Trump fighting the swamp. I loved the Elizabeth Warren face when he hits her.

(01-12-2019 01:26 AM)Sherman Wrote:  

(01-12-2019 01:03 AM)BaatumMania Wrote:  I've seen some evidence over the years that Indian people seem to upset western people a lot more than Mexicans. Mexicans are really just Amerindians (which the west already has) who got brainwashed into a Spanish colonial culture.

Indian people on the other hand (despite good English and some British rule) bring 5,000 years of culture that is just so fundamentally alien (female circumcision and infanticide, super retarded thirsty about sex, pushing obesity = beautiful, Hinduism that none understands) and their food sucks too.

At the end of the day the better group to target for immigration would be Eastern Europeans. I remember some BBC article saying that 50% of Hungarian adults are unemployed (unless they are doing black market jobs) and many possess degrees. Thing is they need a screening process to check for things like English competency or else you're going to end up with a bunch of Magyar speakers trapped in McDonalds as a new serf class.

But the way the west immigration is setup: 99% of immigrants are either Mexican, Indian or Chinese (hyperbole but feels that way in person). It sucks so bad.

Most of your objections is to Muslim culture. The Hindus are mostly Trump supporters, which may be why Trump is agreeable to letting them in. Hinduism is Indo-European and has much more in common with people of European descent than the Semite religions of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. Sanskrit and English are directly related. The Norse and Hindu gods came from the same source. Julius Evola has written a lot on this subject.

This is not remotely accurate. Indians are 80% dems and highly insular. They also are the highest earning ethnicity, while also getting minority set aside federal contracts and gaming the system. No more.

(01-11-2019 09:38 PM)Dismal Operator Wrote:  Meanwhile Bolton's original bullshit from last weekend was taken as Gospel. Then he went to Turkey and got BTFO, and tellingly Trump let him twist in the wind, not saying a word about it. Most of the evidence of Trump cucking or being a "conman" relies on one taking gaslighting articles from shitlib media outlets to heart. The latest one is that story EVERY ONE OF THEM is running with about the wall prototypes being penetrable with a hand saw or something.

The guy is effectively playing a lone hand attempting to affect change from within a system which as been fucked for at least 70 years. I'll cut him some slack for not changing it all by himself in under 2 years, especially having made some huge mistakes. Oil tankers first have to slow down and turn around before even facing the right direction, and take miles to do either. If your view is that we don't have enough time for that, then it was already too late even in 2016 and by now you should be prepared for whatever you think is coming next, and be happy that we're at least getting a few extra years to get ready.

Bolton had the audacity to tell Erdogan to make peace with and leave the Kurds alone in Syria and Iraq. Bolton also visited Israel prior to this to formulate a plan. Erdogan told him to get lost.

Since Israel knows the US troop pull out is coming they have increased bombing runs into Syria. Just yesterday they conducted bombing runs on SAA and Iranian targets inside Syria.

Turkey has moved thousands of troops, tanks, APCS, trucks, artillery pieces and logistical pieces to its border with Syria.

What we could be witnessing is a silent conflict that could blow up big time this year. When the weather improves we always see conflict arise as its easier to operate in.

I do wonder what Israel and Bolton have planned.

^^^

Where Hindu culture goes I've found the shittier aspects of Indian culture generally go with it and dominate. Visit Mauritius one of these days; it has a massive indigenous Indian population because the British used indentured servants (i.e. had a point at which their slavery ended) to do their manual labour rather than the traditional African slaves. The Indians have basically taken over the place and in about six generations turned it into India on a tropical island: resorts run by multinationals are pools of luxury in a sea of shit. No wife burnings and no caste system obviously in place, but the buildings are identical and the feel of the place is identical to Calcutta.

(01-12-2019 02:01 AM)MrLemon Wrote:  THE TEETH! THE TEETH! HELP HELP!



Please God save us from these alien teeth monsters. They want to grind us all up in their HUGE molars. I can't stop...looking at them...

(01-12-2019 09:51 AM)Syberpunk Wrote:  

(01-12-2019 02:01 AM)MrLemon Wrote:  THE TEETH! THE TEETH! HELP HELP!



