(03-09-2017 05:59 AM)catoblepa Wrote:  Milo is more like a libertarian or an atypical leftist rather than a straight up conservative. I disagree with him on a number of things but he's fighting the good fight against authoritarism that is now embodied by the left.

I can't figure out if he's libertarian or conservative. He claims to be both. But I do enjoy the fact that he drives Social Justice Warriors absolutely batshit crazy. Anyone that can piss off SJW's so much... I'm a fan.

(03-18-2017 02:15 AM)BrewDog Wrote:  I can't figure out if he's libertarian or conservative. He claims to be both.

I would be as surprised as anybody to hear that Milo swings both ways.

In an interview with Jeff Berwick (the dollar vigilante), Milo said he was raised to be pro-military, and he had a hard time rejecting that. Not an entirely Libertarian ("NAP") stance.

FWIW

(03-18-2017 02:21 AM)Paracelsus Wrote:  

(03-18-2017 02:15 AM)BrewDog Wrote:  I can't figure out if he's libertarian or conservative. He claims to be both.

I would be as surprised as anybody to hear that Milo swings both ways.

LOL, I think there's a metaphor in here somewhere.

(03-18-2017 02:05 AM)Hoser Wrote:  Sincere question: is Milo a one-hit-wonder whose song has been overplayed? I mean, I like the guy, but I sense that he's jumped the shark. Was he just a novelty or does he have meaningful staying power?

As a troll he is/was a master level tactical nuclear shitlord , the persona he built combined all the sacred points the SJW's and cucks hold dear and swung right back at them (there is a fringe theory that he is actually a closet hetero,if such a thing exists), to the amusement of many red pillers.

As an intellectual when you remove the flamboyant showmanship and the rather annoying gay self promotion the man has exhibited sound and logical reasoning.

As for staying power , he wast he target of a concentrated smear campaign and few recover well.
From what we know he did not withstand it and bended, unlike Roosh who bore the hit and punched back or Pewdiepie who already had a massive income prior to his deals with Disney and also started fighting back.
Therefore Milo currently gives the impression that he has been publicly neutered.

However ,the fellow is genial and many would welcome his return if it meant continuing to drivie feral universitarian maggots even crazier

(03-18-2017 02:05 AM)Hoser Wrote:  Sincere question: is Milo a one-hit-wonder whose song has been overplayed? I mean, I like the guy, but I sense that he's jumped the shark. Was he just a novelty or does he have meaningful staying power?

Too early to tell. Give him six months to decompress/evaluate his life and then another six months to rebuild. In one year you'll have an answer.

Have you been in touch with him at all Roosh?

(03-18-2017 02:42 AM)BrewDog Wrote:  

(03-18-2017 02:21 AM)Paracelsus Wrote:  

(03-18-2017 02:15 AM)BrewDog Wrote:  I can't figure out if he's libertarian or conservative. He claims to be both.

I would be as surprised as anybody to hear that Milo swings both ways.

LOL, I think there's a metaphor in here somewhere.

DOUBLE ENTENDRE

(03-18-2017 02:05 AM)Hoser Wrote:  Sincere question: is Milo a one-hit-wonder whose song has been overplayed? I mean, I like the guy, but I sense that he's jumped the shark. Was he just a novelty or does he have meaningful staying power?

Nah

Milo has been relevant since 2015. He has probably done more than anybody to help get Trump votes from the millennials and still has a strong following.

This will be seen as a a stretch but I believe if he continues to do his college talks and their comes a point of time where college kids stop trying to protest free speech he will be a legend and be read about in US History books.

Great points, guys.

I have to admit, Milo at the very least reminded us of how effective it can be to mock the losers (so long as you've read up on your facts), not for sport (well, not JUST for sport) but to knock some truth into them. He has similarly helped reintroduce shaming as a mean to a noble end.

Tough love from someone who likes rough love. That's Milo.

(03-18-2017 02:15 AM)BrewDog Wrote:  

(03-09-2017 05:59 AM)catoblepa Wrote:  Milo is more like a libertarian or an atypical leftist rather than a straight up conservative. I disagree with him on a number of things but he's fighting the good fight against authoritarism that is now embodied by the left.

I can't figure out if he's libertarian or conservative. He claims to be both. But I do enjoy the fact that he drives Social Justice Warriors absolutely batshit crazy. Anyone that can piss off SJW's so much... I'm a fan.

I don't think I ever saw Milo as a "true" conservative.

I would call Milo a political contrarian. He is in the same vein as guys like Peter Thiel and Ben Carson. They grow up in a community that largely espouses one ideology or political view. They take those views and invert them in order to criticize their flaws.

Milo is of a similar bent like Christopher Hitchens. Strict ideology aside, they enjoy muckraking sensibilities and getting people to talk about difficult topics. I can't stand most atheist "intellectuals" due to their snobbery, but Hitchens actually had a sense of humor, like Milo. They challenge people to combat, then make sure they show up and fight.

(03-18-2017 07:19 PM)All or Nothing Wrote:  

(03-18-2017 02:15 AM)BrewDog Wrote:  

(03-09-2017 05:59 AM)catoblepa Wrote:  Milo is more like a libertarian or an atypical leftist rather than a straight up conservative. I disagree with him on a number of things but he's fighting the good fight against authoritarism that is now embodied by the left.

