Post: #501

DBrown..Good stuff and welcome aboard the "5" Train! We don't see eye to eye here all the time but marginal pieces are more than welcome.

Post: #502

Washing machine in living room girls 6.5 and 6

SUV skeezes 6.5 across the board

Arena tramps 5 4 5.5

Plastic plant tramps 4.5 5.5

Post: #503

(11-09-2011 04:42 PM)el mechanico Wrote:  This is a four

That is not a four.

Post: #504

(11-07-2011 03:31 AM)DamonHVictor Wrote:  Dropped the ball on smashing this 35yo Mexican chick. 5.5, maybe a 6 taking her age into account.

She's better than a 5.5.

She'd look pretty good with longer hair.

Post: #505

(11-11-2011 08:19 PM)dbrown7 Wrote:  

(11-11-2011 11:53 AM)scorpio Wrote:  

(11-11-2011 11:24 AM)dbrown7 Wrote:  All of them have high standards cept the jailbait-ish looking one.

That's cuz you're running beta game on them, brah.

Never have, but more fresh meat:

All L->R
1st pic: 6, 5.5
2nd pic: 6, 5.5, 5.5, 6
3rd pic: 5, 3, 5.5 (6 if she dressed better)
4th pic: 3, 5.5

Post: #506

considered a 5 in my area

Post: #507

(01-01-2012 07:50 PM)Conneray Wrote:  considered a 5 in my area

Damn son, no fucking way that girl is a five, unless you live in a neighborhood full of models or some shit. I guess in some parts of L.A. or Miami she might be "typical", but damn that makes me depressed about where I'm at.

Transplant her to the North Coast of NorCal and she'd be considered solidly in the 8-9 range (no joke). It is very annoying when girls that are really only 7's act like their 10's around here.

Anyways, she's got a pretty face, super nice tits, tan skin, and unless she has absolutely no ass, I don't see how any guy could rate her under a 6.

Post: #508

Ya I live in LA but I found this JUST for you guys.

Post: #509

(01-01-2012 07:50 PM)Conneray Wrote:  considered a 5 in my area

That statement is ridiculous. That girl watches TV and knows she's an 8+.

Another thread on the 10 point scale...
/thread-4974.html

If you guys want to definitively rank yourself or any chick, go here
---> http://www.anaface.com.

Post: #510

(01-01-2012 07:59 PM)Conneray Wrote:  Ya I live in LA but I found this JUST for you guys.

This is perfect.

Post: #511

"Damn son, no fucking way that girl is a five, unless you live in a neighborhood full of models or some shit."

Even then, it depends on what kind of models you're talking about. The chicks they line up for the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue are the kind of chicks I think are the hottest in the modeling world. A lot of fashion models, if they were walking the street, wouldn't necessarily get much attention. SI swimsuit models need bodies that will actually fill out a bikini, while many fashion models aren't built very well. Even facially, some are selected because they have UNUSUAL looks, and not standard attractive looks.

In many instances, I'd roll with the street pretty/sexy girl over the chicks that are walking runways and appearing in ads in magazines.

Ain't no way that girl is a 5 on any scale. Even if you want to say she's cute, as opposed to hot, she's no worse than a 7. And I'm not particularly into blondies, but I can look at any woman and give her props, and if she's with it, she can get fucked.

Post: #512

(01-01-2012 07:50 PM)Conneray Wrote:  considered a 5 in my area

Sorry to say it, but this is dumbest statement of the young 2012. I've been all over, and this ain't a 5 anywhere, especially in America, where being slender alone is a big deal--unless, that is, you're talking on such a micro scale as, literally, one side of one city block.

If such a place existed, it would be swarming with hordes of sausage before you could even finish typing a datasheet on it. Imagine what a 7 would look like there. A 9 would be a goddess.

Post: #513

(01-01-2012 07:59 PM)Conneray Wrote:  Ya I live in LA but I found this JUST for you guys.

I'm in LA this very instant. I know every corner of this city to such an extent that you could gouge out my eyes and fill me up with muscle relaxants and I'd still find the hot chicks here. I've been everywhere in the greater Los Angeles Area at least twice. My above statement stands. You must have just arrived here.

Nice chart, though. Your girl would be a 7 or 8 in that framework.

Post: #514

where in LA are you at right now?

Post: #515

(01-01-2012 11:47 PM)Conneray Wrote:  where in LA are you at right now?

I live in LA (lower anclote) and she would be at least a 5.25 here.

http://www.fivay.org/anclote.html

Post: #516

kinda OT, but if I had to bang 6s for the rest of my life based on that chart, I would be ONE HAPPY MAN, SRS!

Post: #517

Most girls are 5's. Thus, observe any social circle - and the level of beauty you see the most, that's a 5.

It's notable that I live in a country where probably America's 7s are 5s here.

Post: #518

(01-01-2012 07:59 PM)Conneray Wrote:  Ya I live in LA but I found this JUST for you guys.

This chart is excellent and love the descriptions. I think it represents at least the US population as a whole fairly well on a bell curve where a large portion of the female population is concentrated at 4-6, with the main reason for the low rank is being overweight/obese. In countries with better female stock this chart would be shifted upwards if we want it to represent the Bell curve well. Also in some areas of the US (affluent neighborhoods, some college towns) the chart would have to be adjusted upwards, while in others (trailer park, indian rez) downwards.

As for me, according to the is chart my marginally bangable threshold is 6. Also I think that most posts here were underrating women that they posted, some of them are as high as 8...

EDIT: Didn't know there are so many shades of ugly out there, wow, there are some truly ugly women in this chart, unbelievable, they must be scaring little children when walking down the street...

Post: #519

Fresh nickels!

       
       

Post: #520

I'll bite.

Raven haired girl - 7. Definitely doesn't belong here with mediocre girls.
Asian - 5. Nice but something off-putting about her face. Would probably look better without bangs (no pun intended)
Blue eyeliner girl - 5. Her face seems naturally pretty, but being overweight and having that weird hairstyle reduces the effect.
Distraught chick - 6. She's fairly attractive, looks more like caught at a bad time than a bad butterface.

Post: #521

Raven haired girl looks like a man. Probably the type with a big man chest but no breasts

Post: #522

First I'd give a 6 to. Agree with the other nickels. The first one has a sort of a man face, but it's not terrible. The last has a cute face but the body could be very questionable. Without seeing a body shot I'll stick with a 5, with a better figure she gets upgraded. The first and last I'd hook up with. The middle two I'm not into, and would have to be kind of wasted or going through a dry spell to do it.

Post: #523

If the above chart is accurate, I've never tapped below a 6, and usually hit 7+. I think it's a little forgiving to ugly chicks, but sure makes me feel better about the tail I've scored in the past!

Post: #524

The redhead has a cute face. If she's not chubby I'd give her a 7.5 (hell, maybe even an 8 if her body is bangin'). Black-haired girl gets a 7, Asian girl is a 6, maybe 6.5. The blue eyeliner girl could be pretty cute but my secret internet fatty detector is going off. Depending on her body she could be a true 5 (i.e. borderline bangable). If I'm wrong about her being fat I'd hit it no questions asked.

Post: #525

selection of generic girls in my area for OKC (18-22)