Post: #65901

Deepdiver,

Since you asked about it, The PAC can be found here. https://larouchepac.com/

I haven't done any research yet but my initial impression is that they support some good ideas but might be focused too much on ideology. It doesn't seem to be a pure pro-Trump PAC, but the website supports him greatly.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyndon_LaRouche

Lyndon LaRouche has been a crank on the political scene since the 60's. He's run for president a number of times, and has always been considered a fringe candidate, similar to Ron Paul.

In the past, I've mostly dismissed him, but I bet if I take the time to review his platform and writings now, I'll find a lot of them are close to my current neomasculine and nationalist beliefs. It's interesting that he has followers out in public pushing pro-Trump materials like this.

Edit: I just read some of the wiki link. He has a considerably checkered past. He's really kind of a nut job, but I imagine he was right about some things from our point of view, at least some of the time. I wouldn't contribute money to his PAC.

.....

Yeah the LaRouche people I have seen in NH tend to be either retired or unable to hold a steady job - not the RVF men of Action here who know real on the ground Game, not just game theory.

So no I would not donate to LaRouchies... will look for better active focused Defend America & CiC Trump PACs...

Post: #65902

AManLikePutin Wrote:Yesterday evening, I was sitting on a bench at a park, sunglasses on, reading a Nassim Taleb book, as two blonde girls (6.5 territory, WB) in their early 20s came and sat at the chair nearby. They were speaking loudly, so I couldn't help but overhear their conversation.

You didn't fire back?

Post: #65903

(06-16-2017 09:19 AM)Fast Eddie Wrote:  Regardless of whether Trump continues cucking or rediscovers his ballsack the demographics are already baked in. Stack your cash and prepare to abandon ship. Or happily meme yourself to sleep while the ship sinks for all I care.

Yeah, but fucking where? I left the States for Europe a few years ago and it's even more liberal over here. Wasn't planning on staying, just wanted to see the lands of my ancestors before Islam takes over. Asia is a non-option given that you'll never be accepted. Australia and New Zealand are also increasingly turning liberal. So we're basically SOL - there are few places left to run. I better start learning Polish or Hungarian...

Post: #65904

(06-16-2017 10:45 AM)AManLikePutin Wrote:  Yesterday evening, I was sitting on a bench at a park, sunglasses on, reading a Nassim Taleb book, as two blonde girls (6.5 territory, WB) in their early 20s came and sat at the chair nearby. They were speaking loudly, so I couldn't help but overhear their conversation. During the 15 minutes that I was seated next to them (as they were eating burgers and chips, UGH). A brief summary of some of the stuff they said:

"I think if Hillary were a man and had a dick, she would have won in a landslide"

"I want a woman president. I don't care who!"

"If he (Trump) could take away all our rights, he would. I bet Melania is miserable. Their sex life must suck !"

"Women like Laura Ingraham are the reason we don't have equal rights as men and no equal pay"

"Ah, I really envy Iceland. Gay pride is like a family holiday there. Imagine! How awesome!! I'm trying to talk my boyfriend into taking me there for a trip"

"Have you seen Newt Gingrich blame Alexandria shooting on Liberals ? Typical old white man. Ha, it's your own medicine of no gun control bitch !!"

These days every time I listen to ANY group of women < 40 years gossip with each other I feel like my IQ dropped by several points just by exposure. I'm glad I'm not in the market anymore or I'd probably jump out a window. Really don't miss you young bucks...

Post: #65905

That tweet contains a link to a news story that a truck bearing the American flag and a Make America Great Again sticker was fired upon by two men (one Black, one Latino).

