Post: #76

You guys are reading too much into it. It's probably just a marketing ploy.

Post: #77

(11-11-2015 08:07 AM)achromaticmike Wrote:  I'll be patiently waiting for the multitude of pictures you're about to post demonstrating that the pussy you're getting is above and beyond Dan.

So is the endgame to have many pictures with gold diggers/hookers/hired models? Some of the guys on this forum have more money than Dan. I respect the guy for shooting guns, partying like a rockstar, traveling all over, and gambling. I myself am not interested in the drugs he uses or the fact he's spending stolen money, but to each his own. What I don't agree with is using his money to pay girls to be with him. I think that's the easy way and it seems to have lowered his self esteem, which may be causing him to attention whore.

Quote:You guys are reading too much into it. It's probably just a marketing ploy.

I thought the same thing at first. But there's no way a guy worth 9 figures (fuck you money) would subject himself to public humiliation for some type of stunt. What is his upside?

Post: #78

(11-11-2015 09:41 AM)Gringuito Wrote:  So is the endgame to have many pictures with gold diggers/hookers/hired models? Some of the guys on this forum have more money than Dan. I respect the guy for shooting guns, partying like a rockstar, traveling all over, and gambling. I myself am not interested in the drugs he uses or the fact he's spending stolen money, but to each his own. What I don't agree with is using his money to pay girls to be with him. I think that's the easy way and it seems to have lowered his self esteem, which may be causing him to attention whore.

First off; your entire argument is a straw-man. I never said having pictures with those girls was the end-game. You also haven't proven Dan's money is ill-gotten; neither has the government that tried for decades. It's an extremely simplistic argument I'd expect from an SJW.

Further, I would humbly suggest that if you think a guy on steroids who fits the "tall dark and handsome" stereotype and is worth tens of millions of dollars needs to pay girls to be with him and you're posting on this website -- you need to start reading and then go out and get some more experience in the field.

Post: #79

(11-10-2015 06:11 PM)Htownanddown Wrote:  I have to say I don't really understand all the love Dan Bilzerian gets on this forum. Good for him if he is parlaying his Dad's money into girls and more cash, but he seems like an overgrown boy begging for attention to me.

So you bang some slut and then some dude sends you a text about it and you post, "I fucked your bitch" on social media. That is masculine? I tend to be anti-attention whoring whether it be of the male or female variety.

Having said that, its sad to see that BB guy doesn't know any better. Judging by his reaction, this will not be the last time this happens. Anyway I'm sure this ho is reveling in the attention/controversy. She probably thinks the fact that she can stir this up in two high value men is evidence of her value.

O ya and WB. Obviously.

Agree 100%, I remember writing something very similar when this Bilzerian guy become famous way back when. He's a complete tool.

Post: #80

(11-11-2015 10:12 AM)achromaticmike Wrote:  First off; your entire argument is a straw-man. I never said having pictures with those girls was the end-game. You also haven't proven Dan's money is ill-gotten; neither has the government that tried for decades. It's an extremely simplistic argument I'd expect from an SJW.

Further, I would humbly suggest that if you think a guy on steroids who fits the "tall dark and handsome" stereotype and is worth tens of millions of dollars needs to pay girls to be with him and you're posting on this website -- you need to start reading and then go out and get some more experience in the field.

SWJ? That's funny. So in your mind you believe that Dan makes his money in private high states poker matches? That is what he is publicly saying. Keep in mind that he's not ranked and the few times he's played he's done poorly. He's won 10k once in all the time he was playing. And, these private games he claims to have aren't attended by top poker players. It seems they would like a chance to win millions from bad playing wealthy guys.

I'm sure that I won't convince you of anything. You like the lifestyle that Dan has built and that's fine. But not all of us here agree with you.

Post: #81

Another damning example of body language in a picture of the DeLucas




WB for the record, but wow. That body language and slut face.