I can't figure out if he's libertarian or conservative. He claims to be both. But I do enjoy the fact that he drives Social Justice Warriors absolutely batshit crazy. Anyone that can piss off SJW's so much... I'm a fan.

I don't think I ever saw Milo as a "true" conservative.

I would call Milo a political contrarian. He is in the same vein as guys like Peter Thiel and Ben Carson. They grow up in a community that largely espouses one ideology or political view. They take those views and invert them in order to criticize their flaws.

He's funny as hell. I hope he makes a comeback. I think he'll lay low a while and then be ok. The media was out to fuck him and they certainly got his ass.

But he's too entertaining not to be on stage. We'll see more of him one day.

He didn't win the nomination to be Glasgow University's rector.

A Muslim lawyer won it instead.

Quote:At the time nominations were announced Mr Anwar tweeted: "I hope whoever wins is a voice for students but disgusted at those who nominated Milo Yiannopolous".

Should have been Peterson.

(03-21-2017 12:57 PM)debeguiled Wrote:  Should have been Peterson.

Agreed. A great mind, and comes with a lot more genuine substance than Milo.

(03-21-2017 01:03 PM)Teedub Wrote:  

(03-21-2017 12:57 PM)debeguiled Wrote:  Should have been Peterson.

Agreed. A great mind, and comes with a lot more genuine substance than Milo.

Both serve their purpose. Different weapons of war, different tactics. Still, you wouldn't create an army with only tanks and no air support would you? We need all the firepower we can muster against the left. The fact that a Muslim bested him for the prize is proof positive that the West needs reactionary figures like Milo to push the envelope.

Nice vid on the scandal by a semi-hot now-conservative ex-SJW.

Also new data just in:



Molly O'Malia



.... actual age at the time of the pics being taken was 14 years old.



I will spare you the WB questions for a girl who is that well developed and the clearest example of a 10 one could get.

And look at that US jailbait girl play the innocent damsel in distress when a rapper contacts her:





Yeah - I am sooooo innocent your honor:



A 14yo girl is essentially mentally a 16-17yo boy. Sure - women don't become more mature than 16, which is the male equivalent of 26, but hey - it is how nature had created them.

Either way - this pedophilia scandal of Milo is bullshit. We will see whether Milo can come back.

14 and that gut is already forming... meh.

You know that if Milo was on the left, he would have been treated far differently, because he is not speaking in favor of pedophilia, but as a victim of pedophilia, so he is downplaying the effects, and trying to take responsibility for being the aggressor, and tossing off one liners about being better at giving head.

This is exactly the Stockholm Syndrome tinged attitude you find among people who were abused at a young age, trying to normalize and make sense of their experiences, and smoothing over the cognitive dissonance that appears when an authority figure has sex with someone in their care.

Yeah, yeah, you were fine with it, and it led to your fabulous life.

If Milo weren't an ideological opponent, the SJWs would be falling all over themselves to support him and accuse anyone who criticizes him of blaming the victim.

This is why the authoritarian left is so evil, because they try to draw a cloak of humanitarian cover over their naked power grabs. If you want to know why this is so bad, look at the New Testament whenever Jesus addresses the religious leaders directly. He is quite savage, because he knows the spiritual death that comes from hiding your evil behind false altruism, he says in fact that you would be better off having a stone around your neck and being drowned than being that kind of person.

And that girl above could very well be no better than the SJWs. When people talking about losing your innocence, they are usually referring to experiencing violence or sex before your time or some sort of trauma. I don't agree with that. I think losing your innocence is when you are willing to lie, to misrepresent the truth to get what you want. That is when you truly lose your humanity, not when you have some sort of trauma. Trauma can be healed. Bad choices coarsen your heart, and make the next and worse bad choice easier.

This girl probably was a slut by the time she was 14, and so what? It is the poor me act that is truly out of bounds. Lying for gain is the deepest of sins, and as someone who had stepkids, and observed them and their friends from a young age, there are some very young people out there, especially girls, who make the decision, very early on, that truth matters nothing to them, and they will do or say anything to get what they want.

These people can wreak havoc on families and even communities when they falsely accuse elders in the community. They are little sharks from an early age, with black pitiless eyes, and they chose to be that way.

They cannot hide behind childhood, they are what they are.

Milo obviously has some contradictions in his character he needs to work out, that much is clear. I still think the pitiless SJWs and lying girls are far worse than he is.

It should be interesting to see how CNN edits this down.

Damn that was a REALLY good interview!

We must follow his lead and ensure EVERY interview is recorded independently, so when (((they))) selectively edit their footage to make it look like he said one thing, we can show the real context of it.

(03-27-2017 02:44 PM)Hoser Wrote:  Damn that was a REALLY good interview!

We must follow his lead and ensure EVERY interview is recorded independently, so when (((they))) selectively edit their footage to make it look like he said one thing, we can show the real context of it.

Did you see the one Mark Dice clip where both MSNBC & CNN had the same guest 'live' for two separate interviews?
Even when it's to their favour, they still twist the circumstance.

^ I did see that! Mark Dice is really doing a great job calling out the Fake News sources. Best of all, he starts every segment laughing at them before he speaks. Effective af!

Don't know if relevant but an interesting view.

This video posts a not yet disproven "Tool kit" (or a class assignment of sorts) very likely redacted by faculty members -given the academic vocabulary used- for the protesting students at the Milo Speeches.