(05-20-2016 10:47 AM)hydrogonian Wrote: These are convenient words from a man whose only offspring married into the conservative part of an ethnicity that enjoys its own ethnic theocracy that unapologetically builds fences to keep out "invaders", and who would not take a single one of the before-neighboring foreigners that Clinton is lamenting Poland and Hungary are trying to refuse.
While a lot of people were shamed at what happened in Cologne, violence researcher Jörg Baberowski was not among them. He actually saw this is as progressive...
Quote:He said the fact that the German men had not come to the aid of the women being sexually assaulted by large gangs of migrants showed a reluctance to be violent and commented: “We see that men in Germany no longer know how to deal with violence,” Stern reports.
However, immediately following the remark Baberowski, who is a historian at the Humboldt University in Berlin, said “thank god” that German men no longer know how to stand up for themselves or face violent conflict.He claimed that is was good that German men relied solely on the state to take care of them and protect them. He claimed that the New Years’ attacks were a failure of the state to protect its citizens and that if the government can’t guarantee that safety then the confidence the citizens have it it will be shaken.
This guy thinks you should rely on the state to protect you but the state is the one that brought in the criminals.
Quote:Smug Americans who own firearms might laugh at the current plight of the Europeans, but they should not. The Europeans have been brainwashed by the “multi-kulti-uber-alles” Left to simply submit when the planned hijra invasion happened, which is happening now. The ordinary Euros were betrayed by Quisling traitors in high offices. From the Muslim point of view, the hijra invasion is moving from the dawah (preaching) phase to the jihad phase, using violence and threats of even greater violence to force a complete Muslim takeover. That German boy now understands who are the alpha males, and who are not: The Moslems are, and he isn’t.
But there is the long-term danger in this process even to America. If Islam wins in Europe, a well-known social/genetic dynamic will kick in. All of the German girls and women (even the man-hating radical feminists and lesbians) will be raped, enslaved, or “married” by force, but one way or the other, there will be a rising generation of Muslims in Europe who are half-German.
...
I shudder to think of what German Super Muslims will be capable of in thirty years, if Islam is triumphant in Europe. They would make the Earth shake.
(05-20-2016 10:47 AM)hydrogonian Wrote: These are convenient words from a man whose only offspring married into the conservative part of an ethnicity that enjoys its own ethnic theocracy that unapologetically builds fences to keep out "invaders", and who would not take a single one of the before-neighboring foreigners that Clinton is lamenting Poland and Hungary are trying to refuse.
Just imagine how bad that piece of clothing must smell after eating and spending the entire day with it over your mouth.
Like a giant used maxi pad. You see them shuffling around Bangkok quite a bit. I've only been in close proximity to one just once and you could smell the funk covered up with heavy perfume.
It also soaks sweat, dust, bits of food, and combine that with the diet of your average fat arab it will reek for sure.
Good article. The old conventional ideology of Islam is being used by the global elite to stage the next conflict. The buggers probably know that secular Islam would create an independently thinking conservative people who only accept some liberties of the West. So instead they decided to fund, further and promote the original theocratic backwards Islam. Secular leaders are being ousted and the new combating forces are moved to the West. When the war starts, it will be a huge bloodbath.
It's a shame really. I wish there was a way to stop this, but I don't see anything on the horizon that could stop those plans - at least not anything short of a full-blown Alien invasion.
As much as I criticize the ideology of Islam, my heart goes out to all Muslims and the folk in the Middle East who are caught in the mental grip of it all. And of course all the progressives who don't understand the issue at hand:
------
Some Germans fighting back the symptoms of the big plan - won't change a thing of course:
Was at a festival, they have those safe spaces for women where they can go when they feel harassed and assaulted. I did just spent one day at this 12 day festival so I can't say much about the crowd. Did not see any refugees so far. They invest in more security - they all look like out of the refugee camp hired refugees.
From the police reports, the mix is between drunk Germans that are now put as sex offenders and a few migrants that did attack women. But nothing like Cologne so far. The whole topic becomes more and more an issue. Nobody like the refugees, not even the more left wing friends of mine. We then did share our stories about the experiences with the Turks and that they are already an issue. From my subjective picture, Merkels politics and refugees are not in favour.
So is that the endgame? German Independence through Islam? An end to multicultural dominance through Islam? And then just take it back? Islamic Germany would of course be the greatest power in the Islamic world.
It may well work. But the sacrifices are tremendous. Is there really no other way?
Here a talk about a woman from Amarillo, Texas - a small town that has been overrun by a generous US Islamic resettlement program. Thousands of rapefugees have made the city one of the unsafest ones in Texas.
This is not a European program. All Western elites are complicit in it. They would probably do it in Japan and China as well, if they could, but there the folk would string up their leaders on the nearest lamp-post.
(05-22-2016 01:50 PM)RexImperator Wrote: Well, it has already started. I heard on the radio a couple of weeks ago a story about how South Korea needs to start importing immigrants.
