Post: #451

^^Very sad. A couple of those girls have cute faces, if they lost some poundage then they'd be very attractive.

We need a good zombie apocalypse that will trim some of the fat on this world.

Team No More Truffle Shuffles!

Post: #452

Post: #453

(10-27-2017 10:12 AM)Remington Wrote:  ^^Very sad. A couple of those girls have cute faces, if they lost some poundage then they'd be very attractive.

We need a good zombie apocalypse that will trim some of the fat on this world.

Team No More Truffle Shuffles!

A 9 face and a 4 body produces a far less attractive girl.

And the funny part is that they are beginning to promote some "plus size" male models, but the same program would never ever work or be accepted if men demanded that women found fat men attractive:



Also keep in mind that men look less fat with the same bodymass than women and also that they can actually balance some negative sexual market aspects by being more charismatic, wealthy, famous (or mini-famous) etc. With women there is literally nothing they can logically do, but find the men who still find them attractive in their state. At least women can always find some thirsty bloke who will fuck the biggest monstrosity out there.

Post: #454

Google forced to remove Maps feature after huge online backlash from fat people



https://ageofshitlords.com/google-forced...fat-people

Quote:A Google maps feature used for directions which shows how many calories you could be burning if you choose to walk instead of driving has been taken down by Google after facing online backlash from social activists. While Google’s motives may have been to help users lose excess weight and stay in shape, Tumble Inc. interpreted it as an attempt to fat-shame women.

While using the Google maps app to navigate their way to their various destinations, users received fun facts from Google such as how many calories they would be burning if they were walking instead of driving, and the cupcake equivalent of those calories (How many cupcakes they would have had to have eaten to gain those calories).

As can be expected, the Social Justice/fat acceptance crowd wasn’t very happy with this, because the mere suggestion that people should stay healthy is fat-phobic, and health can be found at every size…. or something. Fat women were quick to go on Twitter to call out Google for shaming them.

Post: #455

(10-29-2017 04:07 AM)balybary Wrote:  Google forced to remove Maps feature after huge online backlash from fat people



https://ageofshitlords.com/google-forced...fat-people

Quote:A Google maps feature used for directions which shows how many calories you could be burning if you choose to walk instead of driving has been taken down by Google after facing online backlash from social activists. While Google’s motives may have been to help users lose excess weight and stay in shape, Tumble Inc. interpreted it as an attempt to fat-shame women.

While using the Google maps app to navigate their way to their various destinations, users received fun facts from Google such as how many calories they would be burning if they were walking instead of driving, and the cupcake equivalent of those calories (How many cupcakes they would have had to have eaten to gain those calories).

As can be expected, the Social Justice/fat acceptance crowd wasn’t very happy with this, because the mere suggestion that people should stay healthy is fat-phobic, and health can be found at every size…. or something. Fat women were quick to go on Twitter to call out Google for shaming them.

I guess the idea of simply not using the feature is unthinkable
to people like this. They just don`t have any concepts of
individual choice and liberty. It has to be their way or nothing.
If we`re really gonna descend into Fascism, then a good start
would be to ban cupcakes all together in the US.

   

Post: #456

(10-26-2017 10:18 PM)JayR Wrote:  

Absolutely brilliant!!!!

Post: #457

Seriously guys... the issue is worse than you may think. The average size of a woman in the USA is now 16. I will admit to not being as picky as most of you... but 16 is beyond what I will do. I mean we are at a point where the average woman needs to have her gut pushed out of the way so a man can find her pussy!!



Now, there are tons of lists out there trying to show that size 16 women are attractive. They use some lucky genetic specimens who model larger sized stuff. Here is the general body shape of size 16... no bullshit. Would you bang?

Post: #458

(10-29-2017 05:59 PM)EndsExpect Wrote:  

13 years ago, when my wife arrived in the USA, it was hell to find clothes that fit her. She is a real petite and we couldn't find petite clothes that would fit her. Everything was too damn big! Size '0' was what traditionally was a size 4.

Post: #459

Size sixteen isn't too bad if the girl is two metres tall.

Post: #460

(10-29-2017 08:26 PM)Transsimian Wrote:  Size sixteen isn't too bad if the girl is two metres tall.

I like tall girls.

I'm not going to complain about a 42' bust... but a 36' waist is kind of beefy.

Post: #461

Thanks for ruining my morning, guys. Thanks.

Post: #462

Great article by ROK contributor New Modern Man:

https://relampagofurioso.com/2017/11/18/...bie-brand/

And this is terrific - the female dichotomy in one picture:

   

What is healthy and empowering for a woman is very unhealthy and gross for a dog, a cat, a man, a male child. Women and female children can be as fat as they want.

Post: #463

Post: #464

Some of the garbage in this thread is real end of civilisation kind of stuff.

The OECD just released new data on fatties:

Post: #465

Obese Millennials Jeopardize America's Future: Study

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-11-30...cas-future

Quote:A new study from the New England Journal of Medicine indicates the current obesity epidemic trends in the United States are much worse than thought. The study was published on Wednesday and already has demographers, government officials, and scientist alarmed. The sobering report finds 57.3% of the nation’s children and teens will be obese by the age of 35 if the model continues.

Post: #466

(11-30-2017 03:46 PM)Dusty Wrote:  

Holy shit. I never knew they were real.

Post: #467

(11-30-2017 02:04 PM)Latinopan Wrote:  

Post: #468

(11-30-2017 04:02 PM)gework Wrote:  Some of the garbage in this thread is real end of civilisation kind of stuff.

The OECD just released new data on fatties:

And that there is just calculating obesity. You can double it for all the people who are simply 'overweight', which would put most western countries at well over 50%.

Post: #469

(11-30-2017 07:33 PM)realologist Wrote:  

(11-30-2017 03:46 PM)Dusty Wrote:  

Holy shit. I never knew they were real.

I knew it! I've seen her somewhere!

Post: #470

Quote:Those women that feel like they can have any man or have really high standards like the skinnies are as ill mentally as they are physically. Those blobs of cellulite needs to understand that good looking people attract other good looking people. Taking over two airplane seats with your fat sweaty ass is not attractive.

Its because men allow it. People tend to forget that those fatty/landwhales still get tons of messages from men. If those thirsty guys would stop messaging shit like: "omg girl never change you so hot", maybe my GYM would see lots of fat girls competing on the treadmill to get into a decent shape in the hope, to get a man. But no need in today's age. Even a fatty can fuck a 9 on Tinder from time to time.

Post: #471

Click on pic to see if it's truth or not

Post: #472

Bleech

Post: #473

Software shitposts well.

Post: #474

Overweight UK celebrity posts pics on Instagram:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/art...elfie.html



That same celeb photographed by paparazzi a few moments later displaying the actual state of the body:



It's like a microcosm of the SIF - the first pic is what you see online and then suddenly you meet the whale in the latter pic for your date.

Post: #475