Post: #82

That's his ex wife, whose pic I posted a couple pages back. She's a fitness model, and quite fit physically.

The wife Bliz banged is his newer (and younger) wife model. I guess she will soon be his ex too, and walk off with half his money.

Post: #83

(11-11-2015 10:12 AM)achromaticmike Wrote:  First off; your entire argument is a straw-man. I never said having pictures with those girls was the end-game. You also haven't proven Dan's money is ill-gotten; neither has the government that tried for decades. It's an extremely simplistic argument I'd expect from an SJW.

Further, I would humbly suggest that if you think a guy on steroids who fits the "tall dark and handsome" stereotype and is worth tens of millions of dollars needs to pay girls to be with him and you're posting on this website -- you need to start reading and then go out and get some more experience in the field.

First, there is a massive amount of evidence showing that his money is ill gotten. This article (very detailed and well written, surprising for Vice) goes into more detail on the techniques the Bilzerian family is currently using to dodge the SEC and keep the cash they fraudulently acquired in the 1980s.

http://www.vice.com/read/did-instagram-b...-money-827

Second, he's 5'7" so you can remove "tall" from your description.

Third, he's just really, really stupid. It takes a special type of moron to openly brag about money the government is chasing down. Can you imagine if Jeffrey Skilling was released from prison and started posting pictures of all the expensive cars and houses he bought with hidden money he extracted from Enron? If you're a criminal, or someone who has benefited from a crime, be a bit more fucking discrete.

How desperate for attention must someone be to advertise their lifestyle on Instagram even when it makes them a target for lawsuits and legal action from huge, powerful government agencies?

It's great to aspire to be more successful and use other successful people for inspiration. But it's important to separate people who've lucked into their situation from people that made smart decisions. Someone like Donald Trump is an inspiration with real achievements; Bilzerian is a loser who will never be remembered by anyone after he dies (probably prematurely from a cocaine overdose).

(11-11-2015 10:42 AM)UroboricForms Wrote:  Another damning example of body language in a picture of the DeLucas



WB for the record, but wow. That body language and slut face.

I've always found these body language analysis tests to be useless, since it's easy to snap 50 photos and pick out a bad one to criticize. The guy's reaction has been absolutely pathetic (he should have ignored the whole event and just moved on) but reading too much into a single photo is usually a waste of time.

Post: #84

(11-11-2015 10:12 AM)achromaticmike Wrote:  Further, I would humbly suggest that if you think a guy on steroids who fits the "tall dark and handsome" stereotype and is worth tens of millions of dollars needs to pay girls to be with him and you're posting on this website -- you need to start reading and then go out and get some more experience in the field.

It's painful to see how naive some guys are. You really believe all those girls in the pictures with Bilzerian are not payed whores?

Post: #85

(11-11-2015 09:11 AM)lavidaloca Wrote:  You guys are reading too much into it. It's probably just a marketing ploy.

I was present when this phone call took place. It was on speaker phone.

Ryan: Yooo wassup Dan?

Dan: You know the usual banging chicks with fake tits and shooting guns. Making millions in private poker games. I mean I love myself some attention as you know, but I don't ever wanna be on TV showing my mad poker skills. Hate to make a pro poker player cry on national TV and then bang his girl later on the poker table.

R: Ya man I hear Ya. Look I'll cut to the chase. My forum traffic is slowing down. RVF has some quality posters who know a lot about working out, self defense training, safely using testosterone, etc. I need a bump in traffic.

D: well I could fuck your gold digger whore of a girl. Then you and I could have a Twitter battle and I am sure a bunch of the kardashian fans will total start going to your site since the drama with Odom is slowing down.

R: brilliant. You are seriously a Renaissance man. You can do it all and write poetry. Feel free to bang her in the ass and take a dump on her while you're at it. Just get some good pics. When you gonna do this?

D: probably in about 5 mins she is here taking pics with my gun. I was gonna feel guilty about it but luckily you called. You're a true pal. Bros before hoes.

