Post: #76

Jean, I've noticed you do this a few times now. I've even replied to you myself with no reply from you to my posts. That's ok. I often don't check back over old threads myself.

I'm curious. Do you just have all these ideas in your head then dig out old RVF posts that correspond to them, or do you dig through old RVF posts and pick out the ones that interest you and respond to them? Nothing wrong with either of course.

Roosh has a good policy of not starting new threads about the same subject. He tells people to always do a search before starting a new thread. I think the forum is much better for that, even if the old threads are sometimes years old. I sometimes dig up the old thread myself here and there. Many other members find it very valuable as well, saying 'oh thank you for bringing this thread to my attention - don't know how I missed it'. We are original thinkers here at RVF for sure, but even so, there was probably another original thinker before us that had the idea, and made a thread about it. So I applaud your ability to use the search function.

It's just that a lot of these posts you are responding to are like at least a year or two old. Again, nothing wrong with that. But you never seem to start off where the old thread comments end. And in light of that, I'm wondering if you shouldn't just start a new thread altogether again. It's not against the law.

Perhaps you could shed some light on your way of posting. I am genuinely curious. I had noticed it before a week or two back. More often than not when an old thread is necro'd it is you that has necro'd it, and even when people respond to you (as I have) you don't seem to follow up.

I'm probably the biggest offender with not reading old threads and responding to people. Apologies if so. You can always hit me up via PM and draw my attention to any post that needs it. But I imagine most people are just thinking 'no, don't wake it - let it sleep!'.

Any insight at all would be appreciated Jean, and feel free to ask as much of me again for being so impertinent.

cheers.

Post: #77

(05-28-2017 06:43 AM)Jean Valjean Wrote:  More and more, it seems like being a loser isn't such a bad idea for a man. With all these benefits like free universal healthcare, and free college for your kids, why bother earning any money to pay your own way and that of your family? It just means you're going to be the chump who's subsidizing someone else's family, rather than the guy who sits back and enjoys the benefits of the welfare state.

Yes, we've heard the Enjoy The Decline argument before.

The counter-argument is this: as a white male you're going to be held as the blame for all this shit anyway, so it's rather stupid to turn yourself into a sitting target with zero resources when the leftist herds finally do a Martin Niemoller and come for your head.

God save us from people who mean well. -storm

Post: #78

(01-13-2016 08:28 AM)The Beast1 Wrote:  A picture is worth a thousand words

Post: #79

The look on that baby's face is saying, "Please help me."