Please God save us from these alien teeth monsters. They want to grind us all up in their HUGE molars. I can't stop...looking at them...

[img][/img]

(01-12-2019 01:03 AM)BaatumMania Wrote:  I've seen some evidence over the years that Indian people seem to upset western people a lot more than Mexicans. Mexicans are really just Amerindians (which the west already has) who got brainwashed into a Spanish colonial culture.

Indian people on the other hand (despite good English and some British rule) bring 5,000 years of culture that is just so fundamentally alien (female circumcision and infanticide, super retarded thirsty about sex, pushing obesity = beautiful, Hinduism that none understands) and their food sucks too.

At the end of the day the better group to target for immigration would be Eastern Europeans. I remember some BBC article saying that 50% of Hungarian adults are unemployed (unless they are doing black market jobs) and many possess degrees. Thing is they need a screening process to check for things like English competency or else you're going to end up with a bunch of Magyar speakers trapped in McDonalds as a new serf class.

But the way the west immigration is setup: 99% of immigrants are either Mexican, Indian or Chinese (hyperbole but feels that way in person). It sucks so bad.

Female circumcision isn't part of Indian culture.

British Indian living in the US here...I think there's way to many Indian IT cunts in the US. I deal with them a lot through work and the vast majority are useless.

I would be for a ban on south Indian IT nerds with their shitty food and ugly women.

I don't know why so many RVF's have a hard on for Eastern Europeans. A lot of them are trash - why do you think the UK voted for Brexit? In UK the Polish do the jobs that the Mexicans do in the US - they're cooks, builders and cleaners. The street that I grew up in the UK turned to shit when the Indians and Italians moved out and the Polish and trashy white British moved in.

Hot take coming up:

Indians have been chosen by the (((elite))) to be their upper caste middlemen to deal with the white cattle class.

Indians are good for this purpose for several reasons:

1) They are very nationalistic and overconfident in their ethnicity and country. They share this with their masters as both are new countries.

2) They are fundamentally clannish and unlikely to outmarry. This makes them more stable long term over someone like blacks or east asians who tend to intermarry a lot more.

3) They are very status driven and look down on lower classes. An indian of some wealth and success will look down with venom on those less fortunate. Just see their country for examples. Absolutely no sense of responsibility for the unfortunate (lower caste).

4) They are able to outwardly integrate while staying inwardly separate. Again, just like their masters.

This put together, makes them the perfect bureaucrat class to deal with the pesky whites.

^Didn’t the British do this with Indians in Africa and the Caribbean, as well as the French with Lebanese traders? I guess history does repeat itself.

(01-12-2019 07:16 PM)scotian Wrote:  ^Didn’t the British do this with Indians in Africa and the Caribbean, as well as the French with Lebanese traders? I guess history does repeat itself.

Yes, definitely, no doubt inspired by the caste system in India and how effective it was in ruling a massive population.

It's worth keeping in mind that the "British" at the time were already heavily infiltrated.

Cecil Rhodes, who gave the name to Rhodesia (later Zimbabwe), was financed by the Rothschilds, who also started the De Beers diamond company. Likewise, the jews were there to profit from opium (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Sassoon) and slaves to the colonies from West Africa.

I've read that this was actually why the British didn't fight back when the colonies wanted independence. The colonies weren't profitable for the actual empire. The profits were taken by independent traders, while the british empire got stuck with the bill of admin and military.

When the british still kept on this rather unprofitable business of colonies, then it was for ideological reasons ("White Man's Burden"), which is not that different from the US population being goaded into "spreading democracy" while the same people profit from the war trade.

He's got a point

(01-12-2019 02:01 AM)MrLemon Wrote:  THE TEETH! THE TEETH! HELP HELP!



Please God save us from these alien teeth monsters. They want to grind us all up in their HUGE molars. I can't stop...looking at them...

Since people are posting Aliens and Predators, this is appropriate:

(01-12-2019 09:00 PM)eradicator Wrote:  


He's got a point

Won't happen because the cartels are in bed with the CIA; according to some ex-CIA "contractors", on one occasion they outright murdered a DEA agent because he was messing with their business.