Post: #86

(11-10-2015 10:40 PM)The Lizard of Oz Wrote:  As far as the substance of this thread goes:

Ryan Deluca is someone who has single-handedly created and maintained one of the best and most important forums on the entire web, a veritable cauldron of creativity from which we have all benefited immensely -- some of the very best and juiciest language, images, gifs, memes and tropes in the English language and the entire culture of recent years come straight from the amazing and unstoppable machine that is the Misc. This dude deserves major props for what he has created and contributed to men everywhere -- a contribution of a kind that very few are ever privileged to make.

Dan Bilzerian is a worthless loser and lowlife, and the most striking thing about him is that for a rich guy, he has pretty much the worst taste in pussy of anyone I've ever seen. In every picture where is surrounded by supposedly hot women, almost every last one of them is ugly, a butterface at best, if not worse than that. If you're going to be a "playboy" it's not a bad idea to have a decent piece of pussy once in a while.

In this particular case, Dan B. is acting just as you would expect from a dishonorable loser like he is. As far as Deluca, it's extremely unfortunate that he became involved with a bitch that he can't control (and who is no beauty herself, to say the least). But he is not the first good dude to whom that's happened, and he won't be the last.

Haha, wow, you have higher standards than me for sure, I agree with pretty much what you said except the bold part, I don't like the guy but he does have excellent taste, the girls he hires for his fake lifestyle photo shoots are top notch.

Post: #87

(11-11-2015 10:41 AM)Gringuito Wrote:  

(11-11-2015 10:12 AM)achromaticmike Wrote:  First off; your entire argument is a straw-man. I never said having pictures with those girls was the end-game. You also haven't proven Dan's money is ill-gotten; neither has the government that tried for decades. It's an extremely simplistic argument I'd expect from an SJW.

Further, I would humbly suggest that if you think a guy on steroids who fits the "tall dark and handsome" stereotype and is worth tens of millions of dollars needs to pay girls to be with him and you're posting on this website -- you need to start reading and then go out and get some more experience in the field.

SWJ? That's funny. So in your mind you believe that Dan makes his money in private high states poker matches?

I'm sure that I won't convince you of anything. You like the lifestyle that Dan has built and that's fine. But not all of us here agree with you.

I never said any of that about how Dan made his money. ...and yes, since I'm a straight male -- I do like guns, cars, and hot women. However, please stop making things up and claiming them as my argument. I really don't give a shit how Bilzerian got his money - it's irrelevant - and since I'm not his accountant I don't know for certain the real answer -- do you? That being said; this seems to talk about how Bilzerian's father made his money and makes it appear that it wasn't all "ill-gotten" but instead from corporate takeovers a la Mitt Romney. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Bilzerian

Now go have your little jealous Bilzerian tantrum with someone else.

Post: #88

(11-11-2015 11:12 AM)Teutatis Wrote:  

(11-11-2015 10:12 AM)achromaticmike Wrote:  Further, I would humbly suggest that if you think a guy on steroids who fits the "tall dark and handsome" stereotype and is worth tens of millions of dollars needs to pay girls to be with him and you're posting on this website -- you need to start reading and then go out and get some more experience in the field.

It's painful to see how naive some guys are. You really believe all those girls in the pictures with Bilzerian are not payed whores?

No -- I don't believe ALL of them are not paid whores. It's blatantly obvious a good number of them are aspiring Emirate toilets. Regardless, I also wouldn't put it past Bilzerian to pull more and better quality pussy than his jealous haters on here...

Post: #89

(11-10-2015 11:26 PM)Cr33pin Wrote:  Lizard you know I love you like a brother (no homo) but.....

I would bang every "butterface" in just about every pic ever posted with Dan. You wouldn't bang any of these women or at least find them attractive if you saw them out an about?


Your standards must be as high as giraffe pussy

Cr33pin, the love is mutual my man.

