Post: #51

(09-09-2015 09:04 AM)polar Wrote:  

(09-08-2015 11:23 PM)godfather dust Wrote:  I can't name one good thing gays bring to the table. Lots of bad things though:

Spreading HIV far and wide

Molesting kids (they need this, most gays were molested so if it stopped tommorow they would run out of fresh sodomites)

Nauseating people with their parades, kissing in public/on TV

Annoying the shit out of people with the gay voice

Forcing their views on others

Trying to destroy Christianity (but not the Muslims or Jews.)

It's all good though, hell waits for them.

Let's think positive for a moment. What about musicals, wide-stanced congressmen, the color fuchsia, gay pride parades, and Elton John?

Let's keep this parade of positivity going:

Bathhouses
Ironic groomswear
Disappointed fathers
Appletinis
Buttplugs
Androgynous fashion models
Peeing sitting down
Hookup culture
Food and Wine magazine

Post: #52

They tried this already on an old show called "Once And Again," which was big around 2000-01.

On that show, they did a teen-lesbian subplot, which had one of the stars of that show, Evan Rachel Wood, kiss a pre-fame Mischa Barton. What happened?

Well, for one thing, both of those actresses went off the rails at some point. And while this can't be attributed 100 percent to that kiss, child star advocate Paul Petersen of A Minor Consideration has gone on record repeatedly as saying one of the things that messes up young stars is they're pushed into doing things too early.

Back in 2009 he cited Miley Cyrus' pole dance as evidence she wasn't properly being taken care of by her handlers. Time has proven him correct. So I'd say this gay kiss won't bode well for these young actors.

Post: #53

Has anyone else noticed that channel doesn't call itself ABC Family anymore? Now it's known as, "Freeform".

Freeform (adjective): not organized or planned in a conventional way.
Freeform (adverb): without restrictions or preconceptions.

Sounds like another thinly-veiled jab at the traditional family unit to me.

Post: #54

This episode of Picket Fences was quite controversial when it aired in 1993. It was a teen lesbian kiss:

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0674724/?ref_=ttep_ep21

It was also when I first noticed the amazing Holly Marie Combs, who would go on to other shows like Charmed.

Post: #55

(05-20-2016 11:03 PM)LeoneVolpe Wrote:  Has anyone else noticed that channel doesn't call itself ABC Family anymore? Now it's known as, "Freeform".

Freeform (adjective): not organized or planned in a conventional way.
Freeform (adverb): without restrictions or preconceptions.

Sounds like another thinly-veiled jab at the traditional family unit to me.

In 2006, their slogan changed to "A New Kind of Family".

EDIT:
And the new president say that this programming "would reflect a participatory experience for viewers across multiple platforms."

Post: #56

(09-09-2015 09:59 AM)Suits Wrote:  

(09-09-2015 09:04 AM)polar Wrote:  

(09-08-2015 11:23 PM)godfather dust Wrote:  I can't name one good thing gays bring to the table. Lots of bad things though:

Spreading HIV far and wide

Molesting kids (they need this, most gays were molested so if it stopped tommorow they would run out of fresh sodomites)

Nauseating people with their parades, kissing in public/on TV

Annoying the shit out of people with the gay voice

Forcing their views on others

Trying to destroy Christianity (but not the Muslims or Jews.)

It's all good though, hell waits for them.

Let's think positive for a moment. What about musicals, wide-stanced congressmen, the color fuchsia, gay pride parades, and Elton John?

Let's keep this parade of positivity going:

Bathhouses
Ironic groomswear
Disappointed fathers
Appletinis
Buttplugs
Androgynous fashion models
Peeing sitting down
Hookup culture
Food and Wine magazine

gAyTMs




Gaybies




Justin Dennis




HIV "poz" dating!




Gay Coffee





go on...

Post: #57

I honestly think a rise in homosexuality is partly due to overpopulation of Earth, and it's nature's way of sorting things out a bit.

Obviously, other races are still breeding like rabbits, but I think peak, advanced societies like Japan / western white nations there's some sort of biological drive removed.

I could watch liberal pro-gay programming for 10 years straight I'd still want to fuck every girl in sight. Even at points in life of low self esteem or testosterone, I'd still fuck any girl above a 5 in a heartbeat.

I hate how girls behave. There's nothing objectively redeemable about them. Despite all that, I still want to fuck them. The drive is that strong.

