse, we'll have to build a wall, and make the USA pay for it!

Everytime I want to feel better about being in the UK I visit this thread.

I find it ironic the homos and their supporters believe some dude and his gay zombie group is a threat to them but will bend over like the good servants they are for the incoming third world migration who will do more than simply hand out anti-homo pamplets and use "upsetting" language.

4/20 is coming up guys

Quote:The Liberal government will announce legislation next month that will legalize marijuana in Canada by July 1, 2018.

Quote:CBC News has learned that the legislation will be announced during the week of April 10 and will broadly follow the recommendation of a federally appointed task force that was chaired by former liberal Justice Minister Anne McLellan.

What do you guys think about this? I am a little uninformed when it comes to weed legalization and its impact. All I know is that it will take money from bad guys to give it to other bad guys. Anyone could recommend some articles or studies to read on this issue?

If it does squelch an organized crime revenue stream and keep some thugs away from public and private lands, it's a good thing.

Bad thing is that it might lead to more use among the youth, which will mess them up (schizophrenia, apathy). Personally never been into it, I stick to Scotch, beer and wine in moderation.

(04-03-2017 05:29 PM)911 Wrote:  If it does squelch an organized crime revenue stream and keep some thugs away from public and private lands, it's a good thing.

Bad thing is that it might lead to more use among the youth, which will mess them up (schizophrenia, apathy). Personally never been into it, I stick to Scotch, beer and wine in moderation.

That whole "we can tax it if it's legal" thing hasn't really worked out with tobacco; the Indians around here make huge sums of money every year selling cigarettes off the reserves (in the hundreds of millions per year I'm sure) and I've no doubt someone will set themselves up to do the same thing with pot.

I can't speak from any personal experience, but I've read more than one opinion that says that today's pot ain't what the legalize-it baby-boomer types used to smoke.

If the gov thinks it can do this better than gangsters, they are in for a surprise.

Never underestimate the ability of the government to completely fuck up the simplest of businesses.

Whats going to happen is the price per gram, currently $10, will go up to $20. Then $30, as they will not be able to get their businesses in order. If they want to remain competitive with the gangs and even the mom & pop enterprises, they will have to use some of these people as consultants. Not a bad thing, some of these people actually want to reform themselves but will look for the most lucrative businesses as they are used to easy narco dollars. I know some of them, and not all want to own nightclubs and bars when they 'go legit'.

I am not so worried about the teenagers smoking more weed. They do, or they don't.

(04-03-2017 10:30 PM)Laner Wrote:  If the gov thinks it can do this better than gangsters, they are in for a surprise.

Never underestimate the ability of the government to completely fuck up the simplest of businesses.

Whats going to happen is the price per gram, currently $10, will go up to $20. Then $30, as they will not be able to get their businesses in order. If they want to remain competitive with the gangs and even the mom & pop enterprises, they will have to use some of these people as consultants. Not a bad thing, some of these people actually want to reform themselves but will look for the most lucrative businesses as they are used to easy narco dollars. I know some of them, and not all want to own nightclubs and bars when they 'go legit'.

I am not so worried about the teenagers smoking more weed. They do, or they don't.

I agree, I think its a great theory to legalize in canada, but in reality it will probably end up like cigarettes. Cigarettes are taxed outrageously, so there is a big business in illegal aka "reservation" cigarettes.