But these girls are butterfaces dude. Bottom left and top right have faces that are borderline ugly. Not one of these girls is pretty or even cute. And they're not even especially young. They look like used up whores.

Would I fuck them? If I was in a bathroom stall of a Chicago train station, I would shoot a load in their mouth or asshole depending on the particular bitch. If I was at a Newark airport hotel bar and one of them wanted to go up to her room and suck me off, I'd do that too, sure, although if I was still drinking I might just want to stay at that bar and drink and listen to some Foreigner on my device.

What I wouldn't do, as a rich guy with access to actually hot pussy, is go out of my way to be surrounded by these skanks. There is way, way, way nicer pussy out there, both for pay and for free if you have money and fame. His choices show that he has no taste.

More Bilzerian skank/butterface pics:









It's actually INCREDIBLE how many washed up whores and butterfaces are in these pics, I mean it defies probability. You could do better just pulling random pussy off the streets, and putting a little makeup on it. Guys don't understand how much decent clothing and good makeup can do to a plain girl as long as she's young.

*****************

By contrast, the below pics are what I would consider a decent level of SLUT SURROUND. These are actual hot sluts, the kind that a rich dude should often find himself next to:







Hope this answers the question.

Post: #90

(11-11-2015 11:09 AM)fareast Wrote:  

(11-11-2015 10:12 AM)achromaticmike Wrote:  First off; your entire argument is a straw-man. I never said having pictures with those girls was the end-game. You also haven't proven Dan's money is ill-gotten; neither has the government that tried for decades. It's an extremely simplistic argument I'd expect from an SJW.

Further, I would humbly suggest that if you think a guy on steroids who fits the "tall dark and handsome" stereotype and is worth tens of millions of dollars needs to pay girls to be with him and you're posting on this website -- you need to start reading and then go out and get some more experience in the field.

First, there is a massive amount of evidence showing that his money is ill gotten. This article (very detailed and well written, surprising for Vice) goes into more detail on the techniques the Bilzerian family is currently using to dodge the SEC and keep the cash they fraudulently acquired in the 1980s.

http://www.vice.com/read/did-instagram-b...-money-827

Second, he's 5'7" so you can remove "tall" from your description.

Third, he's just really, really stupid. It takes a special type of moron to openly brag about money the government is chasing down. Can you imagine if Jeffrey Skilling was released from prison and started posting pictures of all the expensive cars and houses he bought with hidden money he extracted from Enron? If you're a criminal, or someone who has benefited from a crime, be a bit more fucking discrete.

How desperate for attention must someone be to advertise their lifestyle on Instagram even when it makes them a target for lawsuits and legal action from huge, powerful government agencies?

It's great to aspire to be more successful and use other successful people for inspiration. But it's important to separate people who've lucked into their situation from people that made smart decisions. Someone like Donald Trump is an inspiration with real achievements; Bilzerian is a loser who will never be remembered by anyone after he dies (probably prematurely from a cocaine overdose).

(11-11-2015 10:42 AM)UroboricForms Wrote:  Another damning example of body language in a picture of the DeLucas



WB for the record, but wow. That body language and slut face.

I've always found these body language analysis tests to be useless, since it's easy to snap 50 photos and pick out a bad one to criticize. The guy's reaction has been absolutely pathetic (he should have ignored the whole event and just moved on) but reading too much into a single photo is usually a waste of time.

Trump's net worth is actually lower than if he had just taken everything he inherited and thrown it that day into the S&P 500 index. He's just as much of a trust-fund baby as Bilzerian.

Post: #91

Bonus slut pic since I was limited by 10 images in previous post, LOL.

