Post: #26

When you first look at a picture, below, of proportion of abortions by race, you might think "ok, it's not so bad."



Then look at another graph like this



Abortions are a much, much larger outcome of minority women's pregancies. Ergo - abortion is actually brown people population control paid for by the state - to manage the population of "undesirables". Is it a surprise that Planned Parenthood founder was a eugenicist racist?

The sad fact is that most lefties don't even know this.

Post: #27

How come the white women didn't get the white bar?

In all seriousness, interesting chart. It only makes sense that those who get pregnant most would have higher abortion rates also.

The state isn't managing it's undesirables. They wouldn't have access to the pregnant women unless they actually wanted to have an abortion. What is interesting is the fetal losses rate. I guess the minorities are less able to afford proper medial care?

Post: #28

(07-15-2015 11:55 PM)samsamsam Wrote:  How come the white women didn't get the white bar?

They all gave the last name "Dolezal".

Post: #29

They use fetuses for research, they were going to be aborted anyway so why not use them? They do not pay women to get pregnant then harvest them, they simply ask women getting abortions if they want to donate the fetus. Many vaccines, drug treatments and antibiotics are developed this way. Fetuses are also a rich source of stem cells, ultimately their research value is enormous.

Post: #30

http://www.factcheck.org/2008/08/obama-and-infanticide/

Let us not forget our 44th president's take...not on abortion, but on born-alive survivors of abortion...

Quote:Anti-abortion activists accuse Obama of "supporting infanticide," and the National Right to Life Committee says he’s conducted a "four-year effort to cover up his full role in killing legislation to protect born-alive survivors of abortions." Obama says they’re "lying."
At issue is Obama’s opposition to Illinois legislation in 2001, 2002 and 2003 that would have defined any aborted fetus that showed signs of life as a "born alive infant" entitled to legal protection, even if doctors believe it could not survive.
Obama opposed the 2001 and 2002 "born alive" bills as backdoor attacks on a woman’s legal right to abortion, but he says he would have been "fully in support" of a similar federal bill that President Bush had signed in 2002, because it contained protections for Roe v. Wade.
We find that, as the NRLC said in a recent statement, Obama voted in committee against the 2003 state bill that was nearly identical to the federal act he says he would have supported. Both contained identical clauses saying that nothing in the bills could be construed to affect legal rights of an unborn fetus, according to an undisputed summary written immediately after the committee’s 2003 mark-up session.
Whether opposing "born alive" legislation is the same as supporting "infanticide," however, is entirely a matter of interpretation. That could be true only for those, such as Obama’s 2004 Republican opponent, Alan Keyes, who believes a fetus that doctors give no chance of surviving is an "infant." It is worth noting that Illinois law already provided that physicians must protect the life of a fetus when there is "a reasonable likelihood of sustained survival of the fetus outside the womb, with or without artificial support."

Let us not forget, there is a difference between your Democrat and your Republican.

I know, the repubs get a lot of hate on forums, and I understand the frustration. Tied to corps, tied to money, the same bull-shit all the same mentality.

Ok, I understand all of that. Make no mistake, there remains a severe difference between the right and the left.

I find any human being ok with the infanticide of an alive baby disturbingly disgusting.

Ok, now let's go hate on republicans. I'm fine with the criticisms they get. They can be grossly differentiated from your average democratic politician.

Mic dropped. I'm going to post in the drunk forum now.

I'm so glad Ronald Reagan is reading this thread right now.

Post: #31

(07-16-2015 02:57 PM)Atlanta Man Wrote:  They use fetuses for research, they were going to be aborted anyway so why not use them? They do not pay women to get pregnant then harvest them, they simply ask women getting abortions if they want to donate the fetus. Many vaccines, drug treatments and antibiotics are developed this way. Fetuses are also a rich source of stem cells, ultimately their research value is enormous.

This just dawned on me today, so they mothers of these dead babies sign something that they will donate the tissue to research...like the organ donor checkbox on a drivers liscence, but then planned parenthood SELLS the tissue.

Thats bullshit, I am sure Latisha or Lupe could use the $1000 cash from her dead child's brain or whatever. Also, if this is all "ok" and no one should be upset about it, why not let the mothers profit and turn themselves into fetal tissue farms, get pregnant, kill the fetus, profit on a monthly basis. If its no big deal it shouldn't be any different than donating blood should it?

Obama should be all over bitches becoming fetus farms as a way to raise black women up out of poverty.

Post: #32

I hate to go against the grain, but an abortion (literally in the first week of discovery, no embryo had even been created, just the sac) saved me from a lifetime of having a kid and financial freedom (at the moment). Along with Plan B and BC.

Obviously I erred shouldn't of worn condoms and pulled out, I learned my lesson for the most part

Not that I'd never EVER do a LTA, this story is getting crazier and crazier, they released another video today, looks like they've got HOURS of footage.

Post: #33

Anybody else see/hear about this and think "Nazi Germany"?

I'm pro-abortion, but this shit is just VILE.

Post: #34

Ok Atlanta Man, so how about we say women who do a neonaticide can sell that body for profit too? They were going to do it anyway, they can just call it a cot death or something and cash in. Research is the most important thing, just ask Mengele.

Baby mongering should not be something we should need to have even a brief moral discussion over. I'm going to assume any "there is no problem" comments haven't been thought through, for my own peace of mind.

Post: #35

This is incredibly evil. After the first video they defended themselves with the claim that it's a donation, then with the claim that it's just to cover their costs, but now they're explicitly saying "to let them check out if someone else is getting a better price so they don't get left out".

