Post: #151

(06-15-2015 07:09 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  Look at it this way. Which of the following would upset you more? You bed a black girl and she tells you:

1). She's really white.

2). She's really a man.

The second instance would easily bother all of us far more. And yet the media is telling us that's OK, but what she did isn't.

Buzz! Wrong answer! That does not compute! This does not make sense. Both race and sex have DNA aspects to them (ask anyone with a racially-directed disease like sickle cell anemia).

So if you can claim you're female, DNA notwithstanding, why can't you claim you're black, DNA notwithstanding?

Oh come on now. Genes for gender are held in an entirely different section of the DNA strand! You can't even compare the two.

Honestly, though, as it relates to DNA, gender is a much more fundamental piece than race. The 23rd chromosome is either XX or XY. Fairly black and white (no pun intended).

Post: #152

This story is the funniest thing on the internet I can ever remember.

"The NAACP official who today resigned in the face of evidence that she masqueraded as black once sued Howard University for denying her teaching posts and a scholarship because she was a white woman, The Smoking Gun has learned.

According to a Court of Appeals opinion, Dolezal's lawsuit “claimed discrimination based on race, pregnancy, family responsibilities and gender.” She alleged that Smith and other school officials improperly blocked her appointment to a teaching assistant post, rejected her application for a post-graduate instructorship, and denied her scholarship aid while she was a student...

The court opinion also noted that Dolezal claimed that the university’s decision to remove some of her artworks from a February 2001 student exhibition was “motivated by a discriminatory purpose to favor African-American students over” her.

As detailed in the court opinion, Dolezal’s lawsuit contended that Howard was “permeated with discriminatory intimidation, ridicule, and insult.”"

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/b...uit-786451

Post: #153

I'm sad that it came to this because she was obviously an asset to the organization if she was elected chapter president. Maybe she didn't need to go to the extreme of portraying herself as a black woman--although she looks about as black as any biracial person--she doesn't seem to have any trouble empathizing with the struggle. Not all black people have the same experiences growing up. I doubt the NAACP would turn their backs on children of the black 1%ers because they went to the best schools and never had to worry about the electricity or heat being shut off in their house a few days before Christmas. If someone is down for the NAACP they should be embraced, not shunned, regardless of their racial background. Everyone seems to forget that organization had more white founders than black ones.

Also, plenty of black people have sued Howard U., so I'm not going to hold that against her.

Post: #154

(06-15-2015 01:31 PM)El Chinito loco Wrote:  

(06-15-2015 01:16 PM)remembermyname Wrote:  

(06-15-2015 12:47 PM)El Chinito loco Wrote:  

(06-15-2015 12:35 PM)samsamsam Wrote:  Well she resigned.

What I thought was interesting was this concept of transracial. What was really interesting was the age groups of who was cool with it. No surprise.

Her parents seem top notch, I mean solid, calm and intelligent. Makes me a little sad knowing that sometimes, your kids will just be fuckheads.

The survey asked: Is it okay to be transracial?
18-24 - 100% Yes
25-34 - 40% Yes
35-54 - 25% Yes
55+ - 10% Yes

Obviously, didn't split it out by who actually participated - who they are, how they identify, etc.

18-24 - 100% Yes


Millenials are so fucked up.

Although it may be a basic survival necessity for asian-americans to be "transracial" in college applications in the future. It's time to brush up on spanish, perm and tease up the fro, and claim to be half black.

America's race relations are so jacked. The balkanization is coming.

So why would you need to

"brush up on spanish"

if you want to

"claim to be half black"

You mean Latino? Your line of thinking makes no sense.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/california-stud...d=31612498

Nigga, please.

Oh wait, did I trigger you?

Post: #155

At first I was thinking is this real? Then I thought whoa can't be real. Then I was mad at her. After I thought she actually looks good a little. Then I thought.. She should get fired.. Then I thought she and the NAACP should embrace her ( if she was doing a good job)

If you care it's genuine. Regardless .

Post: #156

(06-15-2015 07:55 PM)Blackmagic Wrote:  I'm sad that it came to this because she was obviously an asset to the organization if she was elected chapter president.

Not to be a dick was she really an asset? Or just highly manipulative and deceitful? Plenty of unqualified people running organizations. Skill isn't the main driver of promotions. If it were a friend of mine would be a Fortune 500 CEO, he is just not a good political animal. He doesn't see the point. He is one smart fucker.

Post: #157

What's most impressive to me is that many here have seen this coming for a long time. These aren't the only threads or posts on 'transracialism'.