Post: #92

(11-11-2015 10:12 AM)achromaticmike Wrote:  

(11-11-2015 09:41 AM)Gringuito Wrote:  So is the endgame to have many pictures with gold diggers/hookers/hired models? Some of the guys on this forum have more money than Dan. I respect the guy for shooting guns, partying like a rockstar, traveling all over, and gambling. I myself am not interested in the drugs he uses or the fact he's spending stolen money, but to each his own. What I don't agree with is using his money to pay girls to be with him. I think that's the easy way and it seems to have lowered his self esteem, which may be causing him to attention whore.

First off; your entire argument is a straw-man. I never said having pictures with those girls was the end-game. You also haven't proven Dan's money is ill-gotten; neither has the government that tried for decades. It's an extremely simplistic argument I'd expect from an SJW.

Further, I would humbly suggest that if you think a guy on steroids who fits the "tall dark and handsome" stereotype and is worth tens of millions of dollars needs to pay girls to be with him and you're posting on this website -- you need to start reading and then go out and get some more experience in the field.

This is becoming the forum backhanded insult. It's also an argument from fallacy, which I would assume you know about due to the other logical fallacy you mentioned. Let's try to keep this shit mature.

Also, I believe Dan is 5'9".

Finally, I am with fareast on the body language analysis posts. I've said it multiple times, you can not make an assumption from a single picture. Too many variables that can't be determined. We can assume the dude is a bitch because of his actions (texting dan, social media blow up, followers contest, etc), but not because of a single pic someone pulled that seems to prove their argument. That's some main-stream-media level shit.

That being said, good for Dan for banging top shelf (albeit paid for) pussy. Good for the other dude for building the beast that bodybuilding.com is. I hope he can cowboy the fuck up, he's got too much going for him to be tied down to one alley cat after another.

Post: #93

(11-11-2015 11:35 AM)The Lizard of Oz Wrote:  By contrast, the below pics are what I would consider a decent level of SLUT SURROUND. These are actual hot sluts, the kind that a rich dude should often find himself next to:







Hope this answers the question.

Your first chick looks like she's close to balding with that five-head.

As to the other two; comparing professional solo shots that were probably Photoshopped to group pictures is ridiculous. Only the last one rates an 8 or better and that's judging on face alone.

Post: #94

(11-11-2015 11:36 AM)achromaticmike Wrote:  Trump's net worth is actually lower than if he had just taken everything he inherited and thrown it that day into the S&P 500 index. He's just as much of a trust-fund baby as Bilzerian.

I'm just curious, why do you have such a raging boner for this guy? He has no accomplishments, no skills, nothing special. All he does is spend other people's money on prostitutes. Like I said earlier, there's no difference between him and a loser in Pattaya fucking Thai hookers, except for the fact that the Pattaya loser at least uses their own cash to pay, not illegally acquired funds, and usually doesn't broadcast their life on Instagram in a desperate search for attention.

What's even stranger is that you somehow believing the Bodybuilding.com guy hit the jackpot by choosing a good domain name (as if that's all you need to make a successful website) yet have no problem with the Bilzerians stealing money and parading it around tastelessly.

This guy is human garbage. The fact that you put him in the same category as Trump, who employs 22,000 people, shows what a poor judge of character you are.

Post: #95

(11-11-2015 11:46 AM)fareast Wrote:  

(11-11-2015 11:36 AM)achromaticmike Wrote:  Trump's net worth is actually lower than if he had just taken everything he inherited and thrown it that day into the S&P 500 index. He's just as much of a trust-fund baby as Bilzerian.

I'm just curious, why do you have such a raging boner for this guy? He has no accomplishments, no skills, nothing special. All he does is spend other people's money on prostitutes. Like I said earlier, there's no difference between him and a loser in Pattaya fucking Thai hookers, except for the fact that the Pattaya loser at least uses their own cash to pay, not illegally acquired funds, and usually doesn't broadcast their life on Instagram in a desperate search for attention.

What's even stranger is that you somehow believing the Bodybuilding.com guy hit the jackpot by choosing a good domain name (as if that's all you need to make a successful website) yet have no problem with the Bilzerians stealing money and parading it around tastelessly.

