Post: #26

Man a lot of these companies are run by morons.

They strive to go for that urban SJW type, who will unlikely purchase these high sodium products.

They should stick to their strong suit, the old guard, people who grew up with Campbell's soup. A bunch of non-fags that grew up with it, had they gone with some retro ad campaign, the urbanites that they lust over will follow in an attempt to be "vintage, cool, authentic, hipster"

This is what happens when your HR and white collar departments are manned by women and effeminate yes men

Post: #27

Yawn. These advertisers are just sheep. Madison Avenue would claim to produce "edgy" content. I can just picture the flamboyant creative team congratulating one other after producing this piece, which they probably think is so avant garde, but in reality is just the opposite -- jumping on the latest bandwagon.

Wake me up when a commercial is actually clever, or actually goes against the grain of elite opinion.

Post: #28

Why are these two "dads" feeding this boy like he's a baby? He's clearly old enough to feed himself.

Post: #29

(10-14-2015 05:01 PM)Drazen Wrote:  Campbell's is exploiting the gay lifestyle as a marketing gimmick. The commercial is designed to highlight two gay men in a highly trollish and prominent nature.

They get coverage, anyone who denounces them are evil bigots, its a total win-win from an advertiser's point of view. They get coverage in the liberal media with a positive skin. Advertising is meant to illicit a reaction otherwise its not effective. This is all about dollars, I think the guys at the very very top of the pecking order probably give two shits about gay families (they hire SJW-ish bitches as "fall guys" in middle management).

That's the truth. They went viral with it and that was the goal.

It has nothing to do with the core demographic.

Also those gays shown are at best 2% of 2% 0,04% of the population - those are mentally sound, traditional in their lifestyle, not having orgies non-stop, not being themselves sexually molested as a child, not molesting theirs, not putting strange ideas into the heads of their children.

And even with those 0,04% it's less optimal than with a mother/father bond, because the child knows that something is amiss. For most other homosexual couples that parenting looks way less optimal and we should correctly view it with great suspicion. Just as our Red Pill one Milo says it - even he doubts that gays can be good parents, it just does not fit most of their lifestyles.

But hey - we know what's on the agenda. Campbell will get a transgender "father" spot soon.

Post: #30

(10-21-2015 05:00 AM)Scoundrel Wrote:  Why are these two "dads" feeding this boy like he's a baby? He's clearly old enough to feed himself.

"Baby steps" First it's soup. Then:



Then..