Post: #65906

Trump just told the Cubans to GTFO. No further investment until there are no political prisoners, free elections, and all that jazz. Wow! That schmuck Obama must be FUMING

#MUHLEGACY

Post: #65907

(06-16-2017 01:53 PM)LEMONed IScream Wrote:  Trump just told the Cubans to GTFO. No further investment until there are no political prisoners, free elections, and all that jazz. Wow! That schmuck Obama must be FUMING

#MUHLEGACY

It's a meissing. This is just a sign of how disoriented and lost the Trump Admin is now. Yes, I know Trump was very vocal about Cuba in the campaign. Yes, I know the GOP has a large clientele in Florida, and so, has to save face before it. Yes, I know Trump has to keep a bravado image to push other issues. And, what is he getting in exchange? Does he really think this is going to bring 'democracy' to Cuba? Does he know that American companies have been waiting for the green light to take over the Cuban economy for years before the Chinese do? Does he really care about Cuba or Cubans aside from someday opening a Trump golf course in Varadero or Havana?
You can bring 'democracy' or 'American values' to Cuba easier by creating a tsunami of American tourists and investments to the island over night. And American men would appreciate in they can go to Cuba without restrictions to pick up some Cuban pussy before it's too late.
Anyway, I guess President Trump right now is more concerned about selling weapons to Qatar... Wait! Isn't that a country accused by Trump himself of financing terrorism?

Post: #65908

(06-16-2017 12:25 PM)Ghost Tiger Wrote:  

I don't know about you, but the conclusion I'm getting from this chart is that there's a staggering number of retards of every race.

Post: #65909

(06-16-2017 08:34 AM)Turnus Wrote:  

There's an alternative deeper interpretation to president Trump's tweet here.

Robert Mueller is supposedly trying to trigger impeachment hearings, because the Trump-Russia investigation has borne no fruit. If Trump fires Mueller, that triggers (or strongly motivates) impeachment hearings.

So President Trump's tweet is letting Mueller know, that he knows what the game is - and that he's not going to play along.

This forces the democrats and congress to continue to strong play the Trump-Russia connection, which has borne no fruit.

Post: #65910

(06-16-2017 02:40 PM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  

(06-16-2017 12:25 PM)Ghost Tiger Wrote:  

I don't know about you, but the conclusion I'm getting from this chart is that there's a staggering number of retards of every race.

MPAI (Most People Are Idiots)

Post: #65911

(06-16-2017 01:53 PM)LEMONed IScream Wrote:  Trump just told the Cubans to GTFO. No further investment until there are no political prisoners, free elections, and all that jazz. Wow! That schmuck Obama must be FUMING

#MUHLEGACY

Some of you really have no clue how Cuba works.

Post: #65912

Fast Eddie Wrote:Trump is all tweet no action.

And you are Ann Coulter.

Scott Adams points out that this election was so emotionally energizing that many citizens are deeply engaged in government for the first time in decades. This means that many people have ignorant expectations of what President Trump (or, literally, President Anyone) can do.

For example, Ann Coulter tweeted out something like, "Days Spent Constructing The Wall = zero!" The Wall is a public works project, using public land. Therefore, the funding for it must be appropriated by Congress. But Congress can't vote on The Wall on its own; they can only vote on public works projects as part of the yearly budget appropriations meetings in September. Does Ann Coulter know this? Maybe, because she's stopped tweeting about it - but she sure as shit didn't know about this when she tweeted it!

Fast Eddie, your home country is Columbia. Whether that means you were born in America but fled to Colombia, or that you've never been to America, you're not as invested in America's future as those still living in America. And your knowledge base is just as impaired as that of any Columbian.

You've also already lived your own advice to, "Regardless of whether Trump continues cucking or rediscovers his ballsack the demographics are already baked in. Stack your cash and prepare to abandon ship." But continually commenting on Trump's Presidency isn't exactly bravely abandoning ship, is it?

Post: #65913

Post: #65914

   

Post: #65915

(06-16-2017 01:33 PM)redpillage Wrote:  

(06-16-2017 12:25 PM)Ghost Tiger Wrote:  

(06-16-2017 12:08 PM)Disco_Volante Wrote:  What do Mexicans think will happen when USA becomes latino-majority like all the regions they're fleeing from? You know, the shitty primitive places they're eager to leave.

