Post: #526

WesternCancer, none of those girls are even close to a 5. A 5 is the minimum quality of girl that you'd be willing to bang without having to put in any effort. The ones on the top and bottom are genuinely hot (even though I dislike tattoos) and I still think you'd have to be insane to throw any of the others out of bed.

Post: #527

(02-23-2012 09:15 PM)gringochileno Wrote:  WesternCancer, none of those girls are even close to a 5. A 5 is the minimum quality of girl that you'd be willing to bang without having to put in any effort. The ones on the top and bottom are genuinely hot (even though I dislike tattoos) and I still think you'd have to be insane to throw any of the others out of bed.

I updated the mugshots, I wouldn't bang any of the (new) girls unless I was really horny/drunk and they were the ones running any kind of game on me.

Thanks for pointing out that the original girls weren't 5s. The last girl was the "hot" girl for girls in my area, I acknowledged that, but I think as my game-skill progresses so do my standards of beauty, before yeah I'd bang them and maybe even be seen in public with them, but now I would never want to be seen with girls like that in a dating setting.

Post: #528

(02-23-2012 09:47 PM)WesternCancer Wrote:  

(02-23-2012 09:15 PM)gringochileno Wrote:  WesternCancer, none of those girls are even close to a 5. A 5 is the minimum quality of girl that you'd be willing to bang without having to put in any effort. The ones on the top and bottom are genuinely hot (even though I dislike tattoos) and I still think you'd have to be insane to throw any of the others out of bed.

I updated the mugshots, I wouldn't bang any of the (new) girls unless I was really horny/drunk and they were the ones running any kind of game on me.

Thanks for pointing out that the original girls weren't 5s. The last girl was the "hot" girl for girls in my area, I acknowledged that, but I think as my game-skill progresses so do my standards of beauty, before yeah I'd bang them and maybe even be seen in public with them, but now I would never want to be seen with girls like that in a dating setting.

Yeah, those girls are much more appropriate for this thread. I agree with you on the standards increasing with game skill thing but not necessarily when you're just going by the boner test. My dick is still willing to fuck borderline girls but I'm uncomfortable being seen in public with anyone under about a 6.5, whereas a couple years ago I probably would have been willing to go on a few dates to bang a 5.

Asian: actually kind of cute. 6.5, would bang
Weird chin: 6, would bang
Horse face: 6, would bang (looks like she has a nice body)
Lesbo with green shirt: 7 if she grew her hair out, would bang
Last 2: both 4s, would not bang

Post: #529

I would agree with your assessment. However, knowing more details about the lesbo w. green shirt I'm sure you'd change your mind. She's 6'2" the nose is pretty chunky and I'm assuming a set of huge or weirdly shaped teeth based on the way her mouth is always closed and the way its closed (think of people with braces)

http://ak3.okccdn.com/php/load_okc_image...91436.jpeg

Post: #530

Jesus, I think I prefer her friend now (would still bang). It's incredible how much variance there is in how attractive the same person can look in different pictures.

Post: #531

Scary thing is thats her main photo.

I know what you mean, worst thing ever happened to me when I was like 15. I met this girl online, turns out we went to elementary school together. Her pics made her look like Sasha Grey with big tittayz. We meet up one day, turns out shes HUGE, we were still friends but I did not make a move, maybe it was because I was scared... Was that beta???

I was thinking of busting out a fatty identifying data sheet for online dating or something, but have never gotten around to sitting down and staring at fatties for a long time.

Post: #532

The full Tuthmosis Breakdown™ on Cancer's bunch:

   
   
   
   
   

Post: #533

Tuth the best part about the last one is that she wants to start a supplement line and then a gym with a cafe inside of it. Talk about delusional.

Post: #534

Interesting to see that a lot of guys "5" is close to mine
You wanna remember though for regions it may be different
a Miami 5 isn't the same as a Minneapolis 5
I remember once Roosh made a post and posted a video clip and called the girl a "4", the girl in Minneapolis woulda been easily a "6"

but hey to each it's own, I never knock another man's taste

Post: #535

Tuth, how do you rate that woodchucker a 6.5?? I've been to Boston and it's not that bad!! Shiiiit!!! Both of those chicks (her and Dyke) are sup par!

Post: #536

(03-01-2012 04:01 PM)Moma Wrote:  Tuth, how do you rate that woodchucker a 6.5?? I've been to Boston and it's not that bad!! Shiiiit!!! Both of those chicks (her and Dyke) are sup par!

Put some Make up on her and she is a Wisconsin 6

Post: #537

Purple hair girl: 5 - 0.25 for chubby face = 4.75.
2nd girl (sloppy chick): 5ish. Some may rate her higher, some may rate her lower. Nobody is wrong.
Sunglass girl #1: Likely 6ish, but I'm wary of girls who have to cover their eyes with shades.
Non-dynamic duo: Blonde is a 4 to me. Her nose and mouth are garish to me. I'd rate the brunette higher than the blonde: her eyes are likely more attractive and she seems to have better skin complexion. Her nose is hideous though, but her face would look less manly if she grew her hair out.
Sunglass girl #2: 4. With lots of maintenance, she could climb up to five. But she's clearly letting it all hang out. Same comment on sunglass pictures.