/thread-34290-...#pid683369

/thread-32753.html

Post: #158

Rachel Dolezal is 100% perfectly representative of Feminism as a whole. Feminism = a bunch of rich, neurotic white women, the most spoiled, pampered, selfish group of human beings ever alive in any society in any time of history.... who have "invented" a huge pile of victimization fantasies, partially because they need drama, but also as we see here, it's a great way to squeeze a bunch of money out of the system -- which they otherwise are too lazy to get by hard work.

White women are greedy pigs. They will put on blackface to gorge their little piggie selves on NAACP money. They will make false rape claims to gorge their little piggie selves on lawsuits and reparations. They will do anything, to anybody, with no shame, because they have no shame.

It's as simple as that.

I've always wondered how blacks could stand to hear Feminists compare their "oppression" to black oppression. It was white women who spent the money that their husbands, the slave owners, whipped out of black slaves. It was white women who were -always- the first to chase a black man down and cheer and salivate when he was lynched in front of their panting little piggie eyes.

Post: #159

Tropic thunder all over again: an American playing an Australian actor, playing a American actor, pretending to be black.

Post: #160

I predicted transracial long ago.

Posted pics of this guy who attempted to change his race:

From this:



To this:




http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...-look.html

Post: #161

I'm going to chalk this up to mentally ill or opportunistic before I would call it to be 'Trans Racial'.

When confronted by the reporter with the alleged facts, she was like a deer in the headlights. She had no answer. Chances are she developed a complex from her previous experiences with her being overlooked in favour of black people and/or her perception of black people having it 'easier' than white people.

Post: #162

I referenced an article in the Caitlyn Jenner thread in my post.

It talked about transabled people who identify with being disabled cutting off their limbs. Rather than helping these people psychologically, we accept them and cut their arms off.

You can see the damage being done.

This shit makes my day. It shines light on the idiocy of liberals. It doesn't shine anything on transgenders or transabled or transracial...they have obvious psychopathologies.

The same media who accepted and 'understood' Caitlyn are chastising this chic.

Lemme grab my bottle of whiskey, cuz....dis...gon...be...good


Edit: The best argument for her being chastised and not Caitlyn is her wording. I guess she's more adamant to being black vs being born white and identifying as white.

This may make her seem less likable, nay it does make her easier to hate. She lies, she's not self-effacing at all.

Her not being self-effacing and Caitlyn being self-effacing makes neither of them more or less crazy.

The media's demand that this white/black chic bows at it's feet lap at it's toes like Caitlyn only emphasizes the media's derangement.

Post: #163

That's exactly what I was thinking. Which movie is that?

Post: #164

Her interview on the Today show:





tl;dr: "My identity is complex."

It wasn't exactly a roasting, but judging by the questioning from Matt Laurer, you can tell the establishment is not yet ready to adopt transracialism.

Edit: Actually they did hit her with some hard questions. They are definitely not happy with a white person identifying as black.

Post: #165

Quote:I don't see why they are in such a rush to whitewash the work I've done

He never confronts her with the obvious question: Have you ever been diagnosed with mental illness?

He also confronts her with a picture of her as a teenager, where she's pasty white.



Would anyone confront Jenner about whether he is a man in this pic?

Post: #166

(06-16-2015 08:57 AM)Roosh Wrote:  Her interview on the Today show:





tl;dr: "My identity is complex."

It wasn't exactly a roasting, but judging by the questioning from Matt Laurer, you can tell the establishment is not yet ready to adopt transracialism.

So her parents are not supportive of her antics, which indicates that they are at least honest. It is a nice juxtaposition to the mattress girl case, where the parents are fully endorsing the daughter's BS. You have the two Americas in sharp contrast here:

Dolezal's parents: Christian missionaries, rural American folk, most likely decent people.

Sulkowicz' parents: East coast bourgeoisie, amoral SJW scumbags

Post: #167

(06-15-2015 03:04 PM)Socrates Wrote:  

(06-15-2015 07:09 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  Look at it this way. Which of the following would upset you more? You bed a black girl and she tells you:

1). She's really white.

2). She's really a man.

The second instance would easily bother all of us far more. And yet the media is telling us that's OK, but what she did isn't.

Buzz! Wrong answer! That does not compute! This does not make sense. Both race and sex have DNA aspects to them (ask anyone with a racially-directed disease like sickle cell anemia).

So if you can claim you're female, DNA notwithstanding, why can't you claim you're black, DNA notwithstanding?

Oh come on now. Genes for gender are held in an entirely different section of the DNA strand! You can't even compare the two.

Honestly, though, as it relates to DNA, gender is a much more fundamental piece than race. The 23rd chromosome is either XX or XY. Fairly black and white (no pun intended).