Does it really not cross their minds ? goddamn

Damn interesting how the Asian distribution is a lot more platykurtic but at the same remains comparatively populated far into the 130+ range. Very impressive. Seeing this I actually hope that the Chinese succeed in taking over Africa.

I'm not deep like you guys. Could someone please explain this graph? How do you determine a Chinese invasion of Africa from it?

Is this just a joke?

Aloha!

Post: #65916

Leaving DACA in place is infuriating. Does anyone here think this is acceptable?

Post: #65917

(06-16-2017 04:52 PM)Kona Wrote:  

(06-16-2017 01:33 PM)redpillage Wrote:  

(06-16-2017 12:25 PM)Ghost Tiger Wrote:  

(06-16-2017 12:08 PM)Disco_Volante Wrote:  What do Mexicans think will happen when USA becomes latino-majority like all the regions they're fleeing from? You know, the shitty primitive places they're eager to leave.

Does it really not cross their minds ? goddamn

Damn interesting how the Asian distribution is a lot more platykurtic but at the same remains comparatively populated far into the 130+ range. Very impressive. Seeing this I actually hope that the Chinese succeed in taking over Africa.

I'm not deep like you guys. Could someone please explain this graph? How do you determine a Chinese invasion of Africa from it?

Is this just a joke?

Aloha!

The Chinese invasion of Africa is discussed on right wing political boards. Like the pollution of China and India regarding the cancelation of the Paris Climate Accord, liberals remain completely ignorant of China's plan to settle 100 million Chinese people into Africa. Liberals will only begin to understand how scary that is when the first reports of mass genocide are released, and when that day happens, I'm going to ask Tariq Nasheed over twitter whether he thinks Chinese Supremacy is a real thing, and whether the mostly-White (and therefore white supremacist) American military should fight it.

Post: #65918

(06-16-2017 04:54 PM)Thomas Jackson Wrote:  Leaving DACA in place is infuriating. Does anyone here think this is acceptable?

As I've pointed out to Fast Eddie, President Trump can't repeal DACA because the 9th Circuit Court will declare that illegal. Yes, the Supreme Court could then rule on it, but the Court is only 5-4 in our favor. Why not wait until Ruth Bader Ginsberg dies to create a 6-3 majority, instead of repealing DACA now?

Post: #65919

(06-16-2017 05:13 PM)MMX2010 Wrote:  The Chinese invasion of Africa is discussed on right wing political boards. Like the pollution of China and India regarding the cancelation of the Paris Climate Accord, liberals remain completely ignorant of China's plan to settle 100 million Chinese people into Africa. Liberals will only begin to understand how scary that is when the first reports of mass genocide are released, and when that day happens, I'm going to ask Tariq Nasheed over twitter whether he thinks Chinese Supremacy is a real thing, and whether the mostly-White (and therefore white supremacist) American military should fight it.

OK. So how does this graph relate? I'm very confused.

Aloha!

Post: #65920

(06-16-2017 05:13 PM)MMX2010 Wrote:  Liberals will only begin to understand how scary that is when the first reports of mass genocide are released, and when that day happens, I'm going to ask Tariq Nasheed over twitter whether he thinks Chinese Supremacy is a real thing, and whether the mostly-White (and therefore white supremacist) American military should fight it.

That probably won't happen. Genocide is not a Chinese thing. Assimilation is more to it. The Chinese will sinicize the Africans like they're doing to the Tibetans and that's it. The Chinese are happy to intermarry with suitable individuals from any race, from French to Mozambican. Chinese in general are not concerned with genetic purity like the Jews and White Supremacists are.

Robots are going to replace low-skilled workers, and those unable to find work in the new automated economy will be sent to Africa to grow food, build their clans and sinicize the natives. That's how the Chinese government approaches this problem.