But never mind the connections to government. Per the DEA itself, the US financial services industry -- that is to say, the banks -- are involved in the money laundering by which the cartels move cash in and out of the US. Were the cartels declared terrorist organisations, it could result in seizures from some of the biggest US firms around, and who knows how big those monetary amounts would be.

Point being, it'll be a white Christmas in Hell before any US bank's lobbyists ever allow such a declaration to get through Congress - or allow Trump to do something like that. It would not surprise me if Trump did propose such a measure, he'd have a call from his own past (or present) US bank associates to say "You do this, and your entire family can forget ever getting a loan for one of your speculative real estate ventures ever again." Even if he is genuinely trying to save America -- and I really have doubts that he is -- Trump has two very big weaknesses: his need to be popular and his family, be it either their silly policy whisperings in his ear or threats to their continuing richdom.

A thing about Indians going overwhelmingly Democrat, the reason you actually see this with Indians as well as most Asian and even immigrant groups in general is because they usually settle in major cities and heavily blue places such as a San Francisco, New Jersey or Seattle. As we are all too familiar with, liberals are pretty good at using all under-handed tactics possible to get you to vote for their men no matter what color you are, they want to keep you on their plantation. We saw what happened with Kanye once he decided to show some respect to Trump.

When you are an immigrant to a new land, to some degree you are trying to assimilate and want to be get on the good side of the locals. You don't want the liberals to start targeting you for being too independent and actually voting for what you believe in. As an immigrant, you don't have that much power so you go with the flow. Add to that the fact that Asian culture in general is not too big on going against the grain, only the Vietnamese vote Republican due to the circumstances they come to the US in (similar to the Cubans).

I have not known too many Indians that have voted Republicans and those that did were definitely ostracized, not just from Indians but also other minorities and to an extent whites. In most immigrant groups and Indians in particular, there is a heavy need to fit in, a lot of focus on how others see you and a desperation to maintain the status quo than thinking outside of the box. Unfortunately, more Indian immigrants does mean more votes for the Democrats.

As for Indians being "insular", give it a generation or two and that goes away. Most Indians I knew who were born and raised in the United States definitely gave interracial dating a try. I think statistics out there will show that Indians born in the US have a significantly higher rate of interracial marriage than those who are first gen, especially the women. FWIW, I have found being Indian myself that South Asian and Middle Eastern women born in the west are the least receptive to me and often the most hostile. Matt Forney's glorious hit piece on Indian women was quite accurate.

I'd be on board for us bringing in more Eastern Europeans, overwhelmingly the women. When other countries send us their people, we want them sending the sexiest ones too. Say what you want about Eastern Europe and the Slavs but they do produce some damn gorgeous women!

(01-12-2019 06:37 PM)WalterBlack Wrote:  

(01-12-2019 01:03 AM)BaatumMania Wrote:  I've seen some evidence over the years that Indian people seem to upset western people a lot more than Mexicans. Mexicans are really just Amerindians (which the west already has) who got brainwashed into a Spanish colonial culture.

Indian people on the other hand (despite good English and some British rule) bring 5,000 years of culture that is just so fundamentally alien (female circumcision and infanticide, super retarded thirsty about sex, pushing obesity = beautiful, Hinduism that none understands) and their food sucks too.

At the end of the day the better group to target for immigration would be Eastern Europeans. I remember some BBC article saying that 50% of Hungarian adults are unemployed (unless they are doing black market jobs) and many possess degrees. Thing is they need a screening process to check for things like English competency or else you're going to end up with a bunch of Magyar speakers trapped in McDonalds as a new serf class.

But the way the west immigration is setup: 99% of immigrants are either Mexican, Indian or Chinese (hyperbole but feels that way in person). It sucks so bad.

Female circumcision isn't part of Indian culture.

British Indian living in the US here...I think there's way to many Indian IT cunts in the US. I deal with them a lot through work and the vast majority are useless.

I would be for a ban on south Indian IT nerds with their shitty food and ugly women.

