Post: #26

(03-06-2015 08:14 AM)It_is_my_time Wrote:  

(03-06-2015 08:05 AM)Darius Wrote:  The whole point of this is population control through Cultural warfare.

It's being perfected in the west and being exported across the globe.

Agreed. The problem is the negative side effects.

If the elites want population control and don't want to use the China route of one kid per family, then at least let men have some sexual outlet in the form of prostitution.

It's definitely going to have negative effects on society as whole.

As far as prostitution, it really depends where you live. In Canada for instance, prostitution has never technically been illegal. Solicitation however is. All you have to do is go to the yellow pages and look up escorts or go to back pages.

For many men I think virtual porn will replace sex within 20 years.

Post: #27

Where are the parents of these boys? I would never let my kid do this. The imagery and experience will last a lifetime.

Post: #28

(03-06-2015 08:48 AM)Parlay44 Wrote:  Where are the parents of these boys?

Counting the money.

Post: #29

They will keep pushing the boundaries of degeneracy while proclaiming its "artistic", "deep", "sensitive", "sweet". Boil the frog with a slow heat and he won't be able to jump out of the pan until its too late.

Post: #30

This was the future you chose...

it's still not as bad as the transgendered 5 year olds.

Post: #31

Its funny. One of my favorite shows, Black Sails, pulled this gay shit making the male lead character (alpha male Pirate Captain) a fruitbooty. It really isn't funny because these shows are clearly trying to reprogram us.

Post: #32

(03-06-2015 09:28 AM)Chowder Head Wrote:  Its funny. One of my favorite shows, Black Sails, pulled this gay shit making the male lead character (alpha male Pirate Captain) a fruitbooty. It really isn't funny because these shows are clearly trying to reprogram us.

Don't forget the tranny love on Sons of Anarchy.

Post: #33

^^ or House of Cards season two. The examples are increasing exponentially.

Omar Little was effective because he was still such an anomaly.

Post: #34

We watched an episode of "Chopped" last night and it was a special episode where all the contestants were couples. So there were four couples competing on the show, and I was honestly SHOCKED that all four couples were straight. That's how bad it has gotten. Whoever is in charge of booking the contestants for that show is probably catching heat for it, too.

Post: #35

(03-06-2015 08:08 AM)infowarrior1 Wrote:  

(03-05-2015 10:56 PM)Suits Wrote:  I can understand the effort to "normalize" homosexuality.

If you have been attracted to men as long as you remember, obviously you do not want to go through life believing that "there is something wrong with you."

But that doesn't make homosexuality good for society.

I've got mixed feelings on the subject, because I haven't seen evidence that all gay relationships are absolutely terrible for society.

That being said, gayness falls easily into the category of "not particularly helpful for society."

Just like women waiting till 30 to have children is "not particularly helpful for society" gayness isn't doing us any favors.

A society is strong when its common man is motivated to build that society.

Gay men are evolutionary screw-ups that have no reason to be motivated to build anything...it's just far too easy for them to take an ass pounding in the ass at the local bathhouse instead.

Many societies in the past placed a great emphasis on people fulfilling their useful role.

Red-pill in a society where men gain no return from contributing to society is to consider not contributing at all.

Red-pill in a society that honours the contributions of hardworking men, is to earn that honour.

If gay men have to be gay, that's fine with me, but I don't want to see things promoted on TV that aren't useful to society, whether that be underage gay kissing or 35 year old women achieving sexual satisfaction while extracting a unreturned value from society.

I don't want to see these lifestyles promoted. They are not useful lifestyles and they may well be downright harmful lifestyles (to the health of society).

While I'm a big fan of people doing what they want behind closed doors, this sort of advocacy is going to see people like me wanted to legally ban gayness altogether to protect our offspring from stupid ideas.

What do you think of the proposal of not only banning homosexual propaganda and suppressing sodomy but also giving such men the option of exit. So that when they feel oppressed or if they are dissatisfied with the heteronormativity of society they can have their own society separate from it and not negatively impacting the original society.

I have no idea what that would look like in reality.

As a man, I can deal with the fact that some other men like to shove their dicks up other men's poop holes. This means more women for me.

I'm excited by the fact that some women enjoy eating tuna. This significantly elevates that odds of me getting a threesome.

I don't mind the existence of individuals who are truly gay.

I just don't want my children growing up watching television, seeing news media and going to schools where gay propaganda is constantly shoved down their throats.

If you are gay, have fun with it. Just don't mention it.

I don't force gays to listen to me talk about my heterosexuality. I'd appreciate it if they would extend us the save courtesy.

Post: #36

(03-06-2015 10:31 AM)Socrates Wrote:  We watched an episode of "Chopped" last night and it was a special episode where all the contestants were couples. So there were four couples competing on the show, and I was honestly SHOCKED that all four couples were straight. That's how bad it has gotten. Whoever is in charge of booking the contestants for that show is probably catching heat for it, too.