Post: #65921

(06-16-2017 07:10 PM)Kona Wrote:  

(06-16-2017 05:13 PM)MMX2010 Wrote:  The Chinese invasion of Africa is discussed on right wing political boards. Like the pollution of China and India regarding the cancelation of the Paris Climate Accord, liberals remain completely ignorant of China's plan to settle 100 million Chinese people into Africa. Liberals will only begin to understand how scary that is when the first reports of mass genocide are released, and when that day happens, I'm going to ask Tariq Nasheed over twitter whether he thinks Chinese Supremacy is a real thing, and whether the mostly-White (and therefore white supremacist) American military should fight it.

OK. So how does this graph relate? I'm very confused.

Aloha!

It doesn't, in my opinion, because Blacks are listed with an, average IQ of 85, but African blacks have an average IQ of 70. The Chinese average IQ, listed under "Asian" is comparable to average Chinese IQ.

105 minus 70 is 35 IQ points. Holy shit, is that a lot. In America, if you have an IQ of 100, you're smarter than half the population. But if you go back to an IQ of 80, you're only smarter than 5% of the population. If you can envision a line with 144.2 million people on it, that's how many people represent the difference between a 100 IQ and an 80 IQ.

There's no fucking way that the African people can meaningfully learn to co-exist with the Chinese. Not in an economic sense, when the Chinese are the only people qualified for Chinese-created jobs.

Long story short, phase one of the Chinese plan is to send managers to run a bunch of factories. After that, wave after wave of Chinese citizens will flood Africa and displace those Africans from those factory jobs.

In 1960, before a bunch of technology artificially increased the African population, there were only 267 million people living there. So 100 million Chinese represents about 40% of the natural carrying capacity of Africa.

It would be shitty for the Europeans if the Chinese merely displaced the Africans, because then those Africans would move to Europe and America. And it would be arguably shittier from a humanistic perspective, if the Chinese "merely" executed these Africans on site.

But there is no way President Trump, nor President Anyone, could prevent China from moving that many people into Africa. (Though it would be amusing for liberals to say that America is a nation of immigrants enriched by the presence of so much hard-working Mexicans, but Africa *WOULD NOT* be enriched by the presence of so many hard-working Chinese. We could troll leftists further by saying that the Chinese only seek to perform jobs that the Africans literally cannot.)

Without the moral authority, nor military presence to prevent mass Chinese immigration into Africa, Africa is totally fucked. Totally and utterly.

Post: #65922

The Chinese are just taking full advantage of their massive population and doing what they have done best throughout history: assimilating and sinicizing everyone, turning every place they touch into a part of the Sinophere.

Pakistan is feeling more and more like a Chinatown

Analysis: Russia's Far East Turning Chinese

Post: #65923

It was created via executive action how can the 9th circuit even review the reversal of it? That would imply a president cannot reverse executive actions of a previous president.

(06-16-2017 05:15 PM)MMX2010 Wrote:  

(06-16-2017 04:54 PM)Thomas Jackson Wrote:  Leaving DACA in place is infuriating. Does anyone here think this is acceptable?

As I've pointed out to Fast Eddie, President Trump can't repeal DACA because the 9th Circuit Court will declare that illegal. Yes, the Supreme Court could then rule on it, but the Court is only 5-4 in our favor. Why not wait until Ruth Bader Ginsberg dies to create a 6-3 majority, instead of repealing DACA now?

Post: #65924

Thomas Jackson where have you been brother? It does not matter how a policy came into existence, someone can and will sue in the 9th circuit and they will rule on it, putting a block in place that stands until it goes to Supreme Court.

What you are - correctly - saying can't or shouldn't happen has already been happening, and it will continue to.

Post: #65925

(06-16-2017 07:59 PM)Thomas Jackson Wrote:  It was created via executive action how can the 9th circuit even review the reversal of it? That would imply a president cannot reverse executive actions of a previous president.

I don't want to be rude, but I wish you had asked (about six months ago), "How could the 9th Circuit Court, or any court for that matter, use the campaign statements of a presidential candidate, or his campaign team (!), to magically imply the intent of a law?"

Because if you had, you would know "how" the 9th Circuit Court would declare illegal President Trump's removal of DACA.