I don't know why so many RVF's have a hard on for Eastern Europeans. A lot of them are trash - why do you think the UK voted for Brexit? In UK the Polish do the jobs that the Mexicans do in the US - they're cooks, builders and cleaners. The street that I grew up in the UK turned to shit when the Indians and Italians moved out and the Polish and trashy white British moved in.

Because it's more politically correct to hate other white people than non-whites. If you shout: "kick out the Poles" then people would cheer. Do the same but instead say Blacks or Asians then you risk getting a mob beating or thrown into jail over a hate crime.

Trust me if there wasn't the political correction then people would be more open about kicking out the far worse groups. Poles might be competing for your plumbing jobs but Pakistanis are running grooming operations. East Asians are screwing with your real estate, bringing in fentanyl, running brothels (AMPs) and are more likely to take your Accountant / Lawyer job than a Pole.

(01-13-2019 04:01 AM)BaatumMania Wrote:  Because it's more politically correct to hate other white people than non-whites. If you shout: "kick out the Poles" then people would cheer. Do the same but instead say Blacks or Asians then you risk getting a mob beating or thrown into jail over a hate crime.

Trust me if there wasn't the political correction then people would be more open about kicking out the far worse groups. Poles might be competing for your plumbing jobs but Pakistanis are running grooming operations. East Asians are screwing with your real estate, bringing in fentanyl, running brothels (AMPs) and are more likely to take your Accountant / Lawyer job than a Pole.

This might shock you, but most white British people in general do not like eastern Europeans, especially gypsies. They'll get along better with a British raised black or Indian than a Pole. They were OK with Muslims until 9/11. Working class whites and blacks are have basically blended in now. The number of East Asians in the UK is tiny, they're not on most people's radar.

(01-13-2019 04:43 AM)WalterBlack Wrote:  

(01-13-2019 04:01 AM)BaatumMania Wrote:  Because it's more politically correct to hate other white people than non-whites. If you shout: "kick out the Poles" then people would cheer. Do the same but instead say Blacks or Asians then you risk getting a mob beating or thrown into jail over a hate crime.

Trust me if there wasn't the political correction then people would be more open about kicking out the far worse groups. Poles might be competing for your plumbing jobs but Pakistanis are running grooming operations. East Asians are screwing with your real estate, bringing in fentanyl, running brothels (AMPs) and are more likely to take your Accountant / Lawyer job than a Pole.

This might shock you, but most white British people in general do not like eastern Europeans, especially gypsies. They'll get along better with a British raised black or Indian than a Pole. They were OK with Muslims until 9/11. Working class whites and blacks are have basically blended in now. The number of East Asians in the UK is tiny, they're not on most people's radar.

No one views Gypsies as white and even Eastern Europeans view them as outsiders. This likely falls into a straw man or a red herring fallacy. So that "point" of yours is enough for people to disregard anything you're writing here.

Also you're not getting my point on political correction / brainwashing. If there wasn't that stuff then people would had chased out the Indians and Africans decades ago.

(01-13-2019 04:49 AM)BaatumMania Wrote:  

(01-13-2019 04:43 AM)WalterBlack Wrote:  

(01-13-2019 04:01 AM)BaatumMania Wrote:  Because it's more politically correct to hate other white people than non-whites. If you shout: "kick out the Poles" then people would cheer. Do the same but instead say Blacks or Asians then you risk getting a mob beating or thrown into jail over a hate crime.

Trust me if there wasn't the political correction then people would be more open about kicking out the far worse groups. Poles might be competing for your plumbing jobs but Pakistanis are running grooming operations. East Asians are screwing with your real estate, bringing in fentanyl, running brothels (AMPs) and are more likely to take your Accountant / Lawyer job than a Pole.

This might shock you, but most white British people in general do not like eastern Europeans, especially gypsies. They'll get along better with a British raised black or Indian than a Pole. They were OK with Muslims until 9/11. Working class whites and blacks are have basically blended in now. The number of East Asians in the UK is tiny, they're not on most people's radar.

No one views Gypsies as white and even Eastern Europeans view them as outsiders. This likely falls into a straw man or a red herring fallacy. So that "point" of yours is enough for people to disregard anything you're writing here.