Oh they likley had a Queer couple lined up ... but...

They gay couples:

The two dudes were too hungover from the coke and vodka binge the night before and slept it past the alarm.

The two lesbos got in a fight and the butch locked the femme in the washroom and they called in sick.

Post: #37

Of course, to the Left all depravity is good and special.

You could just have soon replaced 'kissed' with 'vigorously licked each others anus holes' and they could still fawn over the whole thing in the same way.

In a healthy society, these filth would be excreted to the furthermost outskirts of civilization, not sat producing broadcast television.

Post: #38

personally, I'm against kissing scenes, especially LGBT shit.

Post: #39

(03-05-2015 10:56 PM)Suits Wrote:  I can understand the effort to "normalize" homosexuality.

If you have been attracted to men as long as you remember, obviously you do not want to go through life believing that "there is something wrong with you."

But that doesn't make homosexuality good for society.

You could quote studies that prove how single parent upbringing results in dysfunction, but since a considerable chunk of the population is in that boat, you won't get anywhere. Maybe get a beat down if you proclaim how dysfunctional they are.

That pretty much sums up why society is fucked.

Post: #40

(03-09-2015 06:09 PM)Grit Wrote:  

(03-05-2015 10:56 PM)Suits Wrote:  I can understand the effort to "normalize" homosexuality.

If you have been attracted to men as long as you remember, obviously you do not want to go through life believing that "there is something wrong with you."

But that doesn't make homosexuality good for society.

You could quote studies that prove how single parent upbringing results in dysfunction, but since a considerable chunk of the population is in that boat, you won't get anywhere. Maybe get a beat down if you proclaim how dysfunctional they are.

That pretty much sums up why society is fucked.

If I recall correctly, single mom's offer the a horrible upbringing, while single fathers do a much better job, but not as good as two parent families.

Now if da gays could actually stay committed to each other long enough to raise kids in pairs, it's possible that the kids might turn out OK, although my gut says "hell no."

However, it's hard to produce the data that will allow you to discriminate regarding this, because it doesn't exist and even if it did, you could argue external factors related to having gay parents.

At the end of the day, until gay parents are proved a good thing, I'd certainly prefer heterosexual upbringings.

Post: #41

(03-06-2015 09:28 AM)Chowder Head Wrote:  Its funny. One of my favorite shows, Black Sails, pulled this gay shit making the male lead character (alpha male Pirate Captain) a fruitbooty. It really isn't funny because these shows are clearly trying to reprogram us.

I missed the show originally and I've been marathon watching it the last week, up until the episode now halfway through the second season with the gay/bi background reveal.

If it had been a minor regular character it would have been a tolerable annoyance, but when it's the semi-sociopathic, intelligent and regularly brutally or pragmatically violent alpha male main character, it fucking ruins the entire show and undermines everything I've watched so far.

Shame, because it was a great show until that happened. Needless to say anyone making accusations on main stream sites about TV writers and producers increasingly pushing their gay agenda, are immediately labeled homophobes and accused of "double standards" for not complaining about previous girl/girl sex scenes on the show.

Post: #42

(03-06-2015 07:52 AM)Pride male Wrote:  If this trend continues one day there will be a gay president.

There has been at least one gay governor of New Jersey. It didn't last and it didn't end well.

Post: #43

(03-06-2015 08:29 AM)Darius Wrote:  

(03-06-2015 08:14 AM)It_is_my_time Wrote:  

(03-06-2015 08:05 AM)Darius Wrote:  The whole point of this is population control through Cultural warfare.

It's being perfected in the west and being exported across the globe.

Agreed. The problem is the negative side effects.

If the elites want population control and don't want to use the China route of one kid per family, then at least let men have some sexual outlet in the form of prostitution.

It's definitely going to have negative effects on society as whole.

As far as prostitution, it really depends where you live. In Canada for instance, prostitution has never technically been illegal. Solicitation however is. All you have to do is go to the yellow pages and look up escorts or go to back pages.

For many men I think virtual porn will replace sex within 20 years.

"Attention crew. This is Captain Picard. You are not allowed to download pornography to the Holodeck! Crewman Jones, you're on report. Your punishment is to mop the Holodeck!" "Oh, goddammit!"

Post: #44

(03-05-2015 10:56 PM)Suits Wrote:  Gay men are evolutionary screw-ups that have no reason to be motivated to build anything...it's just far too easy for them to take an ass pounding in the ass at the local bathhouse instead.

If gay men have to be gay, that's fine with me, but I don't want to see things promoted on TV that aren't useful to society, whether that be underage gay kissing or 35 year old women achieving sexual satisfaction while extracting a unreturned value from society.

It's far from proven there's anything evolutionary going on, which is why they need shows like this - to normalize the lifestyle and make it easier to get at confused youngsters who with the right guidance probably wouldn't go down that path.