Quote:For example, Muslim culture has a very different view of anger. In Western culture, expressions of anger and threats are probably the quickest way to lose face leading to a feeling of shame and a loss of social status. In Muslim culture, aggressive behaviors, especially threats, are generally seen to be accepted, and even expected as a way of handling conflicts. In the context of foreign policy, peaceful approaches such as demonstrations of compassion, compromise and common sense are seen by Muslim leaders as cowardice and a weakness to be exploited. In that respect, anger and violence are not reasons to begin negotiations, but are integral components of the negotiation process itself.
According to Sennels, there is another important psychological difference between Muslim and Western cultures called the “locus of control,” whether people experience life influenced by either internal or external factors.
Westerners feel that their lives are mainly influenced by inner forces, our ways of handling our emotions, our ways of thinking, our ways of relating to people around us, our motivations, and our way of communicating; factors that determine if we feel good and self-confident or not.
In Muslim culture, however, inner factors are replaced by external rules, traditions and laws for human behavior. They have powerful Muslim clerics who set the directions for their community, dictate political views, and provide rules for virtually all aspects of life.
The locus of control is central to the individual’s understanding of freedom and responsibility. When Westerners have problems, we most often look inward and ask “What did I do wrong?” and “What can I do to change the situation?” Muslims look outward for sources to blame asking: “Who did this to me?”Sennels noted that a standard answer from violent Muslims is often: “It is his own fault that I beat him up (or raped her). He (or she) provoked me.”
As a result, Muslim culture offers a formula for perpetual victimhood.
With a decrease in feelings of personal responsibility, there is a greater tendency to demand that the surroundings adapt to Muslim wishes and desires, infiltrating rather than to assimilating into a Western culture.
All of this does not bode well for the logic of any proposal to increase Muslim immigration into non-Muslim cultures or the success of any foreign policy involving Muslim nations by applying current Islamophobia-based misconceptions.
Sennels offers a harsh, but realistic prescription: “We should not permit the destruction of our cities by lawless parallel societies, with groups of roaming criminal Muslims overloading of our welfare system and the growing justified fear that non-Muslims have of violence. The consequences should be so strict that it would be preferable for any anti-social Muslim to go back to a Muslim country, where they can understand, and can be understood by their own culture.
I've read the full article and i think it is full of bollocks. I am from south italy and i recognize most of those "muslim" behaviours, they can be easily found here, "get angry and abusive and you're strong and cool", "i wasn't wrong, he/she deserved it", "it's not my fault i'm unemployed/poor etc. it's because of the place", "your suburb, town, county makes your real identity more than your country" but nobody is muslim here and muslims are definitely not welcome or protected like in "civilized" countries.
I actually don't see anything muslim in those behaviours/mentality, it's just that "westerners" don't know much about the world and call islam everything that looks different to what they're used to or everything they think is bad.
The reason why muslims and all foreigners don't integrate in the "good" part of the world is because they don't need to, it is not their fault,
Quote:they are not bad people because they live in their own ghettos and do whatever the fuck they want, it's the host country's fault. You should stop blaming foreigners for your own weaknesses.
Here if a woman goes out wearing the hijab everybody is gonna look strange at her, she's gonna be seen like an alien, in "good" countries women go to work wearing hijabs and if you say something about it you're gonna be charged with hate crime, so why should they start dressing normally? Here nobody is gonna eat that rubbish they make in those fried chicken shops, kebab shops, indian food shops etc. they're gonna close down straight away, maybe just the high quality ones are gonna survive. In "good" countries local people go and buy that trash on a daily basis, so muslims know they can make business easily selling their food and invade and colonize the west. Same for mobile phones shops, electronic stuff shops, internet cafes etc. if they know it's so easy for them opening their own business, being seen and treated like local people (if not better) without struggling to fit in the new country it is obvious they're not gonna integrate and they will just invade and colonize.
And it is not a problem that can be solved by governments or laws, normal people should have more pride, more self respect, more cultural identity. The laws and the government are the same in centre/north italy and in the south, but the south is still original, it's still real while the rest of italy is getting similar to the rest of europe becuase people there have none of the qualities i mentioned above. And most of the migrants get in the country via the south.
Not sure what you are trying to argue here, friend. No matter how "shortsighted" you may think these Westerners are, the fact remains the same: it is THEIR country. The history, culture, traditions, political systems, etc are all under the guise of that nation. If you, an outsider, cannot function (or blatantly REFUSE to function) in the nation in question, then you may leave. End of discussion.
Despite how much you think it is important for immigrants to "do whatever the fuck they want", when you are in a guest country, you do your best in assimilate as much as you can. End of discussion.
That isn't to say that you stop celebrating your own cultural imperatives. But pitching a tent on someone else's land and refusing to play ball isn't a viable option. It's arrogance in the sense that you think you can take resources from a host country, whilst providing nothing in return. Yet, they say Westerners and people in the highly developed countries are the most entitled.
(05-22-2016 01:50 PM)RexImperator Wrote: Well, it has already started. I heard on the radio a couple of weeks ago a story about how South Korea needs to start importing immigrants.
Nah. It won't have any traction believe me and non asian immigrants would have a very tough time unless they come with the money and social status package.
