Post: #451

Kinda surprised here.

My rankings
0- Girls I would not bang
1- Girls I would bang
2- Girls I would bang, then tell my friends about

Post: #452

What do you make of this group?
[attachment=3512]
Or these?
[attachment=3513]
this is from the Mormon singles facebook

Post: #453

top the one second from the left of mars uh i mean the bride.
excluding the kid from L->R
5,2,6,3,2.5,1,3,2

bottom. the three on the right
L->R
5,5,3,2,5,2,6.5,6.5,5.5

Post: #454

(11-06-2011 11:08 AM)el mechanico Wrote:  What do you make of this group?

Or these?

this is from the Mormon singles facebook

Top Photo: In order from left to right (obviously excluding little girl)

Yes, No, Yes, Yes, No to rest

Bottom Photo: Left to right

Yes, Yes, No, No, No, No, Yes, Yes, Yes

The only ones of all these girls I'd possibly consider a 7+ are the one to the far left on the top photo, and the one behind the red beast in the top photo

Post: #455

My take on one of mechanico's groups:

   

Post: #456

Weddding Photo
L to R: 5,2,6,5,4,2,5.5,3

Mormons
L to R: 5,5,4,3.5,5,5,6,5,5,

Post: #457

(11-06-2011 09:44 AM)Prowl Wrote:  ^^
Hard to tell due to lack of body shot, awful lighting, and duckface on the right.

I give the one on the left a 7.5, although she could be an 8-8.5 depending on lighting/seeing the body.

I give the Asian a 7, which involves some benefit of the doubt on on body and on how she looks sans-duckface.



Bathing Suit trio up above I give 7.5/3/8, just like someone else did. One on the right *might* even be an 8.5-9, if I had a better face shot and if she has dat ass.

Here's a better one..



I'd give the asian a 6.. Shes about 5'3 and probably 100lbs, flat chested.

Id give the ex probably an 8.5.. Small breasts but great legs and ass

Post: #458

(11-06-2011 11:08 AM)el mechanico Wrote:  What do you make of this group?

Or these?

this is from the Mormon singles facebook

2nd photo: the only 3 I would bang are furthest left, furthest right and the 3rd from right

Post: #459

Smashed this slore in the back of my car about 20 minutes after this pic:
Face 6, Body (hard to see, but large-framed) 3.5. Deepthroated like a porn star though.

   

Former Russian GF, I'd say a solid 7. Small tits but glorious ass:
   

Dropped the ball on smashing this 35yo Mexican chick. 5.5, maybe a 6 taking her age into account.

   

Post: #460

(11-07-2011 03:31 AM)DamonHVictor Wrote:  Smashed this slore in the back of my car about 20 minutes after this pic:
Face 6, Body (hard to see, but large-framed) 3.5. Deepthroated like a porn star though.



Former Russian GF, I'd say a solid 7. Small tits but glorious ass:


Dropped the ball on smashing this 35yo Mexican chick. 5.5, maybe a 6 taking her age into account.

First girl if she lost the raccoon makeup, possibly. Russian gf id give her face a 4 and her body a 6 so probably a 5 or 6. The mexican chick over the russian girl any day. The face is the most important to me.

Post: #461

(11-09-2011 03:48 PM)dbrown7 Wrote:  First girl if she lost the raccoon makeup, possibly. Russian gf id give her face a 4 and her body a 6 so probably a 5 or 6. The mexican chick over the russian girl any day. The face is the most important to me.

I'm sorry but there is no way that girl has a 4 face. A 4 is BELOW average, and that face is definitely above average.

Post: #462

Please. All those girls breeze in over 6 with no problem.

Post: #463

I agree with the mechanic, I'd squirt extra hard inside the raccoon lizard, I got a soft spot (hard one) for semi goths.

Post: #464

This is a four
[attachment=3529]

Moma..I'm going to make a sheet about the Hard rock casino in Tampa. It's not flush with white girls but all colored thick booty hos. I was blown away.

