Post: #26

(06-01-2015 01:22 PM)Kid Strangelove Wrote:  The one thing I have noticed about the transgender debate/issue/question, etc, is quite possibly one of my favorite left wing hypocrisy - embracing "traditional" femininity - but only for trans women.

Bruce Jenner doesn't just want to be a woman, he wants to be a pretty girl. He got his hair all done up, wore a pretty swimsuit and is on the cover of a fashion magazine - and everyone approves. He wants to wear makeup and dresses - all markers of traditional femininity - and that's all good with liberals.

Feminists usually rally against "traditional beauty standards" - makeup, fashion, slender figures, deeming them oppressive. But when a man becomes a woman - he doesn't become a neon haired SJW fat acceptance Lindy West freak - he wants to become a pretty girl.


We are now living in an age where men are better at being women than some women

If anything you would think feminists would be against people like this given their sustained efforts to erase distinctions between genders for the last few decades and declare everything equal. A major belief in their agenda is that the majority of gender roles are culturally ingrained but yet "inter-sectional" feminists who are gung-ho about trannies constantly cite scientific studies that the brains of trannies have a similar structure to those of the sex they claim to be. These trannies as you pointed out make even MORE effort to act like stereotypical women which implies that there is indeed a hardwired component of gender behavior.

So which is it? Either you have to disavow trannies to hold on to the belief that differences in stereotypical behavior between sexes are cultural and not wired in to the brain or you have to admit that there is indeed differences between men and women that go beyond just physical traits. I've yet to see a feminist that has been able to resolve this dilemma. Instead they just act and think inconsistently in the way you described in your post.

Just another example of the inconsistencies in third wave feminism which I spoke about in an old post /thread-46101-...#pid985045

Post: #27

----------------------------------------

Post: #28

So, when is the new Wheaties box appearing on the shelves of grocery stores?

Post: #29

I think he said he's only attracted to women and has no interest in men.

Also, this isn't new for him. He's been dressing up as a broad his whole life. People close to him ( eg, his ex wife) knew about his cross dressing since the 1970s.

Post: #30

(06-01-2015 03:05 PM)puckerman Wrote:  So, when is the new Wheaties box appearing on the shelves of grocery stores?

He's endorsing Fruit Loops now.

He's also cuckoo for cocoa puffs.

Post: #31

Post: #32

I may of started a shistorm on my FB saying I didn't give a fucking about bruce changing sides vs. being stoked parts of the patriot act dies.

I used "biologically a dude" and a shit storm followed and some random dyke unfollowed me lol.

Post: #33

Vanity fair is just a modern day carnival act with its "main attraction" being unveiled like Frankenstein's monster...

Mental illness and degeneracy being celebrated on a global scale.

Bruce Jenner is just another "useful idiot" being used to push an anti masculine/heterosexual/family agenda.

He'll no doubt kill himself in 5 years.

Post: #34

Can we expect a song from Kanye on this?

Post: #35

(06-01-2015 01:30 PM)BCien Wrote:  At first glance I thought it was Tina Fey

I think he looks more like Mariska Hargitay.

Post: #36

I don't know, but something really just rubbed me the wrong way about that magazine release.

I don't give a shit about gays wanting to get married and be miserable or trannies or whatever.

Don't fucking put it in face or impinge on my freedoms.

But something just doesn't sit right with me on this one.

Post: #37

2015 is the year of the continuation of that same old sick postmodern cultural agenda rammed down America's (and by cultural imperialism extension - the world's) throats.

Unsurprisingly, executing that funny business are ruthless agents of Zion.

The Vanity Fair cover, with that quasi-ambiguous exposed crotch shown front and center in our faces was photographed by Leibovitz (notice how they couldn't cover that thing in dress or skirt, as that would not make as strong trolling impact.) While glowing, indeed gushing article was written by Bissinger* (mother's maiden name Lebenthal). The Vanity Fair magazine is owned by parent company Conde Nast. The chairman of Conde Nast is Samuel Irving Newhouse Jr. (mother's maiden name Epstein).

*In a column published in GQ, Bissinger states he is a shopaholic with an obsession for expensive designer clothes, spending $638,412.97 between 2010 and 2012. In the same column, Bissinger stated he had questioned his sexuality in the past and had experimented with men.

Post: #38

hey Kaotic,

It's a deliberate attempt to normalize deviant behavior. Bruce has had a global profile through his pimp ex wife and her whores acting like scum, but unfortunately this sort of television is eaten up like happy meals.

He is well so well known within a demographic (mostly young girls and homosexuals) that it will be like "one of the family" getting his penis chopped off.

Post: #39

(06-01-2015 01:22 PM)Jaydublin Wrote:  I wonder if he has the same fetish for black guys as the rest of that family.

Toe sucking, Scat and BD/S&M are fetishes. Black guys are a preference.

Post: #40

I still can't get over the fact that this thing killed a woman while driving and every wannabe PC establishment completely looks over that and celebrates its mental illness as some sort of empowerment and sense of acceptance instead.

Dude got a pussy pass without even having a pussy...

Post: #41

That chick hit the wall hard!!!

Post: #42

I wonder what people would do for attention whoring five years from now? Marry a chicken?

Post: #43

What? WHAT?!

Post: #44

(06-01-2015 04:18 PM)FlyBoy Wrote:  I wonder what people would do for attention whoring five years from now? Marry a chicken?

Have surgery to become a chicken.

Post: #45

Post: #46

So I guess him/her/it killing a woman in a car crash he caused is old news now?

I hope that poor woman's children sue Jenner for every last cent he makes from his attention whoring.

Post: #47

Post: #48

I'll just leave this here.



[/php]

Post: #49

What's the over under about a possible deadly meltdown ?

Isn't there stats backing up transgenders/gays killing themselves at a higher rate ?

No, I'm not wishing it up on him, but it's predictable isn't it ?

Post: #50

WNPTLITB


Would Not Put The Lotion In The Basket