Tuthmosis girls:
1st brunette white chick: I'll give her a six just because she puts the maintenance in.
Asian: 5 but only with makeup. W/o makeup, this chick would drop to 4 easy.
Ponytails: 5.5.
Last chick: 7. Of the bunch, she's got the most natural beauty.

Post: #538

(03-01-2012 04:13 PM)Thesoloist Wrote:  

(03-01-2012 04:01 PM)Moma Wrote:  Tuth, how do you rate that woodchucker a 6.5?? I've been to Boston and it's not that bad!! Shiiiit!!! Both of those chicks (her and Dyke) are sup par!

Put some Make up on her and she is a Wisconsin 6

Yep. Especially in rural areas.

Pretty fucking sad around here.

Post: #539

couple chicks from Spring Break....

One in the blue was DTF of course her friend was a CBing hard....

Post: #540

(03-06-2012 08:46 PM)Thesoloist Wrote:  couple chicks from Spring Break....

One in the blue was DTF of course her friend was a CBing hard....

I'd give the one in the blue a 4 at best. I'd say you dodged a bullet there. The friend is much better, she'd get a 7.5 from me as she has an exotic mix that I find appealing. If only her right arm was over just a couple inches...

Post: #541

(03-06-2012 09:08 PM)Jackhammer Wrote:  

(03-06-2012 08:46 PM)Thesoloist Wrote:  couple chicks from Spring Break....

One in the blue was DTF of course her friend was a CBing hard....

I'd give the one in the blue a 4 at best. I'd say you dodged a bullet there. The friend is much better, she'd get a 7.5 from me as she has an exotic mix that I find appealing. If only her right arm was over just a couple inches...

Interesting IMO both chicks are 6's I don't care for the other one cause she is not my taste. IMO the chick in the blue is hotter and the pics don't do her justice call it my biased or me being drunk heh

here is another one


some broads I met doing nightgame outside the club

Post: #542

(03-06-2012 09:24 PM)Thesoloist Wrote:  here is another one


some broads I met doing nightgame outside the club

That blonde is at least a 6.5

Post: #543

(03-06-2012 09:24 PM)Thesoloist Wrote:  here is another one


some broads I met doing nightgame outside the club

Both of these broads are well over 5s. Probably 7s, in my view.

Post: #544

(03-06-2012 09:24 PM)Thesoloist Wrote:  here is another one


some broads I met doing nightgame outside the club

The blonde one has a face strong enough to french kiss Hercules and Thor at the same time. I pass and drop her to 5.5.

the other one is toight and I raise to 7.

Post: #545

You can tell its a bad pic of the blonde, but totally smashable. My scale: 7.5,7

Post: #546

Both solid 7's to me. Very bangable.

Post: #547

(01-01-2012 10:18 PM)Athlone McGinnis Wrote:  

(01-01-2012 07:59 PM)Conneray Wrote:  Ya I live in LA but I found this JUST for you guys.

This is perfect.

This chart makes me feel better, because most of the girls I've been banging would fall into the 8-9 category on it. That said, I think there should be more attractive girls on the higher end, and the lower level ugglies don't need to parsed out so much.

Post: #548

(03-07-2012 03:09 PM)Moma Wrote:  

(03-06-2012 09:24 PM)Thesoloist Wrote:  here is another one


some broads I met doing nightgame outside the club

The blonde one has a face strong enough to french kiss Hercules and Thor at the same time. I pass and drop her to 5.5.

the other one is toight and I raise to 7.

I'm closer to Moma's rating, I see two 5.5s that could possibly go as high as 6.5 in person. Both could get it with some liquor in me or in a dry spell.

Post: #549

(03-07-2012 10:26 PM)soup Wrote:  

(01-01-2012 10:18 PM)Athlone McGinnis Wrote:  

(01-01-2012 07:59 PM)Conneray Wrote:  Ya I live in LA but I found this JUST for you guys.

This is perfect.

This chart makes me feel better, because most of the girls I've been banging would fall into the 8-9 category on it. That said, I think there should be more attractive girls on the higher end, and the lower level ugglies don't need to parsed out so much.

This chart is nice. I think I'll print it and put a copy in my shirt pocket and keep it with me for reference when I go out.
-
I think it's hard to determine what is a 8-10 without seeing the body. Wouldn't any girl over weight, thick, FAT be a 4 or under? If that's the case 50-60% of the girls in the good ole US of A are 4s and under! Can a 5 be overweight? My thought is no!

Post: #550

Olivia Munn and Christina Hendricks