(02-04-2017 11:05 PM)Delta Wrote: It sounds like the people protesting Milo and Gavin really do believe they're literal Neo-Nazis that advocate for the elimination of non-whites.
Who is giving them that idea and why?
One part 'Rules for radicals'.
One part 'Active measures'.
Great news, Milo has vowed to return to Berkeley to give the speech he promised to give. Massive incoming triggering! Leftist thugs already stockpiling bricks, pipes and pepper spray. Milo seems determined to embarrass the school's administration and the mayor for not only encouraging the "resistance", but also their completely obvious stand down order to the cops. He better be careful, this time was only a warmup. He should force Berkeley to its knees, giving the most offensive talk possible.
I'm usually extremely skeptical about most homos because then tend to engage in pure SJW nonsense, but if there's one homo I have some respect for, I will reserve it for Milo who is putting his own safety and life on the line. He was going to malo Sweden before his security team called it off. The man has balls. You cannot take that away from him. A lesson in courage in these perilous times.
(02-05-2017 08:10 AM)rotekz Wrote: Milo would have to tone down his gay schtick before they offered him a slot.
Agree. I get it, you need to put that mask on to plow ahead in this pathetic cuckosphere of globalist media, but he could really tone it down a notch. Besides, I'm 99,999% sure that he's not gay.
(02-05-2017 08:10 AM)rotekz Wrote: Milo would have to tone down his gay schtick before they offered him a slot.
Agree. I get it, you need to put that mask on to plow ahead in this pathetic cuckosphere of globalist media, but he could really tone it down a notch. Besides, I'm 99,999% sure that he's not gay.
Well, he's been claiming he's gay since he was a student writing for The Tab magazine in Cambridge, years before his first TV appearance, so I highly doubt your theory.
I watched a couple of these lectures today, 'Why Ugly People Hate Me' is awesome. It was like a day of RoK articles condensed into an hour speaking routine.
Milo's next speech at Berkeley will be covered by major media because of what happened there last week. It really puts the leftist idiots running Berkeley in a tight spot because if they fail to make adequate security preparations this time, they won't have an excuse. But, by allowing the speech to happen on a national stage, they will be conceding that conservative and libertarian speakers need to be given just as much consideration as liberal presenters. Milo wins either way, and in a big way.
Quote:Whether or not Berkeley loses its federal funding over the Milo riots (and it won鈥檛), I think it鈥檚 time for action to address this double standard. First, state and local law enforcement agencies need to target violent rioters who seek to silence speakers. It is a felony under federal civil rights law to conspire to deprive citizens of their constitutional rights, among which is free speech. In addition, many states have laws (generally called Klan laws) that punish people who engage in mob violence or intimidation while masked. These should be applied as well.
Second, perhaps it鈥檚 time to have a Title IX-style law banning discrimination according to political viewpoints on campus. Many states (including California) already have laws banning discrimination in hiring and firing based on political viewpoints. Perhaps we need a federal civil rights law providing that colleges that receive federal funds (which is pretty much all of them) can lose those funds if they discriminate against students because of their political views.
Some colleges may complain that this is federal interference in their internal affairs, but given the limited resistance they鈥檝e mounted to intrusive Title IX regulations, it will be hard to take such complaints seriously. America鈥檚 colleges and universities have a free speech problem. It鈥檚 appropriate for the federal government to take action to protect the civil rights of those affected.
Milo has learned from trump. Always put yourself in a win/win situation no matter what the outcome is. Berkeley is going to lose, no matter what happens. Their best bet was to never let it get out of hand in the first place. But being leftists, they lack future time orientation.
(02-06-2017 09:28 AM)C-Note Wrote: Milo's next speech at Berkeley will be covered by major media because of what happened there last week. It really puts the leftist idiots running Berkeley in a tight spot because if they fail to make adequate security preparations this time, they won't have an excuse. But, by allowing the speech to happen on a national stage, they will be conceding that conservative and libertarian speakers need to be given just as much consideration as liberal presenters. Milo wins either way, and in a big way.
(02-06-2017 09:37 AM)TigerMandingo Wrote: My one criticism of Milo is that he talks too fast and mumbles in his speeches. Needs to work on articulation for sure.
With more BBC oral practice, it should handle itself.
I'm usually extremely skeptical about most homos because then tend to engage in pure SJW nonsense, but if there's one homo I have some respect for, I will reserve it for Milo who is putting his own safety and life on the line. He was going to malo Sweden before his security team called it off. The man has balls. You cannot take that away from him. A lesson in courage in these perilous times.
Courage, but he directly profits by it and no doubt enjoys the notoriety, and has a security team and money to fund it.
BAMN's leader just publicly declared that they'll do anything to stop speakers like Milo and Alex at Berkeley. So, now that they've announced that they're coming back, if BAMN and the other black bloc groups don't show up they'll lose face.
Perhaps Berkeley will be smart enough to ask the Feds to help out with security at the event. If that happens then the anarchists will be in trouble because the feds don't mess around. Anyone they arrest or is identified as being a troublemaker will be on the Man's Shit List for the rest of his/her life. If the Feds aren't involved, however, it's likely to be another shit show which will again help promote Milo and Alex's brand.
(02-09-2017 02:16 PM)John Michael Kane Wrote: Milo has a security team, but with no police backup, things could get hairy fast. His safety is far from guaranteed in leftist hellholes.
For U.S. security personnel. What are the handgun carry laws in CA?
(02-06-2017 09:37 AM)TigerMandingo Wrote: My one criticism of Milo is that he talks too fast and mumbles in his speeches. Needs to work on articulation for sure.
I've seen a ton of Milo's stuff and I don't really get this - I think if there's anything you can definitely say about Milo then it's that he is very articulate. When he goes a bit too fast in certain MSM interviews etc it feels like it's because he's forced to repeat the same introductory points again and again for context and just wants to get ahead to the specific things he actually wants to talk about.
(02-09-2017 02:16 PM)John Michael Kane Wrote: Milo has a security team, but with no police backup, things could get hairy fast. His safety is far from guaranteed in leftist hellholes.
For U.S. security personnel. What are the handgun carry laws in CA?
As professional bodyguards, they can be issued and most certainly are, concealed carry permits. Still, the antifas haven't shied away from violence, and someone got shot in the stomach at the violent protest in Seattle. Things can escalate fast when tensions are this high.