Post: #465

(11-09-2011 04:42 PM)el mechanico Wrote:  This is a four


Moma..I'm going to make a sheet about the Hard rock casino in Tampa. It's not flush with white girls but all colored thick booty hos. I was blown away.

I'd give her a 2.5 -

Can't say she really has any redeeming features by the look of it

Post: #466

(11-09-2011 04:27 PM)el mechanico Wrote:  Please. All those girls breeze in over 6 with no problem.

A lot of guys have "Internet ratings" that don't match what they would rate in real life. It's easy to call something a 4 online, but then call it a 7 when you actually hit in real life.

Post: #467

Asian chick: mid 7. Her blonde friend: low 7
Mormons: I'd bang ALL of them, but I'd only be seen in public with the third to the right.
Three chicks: Slore has the best face. The 30-something is not bad.
Mechanico's 4: Chick has a crappy body, ugly clothes, poor style, and just emits white trash vibe. Clean her all up and she's a high 6.

Post: #468

(11-09-2011 11:38 PM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  

(11-09-2011 04:27 PM)el mechanico Wrote:  Please. All those girls breeze in over 6 with no problem.

A lot of guys have "Internet ratings" that don't match what they would rate in real life. It's easy to call something a 4 online, but then call it a 7 when you actually hit in real life.

Yea I know..I'm just tryin' to keep it real yo......I saw this girl at the gas station today and I was thinking ..Holy fuck of juice!!..I talked with her for a few and was thinking if I posted her pic on this thread that she may get a six at best...Maybe a two....No big but I think you should take a second gander at the second from the left Mormon girl...Hard fucks and low carbs may do her some good......Not a sub-five in my world.

Post: #469

(11-10-2011 12:45 AM)el mechanico Wrote:  

(11-09-2011 11:38 PM)Tuthmosis Wrote:  

(11-09-2011 04:27 PM)el mechanico Wrote:  Please. All those girls breeze in over 6 with no problem.

A lot of guys have "Internet ratings" that don't match what they would rate in real life. It's easy to call something a 4 online, but then call it a 7 when you actually hit in real life.

Yea I know..I'm just tryin' to keep it real yo......I saw this girl at the gas station today and I was thinking ..Holy fuck of juice!!..I talked with her for a few and was thinking if I posted her pic on this thread that she may get a six at best...Maybe a two....No big but I think you should take a second gander at the second from the left Mormon girl...Hard fucks and low carbs may do her some good......Not a sub-five in my world.

LOL. I really try to be honest and realistic about my ratings, that's why I actually describe how I arrived at them instead of just dropping some arbitrary number with no explanation.

As for the second Mormon: that crooked mouth really makes me nervous. Coupled with the dumpy body, I have a really problem giving her more than a 5 without another pic to triangulate. The first and fifth ones are probably more fuckable.

Post: #470

(11-06-2011 01:34 PM)SFTD Wrote:  Mormons
L to R: 5,5,4,3.5,5,5,6,5,5,

Almost exactly what I'd rate them, except I'd drop the 3.5 (yellow shirt, hat) to a 3. Something about her mouth/teeth is turning me off.

Post: #471

This is what I consider a two...
[attachment=3537]

Post: #472

(11-10-2011 02:40 PM)el mechanico Wrote:  This is what I consider a two...

what would it take for you to poke that, el mechanico?

Post: #473

(11-09-2011 04:42 PM)el mechanico Wrote:  This is a four


Moma..I'm going to make a sheet about the Hard rock casino in Tampa. It's not flush with white girls but all colored thick booty hos. I was blown away.

When I get up in Tampa, I want us to dig out some tatted wenches! Some delusional dirty lying piglets!

Post: #474

She seriously scores 2 marks?? Do you like her tattoos or something?

Post: #475

(11-10-2011 03:16 PM)big poppa Wrote:  She seriously scores 2 marks?? Do you like her tattoos or something?

Those are tattoos? I thought they were scars..

But the point system works like this:

She gets one point for being alive and two for appearing female (no matter how remotely female she may appear).

If one is alive but appears male, deduct two points.

Get it?