NPR Wrote:South Korea is opening its borders to more immigrants ever before. That's because the number of working-age people is expected to drop dramatically by the year 2040. NPR's Elise Hu reports from one village that's been proactive about welcoming foreigners into its homogeneous society.
...
Kim is also the multicultural coordinator at the school, an increasingly vital role here. The elementary school is in the heart of Wongok, a village in which two thirds of its residents are non-Korean. Factory work with lower wages fueled an influx of migrant labor. The non-ethnic Korean population here has jumped fourfold from 2002 to 2010. For educators, it means teaching a much more diverse student body than they're used to. The kids are mostly from China, but also...
KIM: (Speaking Korean).
HU: The Philippines.
KIM: (Speaking Korean).
HU: Vietnam.
KIM: (Speaking Korean).
HU: Uzbekistan.
KIM: (Speaking Korean).
HU: Kyrgyzstan.
KIM: (Speaking Korean).
HU: Places with multicultural kids, people can interact with each other and, you know, get into conflicts and break the prejudices.
....
KATHARINE MOON: There is real immigration going on in South Korea that is supported, facilitated, advocated by the South Korean government.
[quote=NPR]
South Korea is opening its borders to more immigrants ever before. That's because the number of working-age people is expected to drop dramatically by the year 2040. NPR's Elise Hu reports from one village that's been proactive about welcoming foreigners into its homogeneous society.
...
Kim is also the multicultural coordinator at the school, an increasingly vital role here. The elementary school is in the heart of Wongok, a village in which two thirds of its residents are non-Korean. Factory work with lower wages fueled an influx of migrant labor. The non-ethnic Korean population here has jumped fourfold from 2002 to 2010. For educators, it means teaching a much more diverse student body than they're used to. The kids are mostly from China, but also...
I think you severely overestimate how much traction this will have in the long run. A few experimental cities is not a comprehensive pattern of immigration that's actually making a dent in South Korea's homogeneity. Let's be realistic here.
Quote:South Korea is a relatively homogeneous society with an absolute majority of the population of Korean ethnicity (The Korean ethnic group accounts for approximately 96% of the total population of the Korean Republic). However, with its emergence as an economic powerhouse, opportunities for foreign immigrants increased and in 2007 the number of foreign citizens resident in South Korea passed the million mark for the first time in history.[11] 440,000 of them came from China, with more than half of them being ethnic Koreans of Chinese citizenship. The next largest group was from the United States with 117,000 residents or 12%, excluding the American troops stationed in the country. Vietnam, Philippines, Thailand and other countries followed.
The foreign migrants are still mostly low skilled southeast asian laborers who usually don't stay. 1 million foreigners total out of a population of around 50 million is like 2%. in 2007. Now it's increased to just 3.4% (1.74 million of the total population in 2016.) That's tiny. The largest percentage of those foreigners are ethnic Chinese or SEA migrant workers. They probably get way more tourists than that each year in just Seoul alone.
Just compare that with the statistics in the U.S. where just the asian population alone pushes 5% of the total population. Latinos are like 15%. Blacks are 13%.
Germany's immigrant population is a whopping 20% of the total. That's ridiculous.
You have to look at overall population size and the growth of immigrant communities. It's nowhere near big enough to be called a substantial change in the demographic fabric of South Korea.
It's pretty apparent when you live and travel around the region regularly.
Also, NPR is a globalist shilling MSM site that tries to push the multicult on everyone. It's not even close to becoming a thing in NEA or even SEA for that matter.
(05-17-2016 03:13 AM)Fortis Wrote: I think eastern Europe has a similar cultural feature but it is more fluid than it is in Asia (correct me if I'm wrong). I often get the impression that even a foreigner who speaks the language in an EE country is still viewed as an outsider for the most part.
Nope - if you look more or less like the locals and speak the language, then you will be accepted by Eastern Europeans. Actually they may even like you more than the average local.
EE would not mind millions of Ukrainians or local British moving there. They are only opposed to those who have utterly different behaviors, culture or race.
Since we're on the subject (or were a couple pages back), I'm curious what the guys currently in Europe would recommend to someone considering a move there.
I'm location independent and have been mulling over a move to Hungary for a while now. I've always been drawn towards the country, and I just realized recently that I may actually qualify for citizenship there due to my ancestry.
But at the same time, I'm debating whether I want to be in such a volatile region right now.
Basically my question is, if you didn't already live in Europe but had the opportunity to move there, would you? Obviously somewhere like Germany/France would probably be a bad idea, this is more targeted towards non-enriched Central and Eastern Europe.
this hasn't stopped appearing on my feed (i actually was there, she was only there for 10 minutes).There's also an interview where she admits to hating jews, and some tweets where she wrote hitler didn't kill all jews because he saved some for "them"(muslims). But no sign of that int he media.
she was clearly making fun of the fact that they couldn't do anything about it without facing serious repercussions and our nationalist party already has been in trouble with the law , they even had to change their name due to accusations of racism.(cordon sanitair, name change, members getting arrested at protests etc etc). Funny thing is channel 4 news blew it up more than our own media.
I'd love to see how they phrased that question in mandarin. Seems way off to me. I'm going to guess they probably used the word "foreign friends" instead of refugee.