Fucking bastards. It's crazy that an organization like this receives taxpayer money.

Post: #36

(07-22-2015 03:15 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  It's crazy that an organization like this receives taxpayer money.

Crazy, but not surprising.
All the more reason to minimize your tax to the fullest extent you can - every dollar they get from you will be used to fund evil against you and your society.

Post: #37

No no, we aren't Baby Parts 'R Us, we are "Planned Parenthood"...

I was thinking along the same lines as Dr. Howard, at some point these "mothers" are going to think to themselves, wait, Planned Parenthood is cashing in on MY dead baby? MY BODY MY MONEY!

Then she can go out and whore around some more to grow new meat to sell.

Talk about slippery slopes.... yikes.

Post: #38

(07-22-2015 10:00 AM)Socrates Wrote:  No no, we aren't Baby Parts 'R Us, we are "Planned Parenthood"...

I was thinking along the same lines as Dr. Howard, at some point these "mothers" are going to think to themselves, wait, Planned Parenthood is cashing in on MY dead baby? MY BODY MY MONEY!

Then she can go out and whore around some more to grow new meat to sell.

Talk about slippery slopes.... yikes.

I want to see a very pregnant woman walk through the streets with a shirt on that says "Make money selling dead baby parts, ask me how" and a planned parenthood logo and/or phone #

Post: #39

Damn that was dark Howard - I couldn't imagine a society with a woman like that....then again it's America.

Post: #40

So what do they do with these dead baby parts?

Do they crack the necks and just drink them whole?



Who cares if they sell aborted fetuses. The organs aren't useful as transplants since the tissue becomes unusable in half a day.

I'm all for outrage, but where are these dead things going?

Post: #41

Prostitution and drugs are illegal but selling dead babies isn't. What a country.

Post: #42

How long before there's a lawsuit from these women wanting their share of the profits? These dead inside whores who, rather than being so upset over a difficult choice (as they're portrayed), start realizing they might have $5-10k coming their way!

"I've found another way to make money off of my body!"

Post: #43

Post: #44

When the white house press secretary was questioned today regarding that recent video link of the planned parenthood doctor(ette) proudly talking about how organs are harvested from aborted kids, he said in typical soulless milque toast fashion:

"I haven't seen the videos but read a report on them." then went on to talk about the editing in the videos or some such.

So, when a video like this comes out blowing the lid off how planned parenthood is harvesting organs of abortions for profit (abortion being their religion mind you ) the administration and Obama's biggest outrage are 'how the videos were edited' !

At least that's what I gleaned from this lackey's double speak.

Post: #45

(07-22-2015 03:23 PM)robreke Wrote:  When the white house press secretary was questioned today regarding that recent video link of the planned parenthood doctor(ette) proudly talking about how organs are harvested from aborted kids, he said in typical soulless milque toast fashion:

"I haven't seen the videos but read a report on them." then went on to talk about the editing in the videos or some such.

So, when a video like this comes out blowing the lid off how planned parenthood is harvesting organs of abortions for profit (abortion being their religion mind you ) the administration and Obama's biggest outrage are 'how the videos were edited' !

At least that's what I gleaned from this lackey's double speak.

When caught with something this insidious, liberals claim it's edited or debunked or attack the video maker - all while praying like hell that you don't watch it for yourself.

Post: #46

If a fetus is nothing more then a "parasite" sucking the life out of a woman and not deserving of personhood, then it should make no difference what it is used for. I would respect PP more and give them points for being internally consistent if they will come out and admit that.

Post: #47

This is just recycling body parts. Perhaps some of the recycled body parts saved another child's life that otherwise could not have been saved. Or perhaps the tissue is being used on biological testing for new cures or genomic testing. What's the harm in that?

If I had to guess if a woman desired that her aborted fetus not be resold than any clinic would honor that desire.

It's not as if the abortion occurred BECAUSE the fetus parts need to be resold but quite the opposite. I don't see the outrage at all with this. This tissue is being used to save lives!

Same is true for when you give blood. For every pint of blood that you give, the blood donation center flips it for about $120 yet you gave it for free.

Post: #48

^ Mods, is advocating baby mongering a reportable offense?

Post: #49

I agree with monster. I don't understand the outrage. At least the dead fetus is going towards something other than the trash can.

I'm all about hating on trashy feminist programs, but give outrage where it is due. They shouldn't sell the tissues.

Make no mistake about it, i'm pro-life after having gone through such an experience with a past ex. Note to everyone here, if a woman gets pregnant while taking a pill it's because she wanted it to happen. No woman forgets to take birth control.

Post: #50

(07-22-2015 04:25 PM)monster Wrote:  This is just recycling body parts. Perhaps some of the recycled body parts saved another child's life that otherwise could not have been saved. Or perhaps the tissue is being used on biological testing for new cures or genomic testing. What's the harm in that?

If I had to guess if a woman desired that her aborted fetus not be resold than any clinic would honor that desire.

It's not as if the abortion occurred BECAUSE the fetus parts need to be resold but quite the opposite. I don't see the outrage at all with this. This tissue is being used to save lives!

Same is true for when you give blood. For every pint of blood that you give, the blood donation center flips it for about $120 yet you gave it for free.

I do see the point here. I was actually talking to my dad recently who is uber pro life socially conservative, and he was making this same point (though not denying how disturbing it is).

Regardless, you do see the difference between selling dead people's organs or donated blood, and selling dead fetuses?