There are actually very easy ways to introduce narrative differences between gender and race at this specific level, so "transracialism" doesn't make sense, but being "transgendered" does, whilst still keeping both race and gender under the umbrella of the progressive oppression complex. After all, it's only word games right?

However... rather than giving them time to come up with a counter-narrative, this seems like the perfect opportunity for some deep psi-ops. I say we should play by Alinsky rules: always hold the enemy to their own rules. See, just like you can't change your sex, but gender is a social construct... you can't change your ethnicity, but race is just a social construct, right? Race and ethnicity are different.

It's the kind of concept that's just about fuzzy enough, whilst simultaneously allowing for elitist displays of how much more tolerant you are than your peers, that it might take hold on tumblr and twitter with the right push. And the thing about groups obsessed with ideological conformity is that every member of the group thinks that eventually everyone else will adopt their beliefs, when in reality the group simply tends to homogeneity. People who have enough spine to hold unpopular beliefs are selected out of the group altogether. What this means is that controversial new ideas introduced to the group are not vetoed based on merit or internal consistency, but whether adopting them or opposing them will be better for group homogeneity.

I genuinely believe we could force their hand at this point and make them give the OK to transracialism. Who has un-tarnished twitter or tumblr accounts following enough feminists and race-baiters to be believable? Let's make this fucking happen.

Cisrace shitlords need to stop with the oppressive racial binary. Race is a spectrum, like gender. Are you predisposed to violence and oppression? Do you fancy yourself a slaver? You're at the white end of the spectrum. Like basketball and Beyonce? You might be transafrican. Are you obsessed with anime and manga?



... nah, your dad's right, you're probably still a faggot.

Post: #168

I still think the "transracialism" thing is a smokescreen. I don't think she's crazy. I think it's simpler than that. She's just a crook.

She knowingly and intentionally perpetrating a fraud. She's pretended to be black in order to get power and money she otherwise could never get. She was getting a fat paycheck and big power by lying about being black.

If the NAACP doesn't sue her, they will lose a massive amount of credibility. I think they won't sue, because, so many other people at the NAACP are full of shit as well. They're all scamming corporate donations to fund lavish lifestyles.

I'm guessing the NAACP doesn't do shit for black people. But I don't know anything, I'm as lily-white as they come.

Post: #169

Post: #170

(06-16-2015 12:26 PM)Ocelot Wrote:  Cisrace

Post: #171

Listening to this woman talk is terrible, I can't believe she's just blabbing and justifying this.

"I have a huge issue with blackface. This is not some freak "Birth of a Nation" mockery blackface performance. This is on a very real connective level. How I've actually had to go there with the experience, not just a visible representation but with the experience."

Asked about the black man she pretended was her father: "We connected on a very intimate level as family."

Welcome to America.

Post: #172

I would like to see this woman do the Perp Walk.

Walking into the courtroom in an orange jumpsuit, with handcuffs on her wrists, her fucking fake hairdo gone, her skin back to pasty-white.

That would give me hope for America.

Post: #173

She also has an interview on MSBNC tonight at 8 EST.

She sued Howard University for discrimination because she was white and didn't get her way. She is just a crook.

For the secret agents here, is eye movement up and to the left lying? On a clip I saw, when she was asked a question she looked that way.

Post: #174

Well I see a clear difference between gay, trangsgender and switch your ethnic identity.
Some behaviour is for sure cultural, when you grow up in a poor and dangerous place in the world you act different then in a spoiled and nice environment.
From my understanding, be gay or a transgender has to do with genetics. Some genetics don't sit at the places as they should be. Some kind of mutation. Or they sit at the right place and we just don't know why nature make people like this.

There are men that are more feminine and women that are more masculine. At some point they get homosexual or at the edge they feel wrong in the own body. It goes back to the genetic code. Behaviour is a mix of it and cultural influence. You can act like a Chinese when you grow up there but you will always look different when your parents are not Chinese. Ethnic identity is not changeable.
Its changeable what is consider male or female behaviour, feminism is a way to change this behaviour. But it will never change the biological truth. In Germany Feminist and Gender maniacs talk about Biology as Biologism. Like its just an idea. I mean when gender is just an idea who the hell rise his kids to become gay? I'm not talking about today crap, no gays have been around for all time. Even in old greek and rome. So its was for sure not a cultural thing that they become gay. Its a biological one.

Post: #175

There was a live streamed interview with her folks on channel 4 news here in the UK. The mother and father actually sounded and acted like reasonable, logical and 'good to do' folks. You could just sense the disappointment in their voices.

This bitch needs to get roasted, I'm waiting for Tommy Sotomayor to ether this crazy ho.