Also you're not getting my point on political correction / brainwashing. If there wasn't that stuff then people would had chased out the Indians and Africans decades ago.

I never said gypsies are white - they're originally from India...even if I didn't include gypsies, my comment still stands.

By the way, have you ever been to UK? Do you have a connection to it? I was there 2 weeks ago.

(01-13-2019 01:15 AM)Paracelsus Wrote:  

(01-12-2019 09:00 PM)eradicator Wrote:  


He's got a point

Won't happen because the cartels are in bed with the CIA; according to some ex-CIA "contractors", on one occasion they outright murdered a DEA agent because he was messing with their business.

But never mind the connections to government. Per the DEA itself, the US financial services industry -- that is to say, the banks -- are involved in the money laundering by which the cartels move cash in and out of the US. Were the cartels declared terrorist organisations, it could result in seizures from some of the biggest US firms around, and who knows how big those monetary amounts would be.

Point being, it'll be a white Christmas in Hell before any US bank's lobbyists ever allow such a declaration to get through Congress - or allow Trump to do something like that. It would not surprise me if Trump did propose such a measure, he'd have a call from his own past (or present) US bank associates to say "You do this, and your entire family can forget ever getting a loan for one of your speculative real estate ventures ever again." Even if he is genuinely trying to save America -- and I really have doubts that he is -- Trump has two very big weaknesses: his need to be popular and his family, be it either their silly policy whisperings in his ear or threats to their continuing richdom.

If that is trues (banks, cartel, CIA, etc.) that is really a damn shame.

I feel that when someone becomes President, they should be the first person to say "fuck it" and be willing to sacrifice themselves and their family for the future of this country.

Easy for me to say, as I sit in comfort in my residence being a Samaritan as well.

But shit man, I get tired of hearing people not do this shit and that shit because of connections, at some point you just gotta do a belly flop.

(01-12-2019 07:05 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  Hot take coming up:

Indians have been chosen by the (((elite))) to be their upper caste middlemen to deal with the white cattle class.

Indians are good for this purpose for several reasons:

1) They are very nationalistic and overconfident in their ethnicity and country. They share this with their masters as both are new countries.

2) They are fundamentally clannish and unlikely to outmarry. This makes them more stable long term over someone like blacks or east asians who tend to intermarry a lot more.

3) They are very status driven and look down on lower classes. An indian of some wealth and success will look down with venom on those less fortunate. Just see their country for examples. Absolutely no sense of responsibility for the unfortunate (lower caste).

4) They are able to outwardly integrate while staying inwardly separate. Again, just like their masters.

This put together, makes them the perfect bureaucrat class to deal with the pesky whites.

Indians were a very important part of the British empire. They were shipped around the globe and used as mid level clerks and bureaucrats, roles that they were perfectly suited for.

Gandhi himself was a lawyer in South Africa before returning to India. He didn't have a particularly good opinion of the black Africans in South Africa.

(01-13-2019 05:12 AM)Brother Abdul Majeed Wrote:  

(01-12-2019 07:05 PM)nomadbrah Wrote:  Hot take coming up:

Indians have been chosen by the (((elite))) to be their upper caste middlemen to deal with the white cattle class.

Indians are good for this purpose for several reasons:

1) They are very nationalistic and overconfident in their ethnicity and country. They share this with their masters as both are new countries.

2) They are fundamentally clannish and unlikely to outmarry. This makes them more stable long term over someone like blacks or east asians who tend to intermarry a lot more.

3) They are very status driven and look down on lower classes. An indian of some wealth and success will look down with venom on those less fortunate. Just see their country for examples. Absolutely no sense of responsibility for the unfortunate (lower caste).

4) They are able to outwardly integrate while staying inwardly separate. Again, just like their masters.

This put together, makes them the perfect bureaucrat class to deal with the pesky whites.

Indians were a very important part of the British empire. They were shipped around the globe and used as mid level clerks and bureaucrats, roles that they were perfectly suited for.

Gandhi himself was a lawyer in South Africa before returning to India. He didn't have a particularly good opinion of the black Africans in South Africa.