The rise in homosexuality is a deep mental issue I don't think you can 'teach' them out of. If it's that easy to convert boys to homosexuality then they're not men who will be fit for survival anyways. I don't think you can program a boy to turn gay. Just my speculation...

Post: #58

Homosexuals make up about 1-3% of society but lately it feels like they are 10-20% of the characters on TV. I thought the SJWs were against groups being "overrepresented"- or is that only true when it comes to white hetero males?

Post: #59

Here's my two-cents:

You can't "teach" a gay guy not to be gay. But you can confuse the fuck out of a little boy who would've been straight by exposing him to homosexuality at an early age. Imagine being a kid adopted by queers. You don't think they're going to be promoting that lifestyle as normal? Of course they are. If a kid shows even the slightest leaning toward homosexuality, they'll be pushing the kid in that direction. Hell, even if he doesn't I'm sure they still would. It's sort of the opposite of what gays accuse straight parents of doing by trying to push them toward heterosexuality.

Kids generally want to please their parents and may very well adopt the sexuality/lifestyle most likely to do that, especially if it's all they've known. That's one reason (of many) I don't think gays should be able to adopt children. Despite the media's lies, homos aren't just looking to have families for the sake of having families. I think they're looking to groom future generations of homos. It's legalized child abuse.

Indoctrinate: to teach (someone) to fully accept the ideas, opinions and beliefs of a particular group and not to consider other ideas, opinions and beliefs.

The earlier a child starts getting brainwashed, the better chance that brainwashing has in taking root.

My hypothesis:

A kid brought up being instilled with traditional values by heterosexual parents won't just "jump ship" to being gay (regardless of propaganda exposure) unless he was gay already. A kid brought up being instilled with "progressive" values by homosexual parents is probably a whole lot less likely to end up straight. It would be interesting to see some studies on this subject from a non-biased source. Obviously, I won't trust a study funded by GLAAD.

Post: #60

(05-21-2016 10:44 PM)Disco_Volante Wrote:  The rise in homosexuality is a deep mental issue I don't think you can 'teach' them out of. If it's that easy to convert boys to homosexuality then they're not men who will be fit for survival anyways. I don't think you can program a boy to turn gay. Just my speculation...

Sure you can. It's called child sexual abuse or kiddy fiddling, if you will.

I have known hundreds of gay men & women in my lifetime growing up in the entertainment industry. I have lived with them & their families, as well as in share house situations & a few of them have been close friends & confidants.

Of all of these only 2 of them would I say without doubt, were actually born homosexual. These 2 were extremely comfortable with their sexual bent after having tried on heterosexuality in their teens & had realised that it just didn't fit. Neither of them had any desire to convert me or telegraph their sexuality by joining parades or the like. It is simply just a part of who they are as men.

Child sexual abuse (resulting in a narcissistic disturbance) is without doubt behind the explosion of faggotry that we are seeing today. But I believe there are other factors.

Take a listen to the podcast that Joe Rogan did with Milo Yiannopoulos. Milo explicitly states that he chose (that's right) homosexuality as a way to rebel against his mother (he doesn't elaborate on her however...). 20 years ago, if you wanted to shock Mum or Dad you identified as a pansy & waived your new-found arse-banditry in your parents face as a way of putting the wind up your parents.

Now that I think about it, a good Australian movie titled "The Sum Of Us" showed these two differing homosexual types. This movie, which was an early driving force in Russell Crowe becoming the A-list actor he is today, showed the relationship machinations between an invalid father (Jack Thompson) & his accepted homosexual son (Russell Crowe). It also shows a relationship that Crowe's character tries to have with the latter type I've described above (played by John Polson). It's a very good example of the two types I'm referring to.

(05-21-2016 11:49 PM)Kane12:00 Wrote:  Homosexuals make up about 1-3% of society but lately it feels like they are 10-20% of the characters on TV. I thought the SJWs were against groups being "overrepresented"- or is that only true when it comes to white hetero males?

I recently wrote this elsewhere...

Quote:The first weekend of March in Sydney is reserved for the annual Gay & Lesbian Mardi Gras, which has been running for 38 years. In my lifetime I have witnessed this annual parade morph from a single night of hedonism & exhibitionism to what has now become a month long festival of re-education & recruitment including theatre, film festivals, art exhibitions & other such agents of propaganda. The parade itself is disrupting to the populace in which major city streets & public spaces are shut down for 24 hours in order to corral the scantily-clad freaks & their garish floats so they can march up Oxford St & rub their faggotry in the face of the average Sydney sider.

