(05-05-2017 11:41 AM)WhatTheFuck Wrote:  Quick answer: it feels good.

Long answer:

My ex gf experienced this shit. Dude stealthed on her and she was worried she would be pregnant (told me this after we stated dating). For some reason it never raised a red flag for me despite how easily I fucked her too.. I was blue pill as fuck. Few nights into our escapades she told me this story and how she was very upset at the guy for doing it, and of course I came in to save the day denigrating this degenerate man who would rip off a condom mid-sex. Fuck that tool. I was such a good guy and much better bf material than him.

Don't really know where I'm going with this story, but all I can say is that I always felt this crazy resentment towards the dude who blasted in her. Probably because I was the boyfriend afterwards and was too risk adverse to do such a thing. She wasn't on birth control so I always used a condom.

Moral of the story: blast away and you will feel better about yourself. I have since changed my ways and there is definitely something primal about blasting in a girl raw dog which creates a feeling hard to be matched.

Although, no one wants an accident baby.

(05-05-2017 11:45 AM)rudebwoy Wrote:  Vaccines have been proven to cause autism.

(05-05-2017 11:46 AM)kaotic Wrote:  I agree it feels great - then I got my ex gf pregnant - had the abortion.

I've blasted inside pussy maybe a handful of times since then, always used Plan B after.

Since then I'll just blast in a girls ass if they let me - no chance of pregnancy.

Other than that it's team pull out - even as I cum the thought of knocking of a girl makes me pull out.

I don't trust girls on the pill, period.

(05-05-2017 11:41 AM)WhatTheFuck Wrote:  [quote='kaotic' pid='1564495' dateline='1493937825']

My ex gf experienced this shit. Dude stealthed on her and she was worried she would be pregnant (told me this after we stated dating). For some reason it never raised a red flag for me despite how easily I fucked her too.. I was blue pill as fuck. Few nights into our escapades she told me this story and how she was very upset at the guy for doing it, and of course I came in to save the day denigrating this degenerate man who would rip off a condom mid-sex. Fuck that tool. I was such a good guy and much better bf material than him.

Don't really know where I'm going with this story, but all I can say is that I always felt this crazy resentment towards the dude who blasted in her. Probably because I was the boyfriend afterwards and was too risk adverse to do such a thing. She wasn't on birth control so I always used a condom.

Moral of the story: blast away and you will feel better about yourself. I have since changed my ways and there is definitely something primal about blasting in a girl raw dog which creates a feeling hard to be matched.

Although, no one wants an accident baby.

(05-05-2017 12:05 PM)Rob Banks Wrote:  I assume you plan on sticking around if the girl gets pregnant, right?

Otherwise, you are possibly condemning your own child to be raised by a single mother and no father.

Why not just keep the condom on, or pull out, and avoid all of this?

Ah, but it "feeeels good" to bust inside a girl. That makes it OK, I guess.

(05-05-2017 11:25 AM)ChrisGaines Wrote:  

(05-05-2017 11:12 AM)Renzy Wrote:  And....so what? Even if we concede that in addition to providing abortions, they also provide contraceptives and advice, I fail to see why that mandates they receive federal funding.

Women who support abortion often justify the practice with the motto "My Body, My Choice." Now they can simply update their motto to "My Body, My Choice. My Responsibility."

As I see it, women want to once again divorce rights from responsibility and make it "My Body. My Choice. The tax payers responsibility." when it comes to paying for their beloved enterprise of killing babies they don't want to parent.

Men are constantly hectored by feminists about why we shouldn't be allowed to weigh in on the abortion debate, because as men, we will never get pregnant. Well, us men also pay the lion's share of taxes in this country. So if women can do without our objections regarding abortion, they can do without our tax dollars well.

That's fine, and at least a clearly articulated point (rather than "fuck those cucks in Washington, I'm keeping muh taxes!")

Many of these women receiving care from PP are indigent/lower income. Certainly there is something to be said about "keeping their legs closed" as Kaotic so eloquently stated. However, to get "Freakonomics" on the situation: if these women do not have access to services, they will have children that may also become a further strain on the economy (and your tax dollars will certainly go towards them).