This guy is human garbage. The fact that you put him in the same category as Trump, who employs 22,000 people, shows what a poor judge of character you are.

I don't give a shit about Bilzerian nor the BB.com founder. I just can't stand jealous, whiny haters. As to Trump employing 22,000 people; his trust fund was an order of magnitude higher than Bilzerian's. I like Trump -- I was simply pointing out the obvious -- that like Bilzerian, he's a trust fund baby and has been less successful with his money than the market.

Post: #96

(11-11-2015 11:36 AM)achromaticmike Wrote:  Trump's net worth is actually lower than if he had just taken everything he inherited and thrown it that day into the S&P 500 index. He's just as much of a trust-fund baby as Bilzerian.

While that is debatable depending on what analysis you use to measure Trump's net worth, it is a completely misguided argument and brushes all logic aside in an attempt to make a point.

1. It starts with taking his fathers net worth in early 1974 at around 200mil.
2. Divides that evenly between the trumprats, 5 of them, at 40 mil a piece.
3. Assume dad just ups and gives all his new worth away to his kids (did he? I'm not sure, never cared to look, still don't).
4. Assumes that Trump invested %100 of his inheritance into the SP500.
5. Assumes he reinvests dividends and doesn't touch it for the next 40 years.
6. Assumes he drinks rain water and eats foraged food for the last 40 years? I mean the single assumption that he invests %100 of his money and doesn't a spend a dime on himself for 40 years is, to put it nicely, preposterously laughable.
7. Doesn't account for the business ventures and the job creation for how many people he employs.
8. Doesn't account for charitable donations. You know, all those giant lump sums of monies subtracted from his networth.
9. Doesn't take into account the other trumprats, surely they should have the same networth today?

Theres more, but I don't think we need to write a thesis on such a poorly grounded claim in the first place.

Cmon man, I know you got a hard-on for Dan and limp one for Trump and the BB guy, but please do some of your own analysis and critical thinking before you quote findings of internet articles.

Post: #97

(11-11-2015 11:53 AM)achromaticmike Wrote:  I don't give a shit about Bilzerian nor the BB.com founder. I just can't stand jealous, whiny haters. As to Trump employing 22,000 people; his trust fund was an order of magnitude higher than Bilzerian's. I like Trump -- I was simply pointing out the obvious -- that like Bilzerian, he's a trust fund baby and has been less successful with his money than the market.

Why do you assume that anyone who criticizes him is jealous of him?

I have a great life. I work an honest job that pays very well, come home each evening to a beautiful girlfriend and get to travel to lots of countries most people never have a chance to visit. I'm not the slightest bit jealous -- I just think he's a piece of shit and find it strange that you seem to like him.

If you aspire to be like Dan Bilzerian, I honestly pity you and feel extremely sorry for you. Spending a night or two every few months fucking whores and partying is great; spending your entire life fucking whores and partying is a pathetic way to live that ultimately leads you nowhere.

Also, the line you're citing about Trump's wealth is extremely misleading and a flat out lie. It uses an extreme low point as the starting point (just following the 1987 stock market crash) and calculates Trump's starting wealth using the value of his properties, not his inheritance, as his starting capital.

Post: #98

(11-11-2015 11:31 AM)achromaticmike Wrote:  I really don't give a shit how Bilzerian got his money - it's irrelevant

You and I view things very differently. If someone makes their money legally or illegally, that makes a difference to me.

(11-11-2015 11:31 AM)achromaticmike Wrote:  No -- I don't believe ALL of them are not paid whores. It's blatantly obvious a good number of them are aspiring Emirate toilets. Regardless, I also wouldn't put it past Bilzerian to pull more and better quality pussy than his jealous haters on here...

You don't seem to have a problem with Dan's use of prostitutes. Again, I don't agree with that and I think this forum in general is against P4P.

(11-11-2015 11:31 AM)achromaticmike Wrote:  I just can't stand jealous, whiny haters.