To be clear, I personally don’t have a problem with what another person wants to do behind closed doors. Heterosexuals have plenty of kinks of their own. What I do have a problem with, is the increasingly militant LGBTGTFO agenda that is forcing me to think a certain way about a lifestyle that is detrimental to the individual & society at large.

In conversations with my peers I’ve recently noticed a trend in thinking, specifically in regard to the whole gay marriage debate debacle. In the leftist, lesbianic enclave of the Inner West of Sydney where I reside it is the topic du jour, primarily for its virtue-signaling value & thought-crime marginalizing qualities. Whenever these topics are raised I make sure to nod along (as any good thought criminal has learned to do) but also manage to pose the innocuous question to participants “What do you think is the percentage of homosexuality in the population?”

Rhetorical in nature, because any informed human being knows that it sits at around 1 – 2%, the answers I invariably receive have shown me a number of things about the average individual’s level of queer indoctrination.

“10% mate”

“Oh, its around 20% isn’t it?”

“Look, I don’t know exactly but I’d imagine it would be at least 7%”

These answers tell me that people in this city are so ensconced in the gay agenda, that they can’t see the forest for the trees. So why is this?

Post: #61

If young girls can be programmed to experiment and try out female-on-female sex and become bi/lesbians, then young boys can be programmed too, they might have testosterone, but society makes them weak minded and thus programmable..I saw this stuff happen classmates in school as a young teen, it was scary, it was one of my first glimpses into the red pill. And these were manly men

I'm just lucky my parents have a strong disdain of homosexual men and homosexual women or I might have ended up having the same faith.

Wish there was a way to stop this crap from happening, but the best solution is to leave to a more conservative country.

Post: #62

(03-06-2015 07:52 AM)Pride male Wrote:  If this trend continues one day there will be a gay president.

Post: #63

(09-07-2015 02:34 PM)polar Wrote:  

(09-07-2015 01:51 PM)Phoenix Wrote:  

(09-07-2015 12:57 PM)Cobra Wrote:  Who do the kids listen to? Shit spewed by ABC Family or their own parents. Now that depends on parenting skills thus far doesn't it? I say this because telling them to not watch that crap just won't work. It never has. It looks too shiny.

That's a good question actually. What media should a man allow his kids to see? If he gives them a computer, assuming their first language is English, they're going to be drawn into the toxic clickbait filth swirling around. If you give them a TV, that's basically child abuse when there's shit like 'modern family' and Miley Cyrus being streamed out of it.

I think computer games are fairly safe. They waste time, but they probably won't cause moral damage. I suppose you could collect stacks of old movies and TV shows that aren't morally corrupt for them to watch.

The real question is how are you going to teach your kids to handle the at-school pressure of "omigod did you see that show last night?" and fear of missing out.

I guess I was lucky growing up. I was asked more about the "game" that was on the night before from my friends as a kid than any shows, and this was the 90s when TV was still pretty good.

I hardly ever watch TV nowadays except for sports so I guess I'm not missing anything. A bunch of the shows people listed on this thread (House of Cards, The Fosters, Sons of Anarchy) I have never watched nor have any idea what they are about. I tried to get into The Walking Dead but got bored with the series after a while.

(05-21-2016 08:36 PM)Conscious Pirate Wrote:  HIV "poz" dating!

I must admit I have checked this site out after an STD scare banging a girl in Alaska.

Post: #64

Why are they pushing the gay agenda so aggressively?? And to 13 year old kids no less?

Whoever green lighted this idea needs to be locked up. This is flat out disgusting.

I have no problem with someone being gay. But pushing this lifestyle on kids does not sit well with me at all.

Post: #65

(05-22-2016 08:37 PM)They Call Me Mister Tony Wrote:  Why are they pushing the gay agenda so aggressively?? And to 13 year old kids no less?

Whoever green lighted this idea needs to be locked up. This is flat out disgusting.

I have no problem with someone being gay. But pushing this lifestyle on kids does not sit well with me at all.

Guess who has lots of money and hate their parents: gay men. Lots of disposible income due to no kids to take care of, except the ones they want to make gay so they can have fresh piece of ass ten years down the line. Hollywood is echo chamber for progressive ideas, producers and writers can't imagine world outside its confines.