Until such time as they identify the so called gay gene, I'm not buying the 'born this way' arguments, especially with respect to females - why is it all the career lezzers are fat ugly trolls but the hot ones don't usually stay as carpet munchers?

Should they ever ID a gene or other biological factor, all that will do is create the demand for some kind of prenatal check. Given that so many homosexuals squawk that growng up gay was terrible, well, what parent wouldn't want to prevent that from happening to their kid? What would be the argument for allowing continued births of gay babies, other than to resupply a dwindling number of aging queens with new meat?

Post: #45

This whole diversity thing in Hollywood is becoming a little too much. Now even Marvel is turning the Hulk into an Asian-American. RIP Bruce Banner: http://www.slate.com/blogs/browbeat/2015..._hulk.html

In a bid to not appear racist or insensitive, you ruin a perfectly good script or a perfectly good character. Just to fit in?

There's no TV series out now without a guy guy (read: couple) and a black person displaying black stereotypes. F.R.I.E.N.D.S ran for like ten seasons. No gay guy. No black guy. No Asian. All white cast. Still one of the greatest TV series to ever hit the big screen. Martin didn't have a white character in the casting. Neither did Fresh Prince. Still two of the greatest series ever. Point is...there's things that don't need to be changed. There's scripts that work just fine the way they are.

Imagine if they do a reboot of Harry Potter, and instead of being brothers, Fred and George are engaged to each other... Unnecessary.

There is absolutely no need for:
a black Spiderman
a black James Bond
an Asian Hulk

(or 2 thirteen year old males kissing each other on Family TV.)

I mean just to prove "diversity", Marvel took a Norse God who commands lightning with a mythical hammer and turned him into a Disney princess.

Anyway, that shit brings in ratings so...I might as well shut my mouth (thumbs?) and make my own TV Network.

Post: #46

ABC Family has now been a cesspool of supposedly progressive ideas for more than a few years now. Under the guise of "family" based entertainment, it has been pushing teenage sex and liberal bullshit. The parents don't even know what hit them. Homosexuality is the next level of course.

Who do the kids listen to? Shit spewed by ABC Family or their own parents. Now that depends on parenting skills thus far doesn't it? I say this because telling them to not watch that crap just won't work. It never has. It looks too shiny.

Post: #47

(09-07-2015 12:57 PM)Cobra Wrote:  Who do the kids listen to? Shit spewed by ABC Family or their own parents. Now that depends on parenting skills thus far doesn't it? I say this because telling them to not watch that crap just won't work. It never has. It looks too shiny.

That's a good question actually. What media should a man allow his kids to see? If he gives them a computer, assuming their first language is English, they're going to be drawn into the toxic clickbait filth swirling around. If you give them a TV, that's basically child abuse when there's shit like 'modern family' and Miley Cyrus being streamed out of it.

I think computer games are fairly safe. They waste time, but they probably won't cause moral damage. I suppose you could collect stacks of old movies and TV shows that aren't morally corrupt for them to watch.

Post: #48

(09-07-2015 01:51 PM)Phoenix Wrote:  

(09-07-2015 12:57 PM)Cobra Wrote:  Who do the kids listen to? Shit spewed by ABC Family or their own parents. Now that depends on parenting skills thus far doesn't it? I say this because telling them to not watch that crap just won't work. It never has. It looks too shiny.

That's a good question actually. What media should a man allow his kids to see? If he gives them a computer, assuming their first language is English, they're going to be drawn into the toxic clickbait filth swirling around. If you give them a TV, that's basically child abuse when there's shit like 'modern family' and Miley Cyrus being streamed out of it.

I think computer games are fairly safe. They waste time, but they probably won't cause moral damage. I suppose you could collect stacks of old movies and TV shows that aren't morally corrupt for them to watch.

The real question is how are you going to teach your kids to handle the at-school pressure of "omigod did you see that show last night?" and fear of missing out.

Data sheet maps

Post: #49

I can't name one good thing gays bring to the table. Lots of bad things though:

Spreading HIV far and wide

Molesting kids (they need this, most gays were molested so if it stopped tommorow they would run out of fresh sodomites)

Nauseating people with their parades, kissing in public/on TV

Annoying the shit out of people with the gay voice

Forcing their views on others

Trying to destroy Christianity (but not the Muslims or Jews.)

It's all good though, hell waits for them.

Post: #50

(09-08-2015 11:23 PM)godfather dust Wrote:  I can't name one good thing gays bring to the table. Lots of bad things though:

Spreading HIV far and wide

Molesting kids (they need this, most gays were molested so if it stopped tommorow they would run out of fresh sodomites)

Nauseating people with their parades, kissing in public/on TV

Annoying the shit out of people with the gay voice

Forcing their views on others

Trying to destroy Christianity (but not the Muslims or Jews.)

It's all good though, hell waits for them.

Let's think positive for a moment. What about musicals, wide-stanced congressmen, the color fuchsia, gay pride parades, and Elton John?

Data sheet maps