In some ways India is a Southasian equivalent to Brazil (minus an extremely different overall culture). It's really an amalgamation of multiple ethnic subtypes & subcultures rolled up into one very crowded subcontinent. Ton of wealth in its upper-middle & upper spectrum but it's a bit of a different story as you get further down the totem pole. They call those nations the BRIC nations after all (Brazil, Russia, India, China).

(01-13-2019 04:01 AM)BaatumMania Wrote:  

(01-12-2019 06:37 PM)WalterBlack Wrote:  

(01-12-2019 01:03 AM)BaatumMania Wrote:  I've seen some evidence over the years that Indian people seem to upset western people a lot more than Mexicans. Mexicans are really just Amerindians (which the west already has) who got brainwashed into a Spanish colonial culture.

Indian people on the other hand (despite good English and some British rule) bring 5,000 years of culture that is just so fundamentally alien (female circumcision and infanticide, super retarded thirsty about sex, pushing obesity = beautiful, Hinduism that none understands) and their food sucks too.

At the end of the day the better group to target for immigration would be Eastern Europeans. I remember some BBC article saying that 50% of Hungarian adults are unemployed (unless they are doing black market jobs) and many possess degrees. Thing is they need a screening process to check for things like English competency or else you're going to end up with a bunch of Magyar speakers trapped in McDonalds as a new serf class.

But the way the west immigration is setup: 99% of immigrants are either Mexican, Indian or Chinese (hyperbole but feels that way in person). It sucks so bad.

Female circumcision isn't part of Indian culture.

British Indian living in the US here...I think there's way to many Indian IT cunts in the US. I deal with them a lot through work and the vast majority are useless.

I would be for a ban on south Indian IT nerds with their shitty food and ugly women.

I don't know why so many RVF's have a hard on for Eastern Europeans. A lot of them are trash - why do you think the UK voted for Brexit? In UK the Polish do the jobs that the Mexicans do in the US - they're cooks, builders and cleaners. The street that I grew up in the UK turned to shit when the Indians and Italians moved out and the Polish and trashy white British moved in.

Because it's more politically correct to hate other white people than non-whites. If you shout: "kick out the Poles" then people would cheer. Do the same but instead say Blacks or Asians then you risk getting a mob beating or thrown into jail over a hate crime.

Trust me if there wasn't the political correction then people would be more open about kicking out the far worse groups. Poles might be competing for your plumbing jobs but Pakistanis are running grooming operations. East Asians are screwing with your real estate, bringing in fentanyl, running brothels (AMPs) and are more likely to take your Accountant / Lawyer job than a Pole.

Speaking of Poles, the Poles & Polish-Americans I met & befriended in the Chicago area when I used to live there were some of the best people I ever met, period. If Poles are representative of those gentlemen & beautiful women, I'd say bring a few more of them in!

They fully embrace our way of life & add to the culture (at least I can say that about the people I personally have known).

We don't need more immigrants, even immigrants who "fully embrace our way of life & add to the culture."

Poles need to stay in their country instead of destabilizing and gutting the middle class in western Europe. The EU should be dismantled, and tariffs set up on Eastern Europe to account for their second world socio-economic structure.

US emigration is a different subjects, Poles make a great addition to the north American population, unlike the hordes of tens of millions of low-education illegals that have streamed unchecked for decades from the southern border.

I'm not fundamentally anti-Mexican, but we already have 50 million central American immigrants, most of whom amnestied illegals and their chain migrants, or still illegal, and this number is set to double in the next 20-30 years, to the point where they will form the majority across the Southwest, and a sizeable minority even in states like Illinois or NC.

Part of the problem is that Mexico and Ctrl America have been destabilized by predatory neoliberal globalist policies like for example NAFTA where big agro destroyed small farming communities, precipitating northern mass migrations. Also you've had active political destabilization of countries like Honduras and Guatemala under Obama/Clinton (which were started under Reagan with despicable figures like Negroponte and Elliot Abrams), which have fueled the latest caravans, and set up violent narco-clepto regimes that have been gutting their countries.