Mike, I've been very fortunate and I've made quite a bit of money. I'm pretty sure that I'm worth more than Dan. And I've made this money legally, with no help from my parents. This isn't about him having more than anyone else. It's about how best to live your life. If you are currently or become wealthy you'll have to decide whether hiring women and posting on social media will make you happiest.

Post: #99

(11-11-2015 11:56 AM)AntiTrace Wrote:  

(11-11-2015 11:36 AM)achromaticmike Wrote:  Trump's net worth is actually lower than if he had just taken everything he inherited and thrown it that day into the S&P 500 index. He's just as much of a trust-fund baby as Bilzerian.

While that is debatable depending on what analysis you use to measure Trump's net worth, it is a completely misguided argument and brushes all logic aside in an attempt to make a point.

1. It starts with taking his fathers net worth in early 1974 at around 200mil.
2. Divides that evenly between the trumprats, 5 of them, at 40 mil a piece.
3. Assume dad just ups and gives all his new worth away to his kids (did he? I'm not sure, never cared to look, still don't).
4. Assumes that Trump invested %100 of his inheritance into the SP500.
5. Assumes he reinvests dividends and doesn't touch it for the next 40 years.
6. Assumes he drinks rain water and eats foraged food for the last 40 years? I mean the single assumption that he invests %100 of his money and doesn't a spend a dime on himself for 40 years is, to put it nicely, preposterously laughable.
7. Doesn't account for the business ventures and the job creation for how many people he employs.
8. Doesn't account for charitable donations. You know, all those giant lump sums of monies subtracted from his networth.

Theres more, but I don't think we need to write a thesis on such a poorly grounded claim in the first place.

Cmon man, I know you got a hard-on for Dan and limp one for Trump and the BB guy, but please do some of your own analysis and critical thinking before you quote findings of internet articles.

You already admitted to not knowing how much Trump was given so really it's worthless to argue about it.

1) You're assuming his dad never gave him a penny until he passed away.

2) You're assuming the money was divided equally and the power of the company creating the wealth divided equally as well.

3) Yes -- I'm assuming he reinvested the dividends considering that's how the S&P Index works.

4) Investing billions in the S&P 500 would indirectly lead to countless jobs being created as well.

Regardless, Trump could have parked his money in the S&P 500 while spending millions on hookers and blow and still had a similar net worth to what he has today. His businesses were moderately successful. For all you or I know Bilzerian has invested his money better since we have no clue how his net worth has changed.

Post: #100

(11-11-2015 12:03 PM)Gringuito Wrote:  

(11-11-2015 11:31 AM)achromaticmike Wrote:  I really don't give a shit how Bilzerian got his money - it's irrelevant

You and I view things very differently. If someone makes their money legally or illegally, that makes a difference to me.

(11-11-2015 11:31 AM)achromaticmike Wrote:  No -- I don't believe ALL of them are not paid whores. It's blatantly obvious a good number of them are aspiring Emirate toilets. Regardless, I also wouldn't put it past Bilzerian to pull more and better quality pussy than his jealous haters on here...

You don't seem to have a problem with Dan's use of prostitutes. Again, I don't agree with that and I think this forum in general is against P4P.

(11-11-2015 11:31 AM)achromaticmike Wrote:  I just can't stand jealous, whiny haters.

Mike, I've been very fortunate and I've made quite a bit of money. I'm pretty sure that I'm worth more than Dan. And I've made this money legally, with no help from my parents. This isn't about him having more than anyone else. It's about how best to live your life. If you are currently or become wealthy you'll have to decide whether hiring women and posting on social media will make you happiest.

You don't seem to have a problem with fabricating what people say or attacking their character though. I never said anything about Prostitution. I'm pretty sure that nothing on Dan's page indicates he pays women to have sex with him. I wouldn't doubt he pays Instagram models to show up for some of his photoshoots which is what I was clearly referring to.